Dome (English Wikipedia)

Peterson 1996b, pp. 108, 110, 112. Petersen, Andrew (1996). "A preliminary report on three Muslim shrines in Palestine" (PDF). Levant. 28 (1). Taylor & Francis: 97–113. doi:10.1179/lev.1996.28.1.97.
Kim 1960, pp. 164–165. Kim, Young Jae (1960). "Reconsidering the Symbolic Meaning of the Stupa" (PDF). Bulletin de l'École Française d'Extrême-Orient. 50 (1): 159–168.
Kim 1960, pp. 165–166. Kim, Young Jae (1960). "Reconsidering the Symbolic Meaning of the Stupa" (PDF). Bulletin de l'École Française d'Extrême-Orient. 50 (1): 159–168.

adsabs.harvard.edu (Global: 14^th place; English: 9^th place)

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

Salvadori 1987, p. 233. Salvadori, M.G. (1987). "The Anasazi cribbed domes". Building and Environment. 22 (3). Elsevier Ltd: 233–235. Bibcode:1987BuEnv..22..233S. doi:10.1016/0360-1323(87)90011-4. ISSN 0360-1323.
Cowan 1977, p. 7. Cowan, Henry J. (1977). "A History of Masonry and Concrete Domes in Building Construction". Building and Environment. 12 (1). Great Britain: Pergamon Press: 1–24. Bibcode:1977BuEnv..12....1C. doi:10.1016/0360-1323(77)90002-6. hdl:2027/mdp.39015041999635.

afhalifax.ca (Global: low place; English: low place)

Kayili 2005, p. 9. Kayili, Mutbul (2005). "Acoustic Solutions in Classic Ottoman Architecture" (PDF). FSTC (Foundation for Science Technology and Civilisation) Limited. pp. 1–15. 4087. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2021-08-28. Retrieved 2013-11-28.

arch-bridges.com.cn (Global: low place; English: low place)

Fuentes & Huerta 2010, pp. 346–352. Fuentes, P.; Huerta, S. (2010). "Islamic Domes of Crossed-arches: Origin, Geometry and Structural Behavior". In Chen, Baochun; Wei, Jiangang (eds.). ARCH'10 – 6th International Conference on Arch Bridges, October 11–13, 2010 (PDF). Fuzhou, Fujian, China: Fuzhou University. pp. 346–353. ISBN 978-953-7621-10-0. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-04-27. Retrieved 2015-03-13.
Fuentes & Huerta 2010, pp. 346–347. Fuentes, P.; Huerta, S. (2010). "Islamic Domes of Crossed-arches: Origin, Geometry and Structural Behavior". In Chen, Baochun; Wei, Jiangang (eds.). ARCH'10 – 6th International Conference on Arch Bridges, October 11–13, 2010 (PDF). Fuzhou, Fujian, China: Fuzhou University. pp. 346–353. ISBN 978-953-7621-10-0. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-04-27. Retrieved 2015-03-13.

archive.org (Global: 6^th place; English: 6^th place)

Fleming, Honour & Pevsner 1991, pp. 126–127: "Dome. Vault of even curvature on a circular base. The section can be segmental, semicircular, pointed, or bulbous. If a dome is to be erected on a square base, members must be interpolated at the corners to mediate between the square and the circle. They can be pendentives of squinches. A pendentive is a spherical triangle; its curvature is that of a dome whose diameter is the diagonal is the diagonal of the initial square. The triangle is carried to the height which allows the erection on its top horizontal of the dome proper. A squinch is either an arch or arches of increasing radius projecting one in front of the other, or horizontal arches projecting in the same manner. If squinches are placed in the corners of the square and enough arches are erected on them they will result in a suitable base-line for the dome. In all these cases the dome will have the diameter of the length of one side of the square. It can be placed direct on the circular base-line, when this is achieved, or a drum, usually with windows, can be interpolated. If the dome has no drum and is segmental, it is called a saucer dome. If it has no drum and is semicircular, it is called a calotte. Another method of developing a dome out of a square is to take the diagonal of the square as the diameter of the dome. In this case the dome starts as if by pendentives, but their curvature is then continued without any break. Such domes are called sail vaults, because they resemble a sail with the four corners fixed and the wind blowing into it. A domical vault is not a dome proper. If on a square base, four webs (cells) rise to a point separated by groins (see vault). The same can be done on a polygonal base. An umbrella, parachute, pumpkin or melon dome is a dome on a circular base, but also divided into individual webs, each of which, however, has a base-line curved segmentally in plan and curved in elevation." Fleming, John; Honour, Hugh; Pevsner, Nikolaus, eds. (1991). Dictionary of Architecture (4th ed.). Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0-14-051241-0.
Fleming, Honour & Pevsner 1991, p. 114. Fleming, John; Honour, Hugh; Pevsner, Nikolaus, eds. (1991). Dictionary of Architecture (4th ed.). Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0-14-051241-0.
Fleming, Honour & Pevsner 1991, p. 203. Fleming, John; Honour, Hugh; Pevsner, Nikolaus, eds. (1991). Dictionary of Architecture (4th ed.). Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0-14-051241-0.
Fleming, Honour & Pevsner 1991, p. 127. Fleming, John; Honour, Hugh; Pevsner, Nikolaus, eds. (1991). Dictionary of Architecture (4th ed.). Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0-14-051241-0.
Ward 1915, p. 2. Ward, Clarence (1915). Mediaeval Church Vaulting (illustrated ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Fleming, Honour & Pevsner 1991, pp. 127, 419. Fleming, John; Honour, Hugh; Pevsner, Nikolaus, eds. (1991). Dictionary of Architecture (4th ed.). Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0-14-051241-0.
Fleming, Honour & Pevsner 1991, pp. 127, 329. Fleming, John; Honour, Hugh; Pevsner, Nikolaus, eds. (1991). Dictionary of Architecture (4th ed.). Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0-14-051241-0.
Ousterhout 2008a, p. 13. Ousterhout, Robert G. (2008). Master Builders of Byzantium (paperback ed.). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology. ISBN 978-1-934536-03-2.
Ward 1915, p. 9. Ward, Clarence (1915). Mediaeval Church Vaulting (illustrated ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sear 1983, p. 79. Sear, Frank (1983). Roman Architecture (revised ed.). Cornell University Press. ISBN 978-0-8014-9245-7. Roman architecture.
Langmead & Garnaut 2001, p. 131. Langmead, Donald; Garnaut, Christine (2001). Encyclopedia of Architectural and Engineering Feats (3rd ed.). ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-1-57607-112-0.
Fleming, Honour & Pevsner 1991, pp. 127, 463. Fleming, John; Honour, Hugh; Pevsner, Nikolaus, eds. (1991). Dictionary of Architecture (4th ed.). Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0-14-051241-0.
Fleming, Honour & Pevsner 1991, p. 462. Fleming, John; Honour, Hugh; Pevsner, Nikolaus, eds. (1991). Dictionary of Architecture (4th ed.). Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0-14-051241-0.
Krautheimer 1980, pp. 121, 132. Krautheimer, Richard (1980). "Success and Failure in Late Antique Church Planning". In Weitzmann, Kurt (ed.). Age of Spirituality: A Symposium. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art. pp. 121–140. ISBN 978-0-87099-229-2.
Ward 1915, pp. 116–117. Ward, Clarence (1915). Mediaeval Church Vaulting (illustrated ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Deva 1988, pp. 5–10. Deva, Krishna (1988). "Mauryas Śuṅgas, Kāṇvas, Kuṣāṇas, Kṣatrapas". In Meister, Michael W.; Dhaky, M.A.; Deva, Krishna (eds.). Encyclopaedia of Indian Temple Architecture: Volume II, Part 1. Delhi: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-562313-4.
Ousterhout 2008a, p. 202. Ousterhout, Robert G. (2008). Master Builders of Byzantium (paperback ed.). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology. ISBN 978-1-934536-03-2.
Ousterhout 2008a, p. 214. Ousterhout, Robert G. (2008). Master Builders of Byzantium (paperback ed.). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology. ISBN 978-1-934536-03-2.
Langmead & Garnaut 2001, p. 60. Langmead, Donald; Garnaut, Christine (2001). Encyclopedia of Architectural and Engineering Feats (3rd ed.). ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-1-57607-112-0.
Langmead & Garnaut 2001, pp. 131–132. Langmead, Donald; Garnaut, Christine (2001). Encyclopedia of Architectural and Engineering Feats (3rd ed.). ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-1-57607-112-0.
Levy & Salvadori 2002, pp. 322–323. Levy, Matthys; Salvadori, Mario (2002). Why buildings Fall Down: How Structures Fail (illustrated, reprint ed.). W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-393-31152-5.

archnet.org (Global: 4,214^th place; English: 3,276^th place)

Ashkan & Ahmad 2009, p. 99. Ashkan, Maryam; Ahmad, Yahaya (November 2009). "Persian Domes: History, Morphology, and Typologies". Archnet-IJAR (International Journal of Architectural Research). 3 (3): 98–115.
Ashkan & Ahmad 2009, p. 113. Ashkan, Maryam; Ahmad, Yahaya (November 2009). "Persian Domes: History, Morphology, and Typologies". Archnet-IJAR (International Journal of Architectural Research). 3 (3): 98–115.
Ashkan & Ahmad 2009, pp. 102, 104, 105, 113. Ashkan, Maryam; Ahmad, Yahaya (November 2009). "Persian Domes: History, Morphology, and Typologies". Archnet-IJAR (International Journal of Architectural Research). 3 (3): 98–115.
Ashkan & Ahmad 2009, pp. 105, 110. Ashkan, Maryam; Ahmad, Yahaya (November 2009). "Persian Domes: History, Morphology, and Typologies". Archnet-IJAR (International Journal of Architectural Research). 3 (3): 98–115.
Ashkan & Ahmad 2009, p. 106. Ashkan, Maryam; Ahmad, Yahaya (November 2009). "Persian Domes: History, Morphology, and Typologies". Archnet-IJAR (International Journal of Architectural Research). 3 (3): 98–115.
Ashkan & Ahmad 2009, pp. 102, 108–109. Ashkan, Maryam; Ahmad, Yahaya (November 2009). "Persian Domes: History, Morphology, and Typologies". Archnet-IJAR (International Journal of Architectural Research). 3 (3): 98–115.

bme.hu (Global: low place; English: low place)

fib.bme.hu

Friedman & Farkas 2011, p. 49. Friedman, Noémi; Farkas, György (2011). "Roof Structures in Motion: On Retractable and Deployable Roof Structures Enabling Quick Construction or Adaptation to External Excitations" (PDF). Concrete Structures. pp. 41–50. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-05-14. Retrieved 2013-03-03.

books.google.com (Global: 3^rd place; English: 3^rd place)

