Aliyah (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Aliyah" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
5th place
5th place
497th place
371st place
26th place
20th place
3rd place
3rd place
571st place
403rd place
544th place
387th place
2nd place
2nd place
3,814th place
2,595th place
low place
low place
1,870th place
1,304th place
1,344th place
796th place
11th place
8th place
1,276th place
2,784th place
2,068th place
3,470th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,757th place
1,054th place
7th place
7th place
14th place
14th place
59th place
45th place
2,707th place
2,707th place
459th place
360th place
41st place
34th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
6,941st place
6,926th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
7,785th place
low place
low place
low place
549th place
491st place
low place
low place
low place
low place
6th place
6th place
120th place
125th place
928th place
651st place
507th place
429th place
699th place
479th place
34th place
27th place
2,751st place
8,621st place
low place
low place
low place
low place
5,771st place
3,880th place
1,634th place
1,093rd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
3,184th place
1,919th place
2,955th place
1,781st place
99th place
77th place
30th place
24th place
32nd place
21st place
8,677th place
5,593rd place
534th place
306th place
low place
low place
2,486th place
1,836th place
low place
low place
27th place
51st place
low place
low place
low place
6,955th place
5,631st place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place

algemeiner.com

anglo-list.com

archive.org

archive.today

bjpa.org

bloomberg.com

books.google.com

brookings.edu

cbn.com

cbs.gov.il

cbs.gov.il

www1.cbs.gov.il

chabad.org

cis.org

daat.ac.il

doi.org

forward.com

ghostarchive.org

haaretz.com

hwwi.de

focus-migration.hwwi.de

  • Schneider, Jan (June 2008). "Israel". Focus Migration. 13. Hamburg Institute of International Economics. ISSN 1864-6220. Archived from the original on 2019-05-14. Retrieved 2013-04-29.

ibtimes.co.in

israelnationalnews.com

jafi.org.il

  • ""Aliyah": The Word and Its Meaning". 2005-05-15. Archived from the original on 2009-12-19. Retrieved 2013-04-29.

jewishagency.org

archive.jewishagency.org

jewishagency.org

jewishdatabank.org

  • DellaPergola, Sergio (2014). Dashefsky, Arnold; Sheskin, Ira (eds.). "World Jewish Population, 2014". Current Jewish Population Reports. 11. The American Jewish Year Book (Dordrecht: Springer): 5–9, 16–17. Archived from the original on December 25, 2018. Retrieved January 3, 2016. Israel's Jewish population (not including about 348,000 persons not recorded as Jews in the Population Register and belonging to families initially admitted to the country within the framework of the Law of Return) surpassed six million in 2014 (42.9% of world Jewry).

