Asian Americans (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Asian Americans" in English language version.

Last modified:

Ref.Un. Ref.Website
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
3rd place
3rd place
18th place
18th place
2nd place
2nd place
1,516th place
983rd place
7th place
7th place
5th place
5th place
15th place
8th place
36th place
26th place
114th place
75th place
4th place
4th place
5,860th place
3,314th place
260th place
176th place
156th place
101st place
1,313th place
884th place
84th place
63rd place
377th place
206th place
55th place
36th place
7,958th place
5,122nd place
212th place
141st place
71st place
54th place
low place
low place
248th place
142nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
6th place
6th place
982nd place
614th place
554th place
368th place
35th place
24th place
low place
low place
379th place
278th place
665th place
615th place
3,785th place
2,343rd place
319th place
166th place
191st place
122nd place
94th place
66th place
8,389th place
5,581st place
109th place
87th place
13th place
14th place
322nd place
198th place
517th place
315th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
4,021st place
2,075th place
4,611th place
2,688th place
3,388th place
1,712th place
5,985th place
3,175th place
268th place
208th place
2,513th place
1,292nd place
32nd place
21st place
308th place
253rd place
621st place
429th place
194th place
182nd place
3,519th place
2,509th place
1,526th place
1,638th place
1,292nd place
869th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,139th place
623rd place
484th place
698th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
907th place
529th place
1,689th place
1,562nd place
low place
low place
1,521st place
1,017th place
6,212th place
3,934th place
low place
low place
2,360th place
1,459th place
3,436th place
2,060th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
96th place
89th place
low place
low place
144th place
3,076th place
2,653rd place
1,525th place
14th place
9th place
low place
9,462nd place
low place
low place
low place
6,436th place
low place
low place
5,347th place
2,742nd place
79th place
40th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
2,146th place
1,364th place
9,924th place
5,188th place
5,516th place
3,610th place
663rd place
431st place
852nd place
715th place
1,755th place
831st place
63rd place
47th place
low place
low place
low place
5,899th place
low place
low place
1,339th place
664th place
2,327th place
1,215th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
651st place
479th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
707th place
398th place
8,114th place
5,016th place
2,698th place
1,548th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,099th place
630th place
1,362nd place
822nd place
9,898th place
6,429th place
4,430th place
4,511th place
low place
low place
6,997th place
4,004th place
251st place
248th place
low place
low place
560th place
313th place
1,851st place
1,041st place
3,373rd place
1,898th place
3,696th place
2,398th place
low place
low place
429th place
307th place
5,916th place
3,029th place
228th place
204th place
31st place
19th place
low place
low place
6,028th place
3,334th place
1,062nd place
552nd place
low place
low place
low place
7,551st place
low place
low place
1,619th place
867th place
7,925th place
4,258th place
9,638th place
7,064th place
4,325th place
2,181st place
585th place
280th place
348th place
163rd place
588th place
292nd place
327th place
360th place
903rd place
457th place
low place
low place
5,840th place
3,136th place
697th place
420th place
26th place
23rd place
812th place
412th place
2,523rd place
1,676th place
low place
6,555th place
4,340th place
2,226th place
7,963rd place
4,643rd place
1,390th place
1,286th place
low place
8,852nd place
4,271st place
2,616th place
409th place
260th place
1,400th place
754th place
525th place
339th place
1,740th place
1,127th place
6,824th place
3,837th place
1,327th place
1,093rd place
1,399th place
772nd place
low place
low place
low place
7,222nd place
23rd place
15th place
1,051st place
654th place
1,432nd place
908th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
678th place
327th place

aaiusa.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

aarp.org (Global: 6,997th place; English: 4,004th place)

abc7news.com (Global: 5,840th place; English: 3,136th place)

adl.org (Global: 2,523rd place; English: 1,676th place)

adsabs.harvard.edu (Global: 14th place; English: 9th place)

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

ama-assn.org (Global: 4,430th place; English: 4,511th place)

americanprogress.org (Global: low place; English: 7,222nd place)

apa.org (Global: 1,327th place; English: 1,093rd place)

api-gbv.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

archive-it.org (Global: 1,292nd place; English: 869th place)

wayback.archive-it.org

archive.org (Global: 6th place; English: 6th place)

archives.gov (Global: 319th place; English: 166th place)

archives.gov

obamawhitehouse.archives.gov

asiamattersforamerica.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

asian-nation.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

asianamericanedu.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

asianjournal.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

asianpacificheritage.gov (Global: low place; English: low place)

asianweek.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

asiasociety.org (Global: 8,389th place; English: 5,581st place)

askoxford.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

axios.com (Global: 1,139th place; English: 623rd place)

baltimoresun.com (Global: 588th place; English: 292nd place)

articles.baltimoresun.com

baylor.edu (Global: low place; English: 5,899th place)

bbc.com (Global: 26th place; English: 23rd place)

berkeley.edu (Global: 621st place; English: 429th place)

sis.berkeley.edu

lib.berkeley.edu

blogdriver.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

faizhao.blogdriver.com

books.google.com (Global: 3rd place; English: 3rd place)

cbslocal.com (Global: 1,062nd place; English: 552nd place)

washington.cbslocal.com

  • "New Asian Immigrants To US Now Surpass Hispanics". CBSDC. June 19, 2012. Archived from the original on June 22, 2012. Retrieved June 19, 2012. While immigrants from Asia often obtain visas and arrive legally, many also sneak across the U.S. border or become undocumented residents after overstaying their visas.

