Criticism of Israel (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Criticism of Israel" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
497th place
371st place
12th place
11th place
low place
low place
97th place
164th place
1,367th place
1,176th place
544th place
387th place
36th place
33rd place
2nd place
2nd place
571st place
403rd place
3rd place
3rd place
729th place
650th place
7th place
7th place
8th place
10th place
1,210th place
1,422nd place
9th place
13th place
68th place
117th place
1,948th place
1,153rd place
28th place
26th place
382nd place
2,127th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
9,643rd place
7,561st place
1,429th place
932nd place
6th place
6th place
1,842nd place
1,079th place
low place
low place
32nd place
21st place
low place
low place
109th place
87th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
3,322nd place
1,897th place
129th place
89th place
8,179th place
5,000th place
2,046th place
1,783rd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
2,318th place
1,652nd place
8,331st place
5,204th place
low place
low place
266th place
182nd place
2,812th place
1,942nd place
27th place
51st place
146th place
110th place
low place
low place
2,421st place
2,218th place
3,889th place
3,892nd place
34th place
27th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
264th place
249th place
1,154th place
752nd place
low place
low place
108th place
80th place
7,966th place
6,558th place
5,482nd place
3,140th place
6,190th place
4,693rd place
1,663rd place
1,167th place
low place
low place
3,814th place
2,595th place
1,625th place
890th place
210th place
157th place
5,363rd place
3,477th place
9,212th place
5,638th place
low place
8,573rd place
274th place
309th place
low place
low place
1,757th place
1,054th place
3,169th place
1,838th place
170th place
119th place
low place
low place
low place
8,010th place
5,771st place
3,880th place
4,464th place
4,468th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
11th place
8th place
low place
low place
424th place
310th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,785th place
1,133rd place
1,020th place
629th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
197th place
356th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
14th place
14th place
low place
low place
1,674th place
1,011th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
241st place
193rd place
1,810th place
1,134th place
low place
low place
456th place
300th place
95th place
70th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
2,088th place
1,251st place
79th place
65th place
3,207th place
1,870th place
6,508th place
9,102nd place
2,619th place
2,163rd place
1,870th place
1,304th place

aclu.org

adc.org

adl.org

alandershowitz.com

amnesty.org

amnesty.org.uk

antisemitism.org.uk

apnews.com

archive.org

archive.today

armscontrol.org

armscontrolcenter.org

bbc.co.uk

news.bbc.co.uk

bdsmovement.net

bgu.ac.il

geog.bgu.ac.il

  • Yiftachel, Oren. "Between colonialism and ethnocracy: 'Creeping apartheid' in Israel/Palestine" (PDF). Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. Archived from the original (PDF) on 8 August 2014. Retrieved 9 October 2014. Jewish settlements in the West Bank, that is, beyond the state's recognised sovereign territory, have been built as both civilian and permanent. This makes it impossible to understand their existence, as claimed by Israel, as part of a temporary military occupation. Given the massive civilian settlement and Israeli military control, anyone can observe that the Palestinians have been unwillingly and unwittingly incorporated by the regime as third-class subjects. At the same time, Israel has an interest in perpetually representing this situation as 'temporary', thereby circumventing the need to endow Palestinians with full civil rights