jewishpress.com

jhu.edu

muse.jhu.edu

jns.org

jpost.com

jr.co.il

jstor.org

  • On, Raphael R. Bar (1969). "Israel's Next Census of Population as a Source of Data on Jews". Proceedings of the World Congress of Jewish Studies / דברי הקונגרס העולמי למדעי היהדות. ה: 31*–41*. JSTOR 23524099The estimated 24,000 Jews in Palestine in 1882 represented just 0.3% of the world's Jewish population{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: postscript (link)
  • Alroey 2015, p. 110: "The sweeping and uncritical use of the two terms, "aliyah" and "immigration" is one of the major factors in the emergence of the divergent treatment of similar data. In the Zionist ethos, aliyah has nothing in common with the migration of other peoples. Zionist historiography takes it as axiomatic that the Jews who came to the country as part of the pioneering early waves were "olim" and not simply "immigrants." The latent ideological charge of the term "aliyah" is so deeply rooted in the Hebrew language that it is almost impossible to distinguish between Jews who "merely" immigrated to Palestine and those who made aliyah to the Land of Israel. Jewish social scientists of the early twentieth century were the first to distinguish aliyah from general Jewish migration. The use of "aliyah" as a typological phenomenon came into vogue with the publication of Arthur Ruppin's Soziologie der Juden in 1930 (English: The Jews in the Modern World, 1934)… in the eighth chapter, which looks at migration, Ruppin seems to have found it difficult to free himself of the Zionist terminology that was dominant in that period. [Ruppin wrote that whereas] Jewish immigration to the United States was propelled by economic hardship and pogroms, the olim (not immigrants) came to Palestine with the support of the Hoveve Tsiyon, with whom they felt a high degree of ideological conformity." Alroey, Gur (2015). "Two Historiographies: Israeli Historiography and the Mass Jewish Migration to the United States, 1881–1914". The Jewish Quarterly Review. 105 (1). [University of Pennsylvania Press, Center for Advanced Judaic Studies, University of Pennsylvania]: 99–129. eISSN 1553-0604. ISSN 0021-6682. JSTOR 43298712.
  • Alroey 2015, pp. 115–116. Alroey, Gur (2015). "Two Historiographies: Israeli Historiography and the Mass Jewish Migration to the United States, 1881–1914". The Jewish Quarterly Review. 105 (1). [University of Pennsylvania Press, Center for Advanced Judaic Studies, University of Pennsylvania]: 99–129. eISSN 1553-0604. ISSN 0021-6682. JSTOR 43298712.
  • Shoham 2013. Shoham, Hizky (2013). "From 'Great History' to 'Small History': The Genesis of the Zionist Periodization". Israel Studies. 18 (1). Indiana University Press: 31. doi:10.2979/israelstudies.18.1.31. ISSN 1084-9513. JSTOR 10.2979/israelstudies.18.1.31. S2CID 144978084.
  • Salmon 1978. Salmon, Yosef (1978). "Ideology and Reality in the Bilu "Aliyah"". Harvard Ukrainian Studies. 2 (4). [President and Fellows of Harvard College, Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute]: 430–466. ISSN 0363-5570. JSTOR 41035804.
  • Shoham 2013, p. 35-37: "The term Aliya as defining historical periods appeared only when talking about Jewish history on the long-durée, when looking back to thousands of years. In 1914, the Zionist activist Shemaryahu Levin [wrote]: “Now at the time of the Third Aliya we can witness the fulfillment of the vision of the Second Aliya, in the days of Nehemiah.” Levin based this remark on a contemporaneous historiographical convention, according to which Jewish history knew two main aliyot to the Land of Israel in biblical times: “the First Aliya” took place in the time of biblical Zerubavel, after Cyrus’ declaration, while “the Second Aliya” took place in the days of Ezra and Nehemiah, about 80 years later… Levin’s periodization was not circulated in public, including among practical Zionists. It achieved dominance only after the WW I, in a way different from both Levin’s intention and counting...Along with analogies of the Balfour Declaration to Cyrus, 2,500 years earlier, many leaders began to write and talk about the forthcoming immigration as “the Third Aliya”, which would continue the previous two, those that departed from Babylonia to establish the second temple. About two months after the Balfour Declaration, Isaac Nissenbaum from the Mizrachi (Zionist-religious) movement published an optimis- tic article in which he anticipated a Hebrew majority in Palestine soon." Shoham, Hizky (2013). "From 'Great History' to 'Small History': The Genesis of the Zionist Periodization". Israel Studies. 18 (1). Indiana University Press: 31. doi:10.2979/israelstudies.18.1.31. ISSN 1084-9513. JSTOR 10.2979/israelstudies.18.1.31. S2CID 144978084.
