Animal rights (English Wikipedia)

"Animal Law Courses". Animal Legal Defense Fund. Archived from the original on 2020-12-04. Retrieved 2020-12-13.
For animal-law courses in North America, see "Animal law courses" Archived 2010-06-13 at the Wayback Machine, Animal Legal Defense Fund. Retrieved July 12, 2012.
- For a discussion of animals and personhood, see Wise (2000), pp. 4, 59, 248ff; Wise (2004); Posner (2004); Wise (2007) Archived 2008-06-14 at the

animalsandsociety.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

Pifer, Linda (1996). "Exploring the Gender Gap in Young Adults' Attitudes about Animal Research" (PDF). Society and Animals. 4 (1): 37–52. doi:10.1163/156853096X00034. PMID 11654528. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2021-09-17. Retrieved 2021-06-04.
DeLeeuwa, Jamie; Galen, Luke; Aebersold, Cassandra; Stanton, Victoria (2007). "Support for Animal Rights as a Function of Belief in Evolution, Religious Fundamentalism, and Religious Denomination" (PDF). Society and Animals (15): 353–363. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 20, 2013.

animalstudiesrepository.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

Galvin, Shelley L.; Herzog, Harold A. Jr. (1992). "Ethical Ideology, Animal Rights Activism, And Attitudes Toward The Treatment Of Animals". Ethics & Behavior. 2 (3): 141–149. doi:10.1207/s15327019eb0203_1. PMID 11651362. Archived from the original on 2020-05-31. Retrieved 2020-08-29.

archive.org (Global: 6^th place; English: 6^th place)

Grant, Catharine (2006). The No-nonsense Guide to Animal Rights. New Internationalist. p. 24. ISBN 9781904456407. These religions emphasize ahimsa, which is the principle of non-violence towards all living things. The first precept is a prohibition against the killing of any creature. The Jain, Hindu and Buddhist injunctions against killing serve to teach that all creatures are spiritually equal.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
Owen, Marna A. (2009). Animal Rights: Noble Cause Or Needless Effort?. Twenty-First Century Books. p. 12. ISBN 9780761340829.

bbc.co.uk (Global: 11^th place; English: 10^th place)

"BBC - Religions - Islam: Animals". bbc.co.uk. Archived from the original on 2020-02-04. Retrieved 2019-12-20.
"Ethics - Animal ethics: Animal rights". BBC Online. Archived from the original on March 24, 2022. Retrieved February 10, 2022.

bbc.com (Global: 26^th place; English: 23^rd place)

"Animal rights". BBC. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 17 March 2019. The main reason for Hindu respect for animal rights is the principle of ahimsa. According to the principle of ahimsa, no living thing should be harmed. This applies to humans and animals. The Jains' belief system takes the principle of ahimsa regarding animals so seriously that as well as being strict vegetarians, some followers wear masks to prevent them breathing in insects. They may also sweep paths with a small broom to make sure they do not tread on any living creatures.
"Savitri Devi: The mystical fascist being resurrected by the alt-right". BBC News. 2017-10-28. Retrieved 2025-06-09.

books.google.com (Global: 3^rd place; English: 3^rd place)