books.google.com

btselem.org

cbsnews.com

cfr.org

chicagotribune.com

chomsky.info

chronicle.com

cindysheehanssoapbox.blogspot.com

  • * Sheehan, Cindy, "The Audacity of Israel" Archived 2011-11-02 at the Wayback Machine on Cindy Sheehan's Soapbox online blog, June 4, 2010.
    "Since my son was killed in Iraq and I have come to prominence in the peace movement, the name I am called with the second highest frequency (behind "anti-American") is "anti-Semitic." First of all, isn't it interesting if one is anti-violence and pro-peace, that automatically makes one anti-American and anti-Semitic? That just tells us that violence and oppression are so inherently institutionalized in our cultures, that if one is against these things, that makes one against the entire culture, race or way of life. It should be fundamentally understood that criticism of Israel's program of Palestinian pogrom and the US's demented foreign policy is not to be construed as hatred of all Jews or all Americans."
  • * Sheehan, Cindy, "The Audacity of Israel" Archived 2011-11-02 at the Wayback Machine on Cindy Sheehan's Soapbox online blog, June 4, 2010.
    "Since my son was killed in Iraq and I have come to prominence in the peace movement, the name I am called with the second highest frequency (behind "anti-American") is "anti-Semitic." First of all, isn't it interesting if one is anti-violence and pro-peace, that automatically makes one anti-American and anti-Semitic? That just tells us that violence and oppression are so inherently institutionalized in our cultures, that if one is against these things, that makes one against the entire culture, race or way of life. It should be fundamentally understood that criticism of Israel's program of Palestinian pogrom and the US's demented foreign policy is not to be construed as hatred of all Jews or all Americans."

cnn.com

commondreams.org

counterpunch.org

  • BARAT, FRANK (April 2011). "Why Israel is Not a Democracy". Archived from the original on 2 December 2023. Retrieved 15 September 2014. Ilan Pappé: No, Israel is definitely not a democracy. A country that occupies another people for more than 40 years and disallow them the most elementary civic and human rights cannot be a democracy. A country that pursues a discriminatory policy against a fifth of its Palestinian citizens inside the 67 borders cannot be a democracy. In fact Israel is, what we use to call in political science a Herrenvolk democracy, its democracy only for the masters. The fact that you allow people to participate in the formal side of democracy, namely to vote or to be elected, is useless and meaningless if you don't give them any share in the common good or in the common resources of the State, or if you discriminate against them despite the fact that you allow them to participate in the elections. On almost every level from official legislation through governmental practices, and social and cultural attitudes, Israel is only a democracy for one group, one ethnic group, that given the space that Israel now controls, is not even a majority group anymore, so I think that you'll find it very hard to use any known definition of democracy which will be applicable for the Israeli case.
  • *Peter Schmidt (April 29, 2009). "Head of Anti-Defamation League Urged Santa Barbara to Act Against Critic of Israel". The Chronicle of Higher Education. Archived from the original on October 12, 2012. Retrieved January 2, 2011.
    • Dana L. Cloud (April 30, 2009). "The McCarthyism That Horowitz Built: The Cases of Margo Ramlal Nankoe, William Robinson, Nagesh Rao and Loretta Capeheart". CounterPunch. Archived from the original on May 29, 2010.
    • Ali, Tariq. "Notes on Anti-Semitism, Zionism and Palestine" Archived December 7, 2010, at the Wayback Machine, Counterpunch, March 4, 2004, first published in il manifesto, February 26, 2004.
    • Nader, Ralph, "A Letter to Abraham Foxman: Criticizing Israel is Not Anti-Semitism", in Counterpunch, 16 October 2004, online Archived 2009-07-07 at the Wayback Machine
    • Roberts, Paul Craig, "Criminalizing Criticism of Israel", Counterpunch 7 May 2009, online Archived 2023-12-23 at the Wayback Machine:
      "On October 16, 2004, President George W. Bush signed the Israel Lobby's bill, the Global Anti-Semitism Review Act. This legislation requires the US Department of State to monitor anti-semitism world wide. To monitor anti-semitism, it has to be defined. What is the definition? Basically, as defined by the Israel Lobby and Abe Foxman, it boils down to any criticism of Israel or Jews. Rahm Israel Emanuel hasn't been mopping floors at the White House. As soon as he gets the Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009 passed, it will become a crime for any American to tell the truth about Israel's treatment of Palestinians and theft of their lands. It will be a crime for Christians to acknowledge the New Testament's account of Jews demanding the crucifixion of Jesus. It will be a crime to report the extraordinary influence of the Israel Lobby on the White House and Congress, such as the AIPAC-written resolutions praising Israel for its war crimes against the Palestinians in Gaza that were endorsed by 100 per cent of the US Senate and 99 per cent of the House of Representatives, while the rest of the world condemned Israel for its barbarity. It will be a crime to doubt the Holocaust. It will become a crime to note the disproportionate representation of Jews in the media, finance, and foreign policy. In other words, it means the end of free speech, free inquiry, and the First Amendment to the Constitution. Any facts or truths that cast aspersion upon Israel will simply be banned. ... Criminalizing criticism of Israel destroys any hope of America having an independent foreign policy in the Middle East that serves American rather than Israeli interests. It eliminates any prospect of Americans escaping from their enculturation with Israeli propaganda. To keep American minds captive, the Lobby is working to ban as anti-semitic any truth or disagreeable fact that pertains to Israel. It is permissible to criticize every other country in the world, but it is anti-semitic to criticize Israel, and anti-semitism will soon be a universal hate-crime in the Western world. Most of Europe has already criminalized doubting the Holocaust. It is a crime even to confirm that it happened but to conclude that less than 6 million Jews were murdered."
    • Of Occupation and Apartheid Do I Divest? Archived 2008-07-24 at the Wayback Machine, Desmond Tutu, CounterPunch, October 17, 2002