  • Shoham 2013, p. 42: "The first text in which the periodization as we know it today may be found was an article surveying historical immigrations to and from Palestine, written by the widely recognized writer Y.H. Brenner, and published in October 1919…" Shoham, Hizky (2013). "From 'Great History' to 'Small History': The Genesis of the Zionist Periodization". Israel Studies. 18 (1). Indiana University Press: 31. doi:10.2979/israelstudies.18.1.31. ISSN 1084-9513. JSTOR 10.2979/israelstudies.18.1.31. S2CID 144978084.
  • Alroey 2015, p. 111: "The declaration by Ruppin, the dean of Jewish sociologists, that one "makes aliyah” to the Land of Israel but "immigrates" to the United States laid the terminological and scholarly foundations for turning immigration to Palestine into a unique variety of Jewish migration. During the 1940s and 1950s, demographers and sociologists, including Jacob Lestschinsky, Arieh Tartakower, David Gurevich, Roberto Bachi, and Shmuel Noah Eisenstadt, followed the trail blazed by Ruppin in the 1930s, spinning a Zionist narrative that both created and presumed the unique traits of aliyah and the Zionist enterprise." Alroey, Gur (2015). "Two Historiographies: Israeli Historiography and the Mass Jewish Migration to the United States, 1881–1914". The Jewish Quarterly Review. 105 (1). [University of Pennsylvania Press, Center for Advanced Judaic Studies, University of Pennsylvania]: 99–129. eISSN 1553-0604. ISSN 0021-6682. JSTOR 43298712.
  • Alroey 2015, p. 114: "In his work, Gurevich divided the immigration to Palestine into five separate waves, although he was not the first to do so. He dated the First Aliyah to 1881-1903 and the Second Aliyah to 1904-14 - a periodization that became accepted in the historiography of the Yishuv; few questioned it. Although, as a demographer and statistician, Gurevich had the tools to examine aliyah to Palestine as immigration and to focus on the majority of those who entered the country, he chose to highlight the ideologically-inclined minority who were unrepresentative of the immigrants as a whole." Alroey, Gur (2015). "Two Historiographies: Israeli Historiography and the Mass Jewish Migration to the United States, 1881–1914". The Jewish Quarterly Review. 105 (1). [University of Pennsylvania Press, Center for Advanced Judaic Studies, University of Pennsylvania]: 99–129. eISSN 1553-0604. ISSN 0021-6682. JSTOR 43298712.
  • Alroey 2015, p. 113: "Gurevich's 1944 book The Jewish Population of Palestine: Immigration, Demographic Structure and Natural Growth (in Hebrew) examined immigration to Palestine from a local and Zionist standpoint. Like Ruppin and Lestschinsky, Gurevich stressed the magnetic pull of the country and especially Zionist ideology as the main factors motivating immigration to Palestine in the years 1881 to 1914. He described the First Aliyah as the aliyah of the Bilu'im and saw the pioneering agricultural workers of the Second Aliyah as representative of that aliyah as a whole, because they left their mark on the Yishuv at the beginning of the twentieth century." Alroey, Gur (2015). "Two Historiographies: Israeli Historiography and the Mass Jewish Migration to the United States, 1881–1914". The Jewish Quarterly Review. 105 (1). [University of Pennsylvania Press, Center for Advanced Judaic Studies, University of Pennsylvania]: 99–129. eISSN 1553-0604. ISSN 0021-6682. JSTOR 43298712.
  • Beker 2005, p. 4. Beker, A. (2005). "The Forgotten Narrative: Jewish Refugees From Arab Countries". Jewish Political Studies Review. 17 (3/4): 3–19. JSTOR 25834637.