Kumar, Satish (September 2002). You are, therefore I am: A declaration of dependence. Bloomsbury USA. ISBN 9781903998182.
Compare for example similar usage of the term in 1938: The American Biology Teacher. Vol. 53. National Association of Biology Teachers. 1938. p. 211. Retrieved 16 April 2021. The foundation from which these behaviors spring is the ideology known as speciesism. Speciesism is deeply rooted in the widely-held belief that the human species is entitled to certain rights and privileges.
Cohen, Carl; Regan, Tom (2001). The Animal Rights Debate. Point/Counterpoint: Philosophers Debate Contemporary Issues Series. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. p. 47. ISBN 9780847696628. Retrieved 16 April 2021. Too often overlooked in the animal world, according to Sapontzis, are insects that have interests, and therefore rights.
The concept of "bacteria rights" can appear coupled with disdain or irony: Pluhar, Evelyn B. (1995). "Human "superiority" and the argument from marginal cases". Beyond Prejudice: The Moral Significance of Human and Nonhuman Animals. Book collections on Project MUSE. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. p. 9. ISBN 9780822316480. Retrieved 16 April 2021. For example, in an editorial entitled 'Animal Rights Nonsense,' ... in the prestigious science journal Nature, defenders of animal rights are accused of being committed to the absurdity of 'bacteria rights.'
Martin, Gus (15 June 2011). The SAGE Encyclopedia of Terrorism, Second Edition. SAGE. ISBN 9781412980166 – via Google Books.
Jain & Fischer 1978, pp. 16–17. Jain, Jyotindra; Fischer, Eberhard (1978), Jaina Iconography, vol. 12, Brill Publishers, ISBN 978-90-04-05259-8
Cort 1998, pp. 87–88. Cort, John E., ed. (1998), Open Boundaries: Jain Communities and Cultures in Indian History, SUNY Press, ISBN 0-7914-3785-X
Dundas 2002, p. 146. Dundas, Paul (2002) [1992], The Jains (Second ed.), London and New York: Routledge, ISBN 978-0-415-26605-5
Cort 2001a, p. 121. Cort, John E. (2001a), Jains in the World : Religious Values and Ideology in India, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-513234-2
Waddicor, M. H., Montesquieu and the Philosophy of Natural Law (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1970), p. 63 Archived 16 August 2021 at the Wayback Machine.
Parker, J. V., Animal Minds, Animal Souls, Animal Rights (Lanham: University Press of America, 2010), p. 16 Archived 16 August 2021 at the Wayback Machine, 88 Archived 16 August 2021 at the Wayback Machine, 99 Archived 16 August 2021 at the Wayback Machine.
Spencer, J., "'Love and Hatred are Common to the Whole Sensitive Creation': Animal Feeling in the Century before Darwin," in A. Richardson, ed., After Darwin: Animals, Emotions, and the Mind (Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi, 2013), p. 37 Archived 16 August 2021 at the Wayback Machine.
Workman, L. (2013). Charles Darwin: The Shaping of Evolutionary Thinking. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 177. ISBN 978-1-137-31323-2. Archived from the original on 16 August 2021. Retrieved 19 August 2019.
Jaini 1998, p. 167. Jaini, Padmanabh S. (1998) [1979], The Jain Path of Purification, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-81-208-1578-0
Umakant P. Shah 1987, pp. 165–166. Shah, Umakant Premanand (1987), Jaina-rūpa-maṇḍana: Jaina iconography, Abhinav Publications, ISBN 81-7017-208-X

britannica.com (Global: 37^th place; English: 64^th place)

For animal-law courses in North America, see "Animal law courses" Archived 2010-06-13 at the Wayback Machine, Animal Legal Defense Fund. Retrieved July 12, 2012.
- For a discussion of animals and personhood, see Wise (2000), pp. 4, 59, 248ff; Wise (2004); Posner (2004); Wise (2007) Archived 2008-06-14 at the
- "Animal Rights." Encyclopædia Britannica. 2007.

cambridge.org (Global: 209^th place; English: 151^st place)

Twine, Richard (2013), "Addressing the animal–industrial complex", in Lanjouw, Annette; Corbey, Raymond (eds.), The Politics of Species: Reshaping our Relationships with Other Animals, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 77–92, ISBN 978-1-107-03260-6, retrieved 2026-04-08

city-journal.org (Global: low place; English: 6,497^th place)

Scruton, Roger (Summer 2000). "Animal Rights". City Journal. New York: Manhattan Institute for Policy Research. Archived from the original on 2016-03-03. Retrieved 2005-12-04.

cnn.com (Global: 36^th place; English: 26^th place)

edition.cnn.com

Giménez, Emiliano (January 4, 2015). "Argentine orangutan granted unprecedented legal rights". CNN. CNN Espanol. Archived from the original on April 3, 2021. Retrieved April 21, 2015.

colorado.edu (Global: 2,916^th place; English: 1,912^th place)

spot.colorado.edu

pg. 94-100 Archived 2011-11-27 at the Wayback Machine. Cohen and Regan (2001).

columbia.edu (Global: 554^th place; English: 368^th place)

cup.columbia.edu

Nibert 2013, p. 270. Nibert, David (2013). Animal Oppression and Human Violence: Domesecration, Capitalism, and Global Conflict. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0231151894. Archived from the original on 2022-11-04. Retrieved 2022-09-14.

doi.org (Global: 2^nd place; English: 2^nd place)