dailynexus.com

dailytimes.com.pk

deiryassin.org

dissidentvoice.org

doi.org

europa.eu

fra.europa.eu

  • "Manifestations of Antisemitism in the EU 2002–2003", European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC), 2003, online Archived 2009-12-29 at the Wayback Machine, pp 13, 240: "ARE ANTI-ISRAELI AND ANTI-ZIONIST EXPRESSIONS ANTISEMITIC? If we turn to the crucial question of defining the point where anti-Israeli and anti-Zionist expressions are to be considered as antisemitism, then we could conclude, on the basis of our definition of antisemitism, that anti-Israeli or anti-Zionist attitudes and expression are antisemitic in those cases where Israel is seen as being a representative of "the Jew", i.e. as a representative of the traits attributed to the antisemitic construction of "the Jew". But what if the opposite is the case and Jews are perceived as representatives of Israel? What if Jews are criticised or offended for Israel's policies toward the Palestinians? If we stick to our definition, then, strictly speaking, we would have to qualify hostility towards Jews as "Israelis" only then as antisemitic, if it is based on an underlying perception of Israel as "the Jew". If this is not the case, then we would have to consider hostility towards Jews as "Israelis" as not antisemitic, because this hostility is not based on the antisemitic stereotyping of Jews... What should not be considered as antisemitic and therefore does not have to be monitored under the heading of "antisemitism", is hostility towards Israel as "Israel", i.e. as a country that is criticised for its concrete policies. Hostility towards Israel as "Israel" (as opposed to criticism of Israel as representative of the stereotypical "Jew") should only then become a matter of general public concern, when there is explicit evidence that criticism of Israel as "Israel" produces attacks on Jews as either "the Jew" or "Israeli". If there is no such evidence, the case of criticism and hostility towards Israel as "Israel" should not be part of monitoring activities under the heading of "antisemitism".
  • "Working Definition of Antisemitism" (PDF). European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2011. Retrieved 24 July 2010.