cdc.gov (Global: 251st place; English: 248th place)

census.gov (Global: 18th place; English: 18th place)

census.gov

data.census.gov

quickfacts.census.gov

www2.census.gov

factfinder.census.gov

censusreporter.org (Global: 5,860th place; English: 3,314th place)

chosun.com (Global: 327th place; English: 360th place)

english.chosun.com

chronicle.com (Global: 3,373rd place; English: 1,898th place)

cnn.com (Global: 36th place; English: 26th place)

cnn.com

money.cnn.com

management.fortune.cnn.com

articles.cnn.com

edition.cnn.com

columbia.edu (Global: 554th place; English: 368th place)

academiccommons.columbia.edu

committee100.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

commons.wikimedia.org (Global: 484th place; English: 698th place)

  • Karen R. Humes; Nicholas A. Jones; Roberto R. Ramirez (March 2011). "Overview of Race and Hispanic Origin: 2010" (PDF). United States Census Bureau. United States Department of Commerce. Archived (PDF) from the original on September 3, 2014. Retrieved January 5, 2012.

cornell.edu (Global: 308th place; English: 253rd place)

aasp.cornell.edu

ropercenter.cornell.edu

crainsnewyork.com (Global: 5,916th place; English: 3,029th place)

mycrains.crainsnewyork.com

csmonitor.com (Global: 982nd place; English: 614th place)

dailybulletin.com (Global: low place; English: 7,551st place)

dallasnews.com (Global: 903rd place; English: 457th place)

danvillesanramon.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

dhs.gov (Global: 4,611th place; English: 2,688th place)

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; English: 2nd place)

doi.org

dx.doi.org

duke.edu (Global: 1,851st place; English: 1,041st place)

public.econ.duke.edu

eac.gov (Global: low place; English: low place)

fastcompany.com (Global: 1,399th place; English: 772nd place)

federalregister.gov (Global: 2,513th place; English: 1,292nd place)

ferris.edu (Global: low place; English: low place)

forbes.com (Global: 71st place; English: 54th place)

fullerton.edu (Global: low place; English: low place)

hss.fullerton.edu

fusion.net (Global: low place; English: low place)

gallup.com (Global: 3,519th place; English: 2,509th place)

gallup.com

  • David Crary (October 18, 2012). "Gallup study: 3.4 percent of US adults are LGBT". WTOP. Associated Press. Archived from the original on May 13, 2013. Retrieved October 23, 2012.
    Gary J. Gates; Frank Newport (October 18, 2012). "Special Report: 3.4% of U.S. Adults Identify as LGBT". Gallup. Retrieved March 17, 2017. Nonwhites are more likely than white segments of the U.S. population to identify as LGBT. The survey results show that 4.6% of African Americans identify as LGBT, along with 4.0% of Hispanics and 4.3% of Asians. The disproportionately higher representation of LGBT status among nonwhite population segments corresponds to the slightly below-average 3.2% of white Americans who identified as LGBT.

news.gallup.com

gmanetwork.com (Global: 585th place; English: 280th place)

goldsea.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

google.com (Global: 109th place; English: 87th place)

googleusercontent.com (Global: 144th place; English: 3,076th place)

scholar.googleusercontent.com

govinfo.gov (Global: 1,755th place; English: 831st place)