Parker 2012, p. 97: "Dome, a cupola; the term is derived from the Italian duomo, a cathedral, the custom of erecting cupolas on those buildings having been so prevalent that the name dome has, in the French and English languages, been transferred from the church to this kind of roof [See Cupola.]" Parker, John Henry (2012). A Concise Dictionary of Architectural Terms. Courier Corporation. ISBN 978-0-486-14291-3.
Smith 1950, p. 6: "The domical shape must be distinguished from domical vaulting because the dome, both as idea and as method of roofing, originated in pliable materials upon a primitive shelter and was later preserved, venerated, and translated into more permanent materials, largely for symbolic and traditional reasons. 1. At the primitive level the most prevalent and usually the earliest type of constructed shelter, whether a tent, pit house, earth lodge, or thatched cabin, was more or less circular in plan and covered by necessity with a curved roof. Therefore, in many parts of the ancient world the domical shape became habitually associated in men's memories with a central type of structure which was venerated as a tribal and ancestral shelter, a cosmic symbol, a house of appearances and a ritualistic abode. 2. Hence many widely separate cultures, whose architecture evolved from primitive methods of construction, had some tradition of an ancient and revered shelter which was distinguished by a curved roof, usually more or less domical in appearance, but sometimes hoop-shaped or conical." Smith, Earl Baldwin (1950). The Dome: A Study in the History of Ideas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISSN 0079-5208.
Smith 1950, p. 5: "To the naive eye of men uninterested in construction, the dome, it must be realized, was first of all a shape and then an idea. As a shape (which antedated the beginnings of masonry construction), It was the memorable feature of an ancient, ancestral house. It is still a shape visualized and described by such terms as hemisphere, beehive, onion, melon, and bulbous. In ancient times it was thought of as a tholos, pine cone, omphalos, helmet, tegurium, kubba, kalube, maphalia, vihdra, parasol, amalaka tree, cosmic egg, and heavenly bowl. While the modern terms are purely descriptive, the ancient imagery both preserved some memory of the origin of the domical shape and conveyed something of the ancestral beliefs and supernatural meanings associated with its form." Smith, Earl Baldwin (1950). The Dome: A Study in the History of Ideas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISSN 0079-5208.
Smith 1950, pp. 8–9: "The most primitive and natural shape, derived directly from a round hut made of pliable materials tied together at the top and covered with leaves, skins or thatch, was the pointed and slightly bulbous dome which is so common today among the backward tribes of Nubia and Africa (Fig. 93). This type of dome, resembling a truncated pine cone or beehive, is preserved in the tholos tombs of the Mediterranean (Fig. 63), the rock-cut tombs of Etruria and Sicily (Figs. 64, 65), in the Syrian qubab huts (Fig. 88), on the tomb of Bizzos (Fig. 61) and on many of the early Islamic mosques (Figs. 38–43). To distinguish this shape of dome from the geometric cone we will call it conoid, because of its recognized likeness to the actual pine cone. Other types of domical shapes, flatter and unpointed, were derived from the tent and preserved as tabernacles, ciboria and baldachins (Figs. 144–151). These tent forms, however, could be puffed-up and bulbous owing to the light framework of the roof, as is shown by the celestial baldachin above the great altar of Zeus at Pergamum (Fig. 106) and the Parthian dome among the reliefs of the arch of Septimius Severus at Rome (Fig. 228). There were also in Syria and other parts of the Roman Empire sacred rustic shelters whose ritualistic and domical coverings sometimes had an outward curving flange at the bottom of the dome as the thatch was bent out to form an overhang (Figs. 111–117). In other examples the curve of their light domical roof was broken by the horizontal bindings which held the thatch in place (Fig. 10). The hemispherical shape, which is today so commonly associated with the dome, undoubtedly acquired its geometric curve largely from the theoretical interests of the Greek mathematicians and the practical considerations of Roman mechanics. This Roman standardization of the domical shape, which made it easier to construct accurately in brick, stone and concrete, became the customary form of the antique domical vault." Smith, Earl Baldwin (1950). The Dome: A Study in the History of Ideas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISSN 0079-5208.
Saylor 1994, p. 56: "dome, a hemispherical roof form." Saylor, Henry H. (1994). Dictionary of Architecture (reprint ed.). John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-471-75601-9.
Parker 2003: "Definition dome [ARCHITECTURE] A hemispherical roof." Parker, Sybil P., ed. (2003). McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms (Sixth ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. ISBN 978-0-070-42313-8.
Gorse, Johnston & Pritchard 2012, p. 115: "dome 1. A structure that has a hemispherical roof. 2. A curved layer of rock strata, formed by an upward fold." Gorse, Christopher; Johnston, David; Pritchard, Martin (2012). A Dictionary of Construction, Surveying, and Civil Engineering. OUP Oxford. ISBN 978-0-191-04494-6.
Coates, Brooker & Stone 2009, p. 76: "A dome is a structural element conventionally used to cover large spaces. It is defined as an arch that has been rotated around its vertical axis." Coates, Michael; Brooker, Graeme; Stone, Sally (2009). The Visual Dictionary of Interior Architecture and Design. AVA Publishing. ISBN 978-2-940-37380-2.
Guedes 2016, p. 174: "The dome may be regarded as the three-dimensional counterpart of the arch. In its true circular form, a vertical arch is rotated around a vertical axis and sweeps out, at every level, a continuous circular horizontal ring. Loads can be transmitted both along the meridian lines of the vertical arches and around the horizontal rings." Guedes, Pedro, ed. (2016). The Macmillan Encyclopaedia of Architecture & Technological Change. Springer. ISBN 978-1-349-04697-3.
Palmer 2016, p. 123: "The dome, which is created from an arch turned on its axis 360 degrees, is traditionally considered one of the most important Ancient Roman architectural inventions." Palmer, Allison Lee (2016). Historical Dictionary of Architecture (Second ed.). Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1-442-26309-3.
Trachtenberg & Hyman 1986, p. 583: "Dome A curved vault that is erected on a circular base and that is semicircular, pointed, or bulbous in section. If raised over a square or polygonal base transitional squinches or pendentives must be inserted at the corners of the base to transform it into a near circle." Trachtenberg, Marvin; Hyman, Isabelle (1986). Architecture, from Prehistory to Post-modernism: The Western Tradition. H.N. Abrams. ISBN 978-0-810-91077-5.
Curl 2003, p. 220: "A domical vault is not a true dome. A dome is a vault with a segmental, semicircular, bulbous, or pointed section rising from a circular base." Curl, James Stevens (2003). Classical Architecture: An Introduction to Its Vocabulary and Essentials, with a Select Glossary of Terms (illustrated, reprint, reissue ed.). W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-393-73119-4.
Ambrose, Harris & Stone 2008, p. 41: "A concave structural element, erected on a circular base, and usually the shape of a semi-sphere. A dome has a curved surface and functions much like an arch, but provides support in all directions. Larger domes often have two or even three layers: the top and bottom are decorative, while the centre layer is structural and supports the other two. Domes can be segmental, semicircular, pointed or bulbous." Ambrose, Gavin; Harris, Paul; Stone, Sally (2008). The Visual Dictionary of Architecture (illustrated ed.). AVA Publishing. ISBN 978-2-940-37354-3.
Clarke 2010, p. 79: "dome A vault of even curvature over a circular base; the section can be segmental, semicircular, pointed, or bulbous. If a vault is erected over a square base, squinches or pendentives must be inserted at the corners to connect the dome to the base." Clarke, Michael (2010). The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Art Terms. OUP Oxford. ISBN 978-0-199-56992-2.
Ching 2011, p. 62: "A vaulted structure having a circular plan and usually the form of a portion of a sphere, so constructed as to exert an equal thrust in all directions." Ching, Francis D. K. (2011). A Visual Dictionary of Architecture (2nd ed.). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. p. 336. ISBN 978-1-118-16049-7.
Burden 2012, p. 155: "Dome: a curved roof structure that spans an area on a circular base, producing an equal thrust in all directions. A cross section of the dome can be semicircular, pointed, or segmented." Burden, Ernest (2012). Illustrated Dictionary of Architecture (Third ed.). McGraw Hill Professional. ISBN 978-0-071-77293-8.
Kurtz 2004, p. 378: "Dome" [...] "1. A construction in the form of a spherical cap realized on a circular or polygonal plan. 2. The internal surface of a dome. Syn. with CUPOLA. 3. A surface of revolution generated by any meridian curve turning around a vertical axis. Horizontal sections are circular rings and the dome picks up on its bearings by a circular belt. 4. Syn, with CAVITY; OPEN; POT-HOLE" Kurtz, Jean-Paul (2004). Dictionary of Civil Engineering: English-French. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-0-306-48317-2.
Ching, Jarzombek & Prakash 2007, p. 761: "A vaulted structure having a circular or polygonal plan and usually the form of a portion of a sphere, so constructed so as to exert an equal thrust in all directions." Ching, Francis D. K.; Jarzombek, Mark; Prakash, Vikramaditya (2007). A Global History of Architecture (illustrated ed.). J. Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-471-26892-5.
Davies & Jokiniemi 2008, p. 118: "Dome 1 a hollow, flattened or raised hemispherical roof structure, often of masonry, which rests on a circular, square, or polygonal base. See below. See types of dome illustration. See classical temple illustration. bulbous dome, see onion dome. drum dome. glass dome. half dome. melon dome, see umbrella dome. onion dome. parachute dome, see umbrella dome. pendentive dome. pumpkin dome, see umbrella dome. sail dome, sail vault. saucer dome. semi dome, see half dome. umbrella dome. 2 see domelight." Davies, Nikolas; Jokiniemi, Erkki (2008). Dictionary of Architecture and Building Construction. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-750-68502-3.
Parker 2012, p. 90: "Cupola (Ital.), a concave ceiling, either hemispherical or of any other curve, covering a circular or polygonal area; also a roof, the exterior of which is either one of these forms, usually called a dome, and in Latin tholus." Parker, John Henry (2012). A Concise Dictionary of Architectural Terms. Courier Corporation. ISBN 978-0-486-14291-3.
Davies & Jokiniemi 2012, p. 143: "Dome 1 a hollow, flattened or raised hemispherical roof structure, often of masonry, which rests on a circular, square, or polygonal base. See Types included as separate entries are listed below: bulbous dome, see onion dome; drum dome; half dome; melon dome, see umbrella dome; onion dome; parachute dome, see umbrella dome; pendentive dome; pumpkin dome, see umbrella dome; sail dome, sail vault; saucer dome; semi dome, see half dome; umbrella dome. 2 see domelight." Davies, Nikolas; Jokiniemi, Erkki (2012). Architect's Illustrated Pocket Dictionary. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-136-44406-7.
Cowan & Smith 1998, p. 73: "A vault of double curvature, both curves being convex upwards. Most domes are portions of a sphere; however, it is possible to have a dome of non-spherical curvature on a circular plan, or to have a dome on a non-circular plan, such as an ellipse, an oval or a rectangle." Cowan, Henry J.; Smith, Peter R. (1998). Dictionary of Architectural and Building Technology (Third ed.). Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-0-419-22280-4.
McNeil 2002, p. 879: "A dome is a convex rounded roof covering the whole or a part of a building with a base on the horizontal plane which is circular, elliptical or polygonal. In vertical section the dome may be hemispherical, partly elliptical, saucer-shaped, or formed like a bulb (the so-called onion domes to be seen in eastern Europe)." McNeil, Ian (2002). An Encyclopedia of the History of Technology (revised ed.). Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-0-203-19211-5.
Heyman 1997, p. 27: "A dome is a rounded vault forming a roof over a large interior space." [...] "The rounded vault of the dome can take many forms. Perhaps the simplest of these is a shell of revolution, in which every horizontal section is circular; an egg in an egg-cup is a shell of this kind." Heyman, Jacques (1997). The Stone Skeleton: Structural Engineering of Masonry Architecture (illustrated, reprint ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-62963-8.
Harris 2005, p. 319: "Dome 1. A curved roof structure spanning an area; often hemispherical in shape. 2. A square prefabricated pan form; used in two-way joist (waffle) concrete floor construction. 3. A vault substantially hemispherical in shape, but sometimes slightly pointed or bulbous; a ceiling of similar form. Also see geodesic dome and saucer dome." Harris, Cyril M. (2005). Dictionary of Architecture and Construction (Fourth ed.). McGraw Hill Professional. ISBN 978-0-071-58901-7.
Brett 2012, p. 20: "Dome a vaulted roof; normally circular or polygonal in plan and semicircular, segmental or pointed in section. See also Cupola and Squinch." Brett, Peter (2012). Illustrated Dictionary of Building (Second ed.). Routledge. ISBN 978-1-135-13856-1.
Hourihane 2012, p. 301: "Rounded vault covering an interior space. A very small dome roof, for example a lantern mounted on the eye of a dome proper (e.g. St Paul's Cathedral, London), is known as a cupola. In Italian cupola is used for a monumental dome." [...] "A dome can either be composed of curved segments or be a shell of revolution. The dome at Florence Cathedral by Filippo Brunelleschi (1377–1446) is segmental, octangular at every section. A shell of revolution is generated by rotating an arch about a vertical central axis. To produce a hemispherical surface the arch will be semicircular, but and shape of arch, similarly rotated, will give rise to a shell of revolution; and every horizontal cross-section is still circular. The simplest form of dome is that of such a shell of revolution: for example, the inner masonry dome of St Paul's Cathedral is roughly hemispherical, and has an open eye, while the main dome is conical; but both are shells of revolution, as is the surface of the timber outer dome. A dome can have either a single or a double shell." Hourihane, Colum, ed. (2012). The Grove Encyclopedia of Medieval Art and Architecture. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-539536-5.
Harris 2013: "Dome 1. A curved roof structure spanning an area; often hemispherical in shape. 2. A vault substantially hemispherical in shape, but sometimes slightly pointed or bulbous; a ceiling of similar form." Harris, Cyril M. (2013). Illustrated Dictionary of Historic Architecture (reprint, revised ed.). Courier Corporation. ISBN 978-0-486-13211-2.
Murray, Murray & Jones 2013, p. 151: "dome A structure that can be either circular in plan, or oval, hexagonal, octagonal, or a combination of these forms. It may have a high profile, or hemispherical, or flattened." Murray, Linda; Murray, Peter; Jones, Tom Devonshire, eds. (2013). The Oxford Dictionary of Christian Art and Architecture (Second ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-199-68027-6.
Palmisano & Totaro 2010, p. 519: "The absence of a common language is one of the reasons why nowadays there is a very big gap between the Architect and the Engineer. The introduction of new materials and techniques during the Industrial Revolution and the born of the first polytechnics in the 18th century, led to a different cultural approach to the design causing the born of different languages between Architects and Engineers. Nowadays, with the widespread of very complicated works of the architecture there is a huge need to bridge the gap between Architects and Engineers. In this context, focusing the attention on masonry domes, this paper aims at highlighting that Load Path Method seems to open new prospects in the search for a common language between engineers and architects to give voice, in harmony and in a single design, to formal, aesthetical, functional and structural aspects. According to LPM, a dome can be seen as a system of meridian arches joined by the parallel circles. The arches draw the paths of the vertical loads while the parallel circles draw the paths of the unbalanced thrusts. In fact, differently from the arches, in dome the equilibrium of the thrusts in every node is always possible because of the presence of the parallels." Palmisano, F.; Totaro, A. (2010). "Load path method in the interpretation of dome behavior". In Cruz, Paulo J. da Sousa (ed.). Structures and Architecture. CRC Press. pp. 519–520. ISBN 978-1-439-86297-1.
Jannasch 2016, pp. 745–746: "A funicular masonry dome experiences no hoop stresses, whether tensile or compressive, so it is always on the verge of bursting. Shallow spheric domes maintain compressive stresses in each course and are therefore more stable than the "ideal" funicular form. Viable non-funicular domes also include Herrero's flat vault at the Escorial, and Mackenzie's 1840 concept of an inverted fan vault." [...] "Masonry domes are often explained as free-standing arches rotated around a central axis, or as half-arches swept between a tension ring at the base and an ocular compression ring at the top. Such concepts aren't entirely inaccurate, but they are far from complete. They undervalue or ignore the circumferential compression in each course upon which the rising dome depends and which remains active in many completed structures. They also tend to ignore the vertical shear resistance that prevents inner and upper portions of the dome from crashing vertically down through outer and lower portions, and the horizontal shear resistance that allows lower parts of the dome to contain the thrust of upper parts. Visualizing the dome as a rotated arch implies that the bedding faces between subsequent courses of masonry need to be more or less normal to the section, which is the case in an arch, but not the case in a dome. Lastly, free-standing arches must be thick enough to contain their funicular. This is not true of domes. That the arch and funicular don't really explain of the structural behavior of domes should be clear from real world examples. The conical domes at Pisa and elsewhere, for example, the shallow domes of Byzantium, and the circular vaults at the Escorial are far from funicular. None of them would succeed if "un-rotated" into arches." Jannasch, E. (2016). "Beyond the funicular: Exploiting untapped petentials in masonry construction". In Cruz, Paulo J. da Sousa (ed.). Structures and Architecture: Beyond their Limits. CRC Press. pp. 745–752. ISBN 978-1-317-54996-3.