Liguori, G.; et al. (2017). "Ethical Issues in the Use of Animal Models for Tissue Engineering: Reflections on Legal Aspects, Moral Theory, 3Rs Strategies, and Harm-Benefit Analysis" (PDF). Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods. 23 (12): 850–862. doi:10.1089/ten.TEC.2017.0189. PMID 28756735. S2CID 206268293. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-09-15. Retrieved 2019-07-12.
Franco, Nuno Henrique (2013-03-19). "Animal Experiments in Biomedical Research: A Historical Perspective". Animals. 3 (1): 238–273. doi:10.3390/ani3010238. ISSN 2076-2615. PMC 4495509. PMID 26487317.
Ross, Karen (2014). "Winning Women's Votes: Defending Animal Experimentation and Women's Clubs in New York, 1920–1930". New York History. 95 (1): 26–40. doi:10.1353/nyh.2014.0050.
Lee Edwards, Clea Bourne, Jason Vincent A. Cabañes, Gisela Castro, Núria Almiron (2025), "The Animal-Industrial Complex and the Promotion of Animal Exploitation", The Sage Handbook of Promotional Culture and Society, SAGE, pp. 395–408, doi:10.4135/9781529674583.n29, ISBN 9781529602623{{citation}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
Evans, Woody (2015). "Posthuman Rights: Dimensions of Transhuman Worlds". Teknokultura. 12 (2). doi:10.5209/rev_TK.2015.v12.n2.49072.
Best 2014, p. 103. Best, Steven (2014). The Politics of Total Liberation: Revolution for the 21st Century. Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9781137440723. ISBN 978-1137471116.
Herzog, Harold (2007). "Gender Differences in Human-Animal Interactions: A Review". Anthrozoös. 20 (1): 7–21. doi:10.2752/089279307780216687. S2CID 14988443.
Pifer, Linda (1996). "Exploring the Gender Gap in Young Adults' Attitudes about Animal Research" (PDF). Society and Animals. 4 (1): 37–52. doi:10.1163/156853096X00034. PMID 11654528. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2021-09-17. Retrieved 2021-06-04.
Joffe, Ari R.; Bara, Meredith; Anton, Natalie; Nobis, Nathan (March 29, 2016). "The ethics of animal research: a survey of the public and scientists in North America". BMC Medical Ethics. 17 17. doi:10.1186/s12910-016-0100-x. ISSN 1472-6939. PMC 4812627. PMID 27025215.
Galvin, Shelley L.; Herzog, Harold A. Jr. (1992). "Ethical Ideology, Animal Rights Activism, And Attitudes Toward The Treatment Of Animals". Ethics & Behavior. 2 (3): 141–149. doi:10.1207/s15327019eb0203_1. PMID 11651362. Archived from the original on 2020-05-31. Retrieved 2020-08-29.
Plous, S. (1991). "An attitude survey of animal rights activists". Psychological Science. 2 (3): 194–196. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00131.x. S2CID 145549994.

fooddive.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

Siegner, Cathy (January 25, 2018). "Survey: Most consumers like meat, slaughterhouses not so much". Food Dive. Archived from the original on November 2, 2021. Retrieved February 13, 2022.

ieet.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

George Dvorsky. "The Ethics of Animal Enhancement". Archived from the original on 2017-04-25. Retrieved 2017-04-24.

ipsos.com (Global: 6,619^th place; English: 5,318^th place)

Berg, Jennifer; Jackson, Chris (May 12, 2021). "Nearly nine in ten Americans consume meat as part of their diet". Ipsos. Archived from the original on July 20, 2021. Retrieved February 13, 2022.

ivu.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

Meenakshi Sundaram, T. P. (1957). "Vegetarianism in Tamil Literature". 15th World Vegetarian Congress 1957. International Vegetarian Union (IVU). Archived from the original on 22 January 2022. Retrieved 17 April 2022. Ahimsa is the ruling principle of Indian life from the very earliest times. ... This positive spiritual attitude is easily explained to the common man in a negative way as "ahimsa" and hence this way of denoting it. Tiruvalluvar speaks of this as "kollaamai" or "non-killing."

jstor.org (Global: 23^rd place; English: 15^th place)