jta.org

jweekly.com

jwire.com.au

kefintl.com

knesset.gov.il

m.knesset.gov.il

knesset.gov.il

fs.knesset.gov.il

memo.ru

mfa.gov.il

middleeastmonitor.com

moia.gov.il

nbn.org.il

news.google.com

newsru.co.il

nytimes.com

policyarchive.org

researchgate.net

responsafortoday.com

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

  • Shoham 2013. Shoham, Hizky (2013). "From 'Great History' to 'Small History': The Genesis of the Zionist Periodization". Israel Studies. 18 (1). Indiana University Press: 31. doi:10.2979/israelstudies.18.1.31. ISSN 1084-9513. JSTOR 10.2979/israelstudies.18.1.31. S2CID 144978084.
  • Shoham 2013, p. 35-37: "The term Aliya as defining historical periods appeared only when talking about Jewish history on the long-durée, when looking back to thousands of years. In 1914, the Zionist activist Shemaryahu Levin [wrote]: “Now at the time of the Third Aliya we can witness the fulfillment of the vision of the Second Aliya, in the days of Nehemiah.” Levin based this remark on a contemporaneous historiographical convention, according to which Jewish history knew two main aliyot to the Land of Israel in biblical times: “the First Aliya” took place in the time of biblical Zerubavel, after Cyrus’ declaration, while “the Second Aliya” took place in the days of Ezra and Nehemiah, about 80 years later… Levin’s periodization was not circulated in public, including among practical Zionists. It achieved dominance only after the WW I, in a way different from both Levin’s intention and counting...Along with analogies of the Balfour Declaration to Cyrus, 2,500 years earlier, many leaders began to write and talk about the forthcoming immigration as “the Third Aliya”, which would continue the previous two, those that departed from Babylonia to establish the second temple. About two months after the Balfour Declaration, Isaac Nissenbaum from the Mizrachi (Zionist-religious) movement published an optimis- tic article in which he anticipated a Hebrew majority in Palestine soon." Shoham, Hizky (2013). "From 'Great History' to 'Small History': The Genesis of the Zionist Periodization". Israel Studies. 18 (1). Indiana University Press: 31. doi:10.2979/israelstudies.18.1.31. ISSN 1084-9513. JSTOR 10.2979/israelstudies.18.1.31. S2CID 144978084.
  • Shoham 2013, p. 42: "The first text in which the periodization as we know it today may be found was an article surveying historical immigrations to and from Palestine, written by the widely recognized writer Y.H. Brenner, and published in October 1919…" Shoham, Hizky (2013). "From 'Great History' to 'Small History': The Genesis of the Zionist Periodization". Israel Studies. 18 (1). Indiana University Press: 31. doi:10.2979/israelstudies.18.1.31. ISSN 1084-9513. JSTOR 10.2979/israelstudies.18.1.31. S2CID 144978084.
  • Hizky Shoham (2012). "From "Great History" to "Small History": The Genesis of the Zionist Periodization". Israel Studies. 18 (1): 31–55. doi:10.2979/israelstudies.18.1.31. ISSN 1084-9513. S2CID 144978084.