Smith 1950, p. 5. Smith, Earl Baldwin (1950). The Dome: A Study in the History of Ideas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISSN 0079-5208.
Hourihane 2012, p. 302. Hourihane, Colum, ed. (2012). The Grove Encyclopedia of Medieval Art and Architecture. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-539536-5.
Wright 2009, pp. 179–180, 188. Wright, G.R.H. (2009). Ancient Building Technology, Volume 3: Construction (2 Vols) (illustrated ed.). BRILL. ISBN 978-9-004-17745-1.
Fletcher. Fletcher, Sir Banister (1996). Dan Cruickshank (ed.). Sir Banister Fletcher's A History of Architecture (illustrated, reprint, 20th revised ed.). Architectural Press. ISBN 978-0-7506-2267-7.
Technical 1872, p. 252. The Technical Educator: an Encyclopædia of Technical Education: Vol. 2. Cassell, Petter and Galpin. 1872.
Dumser 2010, p. 436. Dumser, Elisha Ann (2010). "Dome". In Gagarin, Michael; Fantham, Elaine (eds.). The Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Greece and Rome. Vol. 1. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc. pp. 436–438. ISBN 978-0-195-17072-6.
Ching 2011, p. 63. Ching, Francis D. K. (2011). A Visual Dictionary of Architecture (2nd ed.). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. p. 336. ISBN 978-1-118-16049-7.
Peterson 1996a, p. 68. Peterson, Andrew (1996). The Dictionary of Islamic Architecture. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-203-20387-3.
Mainstone 2001, p. 121. Mainstone, Rowland J. (2001). Developments in Structural Form (2 ed.). Architectural Press. ISBN 978-0-7506-5451-7.
Denny 2010, p. 139. Denny, Mark (2010). Super Structures: The Science of Bridges, Buildings, Dams, and Other Feats of Engineering. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 978-0-8018-9436-7.
Minke 2012, pp. 57–59, 127. Minke, Gernot (2012). Building with Earth: Design and Technology of a Sustainable Architecture (3rd; revised ed.). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. ISBN 978-3-034-60872-5.
Hourihane 2012, p. 242. Hourihane, Colum, ed. (2012). The Grove Encyclopedia of Medieval Art and Architecture. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-539536-5.
Hourihane 2012, p. 301. Hourihane, Colum, ed. (2012). The Grove Encyclopedia of Medieval Art and Architecture. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-539536-5.
Blockley 2014, p. 22. Blockley, David (2014). Structural Engineering: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. p. 144. ISBN 978-0-19-165208-0.
Larson & Tyas 2003, pp. 32, 38. Larson, Olga Popovic; Tyas, Andy (2003). Conceptual Structural Design: Bridging the Gap Between Architects and Engineers (illustrated, reprint ed.). Thomas Telford. ISBN 978-0-72773-235-4.
Smith 1950, pp. 51–53. Smith, Earl Baldwin (1950). The Dome: A Study in the History of Ideas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISSN 0079-5208.
Smith 1950, p. 53. Smith, Earl Baldwin (1950). The Dome: A Study in the History of Ideas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISSN 0079-5208.
Smith 1950, pp. 53–56, 79. Smith, Earl Baldwin (1950). The Dome: A Study in the History of Ideas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISSN 0079-5208.
Höcker 2000, pp. 181, 183. Höcker, Christoph (2000). Architecture. Laurence King Publishing. ISBN 978-1-856-69159-8.
Dror 2011, p. 163. Dror, Ben-Yosef (2011). "Area F – Soundings in the Fortifications". In Zertal, Adam (ed.). El-Ahwat, A Fortified Site from the Early Iron Age Near Nahal 'Iron, Israel: Excavations 1993–2000. BRILL. pp. 162–173. ISBN 978-9-004-17645-4.
Wright 2009, p. 188. Wright, G.R.H. (2009). Ancient Building Technology, Volume 3: Construction (2 Vols) (illustrated ed.). BRILL. ISBN 978-9-004-17745-1.
Chen & Lui 2005, pp. 24–18. Chen, W. F.; Lui, E. M. (2005). Handbook of Structural Engineering (2, illustrated, revised ed.). Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press. p. 1768. ISBN 978-1-420-03993-1.
Chen & Lui 2005, pp. 24–18, 24–19. Chen, W. F.; Lui, E. M. (2005). Handbook of Structural Engineering (2, illustrated, revised ed.). Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press. p. 1768. ISBN 978-1-420-03993-1.
Ramaswamy & Eekhout 2002, p. 141. Ramaswany, G. S.; Eekhout, Mick (2002). Analysis, Design and Construction of Steel Space Frames (illustrated, reprint ed.). London, UK: Thomas Telford, Ltd. p. 242. ISBN 978-0-727-73014-5.
Chen & Lui 2005, pp. 24–2, 24–18. Chen, W. F.; Lui, E. M. (2005). Handbook of Structural Engineering (2, illustrated, revised ed.). Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press. p. 1768. ISBN 978-1-420-03993-1.
Hamilton 1983, p. 42. Hamilton, George Heard (1983). The Art and Architecture of Russia (illustrated ed.). Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-05327-2.
Moffett, Fazio & Wodehouse 2003. Moffett, Marian; Fazio, Michael W.; Wodehouse, Lawrence (2003). A World History of Architecture (illustrated ed.). London: Laurence King Publishing. ISBN 978-1-856-69371-4.
Newman & Pevnser 1972, p. 527. Newman, John; Pevnser, Nikolaus, eds. (1972). The Buildings of England: Dorset. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-09598-2.
Dien 2007, p. 80. Dien, Albert E. (2007). Six Dynasties Civilization (Illustrated ed.). Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-07404-8.
Hourihane 2012, p. 303. Hourihane, Colum, ed. (2012). The Grove Encyclopedia of Medieval Art and Architecture. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-539536-5.
Curl 2003, p. 220. Curl, James Stevens (2003). Classical Architecture: An Introduction to Its Vocabulary and Essentials, with a Select Glossary of Terms (illustrated, reprint, reissue ed.). W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-393-73119-4.
Como 2013, p. 320. Como, Mario (2013). Statics of Historic Masonry Constructions. Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-30131-5.
Ambrose & Tripeny 2011, p. 36. Ambrose, James; Tripeny, Patrick (2011). Building Structures (illustrated ed.). John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-470-54260-6.
Denny 2010, p. 140. Denny, Mark (2010). Super Structures: The Science of Bridges, Buildings, Dams, and Other Feats of Engineering. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 978-0-8018-9436-7.
Smith 1950, pp. 8, 9. Smith, Earl Baldwin (1950). The Dome: A Study in the History of Ideas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISSN 0079-5208.
Burckhardt 1987, p. 58. Burckhardt, Jacob (1987). Murray, Peter (ed.). The Architecture of the Italian Renaissance. Translated by James Palmes (illustrated, reprint ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-08049-9.
Palmer, Pettitt & Bahn 2005, p. 24. Palmer, Douglas; Pettitt, Paul; Bahn, Paul G. (2005). Unearthing the past: the great archaeological discoveries that have changed history (Illustrated ed.). Globe Pequot. ISBN 978-1-59228-718-5.^{[permanent dead link]}
Crandall 2000, pp. 34–35. Crandall, David P. (2000). The Place of Stunted Ironwood Trees: A Year in the Lives of the Cattle-herding Himba of Namibia. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group, Inc. ISBN 978-0-82641-270-6.
Hill 1996, p. 69. Hill, Donald Routledge (1996). A history of engineering in classical and medieval times (Illustrated ed.). New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-15291-4.
Smith 1950, p. 6. Smith, Earl Baldwin (1950). The Dome: A Study in the History of Ideas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISSN 0079-5208.
Leick 2003, p. 64. Leick, Gwendolyn, ed. (2003). "Dome". A Dictionary of Ancient Near Eastern Architecture. London and New York: Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-0-203-19965-7.
Mainstone 2001, p. 116. Mainstone, Rowland J. (2001). Developments in Structural Form (2 ed.). Architectural Press. ISBN 978-0-7506-5451-7.
Smith 1950, pp. 81–82. Smith, Earl Baldwin (1950). The Dome: A Study in the History of Ideas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISSN 0079-5208.
Kuiper 2011, pp. 266–267. Kuiper, Kathleen (2011). The Culture of China. The Rosen Publishing Group. ISBN 978-1-61530-183-6.
Dien 2007, pp. 79–80. Dien, Albert E. (2007). Six Dynasties Civilization (Illustrated ed.). Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-07404-8.
Needham & Gwei-Djen 1971, p. 167. Needham, Joseph; Gwei-Djen, Lu (1971) [1962]. Science and Civilisation in China: Physics and Physical Technology, Volume 4. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-07060-7.
Dien 2007, p. 79. Dien, Albert E. (2007). Six Dynasties Civilization (Illustrated ed.). Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-07404-8.
Lehmann 1989, pp. 247, 254–255. Lehmann, Karl (1989) [1945]. "The Dome of Heaven". In Kleinbauer, W. Eugène (ed.). Modern Perspectives in Western Art History: An Anthology of Twentieth-Century Writings on the Visual Arts (Medieval Academy Reprints for Teaching). Vol. 25. University of Toronto Press. pp. 227–270. ISBN 978-0-8020-6708-1.
Smith 1950, p. 9. Smith, Earl Baldwin (1950). The Dome: A Study in the History of Ideas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISSN 0079-5208.
Lehmann 1989, p. 249. Lehmann, Karl (1989) [1945]. "The Dome of Heaven". In Kleinbauer, W. Eugène (ed.). Modern Perspectives in Western Art History: An Anthology of Twentieth-Century Writings on the Visual Arts (Medieval Academy Reprints for Teaching). Vol. 25. University of Toronto Press. pp. 227–270. ISBN 978-0-8020-6708-1.
Winter 2006, p. 130. Winter, Frederick E. (2006). Studies in Hellenistic Architecture (illustrated ed.). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press. ISBN 978-0-8020-3914-9.
Lancaster 2005, p. 49. Lancaster, Lynne C. (2005). Concrete Vaulted Construction in Imperial Rome: Innovations in Context (illustrated ed.). Hong Kong: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-84202-0.
Krautheimer 1986, p. 77. Krautheimer, Richard (1986). Early Christian and Byzantine Architecture (4 ed.). Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-05294-7.
Lehmann 1989, p. 255. Lehmann, Karl (1989) [1945]. "The Dome of Heaven". In Kleinbauer, W. Eugène (ed.). Modern Perspectives in Western Art History: An Anthology of Twentieth-Century Writings on the Visual Arts (Medieval Academy Reprints for Teaching). Vol. 25. University of Toronto Press. pp. 227–270. ISBN 978-0-8020-6708-1.
Lancaster 2005, pp. 46, 50. Lancaster, Lynne C. (2005). Concrete Vaulted Construction in Imperial Rome: Innovations in Context (illustrated ed.). Hong Kong: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-84202-0.
McClendon 2005, p. 16. McClendon, Charles B. (2005). The Origins of Medieval Architecture: Building in Europe, A.D 600–900 (illustrated ed.). Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-10688-6.
Lancaster 2005, p. 161. Lancaster, Lynne C. (2005). Concrete Vaulted Construction in Imperial Rome: Innovations in Context (illustrated ed.). Hong Kong: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-84202-0.
Krautheimer 1986, p. 238. Krautheimer, Richard (1986). Early Christian and Byzantine Architecture (4 ed.). Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-05294-7.
Smith 1950, p. 56. Smith, Earl Baldwin (1950). The Dome: A Study in the History of Ideas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISSN 0079-5208.
Krautheimer 1986, p. 239. Krautheimer, Richard (1986). Early Christian and Byzantine Architecture (4 ed.). Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-05294-7.
Krautheimer 1986, pp. 203, 242. Krautheimer, Richard (1986). Early Christian and Byzantine Architecture (4 ed.). Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-05294-7.
Freely & Çakmak 2004, pp. 90–93, 95–96. Freely, John; Çakmak, Ahmet S. (2004). Byzantine Monuments of Istanbul. New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-77257-0.
Ousterhout 2008b, p. 358. Ousterhout, Robert (2008). "Chapter II.7.2: Churches and Monasteries". In Jeffreys, Elizabeth; Haldon, John; Cormack, Robin (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Byzantine Studies. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-925246-6.
Krautheimer 1986, p. 340. Krautheimer, Richard (1986). Early Christian and Byzantine Architecture (4 ed.). Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-05294-7.
Darling 2004, p. xliii. Darling, Janina K. (2004). Architecture of Greece. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-313-32152-8.
Rosser 2011, p. 137. Rosser, John H. (2011). Historical Dictionary of Byzantium (2 ed.). Scarecrow Press. ISBN 978-0-810-87477-0.
Krautheimer 1986, p. 379. Krautheimer, Richard (1986). Early Christian and Byzantine Architecture (4 ed.). Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-05294-7.
Wittkower 1989, p. 185. Wittkower, Rudolf (1989) [1st Pub. 1963]. "S. Maria della Salute: Scenographic Architecture and the Venetian Baroque". In Kleinbauer, W. Eugène (ed.). Modern Perspectives in Western Art History: An Anthology of Twentieth-Century Writings on the Visual Arts (Medieval Academy Reprints for Teaching). Vol. 25. University of Toronto Press. pp. 165–192. ISBN 978-0-8020-6708-1.
Smith 1950, p. 43. Smith, Earl Baldwin (1950). The Dome: A Study in the History of Ideas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISSN 0079-5208.
Bloom & Blair 2009, pp. 111–112. Bloom, Jonathan M.; Blair, Sheila S., eds. (2009). Grove Encyclopedia of Islamic Art & Architecture: Three-Volume Set. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-530991-1.
Krautheimer 1986, p. 402. Krautheimer, Richard (1986). Early Christian and Byzantine Architecture (4 ed.). Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-05294-7.
Dupré 2001, p. 5. Dupré, Judith (2001). Churches (illustrated ed.). HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-06-019438-3.
Bullough 1991, pp. 57, 89. Bullough, Donald A. (1991). Carolingian Renewal: Sources and Heritage. Manchester University Press. ISBN 978-0-7190-3354-4.
Krautheimer 1986, p. 405. Krautheimer, Richard (1986). Early Christian and Byzantine Architecture (4 ed.). Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-05294-7.
Kuban 1985, pp. 2–4. Kuban, Doğan (1985). Muslim Religious Architecture, Part II. Leiden, The Netherlands: E. J. Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-07084-4.
Kuiper 2011, p. 165. Kuiper, Kathleen (2011). The Culture of China. The Rosen Publishing Group. ISBN 978-1-61530-183-6.
Porter 1928, p. 48. Porter, Arthur Kingsley (1928). Spanish Romanesque Sculpture, Volume 1 (illustrated ed.). Hacker Art Books.
Jeffery 2010, p. 72. Jeffery, George (2010). A Brief Description of the Holy Sepulchre Jerusalem and Other Christian Churches in the Holy City: With Some Account of the Mediaeval Copies of the Holy Sepulchre Surviving in Europe (reprint (1919) ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-108-01604-9.
Stewart 2008, p. 202. Stewart, Charles Anthony (2008). Domes of Heaven: The Domed Basilicas of Cyprus (illustrated ed.). ProQuest LLC. ISBN 978-0-549-75556-2.
Hillenbrand 1994, p. 318. Hillenbrand, Robert (1994). Islamic Architecture: Form, Function, and Meaning. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-10133-2.
Frankl & Crossley 2000, p. 213. Frankl, Paul; Crossley, Paul (2000). Gothic Architecture (illustrated, revised ed.). Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-08799-4.
Hourihane 2012, p. 304. Hourihane, Colum, ed. (2012). The Grove Encyclopedia of Medieval Art and Architecture. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-539536-5.
Melaragno 1991, p. 73. Melaragno, Michele G. (1991). An Introduction to Shell Structures: the Art and Science of Vaulting (softcover ed.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. ISBN 978-1-4757-0225-5.
Peterson 1996a, p. 200. Peterson, Andrew (1996). The Dictionary of Islamic Architecture. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-203-20387-3.
Michell & Zebrowski 1987, p. 15. Michell, George; Zebrowski, Mark (1987). The New Cambridge History of India: Architecture and Art of the Deccan Sultanates. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-56321-5.
Wittkower 1999, p. 48. Wittkower, Rudolf (1999). Art and Architecture in Italy 1600–1750: III. Late Baroque. Revised by Joseph Conners and Jennifer Montagu (6th ed.). Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-07941-8.
Palmer 2009, pp. 92–93. Palmer, Allison Lee (2009). The A to Z of Architecture. Scarecrow Press. ISBN 978-0-810-87058-1.
Gayle & Gayle 1998, pp. 13–14, 18, 26. Gayle, Margot; Gayle, Carol (1998). Cast-iron architecture in America: the significance of James Bogardus (illustrated ed.). W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-393-73015-9.
Mainstone 2001, p. 241. Mainstone, Rowland J. (2001). Developments in Structural Form (2 ed.). Architectural Press. ISBN 978-0-7506-5451-7.
Lippincott 2008, p. 26. Lippincott, Kristen (2008). DK Eyewitness Books: Astronomy. Penguin. ISBN 978-0-756-64349-2.
Kohlmaier & Von Sartory 1991, pp. 126–127. Kohlmaier, Georg; Von Sartory, Barna (1991). Houses of Glass: a Nineteenth-Century Building Type. Translated by John C. Harvey (illustrated ed.). MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-61070-4.
Coleman 2006, p. 32. Coleman, Peter (2006). Shopping Environments (illustrated ed.). Routledge. ISBN 978-0-750-66001-3.
Kohlmaier & Von Sartory 1991, p. 126. Kohlmaier, Georg; Von Sartory, Barna (1991). Houses of Glass: a Nineteenth-Century Building Type. Translated by John C. Harvey (illustrated ed.). MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-61070-4.
Mainstone 2001, p. 171. Mainstone, Rowland J. (2001). Developments in Structural Form (2 ed.). Architectural Press. ISBN 978-0-7506-5451-7.
Mainstone 2001, p. 129. Mainstone, Rowland J. (2001). Developments in Structural Form (2 ed.). Architectural Press. ISBN 978-0-7506-5451-7.
Mainstone 2001, p. 134. Mainstone, Rowland J. (2001). Developments in Structural Form (2 ed.). Architectural Press. ISBN 978-0-7506-5451-7.

