Debate (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Debate" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
5th place
5th place
2nd place
2nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
4th place
4th place
low place
low place
12th place
11th place
1,538th place
1,042nd place
68th place
117th place
281st place
448th place
488th place
374th place
179th place
183rd place
741st place
577th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
265th place
1,095th place
4,212th place
2,675th place
367th place
243rd place
low place
8,086th place
low place
low place
17th place
15th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
6,930th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
652nd place
515th place
low place
low place
6,270th place
4,080th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
11th place
8th place
low place
low place

21caf.org

aclanthology.org

annenbergclassroom.org

asiandebateleague.com

asiasociety.org

  • Perdue, David. "Tibetan Buddhist Debate". Asia Society. Retrieved 2021-02-07. The Tibetan argument forms were brought over with minor adaptations from the Indian logical forms.

au.edu

wudc2020.au.edu

collegecompass.org

columbia.edu

afe.easia.columbia.edu

cross-x.com

cus.org

  • History of the Union | The Cambridge Union Society Archived 2013-12-24 at the Wayback Machine. Cus.org. Retrieved on 2013-07-15.
  • "What Is Debating?". Cambridge Union Society. Archived from the original on 2015-08-14. Retrieved 2015-08-20. Typically, judges decide how persuasive debaters have been through three key criteria: Content: What we say and the arguments and examples we use. Style: How we say it and the language and voice we use. Strategy: How well we engage with the topic, respond to other people's arguments, and structure what we say.

dav.com.au

doi.org

  • Rodger, D; Stewart-Lord, A (2019). "Students' perceptions of debating as a learning strategy: A qualitative study". Nurse Education in Practice. 42: 102681. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2019.102681. PMID 31805450.
  • Al Khatib, Khalid; Trautner, Lukas; Wachsmuth, Henning; Hou, Yufang; Stein, Benno (August 2021). "Employing Argumentation Knowledge Graphs for Neural Argument Generation". Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). Association for Computational Linguistics. pp. 4744–4754. doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.366. S2CID 236460348. Retrieved 29 January 2022.

europa.eu

commission.europa.eu

  • European Commission, Green Paper on Ageing, COM (2021) 50 final, adopted on 27 January 2021, accessed 9 May 2024

fb-connections.org

frenchdebatingassociation.fr

gomang.org

ieee.org

events.vtools.ieee.org

indiatimes.com

timesofindia.indiatimes.com

ipdadebate.info

kings-taunton.co.uk

legifrance.gouv.fr

lwv.org

mmuuadc2012.org

nationalforensicassociation.org

  • "Competition". National Forensic Association. 2022-04-10. Retrieved 2024-01-06.

nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

  • Rodger, D; Stewart-Lord, A (2019). "Students' perceptions of debating as a learning strategy: A qualitative study". Nurse Education in Practice. 42: 102681. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2019.102681. PMID 31805450.

osaa.org

ourcommons.ca

oxford-union.org

parl.gc.ca

parliament.uk

phssl.org

princeton.edu

whigclio.princeton.edu

schoolsdebate.com

schoolsdebate.de

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

speechanddebate.org

stanford.edu

arcade.stanford.edu

theguardian.com

thubtenchodron.org

unc.edu

docsouth.unc.edu

uvm.edu

debate.uvm.edu

vatican.va

  • Pope Francis, Laudato si', paragraph 16, published 24 May 2015, accessed 9 May 2024

web.archive.org

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

worldcat.org