Microsoft Windows 95 (German Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Microsoft Windows 95" in German language version.

Last modified:

Ref.Un. Ref.Website
Global rank German rank
1st place
1st place
29th place
2nd place
88th place
4th place
905th place
50th place
low place
6,786th place
3,418th place
224th place
3,212th place
278th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,712th place
1,310th place
13th place
8th place

abortretry.fail (Global: low place; German: low place)

books.google.at (Global: 3,212th place; German: 278th place)

books.google.de (Global: 88th place; German: 4th place)

  • Garrison Walters: The Essential Guide to Computing – The Story of Information Technology. Prentice Hall PTR, 2001, ISBN 0-13-019469-7, S. 190 (englisch, eingeschränkte Vorschau in der Google-Buchsuche): “The final version was quite fast–it was only very slightly slower than Windows 3.1 in running old 16-bit applications.”
  • Andrew Schulman: DOS Is Dead? Look Again. In: PC Magazine. Band 14, Nr. 9. Ziff Davis, 16. Mai 1995, S. 146 ff., S. 150 (englisch, eingeschränkte Vorschau in der Google-Buchsuche): “…the 16-bit code in the kernel presents something of a problem because it is nonreentrant, meaning two threads cannot access it at the same time without risking a nasty system crash. …Microsoft explored a number of solutions … before finally deciding upon the Win16Mutex. … Win32 threads that wish to call across to the 16-bit side must stop what they’re doing if the [Anm.: mutex] flag is raised. … The result? Win32 apps may be less responsive when Win16 apps are running, and a Win16 app that locks up may lock up Win32 apps, too. This is in stark contrast to Windows NT and OS/2, where 16-bit apps have no effect on 32-bit apps other than the CPU time they consume.”
  • Sebastian Rupley, John Clyman: P6: The Next Step? In: PC Magazine. Band 14, Nr. 15. Ziff Davis, 12. September 1995, S. 104, Why the P6 Prefers NT (englisch, eingeschränkte Vorschau in der Google-Buchsuche): “The processor’s design was optimized from the start for 32-bit applications, and as a result early P6 systems will run existing 16-bit applications slower than a high-end Pentium machine.”
  • Michael Slater: The Best CPU for Your Next PC – Benchmark Tests; Intel, AMD, and Cyrix x86 CPUs. In: PC Magazine. Band 16, Nr. 16. Ziff Davis, 23. September 1997, S. 149 (englisch, eingeschränkte Vorschau in der Google-Buchsuche): “Intel optimized this sixth-generation CPU to run true 32-bit operating systems like Windows NT. True to its calling, the Pentium Pro [Anm.: 200 MHz] was in the 233-MHz K6 and 6x86MX class under Windows NT, but was barely faster than a classic Pentium/200 under Windows 95.”

electronicdesign.com (Global: low place; German: low place)

golem.de (Global: 3,418th place; German: 224th place)

heise.de (Global: 905th place; German: 50th place)

jeffpar.github.io (Global: low place; German: low place)

mirosupport.de (Global: low place; German: low place)

pcplayer.de (Global: low place; German: 6,786th place)

  • pcplayer.de DOS-Spiele unter Windows 95 – BACK TO THE ROOTS – PC Player Special 1/1997 S. 52

pctipp.ch (Global: low place; German: low place)

reddit.com (Global: 1,712th place; German: 1,310th place)

redirecter.toolforge.org (Global: 29th place; German: 2nd place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; German: 1st place)

youtube.com (Global: 13th place; German: 8th place)