caltech.edu (Global: 240^th place; English: 473^rd place)

rincon.gps.caltech.edu

Tsan-wing & Kin-wah 2001, p. 294. Tsan-wing, Ng; Kin-wah, Leung (2001). Deformation Survey for the Preservation of Lei Cheng Uk Han Tomb (PDF). The 10th FIG International Symposium on Deformation Measurements. Session VIII: Structural Deformations. 19 – 22 March 2001. Orange, California, US. pp. 294–301. ISBN 978-0-86078-686-3. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 February 2004.

cam.ac.uk (Global: 569^th place; English: 354^th place)

arct.cam.ac.uk

Arce 2006, p. 209. Arce, Ignacio (2006). Umayyad Arches, Vaults & Domes: Merging and Re-creation. Contributions to Early Islamic Construction History (conference paper) (PDF). Second International Congress on Construction History, Queens' College, Cambridge University; 29/03-02/04/2006. pp. 195–220.
Cipriani & Lau 2006, pp. 696, 698. Cipriani, Barbara; Lau, Wanda W. (2006). Construction Techniques in Medieval Cairo: the Domes of Mamluk Mausolea (1250 A.D. – 1517 A.D.) (PDF). Second International Congress on Construction History. Cambridge, UK. pp. 695–716.

chriskern.net (Global: low place; English: low place)

Kern. Kern, Chris. "Jefferson's Dome at Monticello". Retrieved July 14, 2009.

columbia.edu (Global: 554^th place; English: 368^th place)

Charlier. Charlier, Claude (1988). "After a While, Nothing Seems Strange in a Stadium with a 'Lid'". Smithsonian. Retrieved February 28, 2013.

copernicus.org (Global: 5,068^th place; English: 3,578^th place)

isprs-archives.copernicus.org

Capone & Lanzara 2019, p. 220. Capone, Mara; Lanzara, Emanuela (2019). Scan-to-BIM vs 3D ideal model HBIM: Parametric tools to study domes geometry (PDF). 2019 8th Intl. Workshop 3D-ARCH "3D Virtual Reconstruction and Visualization of Complex Architectures", 6–8 February 2019, Bergamo, Italy. Vol. 42. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. pp. 219–226.

culturalsurvival.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

Wilkie & Morelli 2000. Wilkie, David S.; Morelli, Gilda A. (2000). "Forest Foragers: A Day in the Life of Efe Pygmies in the Democratic Republic of Congo". Cultural Survival Quarterly. 24 (3). Retrieved December 7, 2010.

doi.org (Global: 2^nd place; English: 2^nd place)

doi.org

Downey 1946, pp. 23, 25, 26: "Architectural historians who deal with the history of the dome have been baffled and sometimes led astray by the peculiar vague-ness of some of the literary passages which in some cases form the only evidence for the existence of certain domes or of certain types of domes. When the ancient authors mention a dome, they often call it a sphaira or a sphairion. While inexact, in the geometrical sense, this is a perfectly comprehensible and justifiable method of describing an architectural element whose most prominent characteristic is its sphericity; and that the ancient writers were aware of the inexactitude, but also aware of the usefulness of the graphic image, is suggested by Procopius' reference to the main dome of the Church of the Apostles at Constantinople as τὸ σφαιροειδές, which might be translated "the sphere-like structure."" [...] "Choricius, to the writer's present knowledge, is the only writer of this period who is careful enough to note that a dome or a semi-dome is a hollow spherical form." [...] "Naturally, if one wished to describe a dome vividly, the most arresting feature of its appearance was its sphericity, and everybody knew that if you called a dome a sphaira, you called it this because it resembled a sphaira; and it was understood that a dome was not a sphaira in the geometrical sense. This is of course what one would expect, and the phenomenon is by no means confined to post-classical Greek literature." Downey, Glanville (1946). "On Some Post-Classical Greek Architectural Terms". Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association. 77: 22–34. doi:10.2307/283440. JSTOR 283440.
Curl & Wilson 2015, pp. 236–237: "Cupola, essentially a species of vault, constructed on a circular, elliptical, or polygonal plan, bulbous, segmental, semicircular, or pointed in vertical section. It can be built on top of a structure the plan of which is identical to that of the dome: if that structure's wall is circular or elliptical it is a drum (often pierced with windows) as in a rotunda. However, domes usually provide cover for a square- or rectangular-planned building or compartment, so adjustments are made to facilitate the transition from the square to the circular, elliptical, or polygonal base of the cupola or dome. This is achieved by means of pendentives (fragments of a sail-vault, resembling a species of concave, distorted, almost triangular spandrels, rising up from the corner at the top of the right-angled compartment to the circular or elliptical base of the drum or cupola) or squinches (small arch or series of parallel arches of increasing radius spanning the angle of the square compartment). Both the drum and cupola will have a diameter the same dimension as the side of the square on which the whole structure stands. Types of dome include: calotte: low cupola or saucer dome of segmental vertical section, like a skull-cap; cloister-vault: as domical vault; domical vault: cloister-vault, not a true dome, but formed of four or more (depending on the shape of the base) cells or webs forming groins where they touch vertically and rising to a point; melon: as parachute; Pantheon: low dome on the exterior, often stepped, resembling that of the Pantheon in Rome, and coffered on the interior, widely copied by Neo-Classical architects; parachute: melon, pumpkin, or umbrella dome standing on a scalloped circular base and formed of individual webs, segmental on plan, joined on groins or ribs. Each web has a concave interior and convex exterior so it resembles a parachute, rather than an umbrella; pumpkin: as parachute; sail dome: dome resembling a billowing sail over a square compartment with its diameter the same dimension as the diagonal instead of the side of the square below, enabling the structure to rise as though on pendentives but continuing without interruption. Pendentives are really part of a sail-dome and themselves are a species of sail-vault; umbrella: as parachute." Curl, James Stevens; Wilson, Susan (2015). "Dome". A Dictionary of Architecture and Landscape Architecture (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. pp. 236–237. doi:10.1093/acref/9780199674985.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-967498-5. Retrieved 2020-04-09.
Huerta 2007, p. 212. Huerta, Santigo (2007). "Oval Domes: History, Geometry and Mechanics". Nexus Network Journal. Vol. 9. pp. 211–248. doi:10.1007/978-3-7643-8699-3_4. ISBN 978-3-7643-8444-9.
Curl & Wilson 2015, p. 236. Curl, James Stevens; Wilson, Susan (2015). "Dome". A Dictionary of Architecture and Landscape Architecture (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. pp. 236–237. doi:10.1093/acref/9780199674985.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-967498-5. Retrieved 2020-04-09.
Mediati, Colistra & Arena 2020, p. 3. Mediati, Domenico; Colistra, Daniele; Arena, Marinella (2020). "Domes in the central Mediterranean. Geometric syncretism and cultural hybridizations". Disegnarecon. 13 (25): 1–20. doi:10.20365/disegnarecon.25.2020.10. ISSN 1828-5961.
Gonzalo & Alkadi 2018, p. 95. Gonzalo, José Carlos Palacios; Alkadi, Rana Munir (2018). "Muqarnas Domes and Cornices in the Maghreb and Andalusia" (PDF). Nexus Network Journal. 20 (1). Springer: 95–123. doi:10.1007/s00004-017-0367-3.
Gonzalo & Alkadi 2018, pp. 97–99. Gonzalo, José Carlos Palacios; Alkadi, Rana Munir (2018). "Muqarnas Domes and Cornices in the Maghreb and Andalusia" (PDF). Nexus Network Journal. 20 (1). Springer: 95–123. doi:10.1007/s00004-017-0367-3.
MacDonald 1958, pp. 2–3, 7. MacDonald, William (1958). "Some Implications of Later Roman Construction" (PDF). Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians. 17 (4): 2–8. doi:10.2307/987944. JSTOR 987944.^{[permanent dead link]}
Kuban 1987, p. 73. Kuban, Doğan (1987). "The Style of Sinan's Domed Structures". Muqarnas. 4: 72–97. doi:10.2307/1523097. JSTOR 1523097.
Ashkan & Ahmad 2010, p. 316. Ashkan, Maryam; Ahmad, Yahaya (2010). "Discontinuous Double-shell Domes through Islamic eras in the Middle East and Central Asia: History, Morphology, Typologies, Geometry, and Construction" (PDF). Nexus Network Journal. 12 (2). Turin, Italy: Kim Williams Books: 287–319. doi:10.1007/s00004-010-0013-9.
Robison 1991, p. 395. Robison, Elwin C. (December 1991). "Optics and Mathematics in the Domed Churches of Guarino Guarini". Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians. 50 (4): 384–401. doi:10.2307/990663. JSTOR 990663.
Gye 1988, p. 142. Gye, D. H. (1988). "Arches and Domes in Iranian Islamic Buildings: An Engineer's Perspective". Iran. 26: 129–144. doi:10.2307/4299807. JSTOR 4299807.
Gye 1988, pp. 141–142. Gye, D. H. (1988). "Arches and Domes in Iranian Islamic Buildings: An Engineer's Perspective". Iran. 26: 129–144. doi:10.2307/4299807. JSTOR 4299807.
Rovero & Tonietti 2012, p. 183. Rovero, L.; Tonietti, U. (2012). "Structural behaviour of earthen corbelled domes in the Aleppo's region". Materials and Structures. 45 (1–2): 171–184. doi:10.1617/s11527-011-9758-1. S2CID 137418637.
Pavani 2020, p. 470. Pavani, Raffaella (2020). "Chapter 28 Challenging Mathematical Insights into Masonry Domes Over the Centuries". In Abali, Bilen Emek; Giorgio, Ivan (eds.). Vol 130 Developments and Novel Approaches in Nonlinear Solid Body Mechanics. Advanced Structured Materials. Vol. 130. Springer. pp. 469–479. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-50460-1_28. ISBN 978-3-030-50460-1.
Grabar 1963, pp. 195, 197. Grabar, Oleg (December 1963). "The Islamic Dome, Some Considerations". Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians. 22 (4): 191–198. doi:10.2307/988190. JSTOR 988190.
Baumann & Haggh 1990, pp. 208–209. Baumann, Dorothea; Haggh, Barbara (May 1990). "Musical Acoustics in the Middle Ages". Early Music. 18 (2): 199–210. doi:10.1093/em/xviii.2.199.
Baumann & Haggh 1990, p. 202. Baumann, Dorothea; Haggh, Barbara (May 1990). "Musical Acoustics in the Middle Ages". Early Music. 18 (2): 199–210. doi:10.1093/em/xviii.2.199.
Salvadori 1987, p. 233. Salvadori, M.G. (1987). "The Anasazi cribbed domes". Building and Environment. 22 (3). Elsevier Ltd: 233–235. Bibcode:1987BuEnv..22..233S. doi:10.1016/0360-1323(87)90011-4. ISSN 0360-1323.
Makowski 1962, p. 62. Makowski, Z. S. (1962). "Braced Domes, Their History, Modern Trends and Recent Developments". Architectural Science Review. 5 (2): 62–79. doi:10.1080/00038628.1962.9696050.
Saka 2007, p. 595. Saka, M. P. (2007). "Optimum geometry design of geodesic domes using harmony search algorithm". Advances in Structural Engineering. 10 (6): 595–606. doi:10.1260/136943307783571445. hdl:11511/63569. S2CID 111176744.
Born 1944, pp. 220–221. Born, Wolfgang (April 1944). "The Introduction of the Bulbous Dome into Gothic Architecture and its Subsequent Development". Speculum. 19 (2): 208–221. doi:10.2307/2849071. JSTOR 2849071. S2CID 162699497.
Karydis 2012, pp. 362–363. Karydis, Nikolaos D. (2012). "The Early Byzantine Domed Basilicas of West Asia Minor. An Essay in Graphic Reconstruction" (PDF). Late Antique Archaeology. 9 (1): 357–381. doi:10.1163/22134522-12340013. ISBN 9789004309777. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-05-29. Retrieved May 29, 2015.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: periodical has ISBN (link)
Huerta 2007, p. 231. Huerta, Santigo (2007). "Oval Domes: History, Geometry and Mechanics". Nexus Network Journal. Vol. 9. pp. 211–248. doi:10.1007/978-3-7643-8699-3_4. ISBN 978-3-7643-8444-9.
Bellini 2017, p. 1. Bellini, Federico (2017). "8 Vaults and Domes: Statics as an Art". In Mallgrave, Harry Francis; Payne, Alina (eds.). Companion to the History of Architecture, Volume I, Renaissance and Baroque Architecture. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. pp. 1–33. doi:10.1002/9781118887226.wbcha009. ISBN 978-1-118-88722-6.
Gye 1988, pp. 142–143. Gye, D. H. (1988). "Arches and Domes in Iranian Islamic Buildings: An Engineer's Perspective". Iran. 26: 129–144. doi:10.2307/4299807. JSTOR 4299807.
Yaghan 2003, p. 69. Yaghan, Mohammad Ali Jalal (2003). "Gadrooned-Dome's Muqarnas-Corbel: Analysis and Decoding Historical Drawings". Architectural Science Review. 46 (1): 69–88. doi:10.1080/00038628.2003.9696966. S2CID 109278304.
Grabar 1963, p. 194. Grabar, Oleg (December 1963). "The Islamic Dome, Some Considerations". Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians. 22 (4): 191–198. doi:10.2307/988190. JSTOR 988190.
Grabar 1963, p. 192. Grabar, Oleg (December 1963). "The Islamic Dome, Some Considerations". Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians. 22 (4): 191–198. doi:10.2307/988190. JSTOR 988190.
Nickel 2015, p. 55. Nickel, Lukas (2015). "Bricks in Ancient China and the Question of Early Cross-Asian Interaction". Arts Asiatiques. 70. École française d'Extrême-Orient: 49–62. doi:10.3406/arasi.2015.1883. JSTOR 26358183.
Grabar 1963, pp. 192–194. Grabar, Oleg (December 1963). "The Islamic Dome, Some Considerations". Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians. 22 (4): 191–198. doi:10.2307/988190. JSTOR 988190.
Born 1944, p. 208. Born, Wolfgang (April 1944). "The Introduction of the Bulbous Dome into Gothic Architecture and its Subsequent Development". Speculum. 19 (2): 208–221. doi:10.2307/2849071. JSTOR 2849071. S2CID 162699497.
Howard 1991, pp. 65, 67. Howard, Deborah (1991). "Venice and Islam in the Middle Ages: Some Observations on the Question of Architectural Influence". Architectural History. 34: 59–74. doi:10.2307/1568594. JSTOR 1568594. S2CID 192359421.
Born 1944, p. 209. Born, Wolfgang (April 1944). "The Introduction of the Bulbous Dome into Gothic Architecture and its Subsequent Development". Speculum. 19 (2): 208–221. doi:10.2307/2849071. JSTOR 2849071. S2CID 162699497.
Born 1944, pp. 209–213. Born, Wolfgang (April 1944). "The Introduction of the Bulbous Dome into Gothic Architecture and its Subsequent Development". Speculum. 19 (2): 208–221. doi:10.2307/2849071. JSTOR 2849071. S2CID 162699497.
Cowan 1977, p. 7. Cowan, Henry J. (1977). "A History of Masonry and Concrete Domes in Building Construction". Building and Environment. 12 (1). Great Britain: Pergamon Press: 1–24. Bibcode:1977BuEnv..12....1C. doi:10.1016/0360-1323(77)90002-6. hdl:2027/mdp.39015041999635.
Kuban 1987, p. 75. Kuban, Doğan (1987). "The Style of Sinan's Domed Structures". Muqarnas. 4: 72–97. doi:10.2307/1523097. JSTOR 1523097.
Kuban 1987, pp. 93–94. Kuban, Doğan (1987). "The Style of Sinan's Domed Structures". Muqarnas. 4: 72–97. doi:10.2307/1523097. JSTOR 1523097.
Kuban 1987, p. 84. Kuban, Doğan (1987). "The Style of Sinan's Domed Structures". Muqarnas. 4: 72–97. doi:10.2307/1523097. JSTOR 1523097.
Kuban 1987, pp. 82, 91. Kuban, Doğan (1987). "The Style of Sinan's Domed Structures". Muqarnas. 4: 72–97. doi:10.2307/1523097. JSTOR 1523097.
Kuban 1987, p. 89. Kuban, Doğan (1987). "The Style of Sinan's Domed Structures". Muqarnas. 4: 72–97. doi:10.2307/1523097. JSTOR 1523097.
Peterson 1996b, pp. 108, 110, 112. Petersen, Andrew (1996). "A preliminary report on three Muslim shrines in Palestine" (PDF). Levant. 28 (1). Taylor & Francis: 97–113. doi:10.1179/lev.1996.28.1.97.
Betts 1993, p. 5. Betts, Richard J. (March 1993). "Structural Innovation and Structural Design in Renaissance Architecture". Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians. 52 (1): 5–25. doi:10.2307/990755. JSTOR 990755.
Betts 1993, pp. 5–7. Betts, Richard J. (March 1993). "Structural Innovation and Structural Design in Renaissance Architecture". Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians. 52 (1): 5–25. doi:10.2307/990755. JSTOR 990755.
Huerta 2007, pp. 230–232. Huerta, Santigo (2007). "Oval Domes: History, Geometry and Mechanics". Nexus Network Journal. Vol. 9. pp. 211–248. doi:10.1007/978-3-7643-8699-3_4. ISBN 978-3-7643-8444-9.
Born 1944, pp. 214–215. Born, Wolfgang (April 1944). "The Introduction of the Bulbous Dome into Gothic Architecture and its Subsequent Development". Speculum. 19 (2): 208–221. doi:10.2307/2849071. JSTOR 2849071. S2CID 162699497.
Born 1944, pp. 218–220. Born, Wolfgang (April 1944). "The Introduction of the Bulbous Dome into Gothic Architecture and its Subsequent Development". Speculum. 19 (2): 208–221. doi:10.2307/2849071. JSTOR 2849071. S2CID 162699497.
Mark & Billington 1989, pp. 314–315. Mark, Robert; Billington, David P. (1989). "Structural Imperative and the Origin of New Form". Technology and Culture. 30 (2): 300–329. doi:10.2307/3105106. JSTOR 3105106. S2CID 111941107.
Bradshaw et al. 2002, p. 693. Bradshaw, Richard; Campbell, David; Gargari, Mousa; Mirmiran, Amir; Tripeny, Patrick (June 1, 2002). "Special Structures: Past, Present, and Future" (PDF). Journal of Structural Engineering. 128 (6): 691–709. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:6(691).
Bradshaw et al. 2002, pp. 693–694, 697. Bradshaw, Richard; Campbell, David; Gargari, Mousa; Mirmiran, Amir; Tripeny, Patrick (June 1, 2002). "Special Structures: Past, Present, and Future" (PDF). Journal of Structural Engineering. 128 (6): 691–709. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:6(691).
Bradshaw et al. 2002, pp. 701–702. Bradshaw, Richard; Campbell, David; Gargari, Mousa; Mirmiran, Amir; Tripeny, Patrick (June 1, 2002). "Special Structures: Past, Present, and Future" (PDF). Journal of Structural Engineering. 128 (6): 691–709. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:6(691).
Bradshaw et al. 2002, pp. 700, 703. Bradshaw, Richard; Campbell, David; Gargari, Mousa; Mirmiran, Amir; Tripeny, Patrick (June 1, 2002). "Special Structures: Past, Present, and Future" (PDF). Journal of Structural Engineering. 128 (6): 691–709. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:6(691).