shalomlife.com

tandfonline.com

tchelet.org.il

telegraph.co.uk

terredisrael.com

theconversation.com

timesofisrael.com

transferagreement.com

tripod.com

realaliyah.tripod.com

uawire.org

umich.edu

quod.lib.umich.edu

usatoday.com

usatoday30.usatoday.com

washingtonpost.com

web.archive.org

wikisource.org

he.wikisource.org

worldcat.org

  • Schneider, Jan (June 2008). "Israel". Focus Migration. 13. Hamburg Institute of International Economics. ISSN 1864-6220. Archived from the original on 2019-05-14. Retrieved 2013-04-29.
  • Alroey 2015, p. 110: "The sweeping and uncritical use of the two terms, "aliyah" and "immigration" is one of the major factors in the emergence of the divergent treatment of similar data. In the Zionist ethos, aliyah has nothing in common with the migration of other peoples. Zionist historiography takes it as axiomatic that the Jews who came to the country as part of the pioneering early waves were "olim" and not simply "immigrants." The latent ideological charge of the term "aliyah" is so deeply rooted in the Hebrew language that it is almost impossible to distinguish between Jews who "merely" immigrated to Palestine and those who made aliyah to the Land of Israel. Jewish social scientists of the early twentieth century were the first to distinguish aliyah from general Jewish migration. The use of "aliyah" as a typological phenomenon came into vogue with the publication of Arthur Ruppin's Soziologie der Juden in 1930 (English: The Jews in the Modern World, 1934)… in the eighth chapter, which looks at migration, Ruppin seems to have found it difficult to free himself of the Zionist terminology that was dominant in that period. [Ruppin wrote that whereas] Jewish immigration to the United States was propelled by economic hardship and pogroms, the olim (not immigrants) came to Palestine with the support of the Hoveve Tsiyon, with whom they felt a high degree of ideological conformity." Alroey, Gur (2015). "Two Historiographies: Israeli Historiography and the Mass Jewish Migration to the United States, 1881–1914". The Jewish Quarterly Review. 105 (1). [University of Pennsylvania Press, Center for Advanced Judaic Studies, University of Pennsylvania]: 99–129. eISSN 1553-0604. ISSN 0021-6682. JSTOR 43298712.
  • Alroey 2015, pp. 115–116. Alroey, Gur (2015). "Two Historiographies: Israeli Historiography and the Mass Jewish Migration to the United States, 1881–1914". The Jewish Quarterly Review. 105 (1). [University of Pennsylvania Press, Center for Advanced Judaic Studies, University of Pennsylvania]: 99–129. eISSN 1553-0604. ISSN 0021-6682. JSTOR 43298712.
  • Shoham 2013. Shoham, Hizky (2013). "From 'Great History' to 'Small History': The Genesis of the Zionist Periodization". Israel Studies. 18 (1). Indiana University Press: 31. doi:10.2979/israelstudies.18.1.31. ISSN 1084-9513. JSTOR 10.2979/israelstudies.18.1.31. S2CID 144978084.
  • Salmon 1978. Salmon, Yosef (1978). "Ideology and Reality in the Bilu "Aliyah"". Harvard Ukrainian Studies. 2 (4). [President and Fellows of Harvard College, Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute]: 430–466. ISSN 0363-5570. JSTOR 41035804.
  • Shoham 2013, p. 35-37: "The term Aliya as defining historical periods appeared only when talking about Jewish history on the long-durée, when looking back to thousands of years. In 1914, the Zionist activist Shemaryahu Levin [wrote]: “Now at the time of the Third Aliya we can witness the fulfillment of the vision of the Second Aliya, in the days of Nehemiah.” Levin based this remark on a contemporaneous historiographical convention, according to which Jewish history knew two main aliyot to the Land of Israel in biblical times: “the First Aliya” took place in the time of biblical Zerubavel, after Cyrus’ declaration, while “the Second Aliya” took place in the days of Ezra and Nehemiah, about 80 years later… Levin’s periodization was not circulated in public, including among practical Zionists. It achieved dominance only after the WW I, in a way different from both Levin’s intention and counting...Along with analogies of the Balfour Declaration to Cyrus, 2,500 years earlier, many leaders began to write and talk about the forthcoming immigration as “the Third Aliya”, which would continue the previous two, those that departed from Babylonia to establish the second temple. About two months after the Balfour Declaration, Isaac Nissenbaum from the Mizrachi (Zionist-religious) movement published an optimis- tic article in which he anticipated a Hebrew majority in Palestine soon." Shoham, Hizky (2013). "From 'Great History' to 'Small History': The Genesis of the Zionist Periodization". Israel Studies. 18 (1). Indiana University Press: 31. doi:10.2979/israelstudies.18.1.31. ISSN 1084-9513. JSTOR 10.2979/israelstudies.18.1.31. S2CID 144978084.
