Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Dialect continuum" in English language version.
Last modified:
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: periodical has ISBN (link)U Evropi ima pet dijalektalnih kontinuuma: zapadnoromanski, skandinavski, sjevernoslavenski, zapadnogermanski, južnoslavenski. Južnoslavenski dijalektalni kontinuum ne završava na hrvatsko-slovenskoj i srpsko-bugarskoj granici, nego uslijed pretapanja dijalekata obuhvaća i čitavo slovensko, makedonsko i bugarsko područje. [...] kompletno južnoslavensko područje predstavlja jedan kontinuum dijalekata (Hetzer 1993: 33; Friedman 1999: 8; Alexander 2000: 4; Kristophson 2000: 180) [...][In Europe, there are five dialect continua: Western Romance, Scandinavian, North Slavic, West Germanic, and South Slavic. The South Slavic dialect continuum does not end at the Croatian–Slovenian and Serbian–Bulgarian borders; rather, owing to the gradual blending of dialects, it also encompasses the entirety of the Slovene, Macedonian, and Bulgarian linguistic areas. [...] the entire South Slavic area constitutes a single continuum of dialects (Hetzer 1993: 33; Friedman 1999: 8; Alexander 2000: 4; Kristophson 2000: 180) [...]]
lexical differences between the ethnic variants are extremely limited, even when compared with those between closely related Slavic languages (such as standard Czech and Slovak, Bulgarian and Macedonian), and grammatical differences are even less pronounced. More importantly, complete understanding between the ethnic variants of the standard language makes translation and second language teaching impossible", leading Šipka "to consider it a pluricentric standard language
lexical differences between the ethnic variants are extremely limited, even when compared with those between closely related Slavic languages (such as standard Czech and Slovak, Bulgarian and Macedonian), and grammatical differences are even less pronounced. More importantly, complete understanding between the ethnic variants of the standard language makes translation and second language teaching impossible", leading Šipka "to consider it a pluricentric standard language
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: periodical has ISBN (link)lexical differences between the ethnic variants are extremely limited, even when compared with those between closely related Slavic languages (such as standard Czech and Slovak, Bulgarian and Macedonian), and grammatical differences are even less pronounced. More importantly, complete understanding between the ethnic variants of the standard language makes translation and second language teaching impossible", leading Šipka "to consider it a pluricentric standard language
U Evropi ima pet dijalektalnih kontinuuma: zapadnoromanski, skandinavski, sjevernoslavenski, zapadnogermanski, južnoslavenski. Južnoslavenski dijalektalni kontinuum ne završava na hrvatsko-slovenskoj i srpsko-bugarskoj granici, nego uslijed pretapanja dijalekata obuhvaća i čitavo slovensko, makedonsko i bugarsko područje. [...] kompletno južnoslavensko područje predstavlja jedan kontinuum dijalekata (Hetzer 1993: 33; Friedman 1999: 8; Alexander 2000: 4; Kristophson 2000: 180) [...][In Europe, there are five dialect continua: Western Romance, Scandinavian, North Slavic, West Germanic, and South Slavic. The South Slavic dialect continuum does not end at the Croatian–Slovenian and Serbian–Bulgarian borders; rather, owing to the gradual blending of dialects, it also encompasses the entirety of the Slovene, Macedonian, and Bulgarian linguistic areas. [...] the entire South Slavic area constitutes a single continuum of dialects (Hetzer 1993: 33; Friedman 1999: 8; Alexander 2000: 4; Kristophson 2000: 180) [...]]
lexical differences between the ethnic variants are extremely limited, even when compared with those between closely related Slavic languages (such as standard Czech and Slovak, Bulgarian and Macedonian), and grammatical differences are even less pronounced. More importantly, complete understanding between the ethnic variants of the standard language makes translation and second language teaching impossible", leading Šipka "to consider it a pluricentric standard language