  • Rothman, Lily; Ronk, Liz (February 2, 2017). "Congress Tightened Immigration Laws 100 Years Ago. Here's Who They Turned Away". Time. Archived from the original on June 30, 2020. Retrieved March 14, 2019. Excluded from entry in 1917 were not only convicted criminals, chronic alcoholics and people with contagious diseases, but also people with epilepsy, anarchists, most people who couldn't read and almost everyone from Asia, as well as laborers who were "induced, assisted, encouraged, or solicited to migrate to this country by offers or promises of employment, whether such offers or promises are true or false" and "persons likely to become a public charge".
    Boissoneault, Lorraine (February 6, 2017). "Literacy Tests and Asian Exclusion Were the Hallmarks of the 1917 Immigration Act". Smithsonian. Archived from the original on March 19, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019. The act also levied an $8 tax on every adult immigrant (about $160 today) and barred all immigrants from the "Asiatic zone".
    Little, Becky (September 7, 2017). "The Birth of 'Illegal' Immigration". History. Archived from the original on March 14, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019. A decade later, the Asiatic Barred Zone Act banned most immigration from Asia, as well as immigration by prostitutes, polygamists, anarchists, and people with contagious diseases.
    1917 Congressional Record, Vol. 63, Page 876 (5 February 1917)
    Uma A. Segal (August 14, 2002). A Framework for Immigration: Asians in the United States. Columbia University Press. p. 134. ISBN 978-0-231-50633-5. Archived from the original on June 4, 2020. Retrieved March 15, 2019. Less than ten years later, Congress passed the Immigration Act of February 5, 1917 (commonly known as the Barred Zone Act), which enumerated the classes of people who were ineligible to enter the United States. Among them were those who were natives of a zone defined by latitude and longitude the geographic area identified became known as the Asiatic Barred Zone, and the act clearly became the Asiatic Barred Zone Act. Under the Asiatic Barred Zone Act, the only Asians allowed entry into the United States were Japanese and Filipinos.
    Sixty-Fourth Congress (February 5, 1917). "CHAP. 29. – An Act To regulate the immigration of aliens to, and the residence of aliens in, the United States" (PDF). Library of Congress. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 12, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019. unless otherwise provided for by existing treaties, persons who are natives of islands not possessed by the United States adjacent to the Content of Asia, situate south of the twentieth parallel latitude north, west of the one hundred and sixtieth meridian of longitude east of Greenwich, and north of the tenth parallel of latitude south, or who are natives of any country, province, or dependency situate on the Continent of Asia west of the one hundred and tenth meridian of longitude east from Greenwich and east of the fiftieth meridian of longitude east from Greenwich and south of the fiftieth parallel of latitude north, except that portion of said territory situate between the fiftieth and the sixty-fourth meridians of longitude east from Greenwich and the twenty-fourth and thirty-eighth parallels of latitude north, and no alien now in any way excluded from, or prevented from entering, the United States shall be admitted to the United States. Alt URL Archived May 8, 2019, at the Wayback Machine

h-net.org (Global: 5,516th place; English: 3,610th place)

haaretz.com (Global: 379th place; English: 278th place)

hawaii.edu (Global: 1,313th place; English: 884th place)

opmanong.ssc.hawaii.edu

hawaii.edu

evols.library.manoa.hawaii.edu

manoa.hawaii.edu

history.com (Global: 852nd place; English: 715th place)

  • Rothman, Lily; Ronk, Liz (February 2, 2017). "Congress Tightened Immigration Laws 100 Years Ago. Here's Who They Turned Away". Time. Archived from the original on June 30, 2020. Retrieved March 14, 2019. Excluded from entry in 1917 were not only convicted criminals, chronic alcoholics and people with contagious diseases, but also people with epilepsy, anarchists, most people who couldn't read and almost everyone from Asia, as well as laborers who were "induced, assisted, encouraged, or solicited to migrate to this country by offers or promises of employment, whether such offers or promises are true or false" and "persons likely to become a public charge".
    Boissoneault, Lorraine (February 6, 2017). "Literacy Tests and Asian Exclusion Were the Hallmarks of the 1917 Immigration Act". Smithsonian. Archived from the original on March 19, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019. The act also levied an $8 tax on every adult immigrant (about $160 today) and barred all immigrants from the "Asiatic zone".
    Little, Becky (September 7, 2017). "The Birth of 'Illegal' Immigration". History. Archived from the original on March 14, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019. A decade later, the Asiatic Barred Zone Act banned most immigration from Asia, as well as immigration by prostitutes, polygamists, anarchists, and people with contagious diseases.
    1917 Congressional Record, Vol. 63, Page 876 (5 February 1917)
    Uma A. Segal (August 14, 2002). A Framework for Immigration: Asians in the United States. Columbia University Press. p. 134. ISBN 978-0-231-50633-5. Archived from the original on June 4, 2020. Retrieved March 15, 2019. Less than ten years later, Congress passed the Immigration Act of February 5, 1917 (commonly known as the Barred Zone Act), which enumerated the classes of people who were ineligible to enter the United States. Among them were those who were natives of a zone defined by latitude and longitude the geographic area identified became known as the Asiatic Barred Zone, and the act clearly became the Asiatic Barred Zone Act. Under the Asiatic Barred Zone Act, the only Asians allowed entry into the United States were Japanese and Filipinos.
    Sixty-Fourth Congress (February 5, 1917). "CHAP. 29. – An Act To regulate the immigration of aliens to, and the residence of aliens in, the United States" (PDF). Library of Congress. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 12, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019. unless otherwise provided for by existing treaties, persons who are natives of islands not possessed by the United States adjacent to the Content of Asia, situate south of the twentieth parallel latitude north, west of the one hundred and sixtieth meridian of longitude east of Greenwich, and north of the tenth parallel of latitude south, or who are natives of any country, province, or dependency situate on the Continent of Asia west of the one hundred and tenth meridian of longitude east from Greenwich and east of the fiftieth meridian of longitude east from Greenwich and south of the fiftieth parallel of latitude north, except that portion of said territory situate between the fiftieth and the sixty-fourth meridians of longitude east from Greenwich and the twenty-fourth and thirty-eighth parallels of latitude north, and no alien now in any way excluded from, or prevented from entering, the United States shall be admitted to the United States. Alt URL Archived May 8, 2019, at the Wayback Machine