Vallentyne (2005) Archived 2016-04-13 at the Wayback Machine; Vallentyne (2007).
Kean (1995) Archived 2020-04-13 at the Wayback Machine.

koeblergerhard.de (Global: low place; English: low place)

Bentham, Jeremy. 1780. "Of the Limits of the Penal Branch of Jurisprudence". pp. 307–335 in An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. London: T. Payne and Sons.

nature.com (Global: 207^th place; English: 347^th place)

Rollin (1989), pp. xii, pp. 117–118; Rollin (2007) Archived 2020-07-28 at the Wayback Machine.

newstatesman.com (Global: 1,323^rd place; English: 717^th place)

Manavis, Sarah (2018-09-21). "Eco-fascism: The ideology marrying environmentalism and white supremacy thriving online". New Statesman. Retrieved 2025-06-09.

nih.gov (Global: 5^th place; English: 5^th place)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Liguori, G.; et al. (2017). "Ethical Issues in the Use of Animal Models for Tissue Engineering: Reflections on Legal Aspects, Moral Theory, 3Rs Strategies, and Harm-Benefit Analysis" (PDF). Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods. 23 (12): 850–862. doi:10.1089/ten.TEC.2017.0189. PMID 28756735. S2CID 206268293. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-09-15. Retrieved 2019-07-12.
Franco, Nuno Henrique (2013-03-19). "Animal Experiments in Biomedical Research: A Historical Perspective". Animals. 3 (1): 238–273. doi:10.3390/ani3010238. ISSN 2076-2615. PMC 4495509. PMID 26487317.
Pifer, Linda (1996). "Exploring the Gender Gap in Young Adults' Attitudes about Animal Research" (PDF). Society and Animals. 4 (1): 37–52. doi:10.1163/156853096X00034. PMID 11654528. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2021-09-17. Retrieved 2021-06-04.
Joffe, Ari R.; Bara, Meredith; Anton, Natalie; Nobis, Nathan (March 29, 2016). "The ethics of animal research: a survey of the public and scientists in North America". BMC Medical Ethics. 17 17. doi:10.1186/s12910-016-0100-x. ISSN 1472-6939. PMC 4812627. PMID 27025215.
Galvin, Shelley L.; Herzog, Harold A. Jr. (1992). "Ethical Ideology, Animal Rights Activism, And Attitudes Toward The Treatment Of Animals". Ethics & Behavior. 2 (3): 141–149. doi:10.1207/s15327019eb0203_1. PMID 11651362. Archived from the original on 2020-05-31. Retrieved 2020-08-29.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Garner (2005), pp. 11, 16.
- Also see Frey (1980); and for a review of Frey, see Sprigge (1981) Archived 2016-02-19 at the
- Franco, Nuno Henrique (2013-03-19). "Animal Experiments in Biomedical Research: A Historical Perspective". Animals. 3 (1): 238–273. doi:10.3390/ani3010238. ISSN 2076-2615. PMC 4495509. PMID 26487317.
- Joffe, Ari R.; Bara, Meredith; Anton, Natalie; Nobis, Nathan (March 29, 2016). "The ethics of animal research: a survey of the public and scientists in North America". BMC Medical Ethics. 17 17. doi:10.1186/s12910-016-0100-x. ISSN 1472-6939. PMC 4812627. PMID 27025215.

ohiolink.edu (Global: 7,495^th place; English: 4,383^rd place)

rave.ohiolink.edu

Stockwell, Ryan J. Growing a new agrarian myth: the american agriculture movement, identity, and the call to save the family farm (Thesis). p. 19. Archived from the original on 15 April 2023. Retrieved 11 May 2020.

okstate.edu (Global: 2,678^th place; English: 1,507^th place)

agecon.okstate.edu

Norwood, Bailey; Murray, Susan. "FooDS Food Deman Survey, Volume 5, Issue 9: January 18, 2018" (PDF). Oklahoma State University. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 August 2019. Retrieved February 13, 2022.

organicauthority.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

Ettinger, Jill (November 21, 2017). "70% of Americans Want Better Treatment for Farm Animals, Poll Finds". Organic Authority. Archived from the original on 29 September 2018. Retrieved 13 February 2022.