dx.doi.org

Salvadori 1987, p. 233. Salvadori, M.G. (1987). "The Anasazi cribbed domes". Building and Environment. 22 (3). Elsevier Ltd: 233–235. Bibcode:1987BuEnv..22..233S. doi:10.1016/0360-1323(87)90011-4. ISSN 0360-1323.

donsmaps.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

Hitchcock. Hitchcock, Don. "Mezhirich – Mammoth Camp". Retrieved August 15, 2009.

en.wikisource.org (Global: 82^nd place; English: 41^st place)

Spiers 1911, p. 958. Spiers, Richard Phené (1911). "Vault" . In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 27 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 956–961.
Spiers 1911, p. 957. Spiers, Richard Phené (1911). "Vault" . In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 27 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 956–961.

forumonpublicpolicy.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

Grupico 2011, pp. 3, 8. Grupico, Theresa (2011). "The Dome in Christian and Islamic Sacred Architecture" (PDF). The Forum on Public Policy. 2011 (3): 14. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 29, 2014. Retrieved November 16, 2014.

galteh.ru (Global: low place; English: low place)

galteh. "The history of galvanotechnology in Russia (Russian)". Archived from the original on 2012-03-05.

hdl.handle.net (Global: 66^th place; English: 34^th place)

Dodge 1984, pp. 265–267: "Domes have been the subject of controversy for more than a century. The origins of dome construction and the ways in which it was applied have both been heatedly debated In the light of this, two questions arise. Have some scholars made too much of these matters, thereby creating unnecessary problems and a false controversy? And was there really any 'problem' as regards the dome and the square bay? The underlying issue, however, is that of terminology. Respected scholars have plunged into the debate, only to confuse the situation further by the omission of an adequate definition of terms. Where definitions are given, they are either inconsistent through the text, or do not correspond to those in general use. This leads to confusion, misunderstanding and 'problems with domes'. One thing that most scholars agree upon is that the dome is a kind of vault. R. J. Mainstone defines a dome as
"A spanning space-enclosing structural element circular in plan and commonly hemispherical or nearly so in total form".
R. Krautheimer defines it as "a hemispherical vault" and the Penguin Dictionary of Architecture gives the following definition
"A vault of even curvature erected on a circular base. The section can be segmental, semicircular, pointed or bulbous".
Thus it emerges that the term 'dome' is non-specific, a blanket-word to describe an hemispherical or similar spanning element. When such a vault is placed on a circular wall, as in the Pantheon in Rome, the 'Temple of Mercury' at Bala or the Tor de'Schiavi on the Via Praenestina, there is little disagreement or variation in the term applied to the roofing element; it is a dome. Problems start to occur in recent critical literature when such an element is placed over an octagonal, polygonal or square bay." Dodge, Hazel (1984). Building Materials and Techniques in the Eastern Mediterranean from the Hellenistic Period to the Fourth Century AD (Thesis) (PhD Thesis ed.). Newcastle University. hdl:10443/868.
Dodge 1984, pp. 268–270: "The Penguin Dictionary of Architecture gives the following definition of a 'domical vault':
"A vault rising direct on a square or polygonal base, the curved surfaces separated by groins".
In American and some British publications this feature is called a 'cloister vault' and this has given rise to some of the terminological confusion. However, both Mainstone and Krautheimer, who both use the term 'cloister vault', do point out that it is also called a domical vault. Mainstone's definition is:
"A vault approximating to the dome but polygonal rather than circular in plan";
and Krautheimer's definition is:
"A vault composed of four, eight or twelve curved surfaces, as would result from the interpenetration of two, four or six barrel-vaults of equal height and diameter; also four-sided, eight-sided, etc, dome".
These two definitions exactly describe the Domus Augstana [sic] and Bostra examples. Rivoira'a [sic] definition of the Domus Aurea dome demonstrates how unnecessarily convoluted some terms get. He refers to it as a 'cloister vault dome'. He also calls the domical vault 'the ungroined cloister dome'. The term domical vault can be applied to such a vault on a square base, that is, made up of four panels, as Krautheimer points out. It is with this particular kind of domical vault that even more acute problems of definition have arisen in the past. Butler, in his description of the South Baths at Bostra, calls the octagonal dome, referred to above, an 'eight-sided dome'. The two square rooms of the complex (R and T on Butler's plan) were also vaulted. That over room R is still intact and Butler refers to it as a 'cloistered vault' or a 'square dome'. The first term, as already demonstrated, is the American term for the domical vault, but by its qualification as a square dome has caused some scholars to make some rather misguided statements. Ward-Perkins refers to the structure as a domical vault. Creswell refers to the 'square dome of the Praetorium at Musmiye (ancient Phaena), at the same time giving the French and German terms, voute en arc de cloître and klosterküppel. It is obvious from these that he means the domical or cloister vault. However, Swift calls this kind of vault "the so-called cloister dome on a square plan". By this definition it becomes obvious what kind of structure he is referring to, and he also gives Musmiye as an example." Dodge, Hazel (1984). Building Materials and Techniques in the Eastern Mediterranean from the Hellenistic Period to the Fourth Century AD (Thesis) (PhD Thesis ed.). Newcastle University. hdl:10443/868.
Dodge 1984, p. 277: "Dome A vault of usually even curvature erected on a circular base whose elements are set radially rather than corbelled. The profile can vary. The term can be applied in a general way to other domical forms (Such as the domical and sail vault)" Dodge, Hazel (1984). Building Materials and Techniques in the Eastern Mediterranean from the Hellenistic Period to the Fourth Century AD (Thesis) (PhD Thesis ed.). Newcastle University. hdl:10443/868.
Dodge 1984, pp. 271–276, 279. Dodge, Hazel (1984). Building Materials and Techniques in the Eastern Mediterranean from the Hellenistic Period to the Fourth Century AD (Thesis) (PhD Thesis ed.). Newcastle University. hdl:10443/868.
Saka 2007, p. 595. Saka, M. P. (2007). "Optimum geometry design of geodesic domes using harmony search algorithm". Advances in Structural Engineering. 10 (6): 595–606. doi:10.1260/136943307783571445. hdl:11511/63569. S2CID 111176744.
Dodge 1984, p. 273. Dodge, Hazel (1984). Building Materials and Techniques in the Eastern Mediterranean from the Hellenistic Period to the Fourth Century AD (Thesis) (PhD Thesis ed.). Newcastle University. hdl:10443/868.
Dodge 1984, p. 268. Dodge, Hazel (1984). Building Materials and Techniques in the Eastern Mediterranean from the Hellenistic Period to the Fourth Century AD (Thesis) (PhD Thesis ed.). Newcastle University. hdl:10443/868.
Dodge 1984, p. 274. Dodge, Hazel (1984). Building Materials and Techniques in the Eastern Mediterranean from the Hellenistic Period to the Fourth Century AD (Thesis) (PhD Thesis ed.). Newcastle University. hdl:10443/868.
Dodge 1984, p. 263. Dodge, Hazel (1984). Building Materials and Techniques in the Eastern Mediterranean from the Hellenistic Period to the Fourth Century AD (Thesis) (PhD Thesis ed.). Newcastle University. hdl:10443/868.
Cowan 1977, p. 7. Cowan, Henry J. (1977). "A History of Masonry and Concrete Domes in Building Construction". Building and Environment. 12 (1). Great Britain: Pergamon Press: 1–24. Bibcode:1977BuEnv..12....1C. doi:10.1016/0360-1323(77)90002-6. hdl:2027/mdp.39015041999635.

iranicaonline.org (Global: 320^th place; English: 308^th place)

O'Kane 1995. O'Kane, Bernard (1995). "Domes". Encyclopædia Iranica. Retrieved November 28, 2010.

jstor.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

Steinhardt 2018, p. 86. Steinhardt, Nancy Shatzman (2018). "China's Other Early Mosques". China's Early Mosques. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 75–91. ISBN 978-1-4744-7285-2. JSTOR 10.3366/j.ctvxcrp18.11.
Steinhardt 2018, pp. 85–86. Steinhardt, Nancy Shatzman (2018). "China's Other Early Mosques". China's Early Mosques. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 75–91. ISBN 978-1-4744-7285-2. JSTOR 10.3366/j.ctvxcrp18.11.

jstor.org (Global: 23^rd place; English: 15^th place)

