Birthright citizenship in the United States (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Birthright citizenship in the United States" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
3rd place
3rd place
70th place
63rd place
5th place
5th place
332nd place
246th place
696th place
428th place
264th place
249th place
6th place
6th place
low place
5,885th place
1,697th place
1,040th place
34th place
27th place
14th place
14th place
3,322nd place
1,897th place
2nd place
2nd place
6,211th place
3,772nd place
8,209th place
5,379th place
5,477th place
3,008th place
79th place
65th place
1,418th place
966th place
28th place
26th place
7,309th place
5,071st place
4,010th place
2,209th place
4,146th place
2,310th place
low place
low place
230th place
214th place
2,755th place
1,753rd place
low place
low place
4,363rd place
2,801st place
809th place
536th place
low place
9,533rd place
4,244th place
2,773rd place
low place
low place
198th place
154th place
low place
low place
529th place
314th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
2,852nd place
1,508th place
179th place
183rd place
26th place
20th place
446th place
308th place
low place
6,881st place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,998th place
1,116th place
5,165th place
3,393rd place
low place
low place
7,075th place
4,103rd place
low place
low place
9,578th place
5,378th place
5,025th place
2,711th place
6,607th place
3,855th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
102nd place
76th place
low place
low place
7th place
7th place
599th place
369th place
1,215th place
726th place
9th place
13th place
32nd place
21st place
9,650th place
5,449th place
1,029th place
657th place
low place
low place
2,003rd place
1,161st place
low place
low place
814th place
493rd place
low place
low place
269th place
201st place
1,303rd place
808th place
41st place
34th place
484th place
323rd place
312th place
197th place
8,598th place
4,874th place

14th-amendment.com

alexanderstreet.com

documents.alexanderstreet.com

americanlaw.com

archive.org

archive.today

archives.gov

azcentral.com

binghamton.edu

aadha.binghamton.edu

books.google.com

canlii.org

case.law

cite.case.law

casetext.com

chapman.edu

chron.com

cic.gc.ca

cis.org

cnn.com

edition.cnn.com

constitutioncenter.org

cornell.edu

law.cornell.edu

courthousenews.com

courtlistener.com

doi.org

emory.edu

factcheck.org

fjc.gov

ghostarchive.org

gibsondunn.com

govinfo.gov

  • "Public Law 414" (PDF). govinfo.gov. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Congress. June 27, 1952. pp. 163–282. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 25, 2020. Retrieved December 17, 2020.

handle.net

hdl.handle.net

heinonline.org

  • Smith, Rogers M. (2009). "Birthright Citizenship and the Fourteenth Amendment in 1868 and 2008". University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law. 11 (5): 1329–1336.
  • Augustine-Adams, Kif (Fall 2001). "Gendered States: A Comparative Construction of Citizenship and Nation". Virginia Journal of International Law. 41 (1). Charlottesville, Virginia: John Bassett Moore Society of International Law: 93–139. ISSN 0042-6571. OCLC 93293362. Retrieved March 4, 2021 – via HeinOnline.

house.gov

judiciary.house.gov

ilw.com

jstor.org

justia.com

supreme.justia.com

law.justia.com

  • Fitisemanu v. United States, No. 20-4017, (10th Cir. 2021) ("Such consideration properly falls under the purview of Congress, a point on which we fully agree with the concurrence. These circumstances advise against the extension of birthright citizenship to American Samoa. We reverse.").

komonews.com

landisarn.com

  • Arn, Cynthia C. (2018). "Acquiring U.S. Citizenship". landisarn.com. Portland, Maine: Landis, Arn & Jaynes P. A. Archived from the original on September 24, 2020. Retrieved December 17, 2020.