rug.nl (Global: 2,629^th place; English: 1,971^st place)

pure.rug.nl

Liguori, G.; et al. (2017). "Ethical Issues in the Use of Animal Models for Tissue Engineering: Reflections on Legal Aspects, Moral Theory, 3Rs Strategies, and Harm-Benefit Analysis" (PDF). Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods. 23 (12): 850–862. doi:10.1089/ten.TEC.2017.0189. PMID 28756735. S2CID 206268293. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-09-15. Retrieved 2019-07-12.

sagepub.com (Global: 609^th place; English: 451^st place)

sk.sagepub.com

Lee Edwards, Clea Bourne, Jason Vincent A. Cabañes, Gisela Castro, Núria Almiron (2025), "The Animal-Industrial Complex and the Promotion of Animal Exploitation", The Sage Handbook of Promotional Culture and Society, SAGE, pp. 395–408, doi:10.4135/9781529674583.n29, ISBN 9781529602623{{citation}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

semanticscholar.org (Global: 15^th place; English: 8^th place)

api.semanticscholar.org

Liguori, G.; et al. (2017). "Ethical Issues in the Use of Animal Models for Tissue Engineering: Reflections on Legal Aspects, Moral Theory, 3Rs Strategies, and Harm-Benefit Analysis" (PDF). Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods. 23 (12): 850–862. doi:10.1089/ten.TEC.2017.0189. PMID 28756735. S2CID 206268293. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-09-15. Retrieved 2019-07-12.
Herzog, Harold (2007). "Gender Differences in Human-Animal Interactions: A Review". Anthrozoös. 20 (1): 7–21. doi:10.2752/089279307780216687. S2CID 14988443.
Plous, S. (1991). "An attitude survey of animal rights activists". Psychological Science. 2 (3): 194–196. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00131.x. S2CID 145549994.

sentienceinstitute.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

Reese Anthis, Jacy (November 20, 2017). "Animals, Food, and Technology (AFT) Survey 2017". Sentience Institute. Surveys. Archived from the original on January 4, 2022. Retrieved February 13, 2022.

slate.com (Global: 409^th place; English: 260^th place)

Posner (June 15, 2001) Archived August 21, 2011, at the Wayback Machine; Posner-Singer debate in full Archived 2015-05-09 at the
Singer (June 15, 2001) Archived September 14, 2017, at the Wayback Machine.

stanford.edu (Global: 194^th place; English: 182^nd place)

plato.stanford.edu

"Animal Consciousness, No. 2. Historical background". Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. 23 December 1995. Archived from the original on 6 September 2008. Retrieved 16 December 2014.

thecrimson.com (Global: 1,972^nd place; English: 1,015^th place)

Green, Elizabeth W. (10 October 2003). "Fifteen Questions For Carol J. Adams". The Harvard Crimson. Retrieved 22 November 2008.

thehumaneleague.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

Walsh, Owen (24 February 2025). "Animal Rights: Definition, Issues, and Examples". HumaneLeague.org. The Humane League. Retrieved 27 December 2025.

thevegetariansite.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

"Tom Regan: The Case For Animal Rights". The Vegetarian Site. Archived from the original on November 2, 2019. Retrieved November 2, 2019.

utilitarian.net (Global: low place; English: low place)

Posner (June 15, 2001) Archived August 21, 2011, at the Wayback Machine; Posner-Singer debate in full Archived 2015-05-09 at the

uvic.ca (Global: 6,589^th place; English: 3,880^th place)

onlineacademiccommunity.uvic.ca

Jakopovich, Daniel (2021). "The UK's Animal Welfare (Sentience) Bill Excludes the Vast Majority of Animals: Why We Must Expand Our Moral Circle to Include Invertebrates". Animals & Society Research Initiative, University of Victoria, Canada. Archived from the original on 2022-11-29. Retrieved 2022-06-18.

vox.com (Global: 697^th place; English: 420^th place)

Piper, Kelsey (November 5, 2018). "California and Florida voters could change the lives of millions of animals on Election Day". Vox. Archived from the original on 13 February 2022. Retrieved 13 February 2022.

washingtonpost.com (Global: 35^th place; English: 24^th place)

Park, Yon Soo; Valentino, Benjamin (July 26, 2019). "Who supports animal rights? Here's what we found". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on July 26, 2019. Retrieved July 26, 2019.

web.archive.org (Global: 1^st place; English: 1^st place)