Downey 1946, pp. 23, 25, 26: "Architectural historians who deal with the history of the dome have been baffled and sometimes led astray by the peculiar vague-ness of some of the literary passages which in some cases form the only evidence for the existence of certain domes or of certain types of domes. When the ancient authors mention a dome, they often call it a sphaira or a sphairion. While inexact, in the geometrical sense, this is a perfectly comprehensible and justifiable method of describing an architectural element whose most prominent characteristic is its sphericity; and that the ancient writers were aware of the inexactitude, but also aware of the usefulness of the graphic image, is suggested by Procopius' reference to the main dome of the Church of the Apostles at Constantinople as τὸ σφαιροειδές, which might be translated "the sphere-like structure."" [...] "Choricius, to the writer's present knowledge, is the only writer of this period who is careful enough to note that a dome or a semi-dome is a hollow spherical form." [...] "Naturally, if one wished to describe a dome vividly, the most arresting feature of its appearance was its sphericity, and everybody knew that if you called a dome a sphaira, you called it this because it resembled a sphaira; and it was understood that a dome was not a sphaira in the geometrical sense. This is of course what one would expect, and the phenomenon is by no means confined to post-classical Greek literature." Downey, Glanville (1946). "On Some Post-Classical Greek Architectural Terms". Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association. 77: 22–34. doi:10.2307/283440. JSTOR 283440.
Nobile & Bares 2015, p. 4. Nobile, Marco Rosario; Bares, Maria Mercedes (2015). "The use of 'false vaults' in 18th century buildings of Sicily". Construction History. 30 (1): 53–70. JSTOR 44215897.
Ibrāhīm 1975, p. 5. Ibrāhīm, Laila ʿAlī (1975). "The Transitional Zones of Domes in Cairene Architecture". Kunst des Orients. 10 (1): 5–23. JSTOR 20752454.
MacDonald 1958, pp. 2–3, 7. MacDonald, William (1958). "Some Implications of Later Roman Construction" (PDF). Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians. 17 (4): 2–8. doi:10.2307/987944. JSTOR 987944.^{[permanent dead link]}
Kuban 1987, p. 73. Kuban, Doğan (1987). "The Style of Sinan's Domed Structures". Muqarnas. 4: 72–97. doi:10.2307/1523097. JSTOR 1523097.
Robison 1991, p. 395. Robison, Elwin C. (December 1991). "Optics and Mathematics in the Domed Churches of Guarino Guarini". Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians. 50 (4): 384–401. doi:10.2307/990663. JSTOR 990663.
Gye 1988, p. 142. Gye, D. H. (1988). "Arches and Domes in Iranian Islamic Buildings: An Engineer's Perspective". Iran. 26: 129–144. doi:10.2307/4299807. JSTOR 4299807.
Gye 1988, pp. 141–142. Gye, D. H. (1988). "Arches and Domes in Iranian Islamic Buildings: An Engineer's Perspective". Iran. 26: 129–144. doi:10.2307/4299807. JSTOR 4299807.
Grabar 1963, pp. 195, 197. Grabar, Oleg (December 1963). "The Islamic Dome, Some Considerations". Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians. 22 (4): 191–198. doi:10.2307/988190. JSTOR 988190.
Barbieri 1998, p. 270. Barbieri, Patrizio (1998). "The acoustics of Italian opera houses and auditoriums (c. 1450–1900)". Recercare. 10. Fondazione Italiana per la Musica Antica (FIMA): 263–328. JSTOR 41692748.
Born 1944, pp. 220–221. Born, Wolfgang (April 1944). "The Introduction of the Bulbous Dome into Gothic Architecture and its Subsequent Development". Speculum. 19 (2): 208–221. doi:10.2307/2849071. JSTOR 2849071. S2CID 162699497.
Gye 1988, pp. 142–143. Gye, D. H. (1988). "Arches and Domes in Iranian Islamic Buildings: An Engineer's Perspective". Iran. 26: 129–144. doi:10.2307/4299807. JSTOR 4299807.
Taylor 1996, p. 76. Taylor, Rabun (1996). "A Literary and Structural Analysis of the First Dome on Justinian's Hagia Sophia, Constantinople". Muqarnas. 55 (1). University of California Press on behalf of the Society of Architectural Historians: 66–78. JSTOR 991056.
Creswell 1915a, p. 155. Creswell, K. A. C. (January 1915). "Persian Domes before 1400 A.D.". The Burlington Magazine for Connoisseurs. 26 (142): 146–155. JSTOR 859853.
Grabar 1963, p. 194. Grabar, Oleg (December 1963). "The Islamic Dome, Some Considerations". Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians. 22 (4): 191–198. doi:10.2307/988190. JSTOR 988190.
Grabar 1963, p. 192. Grabar, Oleg (December 1963). "The Islamic Dome, Some Considerations". Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians. 22 (4): 191–198. doi:10.2307/988190. JSTOR 988190.
Nickel 2015, p. 55. Nickel, Lukas (2015). "Bricks in Ancient China and the Question of Early Cross-Asian Interaction". Arts Asiatiques. 70. École française d'Extrême-Orient: 49–62. doi:10.3406/arasi.2015.1883. JSTOR 26358183.
Steinhardt 2018, p. 86. Steinhardt, Nancy Shatzman (2018). "China's Other Early Mosques". China's Early Mosques. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 75–91. ISBN 978-1-4744-7285-2. JSTOR 10.3366/j.ctvxcrp18.11.
Steinhardt 2018, pp. 85–86. Steinhardt, Nancy Shatzman (2018). "China's Other Early Mosques". China's Early Mosques. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 75–91. ISBN 978-1-4744-7285-2. JSTOR 10.3366/j.ctvxcrp18.11.
Creswell 1915a, p. 148. Creswell, K. A. C. (January 1915). "Persian Domes before 1400 A.D.". The Burlington Magazine for Connoisseurs. 26 (142): 146–155. JSTOR 859853.
Grabar 1963, pp. 192–194. Grabar, Oleg (December 1963). "The Islamic Dome, Some Considerations". Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians. 22 (4): 191–198. doi:10.2307/988190. JSTOR 988190.
Born 1944, p. 208. Born, Wolfgang (April 1944). "The Introduction of the Bulbous Dome into Gothic Architecture and its Subsequent Development". Speculum. 19 (2): 208–221. doi:10.2307/2849071. JSTOR 2849071. S2CID 162699497.
Howard 1991, pp. 65, 67. Howard, Deborah (1991). "Venice and Islam in the Middle Ages: Some Observations on the Question of Architectural Influence". Architectural History. 34: 59–74. doi:10.2307/1568594. JSTOR 1568594. S2CID 192359421.
Born 1944, p. 209. Born, Wolfgang (April 1944). "The Introduction of the Bulbous Dome into Gothic Architecture and its Subsequent Development". Speculum. 19 (2): 208–221. doi:10.2307/2849071. JSTOR 2849071. S2CID 162699497.
Born 1944, pp. 209–213. Born, Wolfgang (April 1944). "The Introduction of the Bulbous Dome into Gothic Architecture and its Subsequent Development". Speculum. 19 (2): 208–221. doi:10.2307/2849071. JSTOR 2849071. S2CID 162699497.
Pevny 2009, pp. 471, 474, 481. Pevny, Olenka Z. (2009). "The Encrypted Narrative of Reconstructed Cossack Baroque Forms". Harvard Ukrainian Studies. 31 (1): 471–519. JSTOR 41756512.
Kuban 1987, p. 75. Kuban, Doğan (1987). "The Style of Sinan's Domed Structures". Muqarnas. 4: 72–97. doi:10.2307/1523097. JSTOR 1523097.
Kuban 1987, pp. 93–94. Kuban, Doğan (1987). "The Style of Sinan's Domed Structures". Muqarnas. 4: 72–97. doi:10.2307/1523097. JSTOR 1523097.
Kuban 1987, p. 84. Kuban, Doğan (1987). "The Style of Sinan's Domed Structures". Muqarnas. 4: 72–97. doi:10.2307/1523097. JSTOR 1523097.
Kuban 1987, pp. 82, 91. Kuban, Doğan (1987). "The Style of Sinan's Domed Structures". Muqarnas. 4: 72–97. doi:10.2307/1523097. JSTOR 1523097.
Kuban 1987, p. 89. Kuban, Doğan (1987). "The Style of Sinan's Domed Structures". Muqarnas. 4: 72–97. doi:10.2307/1523097. JSTOR 1523097.
Betts 1993, p. 5. Betts, Richard J. (March 1993). "Structural Innovation and Structural Design in Renaissance Architecture". Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians. 52 (1): 5–25. doi:10.2307/990755. JSTOR 990755.
Betts 1993, pp. 5–7. Betts, Richard J. (March 1993). "Structural Innovation and Structural Design in Renaissance Architecture". Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians. 52 (1): 5–25. doi:10.2307/990755. JSTOR 990755.
Born 1944, pp. 214–215. Born, Wolfgang (April 1944). "The Introduction of the Bulbous Dome into Gothic Architecture and its Subsequent Development". Speculum. 19 (2): 208–221. doi:10.2307/2849071. JSTOR 2849071. S2CID 162699497.
Born 1944, pp. 218–220. Born, Wolfgang (April 1944). "The Introduction of the Bulbous Dome into Gothic Architecture and its Subsequent Development". Speculum. 19 (2): 208–221. doi:10.2307/2849071. JSTOR 2849071. S2CID 162699497.
Mark & Billington 1989, pp. 314–315. Mark, Robert; Billington, David P. (1989). "Structural Imperative and the Origin of New Form". Technology and Culture. 30 (2): 300–329. doi:10.2307/3105106. JSTOR 3105106. S2CID 111941107.

kent.ac.uk (Global: 7,023^rd place; English: 4,256^th place)

kar.kent.ac.uk

Karydis 2012, pp. 362–363. Karydis, Nikolaos D. (2012). "The Early Byzantine Domed Basilicas of West Asia Minor. An Essay in Graphic Reconstruction" (PDF). Late Antique Archaeology. 9 (1): 357–381. doi:10.1163/22134522-12340013. ISBN 9789004309777. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-05-29. Retrieved May 29, 2015.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: periodical has ISBN (link)

kjah.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

Cambon 2022, pp. 155–157. Cambon, Pierre (2022). "Dome Architecture in Ancient Asian Art and Seokguram Grotto: In comparison with Western Dome Constructions" (PDF). Korean Journal of Art History (313). Art History Association of Korea: 155–170.

lcsd.gov.hk (Global: 4,352^nd place; English: 4,583^rd place)

lcsd 2014. "Hong Kong Museum of History: Branch Museums: "Lei Cheng Uk Han Tomb"". Leisure and Cultural Services Department. January 9, 2014. Retrieved February 3, 2014.

mit.edu (Global: 476^th place; English: 340^th place)

web.mit.edu

Bradshaw et al. 2002, p. 693. Bradshaw, Richard; Campbell, David; Gargari, Mousa; Mirmiran, Amir; Tripeny, Patrick (June 1, 2002). "Special Structures: Past, Present, and Future" (PDF). Journal of Structural Engineering. 128 (6): 691–709. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:6(691).
Bradshaw et al. 2002, pp. 693–694, 697. Bradshaw, Richard; Campbell, David; Gargari, Mousa; Mirmiran, Amir; Tripeny, Patrick (June 1, 2002). "Special Structures: Past, Present, and Future" (PDF). Journal of Structural Engineering. 128 (6): 691–709. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:6(691).
Bradshaw et al. 2002, pp. 701–702. Bradshaw, Richard; Campbell, David; Gargari, Mousa; Mirmiran, Amir; Tripeny, Patrick (June 1, 2002). "Special Structures: Past, Present, and Future" (PDF). Journal of Structural Engineering. 128 (6): 691–709. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:6(691).
Bradshaw et al. 2002, pp. 700, 703. Bradshaw, Richard; Campbell, David; Gargari, Mousa; Mirmiran, Amir; Tripeny, Patrick (June 1, 2002). "Special Structures: Past, Present, and Future" (PDF). Journal of Structural Engineering. 128 (6): 691–709. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:6(691).

newadvent.org (Global: 530^th place; English: 466^th place)

Catholic. "The Catholic Encyclopedia". New Advent. Retrieved October 26, 2010.

ntu.ac.uk (Global: low place; English: low place)

irep.ntu.ac.uk

Chilton 2000, p. 131: "In the mind of an engineer a dome is structure with a very distinct behavior. It is a synclastically-curved, three dimensional surface, primarily stressed in compression under its own weight and applied loading, and made of a material resistant to such forces (usually masonry or some form of concrete). Circumferential tension forces that may occur at the base of a dome are usually resisted by a tension ring. However, a dictionary definition of the word dome may be less precise. For instance, in a typical concise dictionary a dome is defined as: -
'dome, n., & v.t.l. Stately building, mansion, (poet.); rounded vault as roof, with circular, elliptical or polygonal base, large cupola; natural vault, canopy, (of sky, trees, etc.); rounded summit of hill etc.; hence domed, domic(al), dome-like, domy. 2. v.t. Cover with, shape as, dome. [F. f. It. duomo cathedral, dome, (& direct) f. L domus house]'
In the past the stately building often had a masonry dome whereas, due to the rapid expansion in structural systems that have become available in the 20th century, this is now less likely to be the case. This has led to many modern large-span structures being described as domes when their primary load-bearing system does not exactly accord with the engineering definition. Some actually work almost entirely in tension, although they still may be more or less dome-shaped (for example the Millennium Dome in Greenwich). This paper, therefore, addresses the conflict that now exists between the precise engineering and more general dictionary definitions of the term dome by reviewing the development of various types of lightweight and tensile domes during the 20th century." Chilton, John (2000). When is a dome not a dome? - 20th-century lightweight and tensile domes. Annual Symposium of the Society of Architectural Historians of Great Britain. Society of Architectural Historians of Great Britain. pp. 131–146.
Chilton 2000, p. 143: "Although the name 'dome' was appropriately applied (in the strict engineering sense) to historical long-span structures of synclastic form, working in compression and using heavy materials with little tensile strength, this is not correct for many of the new lightweight structural systems. However, the name 'dome' in common usage has come to refer to almost any long-span roofing system. The answer, therefore, to the question posed in the title of this paper is "It depends!". A synclastic surface acting predominantly in compression is clearly a dome by name, by form and by engineering definition, whilst a structure acting mainly in tension (such as the Georgia Dome) is a dome in name alone. Between these extremes there are many shades of distinction." Chilton, John (2000). When is a dome not a dome? - 20th-century lightweight and tensile domes. Annual Symposium of the Society of Architectural Historians of Great Britain. Society of Architectural Historians of Great Britain. pp. 131–146.

openbibart.fr (Global: low place; English: low place)

Mainstone 2000, p. 1: "Architecturally, the dome may be seen not only as a structure but also as shelter, spatial enclosure, silhouette, or symbolic form with divers connotations stemming from past uses. To review all these aspects of its history would be impossible in a brief survey." Mainstone, Rowland J. (2000). Domes: A Structural Overview. Annual Symposium of the Society of Architectural Historians of Great Britain. Society of Architectural Historians of Great Britain. pp. 1–14. Archived from the original on 2020-07-29. Retrieved 2020-07-26.
Mainstone 2000, p. 1: "Structurally, I take the term dome to denote, as it normally does, a doubly curved form supported from below and acting primarily in arching compression as it spans the space it encloses." Mainstone, Rowland J. (2000). Domes: A Structural Overview. Annual Symposium of the Society of Architectural Historians of Great Britain. Society of Architectural Historians of Great Britain. pp. 1–14. Archived from the original on 2020-07-29. Retrieved 2020-07-26.

oxfordreference.com (Global: 809^th place; English: 542^nd place)

Curl & Wilson 2015, pp. 236–237: "Cupola, essentially a species of vault, constructed on a circular, elliptical, or polygonal plan, bulbous, segmental, semicircular, or pointed in vertical section. It can be built on top of a structure the plan of which is identical to that of the dome: if that structure's wall is circular or elliptical it is a drum (often pierced with windows) as in a rotunda. However, domes usually provide cover for a square- or rectangular-planned building or compartment, so adjustments are made to facilitate the transition from the square to the circular, elliptical, or polygonal base of the cupola or dome. This is achieved by means of pendentives (fragments of a sail-vault, resembling a species of concave, distorted, almost triangular spandrels, rising up from the corner at the top of the right-angled compartment to the circular or elliptical base of the drum or cupola) or squinches (small arch or series of parallel arches of increasing radius spanning the angle of the square compartment). Both the drum and cupola will have a diameter the same dimension as the side of the square on which the whole structure stands. Types of dome include: calotte: low cupola or saucer dome of segmental vertical section, like a skull-cap; cloister-vault: as domical vault; domical vault: cloister-vault, not a true dome, but formed of four or more (depending on the shape of the base) cells or webs forming groins where they touch vertically and rising to a point; melon: as parachute; Pantheon: low dome on the exterior, often stepped, resembling that of the Pantheon in Rome, and coffered on the interior, widely copied by Neo-Classical architects; parachute: melon, pumpkin, or umbrella dome standing on a scalloped circular base and formed of individual webs, segmental on plan, joined on groins or ribs. Each web has a concave interior and convex exterior so it resembles a parachute, rather than an umbrella; pumpkin: as parachute; sail dome: dome resembling a billowing sail over a square compartment with its diameter the same dimension as the diagonal instead of the side of the square below, enabling the structure to rise as though on pendentives but continuing without interruption. Pendentives are really part of a sail-dome and themselves are a species of sail-vault; umbrella: as parachute." Curl, James Stevens; Wilson, Susan (2015). "Dome". A Dictionary of Architecture and Landscape Architecture (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. pp. 236–237. doi:10.1093/acref/9780199674985.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-967498-5. Retrieved 2020-04-09.
Curl & Wilson 2015, p. 236. Curl, James Stevens; Wilson, Susan (2015). "Dome". A Dictionary of Architecture and Landscape Architecture (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. pp. 236–237. doi:10.1093/acref/9780199674985.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-967498-5. Retrieved 2020-04-09.

programmingarchitecture.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

Dimčić 2011, p. 8. Dimčić, Miloš (2011). "Structural Optimization of Grid Shells Based on Genetic Algorithms". Forschungsbericht 32 (PDF). Stuttgart: Institut für Tragkonstruktionen und Konstruktives Entwerfen. ISBN 978-3-922302-32-2. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-31. Retrieved 2013-03-07.

researchgate.net (Global: 96^th place; English: 89^th place)

Pavlovic, Reccia & Cecchi 2014, pp. 1–2. Pavlovic, Milorad; Reccia, Emanuele; Cecchi, Antonella (2014). Limit analysis of masonry domes: the case of Hagia Sophia and Anime Sante. MONUBASIN - 9th International Symposium on the Conservation of Monuments in the Mediterrean Basin. Ankara, Turkey.
Pavlovic, Reccia & Cecchi 2014, p. 2. Pavlovic, Milorad; Reccia, Emanuele; Cecchi, Antonella (2014). Limit analysis of masonry domes: the case of Hagia Sophia and Anime Sante. MONUBASIN - 9th International Symposium on the Conservation of Monuments in the Mediterrean Basin. Ankara, Turkey.

rusarch.ru (Global: low place; English: low place)

Zagraevsky. Zagraevsky, Sergey. "The shapes of domes of ancient Russian churches (Russian)". RusArch.ru. Archived from the original on 2013-01-16.

sedhc.es (Global: low place; English: low place)

Giustina 2003, p. 1037. Giustina, Irene (2003). On the art and the culture of domes. Construction in Milan and Lombardy in the late sixteenth and in the first half of the seventeenth century (PDF). First International Congress on Construction History. Madrid: Sociedad Española de Historia de la Construcción. pp. 1033–1042.
Fusco & Villanni 2003, pp. 580–581. Fusco, Annarosa Cerutti; Villanni, Marcello (2003). "Pietro da Cortona's Domes between New Experimentations and Construction Knowledge". In Huerta, S. (ed.). Proceedings of the First International Congress on Construction History, Madrid, 20th–24th January 2003 (PDF). Madrid: I. Juan de Herrera. pp. 579–591. ISBN 978-84-9728-070-9.