consilium.europa.eu

european-forum-on-antisemitism.org

eyeontheun.org

ffipp-uk.org

findarticles.com

fpif.org

freedomhouse.org

ft.com

georgetown.edu

ccas.georgetown.edu

ghostarchive.org

gold.ac.uk

research.gold.ac.uk

guardian.co.uk

observer.guardian.co.uk

  • Beaumont, Peter, "The new anti-semitism?" Archived 2008-10-10 at the Wayback Machine, The Observer, February 17, 2002: "But the problem with all this talk of a 'new anti-Semitism' is that those who argue hardest for its inexorable rise are dangerously conflating two connected but critically separate phenomena. The monster that they have conjured from these parts is not only something that does not yet exist – and I say 'yet' with caution – but whose purported existence is being cynically manipulated by some in the Israeli government to try to silence debate about the policies of the Sharon government. … As data collected by the Stephen Roth Institute at Tel Aviv University, and other research, makes clear, the rise in anti-Semitism in Europe coincided with the beginning of al-Aqsa intifada – and Israel's heavy-handed response. … What they are talking about is the criticism in the media and political classes of Europe of the policies of Sharon. Israel's brutal response to the often equally reprehensible anti-Israeli Palestinian violence of the intifada has produced one of the most vigorous media critiques of Israel's policies in the European media in a generation. The reply to this criticism, say those most vocal in reporting the existence of the new anti-Semitism, particularly in the Israeli press, is devastating in its simplicity: criticise Israel, and you are an anti-Semite just as surely as if you were throwing paint at a synagogue in Paris."

haaretz.com

heinonline.org

heritage.org

  • Brett Schaefer (2 June 2010). "Elections for U.N. Human Rights Council Underscore the Need for Reform". heritage.org. Archived from the original on 8 August 2010. Retrieved 6 August 2010. In addition, the council has held 10 special sessions since 2006 that focused on country situations, and a majority of the sessions focused on condemning Israel. The most recent of these special sessions was held in 2009—after the U.S. became a member—to discuss the U.N. Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict (the Goldstone Report), which has been criticized as "deeply flawed" and biased against Israel by the Obama Administration. The council adopted the Goldstone Report in a resolution that condemned Israel in detail but failed to mention Hamas's indiscriminate firing of rockets and mortars at Israeli civilian settlements, even though the Goldstone Report stated that they "constitute war crimes and may amount to crimes against humanity."

hrw.org

huffingtonpost.com

icj-cij.org

icrc.org

iht.com

ijsn.net

  • ISJN: Abigail Bakan, Adam Balsam, Sharon Baltman; et al. (22 March 2009). "Jewish Canadians Concerned about Suppression of Criticism of Israel". Archived from the original on 2 March 2011. Retrieved 20 January 2011.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link):
    "We are appalled by recent attempts of prominent Jewish organizations and leading Canadian politicians to silence protest against the State of Israel. We are alarmed by the escalation of fear tactics. Charges that those organizing Israel Apartheid Week or supporting an academic boycott of Israel are anti-Semites promoting hatred bring the anti-Communist terror of the 1950s vividly to mind. We believe this serves to deflect attention from Israel's flagrant violations of international humanitarian law…. We recognize that anti-Semitism is a reality in Canada as elsewhere, and we are fully committed to resisting any act of hatred against Jews. At the same time, we condemn false charges of anti-Semitism against student organizations, unions, and other groups and people exercising their democratic right to freedom of speech and association regarding legitimate criticism of the State of Israel."

independent.co.uk

  • "Israeli soldier faces jail for passing secrets to reporter". Independent.co.uk. 7 February 2011. Archived from the original on 3 September 2018. Retrieved 22 August 2017.
  • McKernan, Bethan (24 July 2018). "'Spirit of Hitler' has emerged in Israel after new nation state law, says Turkey president Erdogan". The Independent. Archived from the original on 20 November 2023. Retrieved 24 July 2018.
  • "Howard Jacobson: Let's see the 'criticism' of Israel for what it really is". The Independent. London. 18 February 2009. Archived from the original on 20 January 2019. Retrieved 22 August 2017.
  • *Smith, Lewis, "Anti-Semitic? Not me, says Roger Waters", The Independent, 4 October 2010, online Archived 2014-10-06 at the Wayback Machine:
    "Abraham Foxman, the director of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), said using the dollar sign and the Star of David in sequence [during Water's performance] echoed the stereotype that Jews were avaricious. Referring to criticism Waters has previously made of Israel for its treatment of the Palestinians, Mr. Foxman said the musician should have 'chosen some other way to convey his political views without playing into and dredging up the worst age-old anti-Semitic stereotype about Jews and their supposed obsession with making money'. … [Waters replied:] 'If I don't respond [to the suggestion of antisemitism] people will see the story and will come to believe I'm anti-Semitic, and I'm not. Nothing could be further from the truth.' Waters has spoken against Israeli policies and accused the ADL of painting critics as anti-Semitic. 'It's a screen that they hide behind. I don't think they should be taken seriously on that. You can attack Israeli policy without being anti-Jewish,' he [Waters] said."

ipsnews.net

irishtimes.com

israelnationalnews.com

jcpa.org

jewishcurrents.org

  • Quoted by Menachem Wecker, "In Defense of Self-Hating Jews", May 2007, Jewish Currents, online at [5] Archived 2017-03-12 at the Wayback Machine.

jewishjournal.com

jewishvoiceforpeace.org

jfjfp.com

  • Stephen Shalom (19 November 2010). "Singling out Israel – the arguments revisited". Archived from the original on 20 December 2016. Retrieved 9 December 2010.
  • Ellen Goldberg (7 August 2009). "The New Israel Fund says It's Time to Nail the Lies". Archived from the original on 10 March 2016. Retrieved 23 January 2016.:
    "Several organisations such as the self-styled NGO Monitor, Israel Resource News Agency, WorldNetDaily and the Near and Middle East Policy Review are promoting the view that the work of Human Rights NGOs working in Israel is, by its very nature, anti-Israel. Their charge is to associate moral and ethical criticism of any activity by Israel or the policies of its Government as being anti-Israel, anti-Semitic and when conducted by Jews, as evidence of self-hatred."

jpost.com

jta.org

lmu.edu

digitalcommons.lmu.edu

middleeastmonitor.com

newint.org

newrepublic.com

newyorker.com

  • Remnick, David. "Threatened". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on 20 January 2019. Retrieved 9 October 2014. "The dream of a Jewish and democratic state cannot be fulfilled with permanent occupation," Obama has said. Netanyahu and many of his supporters believe otherwise; too often, they consider the tenets of liberal democracy to be negotiable in a game of coalition politics.

ngo-monitor.org

nrg.co.il

nybooks.com

nytimes.com

ohchr.org

ap.ohchr.org

palestinemonitor.org

  • "Anti Anti Semitism With Norman Finkelstein". 12 October 2009. Archived from the original on 28 May 2010. Retrieved 23 January 2016.: An article reviewing Finkelstein's book Beyond Chutzpah:
    "For a more profound explanation of Israeli's emerging opponents, the Zionist lobby blames 'new anti-Semitism'; a term nebulous and versatile enough to fit most any opponent. Arnold Foster and Benjamin Epstein define it as 'callous indifference to Jewish concerns, a failure to understand the most profound apprehension of Jewish people.' A 2007 British government investigation into racism counted 'perceptions of Anti-Semitism' as an example of it. Naturally such vagaries allow for almost indiscriminate accusations. Phyllis Chesler, author of A New Anti-Semitism casts her net wide to include as Israeli's enemies 'western-based international human rights organisations, western anti-capitalist, anti-globalist, pro-environment, anti-war and anti-racist activists, progressive feminists, Jewish feminists and the left and liberal American media'."

peaceindex.org

prospect.org

  • Gorenberg, Gershom (2009-12-04). "Is Israel a Democracy?". The American Prospect. Archived from the original on 2019-08-26. Retrieved 20 September 2014. Whether it ends the occupation and discrimination against Arab citizens within its borders will alter our perception of whether the nation began as an imperfect democracy or a false one. Today's political battles, strangely enough, will determine not only its future but also its past.

rabble.ca

  • Sears, Alan and Rebick, Judy, "Memo to Minister Kenney: Criticism of Israel is not anti-Semitism", online Archived 2021-05-18 at the Wayback Machine: "Defenders of Israeli policy routinely attempt to direct our attention to abuses happening in other places and insist that a hidden agenda must underlie any focus on Israeli brutality in this unjust world. This argument would lead to paralysis in human rights activism by claiming that one must address all cases at once, or only the "worst" cases. Should we have told Rosa Parks, who refused to go the back of a segregated bus in Alabama in 1955, to quit whining as conditions were even worse in South Africa, or colonized Kenya, or for that matter for Palestinians in refugee camps? The deployment of anti-Semitism as an accusation to silence criticism of Israel is also a serious setback in genuine struggles against anti-Semitism and other forms of discrimination. It is based on a claim that the State of Israel is the single outcome of the history of the Jewish people, the final end of generations of diasporic existence. It attempts to make the Zionist project of a Jewish nation the only legitimate project for all Jews." They were writing regarding Israel Apartheid Week controversy described in Haaretz Archived 2018-06-12 at the Wayback Machine.

redpepper.org.uk

reut-institute.org

salon.com

open.salon.com

sandiego.edu

digital.sandiego.edu

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

spme.net

  • Rosenfeld, Alvin (Feb 2007). "Rhetorical Violence and the Jews". Critical Distance. Archived from the original on 8 March 2012. Retrieved 6 Feb 2011. The ubiquitous rubric "criticism of Israel," however, has also come to designate another kind of discourse—one that has almost become a politico-rhetorical genre unto itself, with its own identifiable vocabulary, narrative conventions, and predictable outcomes

springer.com

link.springer.com

state.gov

2001-2009.state.gov

tabletmag.com

tau.ac.il

thecrimson.com

thecst.org.uk

  • Community Security Trust (2009). "Antisemitic Discourse Report 2009" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 August 2014. Retrieved 6 Feb 2011. The term "criticism of Israel" continued to be used as a catch-all defense against the raising of Jewish concerns about antisemitic manifestations, public speakers, groups, websites, agitprop and other phenomena

theguardian.com

thejc.com

thejusticeonline.com

media.thejusticeonline.com

thenation.com

thenational.ae

thetimes.co.uk

timesofisrael.com

timesofisrael.com

jewishnews.timesofisrael.com

timesonline.co.uk

  • *"Father Michael Prior: Roman Catholic priest and scholar who campaigned for the rights of Palestinians", in The Times, 21 August 2004, online[dead link]

tnr.com

typepad.com

oliverkamm.typepad.com

  • Quoted by Oliver Kamm, "Chomsky, antisemitism and intellectual standards", [4] Archived 2018-10-18 at the Wayback Machine:
    Kamm quotes Eban: "There is no difference whatever between anti-Semitism and the denial of Israel's statehood. Classical anti-Semitism denies the equal right of Jews as citizens within society. Anti-Zionism denies the equal rights of the Jewish people its lawful sovereignty within the community of nations. The common principle in the two cases is discrimination". (New York Times, November 3, 1975).
  • "Chomsky, antisemitism and intellectual standards". Archived from the original on 2018-10-18. Retrieved 2021-05-18.

ukmediawatch.org

un.org

un.org

daccess-dds-ny.un.org

unwatch.org

versobooks.com

washingtonpost.com

web.archive.org

wikisource.org

en.wikisource.org

wsj.com

ynet.co.il

ynetnews.com

youtube.com

zmag.org

  • Finkelstein: "ZNet – Beyond Chutzpah". Archived from the original on June 25, 2009. Retrieved June 25, 2009.
    "Whenever Israel faces a public relations debacle such as the Intifada or international pressure to resolve the Israel-Palestine conflict, American Jewish organizations orchestrate this extravaganza called the 'new anti-Semitism.' The purpose is several-fold. First, it is to discredit any charges by claiming the person is an anti-Semite. It's to turn Jews into the victims, so that the victims are not the Palestinians any longer. As people like Abraham Foxman of the ADL put it, the Jews are being threatened by a new holocaust. It's a role reversal – the Jews are now the victims, not the Palestinians. So it serves the function of discrediting the people leveling the charge. It's no longer Israel that needs to leave the Occupied Territories; it's the Arabs who need to free themselves of the anti-Semitism."