"Animal Law Courses". Animal Legal Defense Fund. Archived from the original on 2020-12-04. Retrieved 2020-12-13.
For animal-law courses in North America, see "Animal law courses" Archived 2010-06-13 at the Wayback Machine, Animal Legal Defense Fund. Retrieved July 12, 2012.
- For a discussion of animals and personhood, see Wise (2000), pp. 4, 59, 248ff; Wise (2004); Posner (2004); Wise (2007) Archived 2008-06-14 at the
- Giménez, Emiliano (January 4, 2015). "Argentine orangutan granted unprecedented legal rights". CNN. CNN Espanol. Archived from the original on April 3, 2021. Retrieved April 21, 2015.
- Jakopovich, Daniel (2021). "The UK's Animal Welfare (Sentience) Bill Excludes the Vast Majority of Animals: Why We Must Expand Our Moral Circle to Include Invertebrates". Animals & Society Research Initiative, University of Victoria, Canada. Archived from the original on 2022-11-29. Retrieved 2022-06-18.
- Scruton, Roger (Summer 2000). "Animal Rights". City Journal. New York: Manhattan Institute for Policy Research. Archived from the original on 2016-03-03. Retrieved 2005-12-04.
- Liguori, G.; et al. (2017). "Ethical Issues in the Use of Animal Models for Tissue Engineering: Reflections on Legal Aspects, Moral Theory, 3Rs Strategies, and Harm-Benefit Analysis" (PDF). Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods. 23 (12): 850–862. doi:10.1089/ten.TEC.2017.0189. PMID 28756735. S2CID 206268293. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-09-15. Retrieved 2019-07-12.
- Garner (2005), pp. 11, 16.
  - Also see Frey (1980); and for a review of Frey, see Sprigge (1981) Archived 2016-02-19 at the
  - "Animal rights". BBC. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 17 March 2019. The main reason for Hindu respect for animal rights is the principle of ahimsa. According to the principle of ahimsa, no living thing should be harmed. This applies to humans and animals. The Jains' belief system takes the principle of ahimsa regarding animals so seriously that as well as being strict vegetarians, some followers wear masks to prevent them breathing in insects. They may also sweep paths with a small broom to make sure they do not tread on any living creatures.
  - Waddicor, M. H., Montesquieu and the Philosophy of Natural Law (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1970), p. 63 Archived 16 August 2021 at the Wayback Machine.
  - "Animal Consciousness, No. 2. Historical background". Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. 23 December 1995. Archived from the original on 6 September 2008. Retrieved 16 December 2014.
  - Parker, J. V., Animal Minds, Animal Souls, Animal Rights (Lanham: University Press of America, 2010), p. 16 Archived 16 August 2021 at the Wayback Machine, 88 Archived 16 August 2021 at the Wayback Machine, 99 Archived 16 August 2021 at the Wayback Machine.
  - Spencer, J., "'Love and Hatred are Common to the Whole Sensitive Creation': Animal Feeling in the Century before Darwin," in A. Richardson, ed., After Darwin: Animals, Emotions, and the Mind (Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi, 2013), p. 37 Archived 16 August 2021 at the Wayback Machine.
  - Workman, L. (2013). Charles Darwin: The Shaping of Evolutionary Thinking. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 177. ISBN 978-1-137-31323-2. Archived from the original on 16 August 2021. Retrieved 19 August 2019.
  - Meenakshi Sundaram, T. P. (1957). "Vegetarianism in Tamil Literature". 15th World Vegetarian Congress 1957. International Vegetarian Union (IVU). Archived from the original on 22 January 2022. Retrieved 17 April 2022. Ahimsa is the ruling principle of Indian life from the very earliest times. ... This positive spiritual attitude is easily explained to the common man in a negative way as "ahimsa" and hence this way of denoting it. Tiruvalluvar speaks of this as "kollaamai" or "non-killing."