semanticscholar.org (Global: 15^th place; English: 8^th place)

api.semanticscholar.org

Rovero & Tonietti 2012, p. 183. Rovero, L.; Tonietti, U. (2012). "Structural behaviour of earthen corbelled domes in the Aleppo's region". Materials and Structures. 45 (1–2): 171–184. doi:10.1617/s11527-011-9758-1. S2CID 137418637.
Saka 2007, p. 595. Saka, M. P. (2007). "Optimum geometry design of geodesic domes using harmony search algorithm". Advances in Structural Engineering. 10 (6): 595–606. doi:10.1260/136943307783571445. hdl:11511/63569. S2CID 111176744.
Born 1944, pp. 220–221. Born, Wolfgang (April 1944). "The Introduction of the Bulbous Dome into Gothic Architecture and its Subsequent Development". Speculum. 19 (2): 208–221. doi:10.2307/2849071. JSTOR 2849071. S2CID 162699497.
Yaghan 2003, p. 69. Yaghan, Mohammad Ali Jalal (2003). "Gadrooned-Dome's Muqarnas-Corbel: Analysis and Decoding Historical Drawings". Architectural Science Review. 46 (1): 69–88. doi:10.1080/00038628.2003.9696966. S2CID 109278304.
Born 1944, p. 208. Born, Wolfgang (April 1944). "The Introduction of the Bulbous Dome into Gothic Architecture and its Subsequent Development". Speculum. 19 (2): 208–221. doi:10.2307/2849071. JSTOR 2849071. S2CID 162699497.
Howard 1991, pp. 65, 67. Howard, Deborah (1991). "Venice and Islam in the Middle Ages: Some Observations on the Question of Architectural Influence". Architectural History. 34: 59–74. doi:10.2307/1568594. JSTOR 1568594. S2CID 192359421.
Born 1944, p. 209. Born, Wolfgang (April 1944). "The Introduction of the Bulbous Dome into Gothic Architecture and its Subsequent Development". Speculum. 19 (2): 208–221. doi:10.2307/2849071. JSTOR 2849071. S2CID 162699497.
Born 1944, pp. 209–213. Born, Wolfgang (April 1944). "The Introduction of the Bulbous Dome into Gothic Architecture and its Subsequent Development". Speculum. 19 (2): 208–221. doi:10.2307/2849071. JSTOR 2849071. S2CID 162699497.
Born 1944, pp. 214–215. Born, Wolfgang (April 1944). "The Introduction of the Bulbous Dome into Gothic Architecture and its Subsequent Development". Speculum. 19 (2): 208–221. doi:10.2307/2849071. JSTOR 2849071. S2CID 162699497.
Born 1944, pp. 218–220. Born, Wolfgang (April 1944). "The Introduction of the Bulbous Dome into Gothic Architecture and its Subsequent Development". Speculum. 19 (2): 208–221. doi:10.2307/2849071. JSTOR 2849071. S2CID 162699497.
Mark & Billington 1989, pp. 314–315. Mark, Robert; Billington, David P. (1989). "Structural Imperative and the Origin of New Form". Technology and Culture. 30 (2): 300–329. doi:10.2307/3105106. JSTOR 3105106. S2CID 111941107.

springer.com (Global: 182^nd place; English: 172^nd place)

link.springer.com

Gonzalo & Alkadi 2018, p. 95. Gonzalo, José Carlos Palacios; Alkadi, Rana Munir (2018). "Muqarnas Domes and Cornices in the Maghreb and Andalusia" (PDF). Nexus Network Journal. 20 (1). Springer: 95–123. doi:10.1007/s00004-017-0367-3.
Gonzalo & Alkadi 2018, pp. 97–99. Gonzalo, José Carlos Palacios; Alkadi, Rana Munir (2018). "Muqarnas Domes and Cornices in the Maghreb and Andalusia" (PDF). Nexus Network Journal. 20 (1). Springer: 95–123. doi:10.1007/s00004-017-0367-3.
Ashkan & Ahmad 2010, p. 316. Ashkan, Maryam; Ahmad, Yahaya (2010). "Discontinuous Double-shell Domes through Islamic eras in the Middle East and Central Asia: History, Morphology, Typologies, Geometry, and Construction" (PDF). Nexus Network Journal. 12 (2). Turin, Italy: Kim Williams Books: 287–319. doi:10.1007/s00004-010-0013-9.
Pavani 2020, p. 470. Pavani, Raffaella (2020). "Chapter 28 Challenging Mathematical Insights into Masonry Domes Over the Centuries". In Abali, Bilen Emek; Giorgio, Ivan (eds.). Vol 130 Developments and Novel Approaches in Nonlinear Solid Body Mechanics. Advanced Structured Materials. Vol. 130. Springer. pp. 469–479. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-50460-1_28. ISBN 978-3-030-50460-1.

strangelove.net (Global: low place; English: low place)

Kies. Kies, Lisa. "Russian Church Design". Archived from the original on July 1, 2012. Retrieved February 14, 2014.

syr.edu (Global: 1,643^rd place; English: 794^th place)

surface.syr.edu

Earls 1971, p. 128. Earls, Michael W. (1971). "The Development of Structural Form in Franconian Rococo". In Malo, Paul (ed.). Essays to D. Kenneth Sargent. Syracuse, N.Y.: The School of Architecture, Syracuse University. pp. 127–139.
Earls 1971, pp. 135–36. Earls, Michael W. (1971). "The Development of Structural Form in Franconian Rococo". In Malo, Paul (ed.). Essays to D. Kenneth Sargent. Syracuse, N.Y.: The School of Architecture, Syracuse University. pp. 127–139.

ucpress.edu (Global: 3,462^nd place; English: 2,052^nd place)

jsah.ucpress.edu

MacDonald 1958, pp. 2–3, 7. MacDonald, William (1958). "Some Implications of Later Roman Construction" (PDF). Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians. 17 (4): 2–8. doi:10.2307/987944. JSTOR 987944.^{[permanent dead link]}

uminho.pt (Global: low place; English: low place)

hms.civil.uminho.pt

Arun 2006, pp. 304–305. Arun, G. (2006). "Behaviour of Masonry Vaults and Domes: Geometrical Considerations". In Lourenço, P.B.; Roca, P.; Modena, C.; Agrawal, S. (eds.). Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions (PDF). pp. 299–306. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 23, 2020. Retrieved October 6, 2018.
Arun 2006, p. 304. Arun, G. (2006). "Behaviour of Masonry Vaults and Domes: Geometrical Considerations". In Lourenço, P.B.; Roca, P.; Modena, C.; Agrawal, S. (eds.). Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions (PDF). pp. 299–306. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 23, 2020. Retrieved October 6, 2018.

unige.it (Global: low place; English: low place)

bma.arch.unige.it

Bagliani 2009. Bagliani, Stefano (May 2009). "The Architecture and Mechanics of Elliptical Domes" (PDF). Proceedings of the Third International Congress on Construction History, Cottbus. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-10-16.

upm.es (Global: 9,074^th place; English: low place)

gilbert.aq.upm.es

Tappin 2003, pp. 1941, 1943–1944. Tappin, Stuart (2003). "The Structural Development of Masonry Domes in India". In Huerta, S. (ed.). Proceedings of the First International Congress on Construction History, Madrid, 20th–24th January 2003 (PDF). Madrid: I. Juan de Herrera. pp. 1941–1952. ISBN 978-84-9728-070-9. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-12-11.
Tappin 2003, pp. 1944, 1946–1947. Tappin, Stuart (2003). "The Structural Development of Masonry Domes in India". In Huerta, S. (ed.). Proceedings of the First International Congress on Construction History, Madrid, 20th–24th January 2003 (PDF). Madrid: I. Juan de Herrera. pp. 1941–1952. ISBN 978-84-9728-070-9. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-12-11.
Tappin 2003, p. 1948. Tappin, Stuart (2003). "The Structural Development of Masonry Domes in India". In Huerta, S. (ed.). Proceedings of the First International Congress on Construction History, Madrid, 20th–24th January 2003 (PDF). Madrid: I. Juan de Herrera. pp. 1941–1952. ISBN 978-84-9728-070-9. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-12-11.
Tappin 2003, pp. 1944, 1948–1949. Tappin, Stuart (2003). "The Structural Development of Masonry Domes in India". In Huerta, S. (ed.). Proceedings of the First International Congress on Construction History, Madrid, 20th–24th January 2003 (PDF). Madrid: I. Juan de Herrera. pp. 1941–1952. ISBN 978-84-9728-070-9. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-12-11.
Tappin 2003, pp. 1949–1950. Tappin, Stuart (2003). "The Structural Development of Masonry Domes in India". In Huerta, S. (ed.). Proceedings of the First International Congress on Construction History, Madrid, 20th–24th January 2003 (PDF). Madrid: I. Juan de Herrera. pp. 1941–1952. ISBN 978-84-9728-070-9. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-12-11.
Tappin 2003, pp. 1950–1951. Tappin, Stuart (2003). "The Structural Development of Masonry Domes in India". In Huerta, S. (ed.). Proceedings of the First International Congress on Construction History, Madrid, 20th–24th January 2003 (PDF). Madrid: I. Juan de Herrera. pp. 1941–1952. ISBN 978-84-9728-070-9. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-12-11.

oa.upm.es

Huerta 2007, p. 212. Huerta, Santigo (2007). "Oval Domes: History, Geometry and Mechanics". Nexus Network Journal. Vol. 9. pp. 211–248. doi:10.1007/978-3-7643-8699-3_4. ISBN 978-3-7643-8444-9.
Fernández & Hernández-Ros 1989. Fernández, Santiago Huerta; Hernández-Ros, Ricardo Aroca (1989). "Masonry Domes: A Study on Proportion and Similarity" (PDF). 10 Years of Progress on Shell and Spatial Structures: 11–15 September 1989. 1. Retrieved April 18, 2014.
Huerta 2007, p. 231. Huerta, Santigo (2007). "Oval Domes: History, Geometry and Mechanics". Nexus Network Journal. Vol. 9. pp. 211–248. doi:10.1007/978-3-7643-8699-3_4. ISBN 978-3-7643-8444-9.
Huerta 2007, pp. 230–232. Huerta, Santigo (2007). "Oval Domes: History, Geometry and Mechanics". Nexus Network Journal. Vol. 9. pp. 211–248. doi:10.1007/978-3-7643-8699-3_4. ISBN 978-3-7643-8444-9.

usf.edu (Global: 3,578^th place; English: 2,097^th place)

digital.lib.usf.edu

Osborne 2004, p. 11: "While dome has become the most used English geometric and architectural term for "a large hemispherical, approximately hemispherical or spheroidal vault" (Delbridge, 1981), cupola is the older term." Osborne, R. Armstrong L. (2004). "The troubles with cupolas" (PDF). Acta Carsologica. 33 (2). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2021-06-24. Retrieved 2020-08-29.

utoronto.ca (Global: 1,483^rd place; English: 930^th place)

serai.utsc.utoronto.ca

Hassan, Mazloomi & Omer 2010, p. 105. Hassan, Ahmad Sanusi; Mazloomi, Mehrdad; Omer, Spahic (2010). "Sectional Analysis of Pendentive Dome Mosques During Ottoman Era" (PDF). Canadian Social Science. 6 (5): 124–136. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-02-22. Retrieved February 22, 2015.
Hassan, Mazloomi & Omer 2010, pp. 125–127. Hassan, Ahmad Sanusi; Mazloomi, Mehrdad; Omer, Spahic (2010). "Sectional Analysis of Pendentive Dome Mosques During Ottoman Era" (PDF). Canadian Social Science. 6 (5): 124–136. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-02-22. Retrieved February 22, 2015.

web.archive.org (Global: 1^st place; English: 1^st place)