  • Shoham 2013, p. 42: "The first text in which the periodization as we know it today may be found was an article surveying historical immigrations to and from Palestine, written by the widely recognized writer Y.H. Brenner, and published in October 1919…" Shoham, Hizky (2013). "From 'Great History' to 'Small History': The Genesis of the Zionist Periodization". Israel Studies. 18 (1). Indiana University Press: 31. doi:10.2979/israelstudies.18.1.31. ISSN 1084-9513. JSTOR 10.2979/israelstudies.18.1.31. S2CID 144978084.
  • Alroey 2015, p. 111: "The declaration by Ruppin, the dean of Jewish sociologists, that one "makes aliyah” to the Land of Israel but "immigrates" to the United States laid the terminological and scholarly foundations for turning immigration to Palestine into a unique variety of Jewish migration. During the 1940s and 1950s, demographers and sociologists, including Jacob Lestschinsky, Arieh Tartakower, David Gurevich, Roberto Bachi, and Shmuel Noah Eisenstadt, followed the trail blazed by Ruppin in the 1930s, spinning a Zionist narrative that both created and presumed the unique traits of aliyah and the Zionist enterprise." Alroey, Gur (2015). "Two Historiographies: Israeli Historiography and the Mass Jewish Migration to the United States, 1881–1914". The Jewish Quarterly Review. 105 (1). [University of Pennsylvania Press, Center for Advanced Judaic Studies, University of Pennsylvania]: 99–129. eISSN 1553-0604. ISSN 0021-6682. JSTOR 43298712.
  • Alroey 2015, p. 114: "In his work, Gurevich divided the immigration to Palestine into five separate waves, although he was not the first to do so. He dated the First Aliyah to 1881-1903 and the Second Aliyah to 1904-14 - a periodization that became accepted in the historiography of the Yishuv; few questioned it. Although, as a demographer and statistician, Gurevich had the tools to examine aliyah to Palestine as immigration and to focus on the majority of those who entered the country, he chose to highlight the ideologically-inclined minority who were unrepresentative of the immigrants as a whole." Alroey, Gur (2015). "Two Historiographies: Israeli Historiography and the Mass Jewish Migration to the United States, 1881–1914". The Jewish Quarterly Review. 105 (1). [University of Pennsylvania Press, Center for Advanced Judaic Studies, University of Pennsylvania]: 99–129. eISSN 1553-0604. ISSN 0021-6682. JSTOR 43298712.
  • Alroey 2015, p. 113: "Gurevich's 1944 book The Jewish Population of Palestine: Immigration, Demographic Structure and Natural Growth (in Hebrew) examined immigration to Palestine from a local and Zionist standpoint. Like Ruppin and Lestschinsky, Gurevich stressed the magnetic pull of the country and especially Zionist ideology as the main factors motivating immigration to Palestine in the years 1881 to 1914. He described the First Aliyah as the aliyah of the Bilu'im and saw the pioneering agricultural workers of the Second Aliyah as representative of that aliyah as a whole, because they left their mark on the Yishuv at the beginning of the twentieth century." Alroey, Gur (2015). "Two Historiographies: Israeli Historiography and the Mass Jewish Migration to the United States, 1881–1914". The Jewish Quarterly Review. 105 (1). [University of Pennsylvania Press, Center for Advanced Judaic Studies, University of Pennsylvania]: 99–129. eISSN 1553-0604. ISSN 0021-6682. JSTOR 43298712.
  • Hizky Shoham (2012). "From "Great History" to "Small History": The Genesis of the Zionist Periodization". Israel Studies. 18 (1): 31–55. doi:10.2979/israelstudies.18.1.31. ISSN 1084-9513. S2CID 144978084.
  • Gasparini, Amedeo (24 May 2023). ""Our most important export commodities": independence, money, and ethnic purity in the Jewry policy during the Ceaușescu years". Journal of Modern Jewish Studies. 23 (2): 267–275. doi:10.1080/14725886.2023.2212283. ISSN 1472-5886. Retrieved 15 January 2024.
  • Petrescu, Dragoq (2008). "The Ransom of the Jews: The Story of the Extraordinary Secret Bargain Between Romania and Israel (review)". Journal of Cold War Studies. 10 (1): 127–128. doi:10.1162/jcws.2008.10.1.127. ISSN 1531-3298. Retrieved 15 January 2024.
  • Alexeyeva, Lyudmila (1992). История инакомыслия в СССР [The History of Dissident Movement in the USSR] (in Russian). Vilnius: Vest'. OCLC 489831449. Archived from the original on March 9, 2017. Retrieved October 7, 2012.

ynetnews.com