  - "BBC - Religions - Islam: Animals". bbc.co.uk. Archived from the original on 2020-02-04. Retrieved 2019-12-20.
  - Vallentyne (2005) Archived 2016-04-13 at the Wayback Machine; Vallentyne (2007).
  - Rollin (1989), pp. xii, pp. 117–118; Rollin (2007) Archived 2020-07-28 at the Wayback Machine.
  - Kean (1995) Archived 2020-04-13 at the Wayback Machine.
  - George Dvorsky. "The Ethics of Animal Enhancement". Archived from the original on 2017-04-25. Retrieved 2017-04-24.
  - Nibert 2013, p. 270. Nibert, David (2013). Animal Oppression and Human Violence: Domesecration, Capitalism, and Global Conflict. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0231151894. Archived from the original on 2022-11-04. Retrieved 2022-09-14.
  - pg. 94-100 Archived 2011-11-27 at the Wayback Machine. Cohen and Regan (2001).
  - Posner (June 15, 2001) Archived August 21, 2011, at the Wayback Machine; Posner-Singer debate in full Archived 2015-05-09 at the
  - Singer (June 15, 2001) Archived September 14, 2017, at the Wayback Machine.
  - "Tom Regan: The Case For Animal Rights". The Vegetarian Site. Archived from the original on November 2, 2019. Retrieved November 2, 2019.
  - Pifer, Linda (1996). "Exploring the Gender Gap in Young Adults' Attitudes about Animal Research" (PDF). Society and Animals. 4 (1): 37–52. doi:10.1163/156853096X00034. PMID 11654528. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2021-09-17. Retrieved 2021-06-04.
  - "Ethics - Animal ethics: Animal rights". BBC Online. Archived from the original on March 24, 2022. Retrieved February 10, 2022.
  - DeLeeuwa, Jamie; Galen, Luke; Aebersold, Cassandra; Stanton, Victoria (2007). "Support for Animal Rights as a Function of Belief in Evolution, Religious Fundamentalism, and Religious Denomination" (PDF). Society and Animals (15): 353–363. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 20, 2013.
  - Galvin, Shelley L.; Herzog, Harold A. Jr. (1992). "Ethical Ideology, Animal Rights Activism, And Attitudes Toward The Treatment Of Animals". Ethics & Behavior. 2 (3): 141–149. doi:10.1207/s15327019eb0203_1. PMID 11651362. Archived from the original on 2020-05-31. Retrieved 2020-08-29.
  - Park, Yon Soo; Valentino, Benjamin (July 26, 2019). "Who supports animal rights? Here's what we found". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on July 26, 2019. Retrieved July 26, 2019.
  - Berg, Jennifer; Jackson, Chris (May 12, 2021). "Nearly nine in ten Americans consume meat as part of their diet". Ipsos. Archived from the original on July 20, 2021. Retrieved February 13, 2022.
  - Ettinger, Jill (November 21, 2017). "70% of Americans Want Better Treatment for Farm Animals, Poll Finds". Organic Authority. Archived from the original on 29 September 2018. Retrieved 13 February 2022.
  - Piper, Kelsey (November 5, 2018). "California and Florida voters could change the lives of millions of animals on Election Day". Vox. Archived from the original on 13 February 2022. Retrieved 13 February 2022.
  - Reese Anthis, Jacy (November 20, 2017). "Animals, Food, and Technology (AFT) Survey 2017". Sentience Institute. Surveys. Archived from the original on January 4, 2022. Retrieved February 13, 2022.
  - Siegner, Cathy (January 25, 2018). "Survey: Most consumers like meat, slaughterhouses not so much". Food Dive. Archived from the original on November 2, 2021. Retrieved February 13, 2022.
  - Norwood, Bailey; Murray, Susan. "FooDS Food Deman Survey, Volume 5, Issue 9: January 18, 2018" (PDF). Oklahoma State University. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 August 2019. Retrieved February 13, 2022.
  - Stockwell, Ryan J. Growing a new agrarian myth: the american agriculture movement, identity, and the call to save the family farm (Thesis). p. 19. Archived from the original on 15 April 2023. Retrieved 11 May 2020.

