Pakistan (Danish Wikipedia)

Analisys of sources in references of the Wikipedia ariticle da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakistan

SiteHosts in references Count Global rank Danish rank
books.google.combooks.google.com↓ (6)6114
dawn.comdawn.com↓ (3)35123484
tribune.com.pktribune.com.pk↓ (3)38204269
archive.orgweb.archive.org↓ (2), archive.org↓ (1)327
worldometers.infoworldometers.info↓ (2)218243728
wikidata.orgwikidata.org↓ (2)2low8025
worldbank.orgdata.worldbank.org↓ (2)2213289
oxfordislamicstudies.comoxfordislamicstudies.com↓ (1)147103782
historytoday.comhistorytoday.com↓ (1)130891754
iss.co.zaiss.co.za↓ (1)1lowlow
files.wordpress.comgeopolcecri.files.wordpress.com↓ (1)1599613
globalfirepower.comglobalfirepower.com↓ (1)134375319
dirjournal.comdirjournal.com↓ (1)1lowlow
globaldashboard.orgglobaldashboard.org↓ (1)1lowlow
aiddata.orgaiddata.org↓ (1)1lowlow
scroll.inscroll.in↓ (1)11451low
columbia.educolumbia.edu↓ (1)1393897
snl.nosnl.no↓ (1)171732
citypopulation.decitypopulation.de↓ (1)1350481

aiddata.org

archive.org

books.google.com

citypopulation.de

columbia.edu

data.worldbank.org

dawn.com

dirjournal.com

geopolcecri.files.wordpress.com

  • 11. Vandamme, Dorothee. "Pakistan and Saudi Arabia : Towards Greater Independence in their Afghan Foreign Policy?" (PDF). Université catholique de Louvain. Arkiveret fra originalen (PDF) 10. oktober 2017. Hentet 21. december 2016. Countries like Saudi Arabia and Pakistan have enough influence to not be considered small, but not enough to be major powers. Within the limits of their regions, they play a significant political role. Thus instinctively, they would qualify as middle powers. While it is not the objective here to question the characteristics of Jordan's definition of middle powers, we argue that Pakistan is in fact a middle power despite its being nuclear-armed. When looking at the numbers, for instance, it appears that Saudi Arabia and Pakistan can be classified as middle powers (see in this regard Ping, 2007).

globaldashboard.org

globalfirepower.com

historytoday.com

  • 5. Talbot, Ian (2. februar 1984). "Jinnah and the Making of Pakistan". History Today. As British rule there drew to an end, many Muslims demanded, in the name of Islam, the creation of a separate Pakistan state.

iss.co.za

oxfordislamicstudies.com

  • 4. Hussain, Rizwan. Pakistan. The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Islamic World. Pakistan is unique among Muslim countries in its relationship with Islam: it is the only country to have been established in the name of Islam

scroll.in

snl.no

tribune.com.pk

web.archive.org

  • 10. Hussein Solomon. "South African Foreign Policy and Middle Power Leadership". Arkiveret fra originalen 24. juni 2002. Hentet 27. december 2011.
  • 11. Vandamme, Dorothee. "Pakistan and Saudi Arabia : Towards Greater Independence in their Afghan Foreign Policy?" (PDF). Université catholique de Louvain. Arkiveret fra originalen (PDF) 10. oktober 2017. Hentet 21. december 2016. Countries like Saudi Arabia and Pakistan have enough influence to not be considered small, but not enough to be major powers. Within the limits of their regions, they play a significant political role. Thus instinctively, they would qualify as middle powers. While it is not the objective here to question the characteristics of Jordan's definition of middle powers, we argue that Pakistan is in fact a middle power despite its being nuclear-armed. When looking at the numbers, for instance, it appears that Saudi Arabia and Pakistan can be classified as middle powers (see in this regard Ping, 2007).

wikidata.org

worldometers.info

BestRef shows popularity and reliability scores for sources in references of Wikipedia articles in different languages. Data extraction based on complex method using Wikimedia dumps. To find the most popular and reliable sources we used information about over 200 million references of Wikipedia articles. More details...

Useful links: