Asian Americans (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Asian Americans" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
3rd place
3rd place
45th place
41st place
2nd place
2nd place
7th place
7th place
4th place
4th place
1,418th place
966th place
92nd place
72nd place
11th place
8th place
5th place
5th place
28th place
26th place
137th place
101st place
1,308th place
924th place
61st place
54th place
290th place
202nd place
14th place
14th place
198th place
154th place
109th place
87th place
54th place
48th place
41st place
34th place
low place
low place
6th place
6th place
low place
low place
791st place
550th place
488th place
374th place
low place
6,402nd place
166th place
121st place
34th place
27th place
low place
low place
581st place
738th place
18th place
17th place
497th place
371st place
146th place
110th place
79th place
65th place
low place
6,930th place
9th place
13th place
228th place
158th place
330th place
222nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
910th place
593rd place
4,161st place
2,305th place
4,767th place
3,136th place
3,754th place
2,155th place
4,531st place
2,541st place
4,783rd place
3,049th place
332nd place
246th place
580th place
462nd place
179th place
183rd place
2,558th place
1,868th place
446th place
308th place
low place
low place
571st place
403rd place
2,474th place
1,469th place
low place
low place
22nd place
19th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
703rd place
501st place
710th place
648th place
6,372nd place
5,946th place
5,752nd place
3,776th place
low place
8,094th place
2,333rd place
1,632nd place
3,341st place
2,191st place
low place
7,752nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
120th place
125th place
low place
low place
243rd place
882nd place
2,542nd place
1,675th place
6,600th place
5,668th place
low place
8,876th place
7,931st place
4,485th place
163rd place
185th place
low place
low place
5,544th place
3,110th place
926th place
945th place
low place
low place
135th place
105th place
low place
low place
low place
6,838th place
5,447th place
3,767th place
503rd place
364th place
555th place
467th place
1,998th place
1,116th place
70th place
63rd place
low place
low place
low place
6,161st place
8,209th place
5,379th place
low place
low place
853rd place
505th place
1,824th place
1,065th place
low place
8,744th place
low place
low place
551st place
406th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
758th place
500th place
8,132nd place
5,327th place
2,271st place
1,360th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,115th place
741st place
1,174th place
773rd place
7,460th place
4,676th place
3,257th place
3,398th place
low place
low place
4,682nd place
2,794th place
218th place
212th place
low place
low place
699th place
479th place
1,880th place
1,218th place
3,169th place
1,838th place
low place
low place
459th place
360th place
6,865th place
3,874th place
264th place
249th place
17th place
15th place
low place
low place
4,892nd place
2,749th place
680th place
412th place
low place
low place
low place
7,423rd place
low place
low place
1,215th place
726th place
7,051st place
4,002nd place
5,134th place
2,827th place
824th place
488th place
437th place
260th place
453rd place
267th place
342nd place
357th place
757th place
455th place
low place
low place
6,015th place
3,400th place
484th place
323rd place
20th place
30th place
914th place
530th place
1,810th place
1,134th place
low place
low place
9,402nd place
5,867th place
4,936th place
2,833rd place
low place
low place
6,804th place
4,447th place
993rd place
920th place
1,716th place
973rd place
low place
9,291st place
2,755th place
1,753rd place
259th place
188th place
1,553rd place
1,008th place
346th place
229th place
1,110th place
695th place
6,864th place
3,942nd place
1,220th place
1,102nd place
1,040th place
623rd place
low place
low place
low place
7,965th place
26th place
20th place
561st place
392nd place
1,077th place
761st place
low place
low place

aaiusa.org

aarp.org

abc7news.com

adl.org

ama-assn.org

americanprogress.org

apa.org

api-gbv.org

archive-it.org

wayback.archive-it.org

archive.org

archive.today

archives.gov

archives.gov

obamawhitehouse.archives.gov

asiamattersforamerica.org

asian-nation.org

asianjournal.com

asianpacificheritage.gov

asianweek.com

asiasociety.org

askoxford.com

axios.com

baltimoresun.com

articles.baltimoresun.com

baylor.edu

bbc.com

berkeley.edu

sis.berkeley.edu

lib.berkeley.edu

blogdriver.com

faizhao.blogdriver.com

books.google.com

cbslocal.com

washington.cbslocal.com

  • "New Asian Immigrants To US Now Surpass Hispanics". CBSDC. June 19, 2012. Archived from the original on June 22, 2012. Retrieved June 19, 2012. While immigrants from Asia often obtain visas and arrive legally, many also sneak across the U.S. border or become undocumented residents after overstaying their visas.

cdc.gov

census.gov

census.gov

data.census.gov

  • "US Census Data". United States Census Bureau. Retrieved September 21, 2024.
  • "US Census Data". United States Census Bureau. Retrieved September 21, 2024.

quickfacts.census.gov

www2.census.gov

factfinder.census.gov

censusreporter.org

chosun.com

english.chosun.com

chronicle.com

cnn.com

cnn.com

money.cnn.com

management.fortune.cnn.com

articles.cnn.com

edition.cnn.com

columbia.edu

academiccommons.columbia.edu

committee100.org

cornell.edu

aasp.cornell.edu

ropercenter.cornell.edu

crainsnewyork.com

mycrains.crainsnewyork.com

csmonitor.com

dailybulletin.com

dallasnews.com

danvillesanramon.com

dhs.gov

doi.org

doi.org

dx.doi.org

duke.edu

public.econ.duke.edu

eac.gov

fastcompany.com

federalregister.gov

ferris.edu

forbes.com

fullerton.edu

hss.fullerton.edu

fusion.net

gallup.com

gallup.com

  • David Crary (October 18, 2012). "Gallup study: 3.4 percent of US adults are LGBT". WTOP. Associated Press. Archived from the original on May 13, 2013. Retrieved October 23, 2012.
    Gary J. Gates; Frank Newport (October 18, 2012). "Special Report: 3.4% of U.S. Adults Identify as LGBT". Gallup. Retrieved March 17, 2017. Nonwhites are more likely than white segments of the U.S. population to identify as LGBT. The survey results show that 4.6% of African Americans identify as LGBT, along with 4.0% of Hispanics and 4.3% of Asians. The disproportionately higher representation of LGBT status among nonwhite population segments corresponds to the slightly below-average 3.2% of white Americans who identified as LGBT.

news.gallup.com

gmanetwork.com

goldsea.com

google.com

googleusercontent.com

scholar.googleusercontent.com

govinfo.gov

  • Rothman, Lily; Ronk, Liz (February 2, 2017). "Congress Tightened Immigration Laws 100 Years Ago. Here's Who They Turned Away". Time. Archived from the original on June 30, 2020. Retrieved March 14, 2019. Excluded from entry in 1917 were not only convicted criminals, chronic alcoholics and people with contagious diseases, but also people with epilepsy, anarchists, most people who couldn't read and almost everyone from Asia, as well as laborers who were "induced, assisted, encouraged, or solicited to migrate to this country by offers or promises of employment, whether such offers or promises are true or false" and "persons likely to become a public charge".
    Boissoneault, Lorraine (February 6, 2017). "Literacy Tests and Asian Exclusion Were the Hallmarks of the 1917 Immigration Act". Smithsonian. Archived from the original on March 19, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019. The act also levied an $8 tax on every adult immigrant (about $160 today) and barred all immigrants from the "Asiatic zone".
    Little, Becky (September 7, 2017). "The Birth of 'Illegal' Immigration". History. Archived from the original on March 14, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019. A decade later, the Asiatic Barred Zone Act banned most immigration from Asia, as well as immigration by prostitutes, polygamists, anarchists, and people with contagious diseases.
    1917 Congressional Record, Vol. 63, Page 876 (5 February 1917)
    Uma A. Segal (August 14, 2002). A Framework for Immigration: Asians in the United States. Columbia University Press. p. 134. ISBN 978-0-231-50633-5. Archived from the original on June 4, 2020. Retrieved March 15, 2019. Less than ten years later, Congress passed the Immigration Act of February 5, 1917 (commonly known as the Barred Zone Act), which enumerated the classes of people who were ineligible to enter the United States. Among them were those who were natives of a zone defined by latitude and longitude the geographic area identified became known as the Asiatic Barred Zone, and the act clearly became the Asiatic Barred Zone Act. Under the Asiatic Barred Zone Act, the only Asians allowed entry into the United States were Japanese and Filipinos.
    Sixty-Fourth Congress (February 5, 1917). "CHAP. 29. – An Act To regulate the immigration of aliens to, and the residence of aliens in, the United States" (PDF). Library of Congress. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 12, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019. unless otherwise provided for by existing treaties, persons who are natives of islands not possessed by the United States adjacent to the Content of Asia, situate south of the twentieth parallel latitude north, west of the one hundred and sixtieth meridian of longitude east of Greenwich, and north of the tenth parallel of latitude south, or who are natives of any country, province, or dependency situate on the Continent of Asia west of the one hundred and tenth meridian of longitude east from Greenwich and east of the fiftieth meridian of longitude east from Greenwich and south of the fiftieth parallel of latitude north, except that portion of said territory situate between the fiftieth and the sixty-fourth meridians of longitude east from Greenwich and the twenty-fourth and thirty-eighth parallels of latitude north, and no alien now in any way excluded from, or prevented from entering, the United States shall be admitted to the United States. Alt URL Archived May 8, 2019, at the Wayback Machine

h-net.org

haaretz.com

harvard.edu

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

news.harvard.edu

hsph.harvard.edu

hawaii.edu

opmanong.ssc.hawaii.edu

hawaii.edu

evols.library.manoa.hawaii.edu

manoa.hawaii.edu

history.com

  • Rothman, Lily; Ronk, Liz (February 2, 2017). "Congress Tightened Immigration Laws 100 Years Ago. Here's Who They Turned Away". Time. Archived from the original on June 30, 2020. Retrieved March 14, 2019. Excluded from entry in 1917 were not only convicted criminals, chronic alcoholics and people with contagious diseases, but also people with epilepsy, anarchists, most people who couldn't read and almost everyone from Asia, as well as laborers who were "induced, assisted, encouraged, or solicited to migrate to this country by offers or promises of employment, whether such offers or promises are true or false" and "persons likely to become a public charge".
    Boissoneault, Lorraine (February 6, 2017). "Literacy Tests and Asian Exclusion Were the Hallmarks of the 1917 Immigration Act". Smithsonian. Archived from the original on March 19, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019. The act also levied an $8 tax on every adult immigrant (about $160 today) and barred all immigrants from the "Asiatic zone".
    Little, Becky (September 7, 2017). "The Birth of 'Illegal' Immigration". History. Archived from the original on March 14, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019. A decade later, the Asiatic Barred Zone Act banned most immigration from Asia, as well as immigration by prostitutes, polygamists, anarchists, and people with contagious diseases.
    1917 Congressional Record, Vol. 63, Page 876 (5 February 1917)
    Uma A. Segal (August 14, 2002). A Framework for Immigration: Asians in the United States. Columbia University Press. p. 134. ISBN 978-0-231-50633-5. Archived from the original on June 4, 2020. Retrieved March 15, 2019. Less than ten years later, Congress passed the Immigration Act of February 5, 1917 (commonly known as the Barred Zone Act), which enumerated the classes of people who were ineligible to enter the United States. Among them were those who were natives of a zone defined by latitude and longitude the geographic area identified became known as the Asiatic Barred Zone, and the act clearly became the Asiatic Barred Zone Act. Under the Asiatic Barred Zone Act, the only Asians allowed entry into the United States were Japanese and Filipinos.
    Sixty-Fourth Congress (February 5, 1917). "CHAP. 29. – An Act To regulate the immigration of aliens to, and the residence of aliens in, the United States" (PDF). Library of Congress. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 12, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019. unless otherwise provided for by existing treaties, persons who are natives of islands not possessed by the United States adjacent to the Content of Asia, situate south of the twentieth parallel latitude north, west of the one hundred and sixtieth meridian of longitude east of Greenwich, and north of the tenth parallel of latitude south, or who are natives of any country, province, or dependency situate on the Continent of Asia west of the one hundred and tenth meridian of longitude east from Greenwich and east of the fiftieth meridian of longitude east from Greenwich and south of the fiftieth parallel of latitude north, except that portion of said territory situate between the fiftieth and the sixty-fourth meridians of longitude east from Greenwich and the twenty-fourth and thirty-eighth parallels of latitude north, and no alien now in any way excluded from, or prevented from entering, the United States shall be admitted to the United States. Alt URL Archived May 8, 2019, at the Wayback Machine

hkspublications.org

aapr.hkspublications.org

huffingtonpost.com

hyphenmagazine.com

ide.go.jp

ir.ide.go.jp

imdiversity.com

inconvenientminority.com

indiacurrents.com

indiatimes.com

economictimes.indiatimes.com

inquirer.net

usa.inquirer.net

insidehighered.com

ipums.org

usa.ipums.org

ipums.org

jhu.edu

education.jhu.edu

jstor.org

kapionews.com

kqed.org

latimes.com

  • K. Connie Kang (September 7, 2002). "Yuji Ichioka, 66; Led Way in Studying Lives of Asian Americans". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on March 14, 2014. Retrieved May 4, 2013. Yet Ichioka created the first inter-ethnic pan-Asian American political group. And he coined the term "Asian American" to frame a new self-defining political lexicon. Before that, people of Asian ancestry were generally called Oriental or Asiatic.

loc.gov

  • Rothman, Lily; Ronk, Liz (February 2, 2017). "Congress Tightened Immigration Laws 100 Years Ago. Here's Who They Turned Away". Time. Archived from the original on June 30, 2020. Retrieved March 14, 2019. Excluded from entry in 1917 were not only convicted criminals, chronic alcoholics and people with contagious diseases, but also people with epilepsy, anarchists, most people who couldn't read and almost everyone from Asia, as well as laborers who were "induced, assisted, encouraged, or solicited to migrate to this country by offers or promises of employment, whether such offers or promises are true or false" and "persons likely to become a public charge".
    Boissoneault, Lorraine (February 6, 2017). "Literacy Tests and Asian Exclusion Were the Hallmarks of the 1917 Immigration Act". Smithsonian. Archived from the original on March 19, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019. The act also levied an $8 tax on every adult immigrant (about $160 today) and barred all immigrants from the "Asiatic zone".
    Little, Becky (September 7, 2017). "The Birth of 'Illegal' Immigration". History. Archived from the original on March 14, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019. A decade later, the Asiatic Barred Zone Act banned most immigration from Asia, as well as immigration by prostitutes, polygamists, anarchists, and people with contagious diseases.
    1917 Congressional Record, Vol. 63, Page 876 (5 February 1917)
    Uma A. Segal (August 14, 2002). A Framework for Immigration: Asians in the United States. Columbia University Press. p. 134. ISBN 978-0-231-50633-5. Archived from the original on June 4, 2020. Retrieved March 15, 2019. Less than ten years later, Congress passed the Immigration Act of February 5, 1917 (commonly known as the Barred Zone Act), which enumerated the classes of people who were ineligible to enter the United States. Among them were those who were natives of a zone defined by latitude and longitude the geographic area identified became known as the Asiatic Barred Zone, and the act clearly became the Asiatic Barred Zone Act. Under the Asiatic Barred Zone Act, the only Asians allowed entry into the United States were Japanese and Filipinos.
    Sixty-Fourth Congress (February 5, 1917). "CHAP. 29. – An Act To regulate the immigration of aliens to, and the residence of aliens in, the United States" (PDF). Library of Congress. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 12, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019. unless otherwise provided for by existing treaties, persons who are natives of islands not possessed by the United States adjacent to the Content of Asia, situate south of the twentieth parallel latitude north, west of the one hundred and sixtieth meridian of longitude east of Greenwich, and north of the tenth parallel of latitude south, or who are natives of any country, province, or dependency situate on the Continent of Asia west of the one hundred and tenth meridian of longitude east from Greenwich and east of the fiftieth meridian of longitude east from Greenwich and south of the fiftieth parallel of latitude north, except that portion of said territory situate between the fiftieth and the sixty-fourth meridians of longitude east from Greenwich and the twenty-fourth and thirty-eighth parallels of latitude north, and no alien now in any way excluded from, or prevented from entering, the United States shall be admitted to the United States. Alt URL Archived May 8, 2019, at the Wayback Machine

macleans.ca

mamasmiles.com

mashable.com

medium.com

  • Lim, Woojin (January 21, 2021). "Jason Tom: Hawaii's Human Beatbox". The International Wave: A Collection of In-Depth Conversations With Artists of Asian Descent. Archived from the original on January 23, 2021. Retrieved January 23, 2021.

michigan.gov

migrationpolicy.org

millennialmagazine.com

modelminority.com

nationaljournal.com

nbcboston.com

nbcnews.com

nbcphiladelphia.com

ncsu.edu

www4.ncsu.edu

newamericaneconomy.org

research.newamericaneconomy.org

newsday.com

newyorker.com

nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

nlm.nih.gov

npr.org

nps.gov

nursingworld.org

nymag.com

nytimes.com

nyu.edu

steinhardt.nyu.edu

optimistdaily.com

osu.edu

asianamericanstudies.osu.edu

oxforddictionaries.com

oxfordre.com

education.oxfordre.com

oxfordre.com

pbs.org

pdx.edu

wc.pdx.edu

pewforum.org

pewhispanic.org

pewresearch.org

pewsocialtrends.org

  • Taylor, Paul; D'Vera Cohn; Wendy Wang; Jeffrey S. Passel; Rakesh Kochhar; Richard Fry; Kim Parker; Cary Funk; Gretchen M. Livingston; Eileen Patten; Seth Motel; Ana Gonzalez-Barrera (July 12, 2012). "The Rise of Asian Americans" (PDF). Pew Research Social & Demographic Trends. Pew Research Center. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 5, 2016. Retrieved January 28, 2013.

phillymag.com

pinnaclenews.com

prb.org

psmag.com

qz.com

realclearpolitics.com

researchgate.net

russellsage.org

  • Lee, Jennifer; Ramakrishnan, Karthick (October 14, 2019). "Who counts as Asian" (PDF). Russellsage.org. p. 4. Retrieved July 7, 2021.

sandiegohistory.org

sciencedaily.com

scpr.org

searac.org

seattlepi.com

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

senate.gov

sfgate.com

sikhtimes.com

slate.com

smithsonianmag.com

  • Rothman, Lily; Ronk, Liz (February 2, 2017). "Congress Tightened Immigration Laws 100 Years Ago. Here's Who They Turned Away". Time. Archived from the original on June 30, 2020. Retrieved March 14, 2019. Excluded from entry in 1917 were not only convicted criminals, chronic alcoholics and people with contagious diseases, but also people with epilepsy, anarchists, most people who couldn't read and almost everyone from Asia, as well as laborers who were "induced, assisted, encouraged, or solicited to migrate to this country by offers or promises of employment, whether such offers or promises are true or false" and "persons likely to become a public charge".
    Boissoneault, Lorraine (February 6, 2017). "Literacy Tests and Asian Exclusion Were the Hallmarks of the 1917 Immigration Act". Smithsonian. Archived from the original on March 19, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019. The act also levied an $8 tax on every adult immigrant (about $160 today) and barred all immigrants from the "Asiatic zone".
    Little, Becky (September 7, 2017). "The Birth of 'Illegal' Immigration". History. Archived from the original on March 14, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019. A decade later, the Asiatic Barred Zone Act banned most immigration from Asia, as well as immigration by prostitutes, polygamists, anarchists, and people with contagious diseases.
    1917 Congressional Record, Vol. 63, Page 876 (5 February 1917)
    Uma A. Segal (August 14, 2002). A Framework for Immigration: Asians in the United States. Columbia University Press. p. 134. ISBN 978-0-231-50633-5. Archived from the original on June 4, 2020. Retrieved March 15, 2019. Less than ten years later, Congress passed the Immigration Act of February 5, 1917 (commonly known as the Barred Zone Act), which enumerated the classes of people who were ineligible to enter the United States. Among them were those who were natives of a zone defined by latitude and longitude the geographic area identified became known as the Asiatic Barred Zone, and the act clearly became the Asiatic Barred Zone Act. Under the Asiatic Barred Zone Act, the only Asians allowed entry into the United States were Japanese and Filipinos.
    Sixty-Fourth Congress (February 5, 1917). "CHAP. 29. – An Act To regulate the immigration of aliens to, and the residence of aliens in, the United States" (PDF). Library of Congress. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 12, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019. unless otherwise provided for by existing treaties, persons who are natives of islands not possessed by the United States adjacent to the Content of Asia, situate south of the twentieth parallel latitude north, west of the one hundred and sixtieth meridian of longitude east of Greenwich, and north of the tenth parallel of latitude south, or who are natives of any country, province, or dependency situate on the Continent of Asia west of the one hundred and tenth meridian of longitude east from Greenwich and east of the fiftieth meridian of longitude east from Greenwich and south of the fiftieth parallel of latitude north, except that portion of said territory situate between the fiftieth and the sixty-fourth meridians of longitude east from Greenwich and the twenty-fourth and thirty-eighth parallels of latitude north, and no alien now in any way excluded from, or prevented from entering, the United States shall be admitted to the United States. Alt URL Archived May 8, 2019, at the Wayback Machine

ssrn.com

papers.ssrn.com

  • Chin, Gabriel J. (April 18, 2008). "The Civil Rights Revolution Comes to Immigration Law: A New Look at the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965". North Carolina Law Review. SSRN 1121504.

stanford.edu

aas.stanford.edu

fsi.stanford.edu

startribune.com

state.gov

travel.state.gov

stripes.com

theatlantic.com

thedailybeast.com

thehartfordguardian.com

time.com

  • Kambhampaty, Anna Purna (May 22, 2020). "In 1968, These Activists Coined the Term 'Asian American'—And Helped Shape Decades of Advocacy". Time. Archived from the original on June 1, 2020. Retrieved January 29, 2023.
  • Kambhampaty, Anna Purna (March 12, 2020). "At Census Time, Asian Americans Again Confront the Question of Who 'Counts' as Asian. Here's How the Answer Got So Complicated". Time. Retrieved July 9, 2021. But American culture tends not to think of all regions in Asia as equally Asian. A quick Google search of "Asian food nearby" is likely to call up Chinese or Japanese restaurants, but not Indian or Filipino. Years after someone posted a thread on College Confidential, a popular college admissions forum, titled "Do Indians count as Asians?" the SAT in 2016 tweaked its race categories, explaining to test-takers that "Asian" did include "Indian subcontinent and Philippines origin."
  • Rothman, Lily; Ronk, Liz (February 2, 2017). "Congress Tightened Immigration Laws 100 Years Ago. Here's Who They Turned Away". Time. Archived from the original on June 30, 2020. Retrieved March 14, 2019. Excluded from entry in 1917 were not only convicted criminals, chronic alcoholics and people with contagious diseases, but also people with epilepsy, anarchists, most people who couldn't read and almost everyone from Asia, as well as laborers who were "induced, assisted, encouraged, or solicited to migrate to this country by offers or promises of employment, whether such offers or promises are true or false" and "persons likely to become a public charge".
    Boissoneault, Lorraine (February 6, 2017). "Literacy Tests and Asian Exclusion Were the Hallmarks of the 1917 Immigration Act". Smithsonian. Archived from the original on March 19, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019. The act also levied an $8 tax on every adult immigrant (about $160 today) and barred all immigrants from the "Asiatic zone".
    Little, Becky (September 7, 2017). "The Birth of 'Illegal' Immigration". History. Archived from the original on March 14, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019. A decade later, the Asiatic Barred Zone Act banned most immigration from Asia, as well as immigration by prostitutes, polygamists, anarchists, and people with contagious diseases.
    1917 Congressional Record, Vol. 63, Page 876 (5 February 1917)
    Uma A. Segal (August 14, 2002). A Framework for Immigration: Asians in the United States. Columbia University Press. p. 134. ISBN 978-0-231-50633-5. Archived from the original on June 4, 2020. Retrieved March 15, 2019. Less than ten years later, Congress passed the Immigration Act of February 5, 1917 (commonly known as the Barred Zone Act), which enumerated the classes of people who were ineligible to enter the United States. Among them were those who were natives of a zone defined by latitude and longitude the geographic area identified became known as the Asiatic Barred Zone, and the act clearly became the Asiatic Barred Zone Act. Under the Asiatic Barred Zone Act, the only Asians allowed entry into the United States were Japanese and Filipinos.
    Sixty-Fourth Congress (February 5, 1917). "CHAP. 29. – An Act To regulate the immigration of aliens to, and the residence of aliens in, the United States" (PDF). Library of Congress. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 12, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019. unless otherwise provided for by existing treaties, persons who are natives of islands not possessed by the United States adjacent to the Content of Asia, situate south of the twentieth parallel latitude north, west of the one hundred and sixtieth meridian of longitude east of Greenwich, and north of the tenth parallel of latitude south, or who are natives of any country, province, or dependency situate on the Continent of Asia west of the one hundred and tenth meridian of longitude east from Greenwich and east of the fiftieth meridian of longitude east from Greenwich and south of the fiftieth parallel of latitude north, except that portion of said territory situate between the fiftieth and the sixty-fourth meridians of longitude east from Greenwich and the twenty-fourth and thirty-eighth parallels of latitude north, and no alien now in any way excluded from, or prevented from entering, the United States shall be admitted to the United States. Alt URL Archived May 8, 2019, at the Wayback Machine
  • Purna Kamphampaty, Anna; Lang, Cady (November 7, 2020). "The Historic Barriers Kamala Harris Overcame to Reach the Vice-Presidency". Time. Archived from the original on March 26, 2021. Retrieved November 9, 2020.
  • "Why More Policing Isn't the Answer to a Rise in Anti-Asian Hate Crimes". Time. February 18, 2021. Archived from the original on March 5, 2021. Retrieved March 6, 2021.

timesofisrael.com

ucr.edu

mfas.ucr.edu

ucsb.edu

presidency.ucsb.edu

uhalumni.org

  • "Hawai'i's Human Beatbox". University of Hawaiʻi Foundation Office of Alumni Relations. October 19, 2018. Archived from the original on January 31, 2021. Retrieved January 23, 2021.
  • Ching, Kapiʻolani (December 13, 2018). "Hawaiʻi's Human Beatbox". University of Hawaiʻi at Kapiʻolani Alumni. Archived from the original on January 30, 2021. Retrieved January 23, 2021.

uic.edu

umass.edu

umb.edu

faculty.umb.edu

umich.edu

sitemaker.umich.edu

unlv.edu

magazine.unlv.edu

upi.com

  • Sailer, Steve (July 11, 2002). "Feature: Who exactly is Asian American?". UPI. Los Angeles. Archived from the original on September 5, 2018. Retrieved September 4, 2018.
  • Sailer, Steve (July 11, 2002). "Feature: Who exactly is Asian American?". UPI. Los Angeles. Archived from the original on September 5, 2018. Retrieved September 20, 2020. It is a political term used by Asian-American activists and enhanced by governmental treatment. In terms of culture, physical characteristics, and pre-migrant historical experiences, I have argued, South and East Asians do not have commonalities and as a result, they do not maintain close ties in terms friendship, intermarriage or sharing neighborhoods
  • Sailer, Steve (July 11, 2002). "Feature: Who exactly is Asian American?". UPI. Los Angeles. Archived from the original on September 5, 2018. Retrieved July 8, 2021. Dinesh D'Souza ... told United Press International, "Middle Eastern culture has some similarities (religion, cuisine, taste in music and movies) with Asian Indian culture, but very few with Oriental (Far Eastern) culture."
  • Sailer, Steve (July 11, 2002). "Feature: Who exactly is Asian American?". UPI. Los Angeles. Archived from the original on September 5, 2018. Retrieved July 8, 2021. The most common justification advanced for federal government's clustering together South Asians and East Asians is that Buddhism originated in India.

usatoday.com

usatoday.com

usatoday30.usatoday.com

usc.edu

healthadministrationdegree.usc.edu

usdoj.gov

ojp.usdoj.gov

uwb.edu

library.uwb.edu

  • Rothman, Lily; Ronk, Liz (February 2, 2017). "Congress Tightened Immigration Laws 100 Years Ago. Here's Who They Turned Away". Time. Archived from the original on June 30, 2020. Retrieved March 14, 2019. Excluded from entry in 1917 were not only convicted criminals, chronic alcoholics and people with contagious diseases, but also people with epilepsy, anarchists, most people who couldn't read and almost everyone from Asia, as well as laborers who were "induced, assisted, encouraged, or solicited to migrate to this country by offers or promises of employment, whether such offers or promises are true or false" and "persons likely to become a public charge".
    Boissoneault, Lorraine (February 6, 2017). "Literacy Tests and Asian Exclusion Were the Hallmarks of the 1917 Immigration Act". Smithsonian. Archived from the original on March 19, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019. The act also levied an $8 tax on every adult immigrant (about $160 today) and barred all immigrants from the "Asiatic zone".
    Little, Becky (September 7, 2017). "The Birth of 'Illegal' Immigration". History. Archived from the original on March 14, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019. A decade later, the Asiatic Barred Zone Act banned most immigration from Asia, as well as immigration by prostitutes, polygamists, anarchists, and people with contagious diseases.
    1917 Congressional Record, Vol. 63, Page 876 (5 February 1917)
    Uma A. Segal (August 14, 2002). A Framework for Immigration: Asians in the United States. Columbia University Press. p. 134. ISBN 978-0-231-50633-5. Archived from the original on June 4, 2020. Retrieved March 15, 2019. Less than ten years later, Congress passed the Immigration Act of February 5, 1917 (commonly known as the Barred Zone Act), which enumerated the classes of people who were ineligible to enter the United States. Among them were those who were natives of a zone defined by latitude and longitude the geographic area identified became known as the Asiatic Barred Zone, and the act clearly became the Asiatic Barred Zone Act. Under the Asiatic Barred Zone Act, the only Asians allowed entry into the United States were Japanese and Filipinos.
    Sixty-Fourth Congress (February 5, 1917). "CHAP. 29. – An Act To regulate the immigration of aliens to, and the residence of aliens in, the United States" (PDF). Library of Congress. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 12, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019. unless otherwise provided for by existing treaties, persons who are natives of islands not possessed by the United States adjacent to the Content of Asia, situate south of the twentieth parallel latitude north, west of the one hundred and sixtieth meridian of longitude east of Greenwich, and north of the tenth parallel of latitude south, or who are natives of any country, province, or dependency situate on the Continent of Asia west of the one hundred and tenth meridian of longitude east from Greenwich and east of the fiftieth meridian of longitude east from Greenwich and south of the fiftieth parallel of latitude north, except that portion of said territory situate between the fiftieth and the sixty-fourth meridians of longitude east from Greenwich and the twenty-fourth and thirty-eighth parallels of latitude north, and no alien now in any way excluded from, or prevented from entering, the United States shall be admitted to the United States. Alt URL Archived May 8, 2019, at the Wayback Machine

voanews.com

voanews.com

m.voanews.com

vox.com

washingtonpost.com

way.net

web.archive.org

wikimedia.org

commons.wikimedia.org

  • Karen R. Humes; Nicholas A. Jones; Roberto R. Ramirez (March 2011). "Overview of Race and Hispanic Origin: 2010" (PDF). United States Census Bureau. United States Department of Commerce. Archived (PDF) from the original on September 3, 2014. Retrieved January 5, 2012.

wnyc.org

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

worldcat.org

wsj.com

blogs.wsj.com

wtop.com

  • David Crary (October 18, 2012). "Gallup study: 3.4 percent of US adults are LGBT". WTOP. Associated Press. Archived from the original on May 13, 2013. Retrieved October 23, 2012.
    Gary J. Gates; Frank Newport (October 18, 2012). "Special Report: 3.4% of U.S. Adults Identify as LGBT". Gallup. Retrieved March 17, 2017. Nonwhites are more likely than white segments of the U.S. population to identify as LGBT. The survey results show that 4.6% of African Americans identify as LGBT, along with 4.0% of Hispanics and 4.3% of Asians. The disproportionately higher representation of LGBT status among nonwhite population segments corresponds to the slightly below-average 3.2% of white Americans who identified as LGBT.

youtube.com