Joeri Rogelj et al.: Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C. In: Nature. Band534, 2016, S.631–639, doi:10.1038/nature18307.
Peter U. Clark et al.: Consequences of twenty-first-century policy for multi-millennial climate and sea-level change. In: Nature Climate Change. Band6, 2016, S.360-269, doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE2923.
Gregor Hagedorn et al.: The concerns of the young protesters are justified. A statement by Scientists for Future concerning the protests for more climate protection. In: GAIA. Band28, Nr.2, 2019, S.79–87, doi:10.14512/gaia.28.2.3.
Christophe McGlade, Paul Ekins: The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2 °C. In: Nature. Band517, 2015, S.187–190, doi:10.1038/nature14016 (englisch).
Vicki Duscha, Alexandra Denishchenkova, Jakob Wachsmuth: Achievability of the Paris Agreement targets in the EU: demand-side reduction potentials in a carbon budget perspective. In: Climate Policy. 25. Mai 2018, doi:10.1080/14693062.2018.1471385 (englisch).
Joeri Rogelj et al.: Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5 °C. In: Nature Climate Change. Band5, 2015, S.519–527, doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE2572 (englisch).
Christopher B. Field, Katharine J. Mach: Rightsizing carbon dioxide removal. Betting the future on planetary-scale carbon dioxide removal from the atmosphere is risky. In: Science. Band356, Nr.6339, 2017, S.706f., doi:10.1126/science.aam9726.
Sachverständigenrat für Umweltfragen (Hrsg.): Wo stehen wir beim CO2-Budget? Eine Aktualisierung. Stellungnahme. 2024, ISBN 978-3-947370-30-6 (umweltrat.de [PDF]).