Mainstone 2000, p. 1: "Architecturally, the dome may be seen not only as a structure but also as shelter, spatial enclosure, silhouette, or symbolic form with divers connotations stemming from past uses. To review all these aspects of its history would be impossible in a brief survey." Mainstone, Rowland J. (2000). Domes: A Structural Overview. Annual Symposium of the Society of Architectural Historians of Great Britain. Society of Architectural Historians of Great Britain. pp. 1–14. Archived from the original on 2020-07-29. Retrieved 2020-07-26.
Osborne 2004, p. 11: "While dome has become the most used English geometric and architectural term for "a large hemispherical, approximately hemispherical or spheroidal vault" (Delbridge, 1981), cupola is the older term." Osborne, R. Armstrong L. (2004). "The troubles with cupolas" (PDF). Acta Carsologica. 33 (2). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2021-06-24. Retrieved 2020-08-29.
Mainstone 2000, p. 1: "Structurally, I take the term dome to denote, as it normally does, a doubly curved form supported from below and acting primarily in arching compression as it spans the space it encloses." Mainstone, Rowland J. (2000). Domes: A Structural Overview. Annual Symposium of the Society of Architectural Historians of Great Britain. Society of Architectural Historians of Great Britain. pp. 1–14. Archived from the original on 2020-07-29. Retrieved 2020-07-26.
Arun 2006, pp. 304–305. Arun, G. (2006). "Behaviour of Masonry Vaults and Domes: Geometrical Considerations". In Lourenço, P.B.; Roca, P.; Modena, C.; Agrawal, S. (eds.). Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions (PDF). pp. 299–306. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 23, 2020. Retrieved October 6, 2018.
Grupico 2011, pp. 3, 8. Grupico, Theresa (2011). "The Dome in Christian and Islamic Sacred Architecture" (PDF). The Forum on Public Policy. 2011 (3): 14. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 29, 2014. Retrieved November 16, 2014.
Kayili 2005, p. 9. Kayili, Mutbul (2005). "Acoustic Solutions in Classic Ottoman Architecture" (PDF). FSTC (Foundation for Science Technology and Civilisation) Limited. pp. 1–15. 4087. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2021-08-28. Retrieved 2013-11-28.
Karydis 2012, pp. 362–363. Karydis, Nikolaos D. (2012). "The Early Byzantine Domed Basilicas of West Asia Minor. An Essay in Graphic Reconstruction" (PDF). Late Antique Archaeology. 9 (1): 357–381. doi:10.1163/22134522-12340013. ISBN 9789004309777. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-05-29. Retrieved May 29, 2015.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: periodical has ISBN (link)
Hassan, Mazloomi & Omer 2010, p. 105. Hassan, Ahmad Sanusi; Mazloomi, Mehrdad; Omer, Spahic (2010). "Sectional Analysis of Pendentive Dome Mosques During Ottoman Era" (PDF). Canadian Social Science. 6 (5): 124–136. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-02-22. Retrieved February 22, 2015.
Fuentes & Huerta 2010, pp. 346–352. Fuentes, P.; Huerta, S. (2010). "Islamic Domes of Crossed-arches: Origin, Geometry and Structural Behavior". In Chen, Baochun; Wei, Jiangang (eds.). ARCH'10 – 6th International Conference on Arch Bridges, October 11–13, 2010 (PDF). Fuzhou, Fujian, China: Fuzhou University. pp. 346–353. ISBN 978-953-7621-10-0. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-04-27. Retrieved 2015-03-13.
Arun 2006, p. 304. Arun, G. (2006). "Behaviour of Masonry Vaults and Domes: Geometrical Considerations". In Lourenço, P.B.; Roca, P.; Modena, C.; Agrawal, S. (eds.). Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions (PDF). pp. 299–306. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 23, 2020. Retrieved October 6, 2018.
Bagliani 2009. Bagliani, Stefano (May 2009). "The Architecture and Mechanics of Elliptical Domes" (PDF). Proceedings of the Third International Congress on Construction History, Cottbus. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-10-16.
Tsan-wing & Kin-wah 2001, p. 294. Tsan-wing, Ng; Kin-wah, Leung (2001). Deformation Survey for the Preservation of Lei Cheng Uk Han Tomb (PDF). The 10th FIG International Symposium on Deformation Measurements. Session VIII: Structural Deformations. 19 – 22 March 2001. Orange, California, US. pp. 294–301. ISBN 978-0-86078-686-3. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 February 2004.
Fuentes & Huerta 2010, pp. 346–347. Fuentes, P.; Huerta, S. (2010). "Islamic Domes of Crossed-arches: Origin, Geometry and Structural Behavior". In Chen, Baochun; Wei, Jiangang (eds.). ARCH'10 – 6th International Conference on Arch Bridges, October 11–13, 2010 (PDF). Fuzhou, Fujian, China: Fuzhou University. pp. 346–353. ISBN 978-953-7621-10-0. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-04-27. Retrieved 2015-03-13.
Kies. Kies, Lisa. "Russian Church Design". Archived from the original on July 1, 2012. Retrieved February 14, 2014.
skypalace. "About Russian Domes and Cupolas". skypalace.org. Archived from the original on 2011-07-28.
Zagraevsky. Zagraevsky, Sergey. "The shapes of domes of ancient Russian churches (Russian)". RusArch.ru. Archived from the original on 2013-01-16.
galteh. "The history of galvanotechnology in Russia (Russian)". Archived from the original on 2012-03-05.
Hassan, Mazloomi & Omer 2010, pp. 125–127. Hassan, Ahmad Sanusi; Mazloomi, Mehrdad; Omer, Spahic (2010). "Sectional Analysis of Pendentive Dome Mosques During Ottoman Era" (PDF). Canadian Social Science. 6 (5): 124–136. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-02-22. Retrieved February 22, 2015.
Tappin 2003, pp. 1941, 1943–1944. Tappin, Stuart (2003). "The Structural Development of Masonry Domes in India". In Huerta, S. (ed.). Proceedings of the First International Congress on Construction History, Madrid, 20th–24th January 2003 (PDF). Madrid: I. Juan de Herrera. pp. 1941–1952. ISBN 978-84-9728-070-9. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-12-11.
Tappin 2003, pp. 1944, 1946–1947. Tappin, Stuart (2003). "The Structural Development of Masonry Domes in India". In Huerta, S. (ed.). Proceedings of the First International Congress on Construction History, Madrid, 20th–24th January 2003 (PDF). Madrid: I. Juan de Herrera. pp. 1941–1952. ISBN 978-84-9728-070-9. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-12-11.
Tappin 2003, p. 1948. Tappin, Stuart (2003). "The Structural Development of Masonry Domes in India". In Huerta, S. (ed.). Proceedings of the First International Congress on Construction History, Madrid, 20th–24th January 2003 (PDF). Madrid: I. Juan de Herrera. pp. 1941–1952. ISBN 978-84-9728-070-9. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-12-11.
Tappin 2003, pp. 1944, 1948–1949. Tappin, Stuart (2003). "The Structural Development of Masonry Domes in India". In Huerta, S. (ed.). Proceedings of the First International Congress on Construction History, Madrid, 20th–24th January 2003 (PDF). Madrid: I. Juan de Herrera. pp. 1941–1952. ISBN 978-84-9728-070-9. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-12-11.
Tappin 2003, pp. 1949–1950. Tappin, Stuart (2003). "The Structural Development of Masonry Domes in India". In Huerta, S. (ed.). Proceedings of the First International Congress on Construction History, Madrid, 20th–24th January 2003 (PDF). Madrid: I. Juan de Herrera. pp. 1941–1952. ISBN 978-84-9728-070-9. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-12-11.
Tappin 2003, pp. 1950–1951. Tappin, Stuart (2003). "The Structural Development of Masonry Domes in India". In Huerta, S. (ed.). Proceedings of the First International Congress on Construction History, Madrid, 20th–24th January 2003 (PDF). Madrid: I. Juan de Herrera. pp. 1941–1952. ISBN 978-84-9728-070-9. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-12-11.
Dimčić 2011, p. 8. Dimčić, Miloš (2011). "Structural Optimization of Grid Shells Based on Genetic Algorithms". Forschungsbericht 32 (PDF). Stuttgart: Institut für Tragkonstruktionen und Konstruktives Entwerfen. ISBN 978-3-922302-32-2. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-31. Retrieved 2013-03-07.
Friedman & Farkas 2011, p. 49. Friedman, Noémi; Farkas, György (2011). "Roof Structures in Motion: On Retractable and Deployable Roof Structures Enabling Quick Construction or Adaptation to External Excitations" (PDF). Concrete Structures. pp. 41–50. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-05-14. Retrieved 2013-03-03.

worldcat.org (Global: 4^th place; English: 4^th place)

search.worldcat.org

Smith 1950, p. 6: "The domical shape must be distinguished from domical vaulting because the dome, both as idea and as method of roofing, originated in pliable materials upon a primitive shelter and was later preserved, venerated, and translated into more permanent materials, largely for symbolic and traditional reasons. 1. At the primitive level the most prevalent and usually the earliest type of constructed shelter, whether a tent, pit house, earth lodge, or thatched cabin, was more or less circular in plan and covered by necessity with a curved roof. Therefore, in many parts of the ancient world the domical shape became habitually associated in men's memories with a central type of structure which was venerated as a tribal and ancestral shelter, a cosmic symbol, a house of appearances and a ritualistic abode. 2. Hence many widely separate cultures, whose architecture evolved from primitive methods of construction, had some tradition of an ancient and revered shelter which was distinguished by a curved roof, usually more or less domical in appearance, but sometimes hoop-shaped or conical." Smith, Earl Baldwin (1950). The Dome: A Study in the History of Ideas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISSN 0079-5208.
Smith 1950, p. 5: "To the naive eye of men uninterested in construction, the dome, it must be realized, was first of all a shape and then an idea. As a shape (which antedated the beginnings of masonry construction), It was the memorable feature of an ancient, ancestral house. It is still a shape visualized and described by such terms as hemisphere, beehive, onion, melon, and bulbous. In ancient times it was thought of as a tholos, pine cone, omphalos, helmet, tegurium, kubba, kalube, maphalia, vihdra, parasol, amalaka tree, cosmic egg, and heavenly bowl. While the modern terms are purely descriptive, the ancient imagery both preserved some memory of the origin of the domical shape and conveyed something of the ancestral beliefs and supernatural meanings associated with its form." Smith, Earl Baldwin (1950). The Dome: A Study in the History of Ideas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISSN 0079-5208.
Smith 1950, pp. 8–9: "The most primitive and natural shape, derived directly from a round hut made of pliable materials tied together at the top and covered with leaves, skins or thatch, was the pointed and slightly bulbous dome which is so common today among the backward tribes of Nubia and Africa (Fig. 93). This type of dome, resembling a truncated pine cone or beehive, is preserved in the tholos tombs of the Mediterranean (Fig. 63), the rock-cut tombs of Etruria and Sicily (Figs. 64, 65), in the Syrian qubab huts (Fig. 88), on the tomb of Bizzos (Fig. 61) and on many of the early Islamic mosques (Figs. 38–43). To distinguish this shape of dome from the geometric cone we will call it conoid, because of its recognized likeness to the actual pine cone. Other types of domical shapes, flatter and unpointed, were derived from the tent and preserved as tabernacles, ciboria and baldachins (Figs. 144–151). These tent forms, however, could be puffed-up and bulbous owing to the light framework of the roof, as is shown by the celestial baldachin above the great altar of Zeus at Pergamum (Fig. 106) and the Parthian dome among the reliefs of the arch of Septimius Severus at Rome (Fig. 228). There were also in Syria and other parts of the Roman Empire sacred rustic shelters whose ritualistic and domical coverings sometimes had an outward curving flange at the bottom of the dome as the thatch was bent out to form an overhang (Figs. 111–117). In other examples the curve of their light domical roof was broken by the horizontal bindings which held the thatch in place (Fig. 10). The hemispherical shape, which is today so commonly associated with the dome, undoubtedly acquired its geometric curve largely from the theoretical interests of the Greek mathematicians and the practical considerations of Roman mechanics. This Roman standardization of the domical shape, which made it easier to construct accurately in brick, stone and concrete, became the customary form of the antique domical vault." Smith, Earl Baldwin (1950). The Dome: A Study in the History of Ideas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISSN 0079-5208.
Smith 1950, p. 5. Smith, Earl Baldwin (1950). The Dome: A Study in the History of Ideas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISSN 0079-5208.
Mediati, Colistra & Arena 2020, p. 3. Mediati, Domenico; Colistra, Daniele; Arena, Marinella (2020). "Domes in the central Mediterranean. Geometric syncretism and cultural hybridizations". Disegnarecon. 13 (25): 1–20. doi:10.20365/disegnarecon.25.2020.10. ISSN 1828-5961.
Smith 1950, pp. 51–53. Smith, Earl Baldwin (1950). The Dome: A Study in the History of Ideas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISSN 0079-5208.
Smith 1950, p. 53. Smith, Earl Baldwin (1950). The Dome: A Study in the History of Ideas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISSN 0079-5208.
Smith 1950, pp. 53–56, 79. Smith, Earl Baldwin (1950). The Dome: A Study in the History of Ideas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISSN 0079-5208.
Salvadori 1987, p. 233. Salvadori, M.G. (1987). "The Anasazi cribbed domes". Building and Environment. 22 (3). Elsevier Ltd: 233–235. Bibcode:1987BuEnv..22..233S. doi:10.1016/0360-1323(87)90011-4. ISSN 0360-1323.
Smith 1950, pp. 8, 9. Smith, Earl Baldwin (1950). The Dome: A Study in the History of Ideas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISSN 0079-5208.
Smith 1950, p. 6. Smith, Earl Baldwin (1950). The Dome: A Study in the History of Ideas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISSN 0079-5208.
Smith 1950, pp. 81–82. Smith, Earl Baldwin (1950). The Dome: A Study in the History of Ideas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISSN 0079-5208.
Smith 1950, p. 9. Smith, Earl Baldwin (1950). The Dome: A Study in the History of Ideas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISSN 0079-5208.
Smith 1950, p. 56. Smith, Earl Baldwin (1950). The Dome: A Study in the History of Ideas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISSN 0079-5208.
Smith 1950, p. 43. Smith, Earl Baldwin (1950). The Dome: A Study in the History of Ideas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISSN 0079-5208.

Dome (English Wikipedia)

academia.edu (Global: 105th place; English: 99th place)

adsabs.harvard.edu (Global: 14th place; English: 9th place)

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

afhalifax.ca (Global: low place; English: low place)

arch-bridges.com.cn (Global: low place; English: low place)

archive.org (Global: 6th place; English: 6th place)

archnet.org (Global: 4,214th place; English: 3,276th place)

bme.hu (Global: low place; English: low place)

fib.bme.hu

books.google.com (Global: 3rd place; English: 3rd place)

caltech.edu (Global: 240th place; English: 473rd place)

rincon.gps.caltech.edu

cam.ac.uk (Global: 569th place; English: 354th place)

arct.cam.ac.uk

chriskern.net (Global: low place; English: low place)

columbia.edu (Global: 554th place; English: 368th place)

copernicus.org (Global: 5,068th place; English: 3,578th place)

isprs-archives.copernicus.org

culturalsurvival.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; English: 2nd place)

doi.org

dx.doi.org

donsmaps.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

en.wikisource.org (Global: 82nd place; English: 41st place)

forumonpublicpolicy.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

galteh.ru (Global: low place; English: low place)

hdl.handle.net (Global: 66th place; English: 34th place)

iranicaonline.org (Global: 320th place; English: 308th place)

jstor.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

jstor.org (Global: 23rd place; English: 15th place)

kent.ac.uk (Global: 7,023rd place; English: 4,256th place)

kar.kent.ac.uk

kjah.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

lcsd.gov.hk (Global: 4,352nd place; English: 4,583rd place)

mit.edu (Global: 476th place; English: 340th place)

web.mit.edu

newadvent.org (Global: 530th place; English: 466th place)

ntu.ac.uk (Global: low place; English: low place)

irep.ntu.ac.uk

openbibart.fr (Global: low place; English: low place)

oxfordreference.com (Global: 809th place; English: 542nd place)

programmingarchitecture.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

researchgate.net (Global: 96th place; English: 89th place)

rusarch.ru (Global: low place; English: low place)

sedhc.es (Global: low place; English: low place)

semanticscholar.org (Global: 15th place; English: 8th place)

api.semanticscholar.org

springer.com (Global: 182nd place; English: 172nd place)

link.springer.com

strangelove.net (Global: low place; English: low place)

syr.edu (Global: 1,643rd place; English: 794th place)

surface.syr.edu

ucpress.edu (Global: 3,462nd place; English: 2,052nd place)

jsah.ucpress.edu

uminho.pt (Global: low place; English: low place)

hms.civil.uminho.pt

unige.it (Global: low place; English: low place)

bma.arch.unige.it

upm.es (Global: 9,074th place; English: low place)

gilbert.aq.upm.es

oa.upm.es

usf.edu (Global: 3,578th place; English: 2,097th place)

digital.lib.usf.edu

utoronto.ca (Global: 1,483rd place; English: 930th place)

serai.utsc.utoronto.ca

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; English: 1st place)

worldcat.org (Global: 4th place; English: 4th place)

search.worldcat.org

academia.edu (Global: 105^th place; English: 99^th place)

adsabs.harvard.edu (Global: 14^th place; English: 9^th place)

archive.org (Global: 6^th place; English: 6^th place)

archnet.org (Global: 4,214^th place; English: 3,276^th place)

books.google.com (Global: 3^rd place; English: 3^rd place)

caltech.edu (Global: 240^th place; English: 473^rd place)

cam.ac.uk (Global: 569^th place; English: 354^th place)

columbia.edu (Global: 554^th place; English: 368^th place)

copernicus.org (Global: 5,068^th place; English: 3,578^th place)

doi.org (Global: 2^nd place; English: 2^nd place)

en.wikisource.org (Global: 82^nd place; English: 41^st place)

hdl.handle.net (Global: 66^th place; English: 34^th place)

iranicaonline.org (Global: 320^th place; English: 308^th place)

jstor.org (Global: 23^rd place; English: 15^th place)

kent.ac.uk (Global: 7,023^rd place; English: 4,256^th place)

lcsd.gov.hk (Global: 4,352^nd place; English: 4,583^rd place)

mit.edu (Global: 476^th place; English: 340^th place)

newadvent.org (Global: 530^th place; English: 466^th place)

oxfordreference.com (Global: 809^th place; English: 542^nd place)

researchgate.net (Global: 96^th place; English: 89^th place)

semanticscholar.org (Global: 15^th place; English: 8^th place)

springer.com (Global: 182^nd place; English: 172^nd place)

syr.edu (Global: 1,643^rd place; English: 794^th place)

ucpress.edu (Global: 3,462^nd place; English: 2,052^nd place)

upm.es (Global: 9,074^th place; English: low place)

usf.edu (Global: 3,578^th place; English: 2,097^th place)

utoronto.ca (Global: 1,483^rd place; English: 930^th place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1^st place; English: 1^st place)

worldcat.org (Global: 4^th place; English: 4^th place)