DR-DOS (German Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "DR-DOS" in German language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank German rank
1st place
1st place
low place
low place
33rd place
2nd place
2,106th place
139th place
766th place
46th place
3,700th place
6,780th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,564th place
3,084th place
1,216th place
2,718th place
low place
low place
6,116th place
low place
8th place
37th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,039th place
low place
low place

IABotmemento.invalid

antonis.de

bbc.co.uk

news.bbc.co.uk

cmu.edu

cs.cmu.edu

  • Ralf Brown: Ralf Brown’s Interrupt List. INTER61 vom 16. Juli 2000 (cs.cmu.edu) Eintrag für die DR-DOS version unter INT 21h/AH=4452h.

computerwoche.de

ddj.com

freedos.org

google.de

books.google.de

groklaw.net

heise.de

kegel.com

  • Software Developer Caldera Sues Microsoft For Antitrust Practices Alleges Monopolistic Acts Shut Its DR DOS Operating System Out of Market. (Pressemitteilung) In: Caldera News. Caldera, 24. Juli 1996, abgerufen am 30. Mai 2024 (englisch): „As these demands escalated, the suit explains, ‘a number of OEMs approached DRI and requested that it develop a version of DOS that would fill the gaps in functionality that plagued MS-DOS. ... Accordingly, in 1987 DRI began planning for a new version of DOS, to be called DR DOS. The result of DRI's initial development effort was a product designated as DR DOS 3.31, introduced on May 28, 1988. DR DOS 3.31 was followed quickly by enhanced versions of the product. Thus DR DOS 5.0, introduced in May 1990, and DR DOS 6.0, introduced in September 1991, were significantly superior to then-existing versions MS-DOS in many areas.‘“

oldcomputers.dyndns.org

redirecter.toolforge.org

seattleweekly.com

  • Mike Romano: The mouse that roared. Forget the feds. It’s up to an obscure Utah company to prove what we already know: that Microsoft is a monopoly. In: Seattle Weekly 16. September 1998, (seattleweekly.com)

theregister.co.uk

theregister.com

  • Graham Lea: DR-Dos is terrific, says MS tester. In: The Register. 5. November 1999, abgerufen am 30. Mai 2024 (englisch): „Conclusion: DR DOS is vastly superior to MS-DOS 5.0.“
  • Graham Lea: Win95 – is it just Dos 7 plus Windows 4 after all? In: The Register. 5. November 1999, abgerufen am 30. Mai 2024 (englisch): „an internal Microsoft strategy document dated 16 June 1992 admitted that Novell was its biggest threat: ‘Novell is after the desktop. As you know, they have acquired Digital Research and are now working hard to tightly integrate DR-DOS with NetWare. We should also assume they are working on a Windows clone and/or that they are working on a virtualised DOS environment which will run standard mode Windows as a client. This is perhaps our biggest threat.’“

v3.co.uk

web.archive.org