worldcat.org (Global: 4^th place; English: 4^th place)

search.worldcat.org

Franco, Nuno Henrique (2013-03-19). "Animal Experiments in Biomedical Research: A Historical Perspective". Animals. 3 (1): 238–273. doi:10.3390/ani3010238. ISSN 2076-2615. PMC 4495509. PMID 26487317.
Joffe, Ari R.; Bara, Meredith; Anton, Natalie; Nobis, Nathan (March 29, 2016). "The ethics of animal research: a survey of the public and scientists in North America". BMC Medical Ethics. 17 17. doi:10.1186/s12910-016-0100-x. ISSN 1472-6939. PMC 4812627. PMID 27025215.

Animal rights (English Wikipedia)

aldf.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

animalsandsociety.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

animalstudiesrepository.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

archive.org (Global: 6th place; English: 6th place)

bbc.co.uk (Global: 11th place; English: 10th place)

bbc.com (Global: 26th place; English: 23rd place)

books.google.com (Global: 3rd place; English: 3rd place)

britannica.com (Global: 37th place; English: 64th place)

cambridge.org (Global: 209th place; English: 151st place)

city-journal.org (Global: low place; English: 6,497th place)

cnn.com (Global: 36th place; English: 26th place)

edition.cnn.com

colorado.edu (Global: 2,916th place; English: 1,912th place)

spot.colorado.edu

columbia.edu (Global: 554th place; English: 368th place)

cup.columbia.edu

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; English: 2nd place)

fooddive.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

ieet.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

ipsos.com (Global: 6,619th place; English: 5,318th place)

ivu.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

jstor.org (Global: 23rd place; English: 15th place)

koeblergerhard.de (Global: low place; English: low place)

nature.com (Global: 207th place; English: 347th place)

newstatesman.com (Global: 1,323rd place; English: 717th place)

nih.gov (Global: 5th place; English: 5th place)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

ohiolink.edu (Global: 7,495th place; English: 4,383rd place)

rave.ohiolink.edu

okstate.edu (Global: 2,678th place; English: 1,507th place)

agecon.okstate.edu

organicauthority.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

rug.nl (Global: 2,629th place; English: 1,971st place)

pure.rug.nl

sagepub.com (Global: 609th place; English: 451st place)

sk.sagepub.com

semanticscholar.org (Global: 15th place; English: 8th place)

api.semanticscholar.org

sentienceinstitute.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

slate.com (Global: 409th place; English: 260th place)

stanford.edu (Global: 194th place; English: 182nd place)

plato.stanford.edu

thecrimson.com (Global: 1,972nd place; English: 1,015th place)

thehumaneleague.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

thevegetariansite.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

utilitarian.net (Global: low place; English: low place)

uvic.ca (Global: 6,589th place; English: 3,880th place)

onlineacademiccommunity.uvic.ca

vox.com (Global: 697th place; English: 420th place)

washingtonpost.com (Global: 35th place; English: 24th place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; English: 1st place)

worldcat.org (Global: 4th place; English: 4th place)

search.worldcat.org

archive.org (Global: 6^th place; English: 6^th place)

bbc.co.uk (Global: 11^th place; English: 10^th place)

bbc.com (Global: 26^th place; English: 23^rd place)

books.google.com (Global: 3^rd place; English: 3^rd place)

britannica.com (Global: 37^th place; English: 64^th place)

cambridge.org (Global: 209^th place; English: 151^st place)

city-journal.org (Global: low place; English: 6,497^th place)

cnn.com (Global: 36^th place; English: 26^th place)

colorado.edu (Global: 2,916^th place; English: 1,912^th place)

columbia.edu (Global: 554^th place; English: 368^th place)

doi.org (Global: 2^nd place; English: 2^nd place)

ipsos.com (Global: 6,619^th place; English: 5,318^th place)

jstor.org (Global: 23^rd place; English: 15^th place)

nature.com (Global: 207^th place; English: 347^th place)

newstatesman.com (Global: 1,323^rd place; English: 717^th place)

nih.gov (Global: 5^th place; English: 5^th place)

ohiolink.edu (Global: 7,495^th place; English: 4,383^rd place)

okstate.edu (Global: 2,678^th place; English: 1,507^th place)

rug.nl (Global: 2,629^th place; English: 1,971^st place)

sagepub.com (Global: 609^th place; English: 451^st place)

semanticscholar.org (Global: 15^th place; English: 8^th place)

slate.com (Global: 409^th place; English: 260^th place)

stanford.edu (Global: 194^th place; English: 182^nd place)

thecrimson.com (Global: 1,972^nd place; English: 1,015^th place)

uvic.ca (Global: 6,589^th place; English: 3,880^th place)

vox.com (Global: 697^th place; English: 420^th place)

washingtonpost.com (Global: 35^th place; English: 24^th place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1^st place; English: 1^st place)

worldcat.org (Global: 4^th place; English: 4^th place)