legislation.gov.uk

loc.gov

memory.loc.gov

  • Expatriation Act, 14th-amendment.com, quoting Sanger 1869, pp. 223–224. Sanger, George P., ed. (1869), Statutes at Large and Proclamations, of the United States of America. From December 1867 – March 1869, Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.
  • Congressional Globe, 1st Session, 39th Congress, pt. 4, p. 2893 Senator Reverdy Johnson said in the debate: "Now, all this amendment provides is, that all persons born in the United States and not subject to some foreign Power—for that, no doubt, is the meaning of the committee who have brought the matter before us—shall be considered as citizens of the United States ... If there are to be citizens of the United States entitled everywhere to the character of citizens of the United States, there should be some certain definition of what citizenship is, what has created the character of citizen as between himself and the United States, and the amendment says citizenship may depend upon birth, and I know of no better way to give rise to citizenship than the fact of birth within the territory of the United States, born of parents who at the time were subject to the authority of the United States."
  • Congressional Globe, 1st Session, 39th Congress, pt. 4, p. 2897.
  • Congressional Globe, 1st Session, 39th Congress, pt. 1, p. 572.
  • Congressional Globe, 1st Session, 39th Congress, pt. 1, p. 498. The debate on the Civil Rights Act contained the following exchange:
    Mr. Cowan: "I will ask whether it will not have the effect of naturalizing the children of Chinese and Gypsies born in this country?"
    Mr. Trumbull: "Undoubtedly."
    ...
    Mr. Trumbull: "I understand that under the naturalization laws the children who are born here of parents who have not been naturalized are citizens. This is the law, as I understand it, at the present time. Is not the child born in this country of German parents a citizen? I am afraid we have got very few citizens in some of the counties of good old Pennsylvania if the children born of German parents are not citizens."
    Mr. Cowan: "The honorable Senator assumes that which is not the fact. The children of German parents are citizens; but Germans are not Chinese; Germans are not Australians, nor Hottentots, nor anything of the kind. That is the fallacy of his argument."
    Mr. Trumbull: "If the Senator from Pennsylvania will show me in the law any distinction made between the children of German parents and the children of Asiatic parents, I may be able to appreciate the point which he makes; but the law makes no such distinction; and the child of an Asiatic is just as much of a citizen as the child of a European."
  • Congressional Globe, 1st Session, 39th Congress, pt. 4, pp. 2891–2. During the debate on the Amendment, Senator John Conness of California declared, "The proposition before us, I will say, Mr. President, relates simply in that respect to the children begotten of Chinese parents in California, and it is proposed to declare that they shall be citizens. We have declared that by law [the Civil Rights Act]; now it is proposed to incorporate that same provision in the fundamental instrument of the nation. I am in favor of doing so. I voted for the proposition to declare that the children of all parentage, whatever, born in California, should be regarded and treated as citizens of the United States, entitled to equal Civil Rights with other citizens."
  • Congressional Globe, 1st Session, 39th Congress, pt. 4, pp. 2890, 2892–4, 2896.
  • Congressional Globe, 1st Session, 39th Congress, pt. 4, p. 2893. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lyman Trumbull, participating in the debate, stated the following: "What do we [the committee reporting the clause] mean by 'subject to the jurisdiction of the United States'? Not owing allegiance to anybody else. That is what it means." He then proceeded to expound upon what he meant by "complete jurisdiction": "Can you sue a Navajoe Indian in court? ... We make treaties with them, and therefore they are not subject to our jurisdiction ... If we want to control the Navajoes, or any other Indians of which the Senator from Wisconsin has spoken, how do we do it? Do we pass a law to control them? Are they subject to our jurisdiction in that sense? ... Would he [Sen. Doolittle] think of punishing them for instituting among themselves their own tribal regulations? Does the Government of the United States pretend to take jurisdiction of murders and robberies and other crimes committed by one Indian upon another? ... It is only those persons who come completely within our jurisdiction, who are subject to our laws, that we think of making citizens."
  • Congressional Globe, 1st Session, 39th Congress, pt. 4, p. 2895. Howard additionally stated the word jurisdiction meant "the same jurisdiction in extent and quality as applies to every citizen of the United States now" and that the United States possessed a "full and complete jurisdiction" over the person described in the amendment.

cdn.loc.gov

thomas.loc.gov

loc.gov

marketwatch.com

migrationpolicy.org

newsweek.com

nytimes.com

  • "... During that debate, Senator Edgar Cowan of Pennsylvania objected to the citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment. 'Is the child of the Chinese immigrant in California a citizen?' he asked on the Senate floor. Senator John Conness of California said the answer should be 'yes.' 'The children of all parentage whatever, born in California, should be regarded and treated as citizens of the United States, entitled to equal civil rights with other citizens,' Mr. Conness said." Robert Pear (August 7, 1996), "Citizenship Proposal Faces Obstacle in the Constitution", New York Times

openjurist.org

oyez.org

pbs.org

perma.cc

pewhispanic.org

pewresearch.org

politico.com

pressherald.com

pri.org

publicsquare.net

scholar.google.com

seattlepi.com

splcenter.org

stanford.edu

law.stanford.edu

state.gov

fam.state.gov

travel.state.gov

history.state.gov

tcpalm.com

teachingamericanhistory.org

thesocialcontract.com

uchicago.edu

chicagounbound.uchicago.edu

uclalawreview.org

uconn.edu

digitalcommons.lib.uconn.edu

uniset.ca

usatoday.com

uscis.gov

usdoj.gov

  • Walter Dellinger, Assistant Attorney General (December 13, 1995), "Legislation denying citizenship at birth to certain children born in the United States", Memoranda and Opinions, Office of Legal Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, archived from the original on July 25, 2009, retrieved January 4, 2007, A bill that would deny citizenship to children born in the United States to certain classes of alien parents is unconstitutional on its face. A constitutional amendment to restrict birthright citizenship, although not technically unlawful, would flatly contradict the Nation's constitutional history and constitutional traditions..

uwb.edu

library.uwb.edu

vox.com

washingtonpost.com

washingtontimes.com

web.archive.org

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

wsj.com

blogs.wsj.com

youtube.com