Ambiguity (law) (English Wikipedia)
Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Ambiguity (law)" in English language version.
refsWebsite
Global rank
English rank
3,322nd place
1,897th place
3rd place
3rd place
332nd place
246th place
6,607th place
3,855th place
27th place
51st place
books.google.com
- 5 Bing (N.C.) 425.
- 10 Mod. 40, 88 E.R. 617.
canlii.org
- Nowegijick v The Queen, [1983] 1 SCR 29, 1983 CanLII 18 at 33 (Supreme Court of Canada). See also R v Badger, [1996] 1 SCR 771, 1996 CanLII 236 (Supreme Court of Canada) and Elliott, David W. (1996). "Aboriginal Peoples in Canada and the United States and the Scope of the Special Fiduciary Relationship". Manitoba Law Journal. 24 (1): 137–186. 1996 CanLIIDocs 162 – via CanLII. at note 49 and accompanying text.
cornell.edu
law.cornell.edu
- United States v. Wiltberger, 18 U.S. (5 Wheat.) 76 (1820) at paragraph 5 (Supreme Court of the United States).
heinonline.org
- Horton, David (2009). "Flipping the Script: Contra Proferentem and Standard Form Contracts". University of Colorado Law Review. 80 (2): 431–486 – via HeinOnline.
- Rotman, Leonard I. (1997). "Taking Aim at the Canons of Treaty Interpretation in Canadian Aboriginal Rights Jurisprudence". University of New Brunswick Law Journal. 46: 11–52 – via HeinOnline.
jstor.org
wikisource.org
en.wikisource.org
- One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Ambiguity". Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 1 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 794–795.