hkspublications.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

aapr.hkspublications.org

hsph.harvard.edu (Global: 9,638th place; English: 7,064th place)

huffingtonpost.com (Global: 212th place; English: 141st place)

hyphenmagazine.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

ide.go.jp (Global: low place; English: low place)

ir.ide.go.jp

imdiversity.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

inconvenientminority.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

indiacurrents.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

indiatimes.com (Global: 31st place; English: 19th place)

economictimes.indiatimes.com

inquirer.net (Global: 348th place; English: 163rd place)

usa.inquirer.net

insidehighered.com (Global: 4,021st place; English: 2,075th place)

ipums.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

usa.ipums.org

ipums.org

jhu.edu (Global: 560th place; English: 313th place)

education.jhu.edu

jstor.org (Global: 23rd place; English: 15th place)

kapionews.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

kqed.org (Global: 4,325th place; English: 2,181st place)

latimes.com (Global: 32nd place; English: 21st place)

  • K. Connie Kang (September 7, 2002). "Yuji Ichioka, 66; Led Way in Studying Lives of Asian Americans". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on March 14, 2014. Retrieved May 4, 2013. Yet Ichioka created the first inter-ethnic pan-Asian American political group. And he coined the term "Asian American" to frame a new self-defining political lexicon. Before that, people of Asian ancestry were generally called Oriental or Asiatic.

loc.gov (Global: 63rd place; English: 47th place)

  • Rothman, Lily; Ronk, Liz (February 2, 2017). "Congress Tightened Immigration Laws 100 Years Ago. Here's Who They Turned Away". Time. Archived from the original on June 30, 2020. Retrieved March 14, 2019. Excluded from entry in 1917 were not only convicted criminals, chronic alcoholics and people with contagious diseases, but also people with epilepsy, anarchists, most people who couldn't read and almost everyone from Asia, as well as laborers who were "induced, assisted, encouraged, or solicited to migrate to this country by offers or promises of employment, whether such offers or promises are true or false" and "persons likely to become a public charge".
    Boissoneault, Lorraine (February 6, 2017). "Literacy Tests and Asian Exclusion Were the Hallmarks of the 1917 Immigration Act". Smithsonian. Archived from the original on March 19, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019. The act also levied an $8 tax on every adult immigrant (about $160 today) and barred all immigrants from the "Asiatic zone".
    Little, Becky (September 7, 2017). "The Birth of 'Illegal' Immigration". History. Archived from the original on March 14, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019. A decade later, the Asiatic Barred Zone Act banned most immigration from Asia, as well as immigration by prostitutes, polygamists, anarchists, and people with contagious diseases.
    1917 Congressional Record, Vol. 63, Page 876 (5 February 1917)
    Uma A. Segal (August 14, 2002). A Framework for Immigration: Asians in the United States. Columbia University Press. p. 134. ISBN 978-0-231-50633-5. Archived from the original on June 4, 2020. Retrieved March 15, 2019. Less than ten years later, Congress passed the Immigration Act of February 5, 1917 (commonly known as the Barred Zone Act), which enumerated the classes of people who were ineligible to enter the United States. Among them were those who were natives of a zone defined by latitude and longitude the geographic area identified became known as the Asiatic Barred Zone, and the act clearly became the Asiatic Barred Zone Act. Under the Asiatic Barred Zone Act, the only Asians allowed entry into the United States were Japanese and Filipinos.
    Sixty-Fourth Congress (February 5, 1917). "CHAP. 29. – An Act To regulate the immigration of aliens to, and the residence of aliens in, the United States" (PDF). Library of Congress. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 12, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019. unless otherwise provided for by existing treaties, persons who are natives of islands not possessed by the United States adjacent to the Content of Asia, situate south of the twentieth parallel latitude north, west of the one hundred and sixtieth meridian of longitude east of Greenwich, and north of the tenth parallel of latitude south, or who are natives of any country, province, or dependency situate on the Continent of Asia west of the one hundred and tenth meridian of longitude east from Greenwich and east of the fiftieth meridian of longitude east from Greenwich and south of the fiftieth parallel of latitude north, except that portion of said territory situate between the fiftieth and the sixty-fourth meridians of longitude east from Greenwich and the twenty-fourth and thirty-eighth parallels of latitude north, and no alien now in any way excluded from, or prevented from entering, the United States shall be admitted to the United States. Alt URL Archived May 8, 2019, at the Wayback Machine

macleans.ca (Global: 2,327th place; English: 1,215th place)

mamasmiles.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

mashable.com (Global: 1,051st place; English: 654th place)

medium.com (Global: 651st place; English: 479th place)

  • Lim, Woojin (January 21, 2021). "Jason Tom: Hawaii's Human Beatbox". The International Wave: A Collection of In-Depth Conversations With Artists of Asian Descent. Archived from the original on January 23, 2021. Retrieved January 23, 2021.

medlineplus.gov (Global: 1,521st place; English: 1,017th place)

michigan.gov (Global: 4,340th place; English: 2,226th place)

migrationpolicy.org (Global: 7,958th place; English: 5,122nd place)

millennialmagazine.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

modelminority.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

nationaljournal.com (Global: 6,824th place; English: 3,837th place)

nbcboston.com (Global: low place; English: 6,555th place)

nbcnews.com (Global: 156th place; English: 101st place)

nbcphiladelphia.com (Global: 7,925th place; English: 4,258th place)

ncsu.edu (Global: 2,653rd place; English: 1,525th place)

www4.ncsu.edu

newamericaneconomy.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

research.newamericaneconomy.org

news.harvard.edu (Global: 3,696th place; English: 2,398th place)

newsday.com (Global: 1,339th place; English: 664th place)

newyorker.com (Global: 191st place; English: 122nd place)

nih.gov (Global: 5th place; English: 5th place)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

npr.org (Global: 114th place; English: 75th place)

nps.gov (Global: 79th place; English: 40th place)

nursingworld.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

nymag.com (Global: 525th place; English: 339th place)

nytimes.com (Global: 7th place; English: 7th place)

nyu.edu (Global: 1,362nd place; English: 822nd place)

steinhardt.nyu.edu

optimistdaily.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

osu.edu (Global: 2,360th place; English: 1,459th place)

asianamericanstudies.osu.edu

oxforddictionaries.com (Global: 1,689th place; English: 1,562nd place)

oxfordre.com (Global: 3,785th place; English: 2,343rd place)

education.oxfordre.com

oxfordre.com

pbs.org (Global: 260th place; English: 176th place)

pdx.edu (Global: 8,114th place; English: 5,016th place)

wc.pdx.edu

perspy.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

  • Chen, Thomas (February 26, 2009). "WHY ASIAN AMERICANS VOTED FOR OBAMA". Perspective. Archived from the original on August 26, 2014. Retrieved March 4, 2013. A survey of Filipino Americans in California—the second largest Asian American ethnic group and traditionally Republican voters

pewforum.org (Global: 1,526th place; English: 1,638th place)

pewhispanic.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

pewresearch.org (Global: 1,516th place; English: 983rd place)

pewsocialtrends.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

  • Taylor, Paul; D'Vera Cohn; Wendy Wang; Jeffrey S. Passel; Rakesh Kochhar; Richard Fry; Kim Parker; Cary Funk; Gretchen M. Livingston; Eileen Patten; Seth Motel; Ana Gonzalez-Barrera (July 12, 2012). "The Rise of Asian Americans" (PDF). Pew Research Social & Demographic Trends. Pew Research Center. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 5, 2016. Retrieved January 28, 2013.

phillymag.com (Global: 5,985th place; English: 3,175th place)

pinnaclenews.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

prb.org (Global: low place; English: 9,462nd place)

psmag.com (Global: 9,898th place; English: 6,429th place)

qz.com (Global: 1,740th place; English: 1,127th place)

rappler.com (Global: 678th place; English: 327th place)

realclearpolitics.com (Global: 3,388th place; English: 1,712th place)

researchgate.net (Global: 96th place; English: 89th place)

russellsage.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

  • Lee, Jennifer; Ramakrishnan, Karthick (October 14, 2019). "Who counts as Asian" (PDF). Russellsage.org. p. 4. Retrieved July 7, 2021.

sandiegohistory.org (Global: 9,924th place; English: 5,188th place)

sciencedaily.com (Global: 1,390th place; English: 1,286th place)

scpr.org (Global: low place; English: 6,436th place)

searac.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

seattlepi.com (Global: 1,619th place; English: 867th place)

semanticscholar.org (Global: 15th place; English: 8th place)

api.semanticscholar.org

senate.gov (Global: 707th place; English: 398th place)

sfgate.com (Global: 248th place; English: 142nd place)

sikhtimes.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

slate.com (Global: 409th place; English: 260th place)

smithsonianmag.com (Global: 663rd place; English: 431st place)

  • Rothman, Lily; Ronk, Liz (February 2, 2017). "Congress Tightened Immigration Laws 100 Years Ago. Here's Who They Turned Away". Time. Archived from the original on June 30, 2020. Retrieved March 14, 2019. Excluded from entry in 1917 were not only convicted criminals, chronic alcoholics and people with contagious diseases, but also people with epilepsy, anarchists, most people who couldn't read and almost everyone from Asia, as well as laborers who were "induced, assisted, encouraged, or solicited to migrate to this country by offers or promises of employment, whether such offers or promises are true or false" and "persons likely to become a public charge".
    Boissoneault, Lorraine (February 6, 2017). "Literacy Tests and Asian Exclusion Were the Hallmarks of the 1917 Immigration Act". Smithsonian. Archived from the original on March 19, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019. The act also levied an $8 tax on every adult immigrant (about $160 today) and barred all immigrants from the "Asiatic zone".
    Little, Becky (September 7, 2017). "The Birth of 'Illegal' Immigration". History. Archived from the original on March 14, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019. A decade later, the Asiatic Barred Zone Act banned most immigration from Asia, as well as immigration by prostitutes, polygamists, anarchists, and people with contagious diseases.
    1917 Congressional Record, Vol. 63, Page 876 (5 February 1917)
    Uma A. Segal (August 14, 2002). A Framework for Immigration: Asians in the United States. Columbia University Press. p. 134. ISBN 978-0-231-50633-5. Archived from the original on June 4, 2020. Retrieved March 15, 2019. Less than ten years later, Congress passed the Immigration Act of February 5, 1917 (commonly known as the Barred Zone Act), which enumerated the classes of people who were ineligible to enter the United States. Among them were those who were natives of a zone defined by latitude and longitude the geographic area identified became known as the Asiatic Barred Zone, and the act clearly became the Asiatic Barred Zone Act. Under the Asiatic Barred Zone Act, the only Asians allowed entry into the United States were Japanese and Filipinos.
    Sixty-Fourth Congress (February 5, 1917). "CHAP. 29. – An Act To regulate the immigration of aliens to, and the residence of aliens in, the United States" (PDF). Library of Congress. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 12, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019. unless otherwise provided for by existing treaties, persons who are natives of islands not possessed by the United States adjacent to the Content of Asia, situate south of the twentieth parallel latitude north, west of the one hundred and sixtieth meridian of longitude east of Greenwich, and north of the tenth parallel of latitude south, or who are natives of any country, province, or dependency situate on the Continent of Asia west of the one hundred and tenth meridian of longitude east from Greenwich and east of the fiftieth meridian of longitude east from Greenwich and south of the fiftieth parallel of latitude north, except that portion of said territory situate between the fiftieth and the sixty-fourth meridians of longitude east from Greenwich and the twenty-fourth and thirty-eighth parallels of latitude north, and no alien now in any way excluded from, or prevented from entering, the United States shall be admitted to the United States. Alt URL Archived May 8, 2019, at the Wayback Machine

ssrn.com (Global: 907th place; English: 529th place)

papers.ssrn.com

  • Chin, Gabriel J. (April 18, 2008). "The Civil Rights Revolution Comes to Immigration Law: A New Look at the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965". North Carolina Law Review. SSRN 1121504.

stanford.edu (Global: 194th place; English: 182nd place)

aas.stanford.edu

fsi.stanford.edu

startribune.com (Global: 812th place; English: 412th place)

state.gov (Global: 228th place; English: 204th place)

travel.state.gov

stripes.com (Global: 2,698th place; English: 1,548th place)

theatlantic.com (Global: 322nd place; English: 198th place)

thedailybeast.com (Global: 517th place; English: 315th place)

thehartfordguardian.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

time.com (Global: 84th place; English: 63rd place)

  • Kambhampaty, Anna Purna (May 22, 2020). "In 1968, These Activists Coined the Term 'Asian American'—And Helped Shape Decades of Advocacy". Time. Archived from the original on June 1, 2020. Retrieved January 29, 2023.
  • Kambhampaty, Anna Purna (March 12, 2020). "At Census Time, Asian Americans Again Confront the Question of Who 'Counts' as Asian. Here's How the Answer Got So Complicated". Time. Retrieved July 9, 2021. But American culture tends not to think of all regions in Asia as equally Asian. A quick Google search of "Asian food nearby" is likely to call up Chinese or Japanese restaurants, but not Indian or Filipino. Years after someone posted a thread on College Confidential, a popular college admissions forum, titled "Do Indians count as Asians?" the SAT in 2016 tweaked its race categories, explaining to test-takers that "Asian" did include "Indian subcontinent and Philippines origin."
  • Rothman, Lily; Ronk, Liz (February 2, 2017). "Congress Tightened Immigration Laws 100 Years Ago. Here's Who They Turned Away". Time. Archived from the original on June 30, 2020. Retrieved March 14, 2019. Excluded from entry in 1917 were not only convicted criminals, chronic alcoholics and people with contagious diseases, but also people with epilepsy, anarchists, most people who couldn't read and almost everyone from Asia, as well as laborers who were "induced, assisted, encouraged, or solicited to migrate to this country by offers or promises of employment, whether such offers or promises are true or false" and "persons likely to become a public charge".
    Boissoneault, Lorraine (February 6, 2017). "Literacy Tests and Asian Exclusion Were the Hallmarks of the 1917 Immigration Act". Smithsonian. Archived from the original on March 19, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019. The act also levied an $8 tax on every adult immigrant (about $160 today) and barred all immigrants from the "Asiatic zone".
    Little, Becky (September 7, 2017). "The Birth of 'Illegal' Immigration". History. Archived from the original on March 14, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019. A decade later, the Asiatic Barred Zone Act banned most immigration from Asia, as well as immigration by prostitutes, polygamists, anarchists, and people with contagious diseases.
    1917 Congressional Record, Vol. 63, Page 876 (5 February 1917)
    Uma A. Segal (August 14, 2002). A Framework for Immigration: Asians in the United States. Columbia University Press. p. 134. ISBN 978-0-231-50633-5. Archived from the original on June 4, 2020. Retrieved March 15, 2019. Less than ten years later, Congress passed the Immigration Act of February 5, 1917 (commonly known as the Barred Zone Act), which enumerated the classes of people who were ineligible to enter the United States. Among them were those who were natives of a zone defined by latitude and longitude the geographic area identified became known as the Asiatic Barred Zone, and the act clearly became the Asiatic Barred Zone Act. Under the Asiatic Barred Zone Act, the only Asians allowed entry into the United States were Japanese and Filipinos.
    Sixty-Fourth Congress (February 5, 1917). "CHAP. 29. – An Act To regulate the immigration of aliens to, and the residence of aliens in, the United States" (PDF). Library of Congress. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 12, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019. unless otherwise provided for by existing treaties, persons who are natives of islands not possessed by the United States adjacent to the Content of Asia, situate south of the twentieth parallel latitude north, west of the one hundred and sixtieth meridian of longitude east of Greenwich, and north of the tenth parallel of latitude south, or who are natives of any country, province, or dependency situate on the Continent of Asia west of the one hundred and tenth meridian of longitude east from Greenwich and east of the fiftieth meridian of longitude east from Greenwich and south of the fiftieth parallel of latitude north, except that portion of said territory situate between the fiftieth and the sixty-fourth meridians of longitude east from Greenwich and the twenty-fourth and thirty-eighth parallels of latitude north, and no alien now in any way excluded from, or prevented from entering, the United States shall be admitted to the United States. Alt URL Archived May 8, 2019, at the Wayback Machine
  • Purna Kamphampaty, Anna; Lang, Cady (November 7, 2020). "The Historic Barriers Kamala Harris Overcame to Reach the Vice-Presidency". Time. Archived from the original on March 26, 2021. Retrieved November 9, 2020.
  • "Why More Policing Isn't the Answer to a Rise in Anti-Asian Hate Crimes". Time. February 18, 2021. Archived from the original on March 5, 2021. Retrieved March 6, 2021.

timesofisrael.com (Global: 268th place; English: 208th place)

ucr.edu (Global: 1,400th place; English: 754th place)

mfas.ucr.edu

ucsb.edu (Global: 1,099th place; English: 630th place)

presidency.ucsb.edu

ucsd.edu (Global: 2,146th place; English: 1,364th place)

library.ucsd.edu

uhalumni.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

  • "Hawai'i's Human Beatbox". University of Hawaiʻi Foundation Office of Alumni Relations. October 19, 2018. Archived from the original on January 31, 2021. Retrieved January 23, 2021.
  • Ching, Kapiʻolani (December 13, 2018). "Hawaiʻi's Human Beatbox". University of Hawaiʻi at Kapiʻolani Alumni. Archived from the original on January 30, 2021. Retrieved January 23, 2021.

uic.edu (Global: 6,212th place; English: 3,934th place)

umass.edu (Global: 3,436th place; English: 2,060th place)

umb.edu (Global: low place; English: 8,852nd place)

faculty.umb.edu

umich.edu (Global: 429th place; English: 307th place)

sitemaker.umich.edu

unlv.edu (Global: 7,963rd place; English: 4,643rd place)

magazine.unlv.edu

upi.com (Global: 377th place; English: 206th place)

  • Sailer, Steve (July 11, 2002). "Feature: Who exactly is Asian American?". UPI. Los Angeles. Archived from the original on September 5, 2018. Retrieved September 4, 2018.
  • Sailer, Steve (July 11, 2002). "Feature: Who exactly is Asian American?". UPI. Los Angeles. Archived from the original on September 5, 2018. Retrieved September 20, 2020. It is a political term used by Asian-American activists and enhanced by governmental treatment. In terms of culture, physical characteristics, and pre-migrant historical experiences, I have argued, South and East Asians do not have commonalities and as a result, they do not maintain close ties in terms friendship, intermarriage or sharing neighborhoods
  • Sailer, Steve (July 11, 2002). "Feature: Who exactly is Asian American?". UPI. Los Angeles. Archived from the original on September 5, 2018. Retrieved July 8, 2021. Dinesh D'Souza ... told United Press International, "Middle Eastern culture has some similarities (religion, cuisine, taste in music and movies) with Asian Indian culture, but very few with Oriental (Far Eastern) culture."
  • Sailer, Steve (July 11, 2002). "Feature: Who exactly is Asian American?". UPI. Los Angeles. Archived from the original on September 5, 2018. Retrieved July 8, 2021. The most common justification advanced for federal government's clustering together South Asians and East Asians is that Buddhism originated in India.

usatoday.com (Global: 55th place; English: 36th place)

usatoday.com

usatoday30.usatoday.com

usc.edu (Global: 1,432nd place; English: 908th place)

healthadministrationdegree.usc.edu

usdoj.gov (Global: 4,271st place; English: 2,616th place)

ojp.usdoj.gov

uwb.edu (Global: low place; English: low place)

library.uwb.edu

  • Rothman, Lily; Ronk, Liz (February 2, 2017). "Congress Tightened Immigration Laws 100 Years Ago. Here's Who They Turned Away". Time. Archived from the original on June 30, 2020. Retrieved March 14, 2019. Excluded from entry in 1917 were not only convicted criminals, chronic alcoholics and people with contagious diseases, but also people with epilepsy, anarchists, most people who couldn't read and almost everyone from Asia, as well as laborers who were "induced, assisted, encouraged, or solicited to migrate to this country by offers or promises of employment, whether such offers or promises are true or false" and "persons likely to become a public charge".
    Boissoneault, Lorraine (February 6, 2017). "Literacy Tests and Asian Exclusion Were the Hallmarks of the 1917 Immigration Act". Smithsonian. Archived from the original on March 19, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019. The act also levied an $8 tax on every adult immigrant (about $160 today) and barred all immigrants from the "Asiatic zone".
    Little, Becky (September 7, 2017). "The Birth of 'Illegal' Immigration". History. Archived from the original on March 14, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019. A decade later, the Asiatic Barred Zone Act banned most immigration from Asia, as well as immigration by prostitutes, polygamists, anarchists, and people with contagious diseases.
    1917 Congressional Record, Vol. 63, Page 876 (5 February 1917)
    Uma A. Segal (August 14, 2002). A Framework for Immigration: Asians in the United States. Columbia University Press. p. 134. ISBN 978-0-231-50633-5. Archived from the original on June 4, 2020. Retrieved March 15, 2019. Less than ten years later, Congress passed the Immigration Act of February 5, 1917 (commonly known as the Barred Zone Act), which enumerated the classes of people who were ineligible to enter the United States. Among them were those who were natives of a zone defined by latitude and longitude the geographic area identified became known as the Asiatic Barred Zone, and the act clearly became the Asiatic Barred Zone Act. Under the Asiatic Barred Zone Act, the only Asians allowed entry into the United States were Japanese and Filipinos.
    Sixty-Fourth Congress (February 5, 1917). "CHAP. 29. – An Act To regulate the immigration of aliens to, and the residence of aliens in, the United States" (PDF). Library of Congress. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 12, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019. unless otherwise provided for by existing treaties, persons who are natives of islands not possessed by the United States adjacent to the Content of Asia, situate south of the twentieth parallel latitude north, west of the one hundred and sixtieth meridian of longitude east of Greenwich, and north of the tenth parallel of latitude south, or who are natives of any country, province, or dependency situate on the Continent of Asia west of the one hundred and tenth meridian of longitude east from Greenwich and east of the fiftieth meridian of longitude east from Greenwich and south of the fiftieth parallel of latitude north, except that portion of said territory situate between the fiftieth and the sixty-fourth meridians of longitude east from Greenwich and the twenty-fourth and thirty-eighth parallels of latitude north, and no alien now in any way excluded from, or prevented from entering, the United States shall be admitted to the United States. Alt URL Archived May 8, 2019, at the Wayback Machine

voanews.com (Global: 665th place; English: 615th place)

voanews.com

m.voanews.com

vox.com (Global: 697th place; English: 420th place)

washingtonpost.com (Global: 35th place; English: 24th place)

way.net (Global: low place; English: low place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; English: 1st place)

wnyc.org (Global: 6,028th place; English: 3,334th place)

worldcat.org (Global: 4th place; English: 4th place)

search.worldcat.org

wsj.com (Global: 94th place; English: 66th place)

blogs.wsj.com

wtop.com (Global: 5,347th place; English: 2,742nd place)

  • David Crary (October 18, 2012). "Gallup study: 3.4 percent of US adults are LGBT". WTOP. Associated Press. Archived from the original on May 13, 2013. Retrieved October 23, 2012.
    Gary J. Gates; Frank Newport (October 18, 2012). "Special Report: 3.4% of U.S. Adults Identify as LGBT". Gallup. Retrieved March 17, 2017. Nonwhites are more likely than white segments of the U.S. population to identify as LGBT. The survey results show that 4.6% of African Americans identify as LGBT, along with 4.0% of Hispanics and 4.3% of Asians. The disproportionately higher representation of LGBT status among nonwhite population segments corresponds to the slightly below-average 3.2% of white Americans who identified as LGBT.

youtube.com (Global: 13th place; English: 14th place)