Eclipse (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Eclipse" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
18th place
17th place
2nd place
2nd place
75th place
83rd place
3rd place
3rd place
14th place
14th place
11th place
8th place
7th place
7th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
3,401st place
8,153rd place
low place
low place
1,064th place
992nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
2,467th place
2,049th place
low place
9,112th place
6th place
6th place
212th place
172nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
5,939th place
6,219th place
179th place
183rd place
1,547th place
1,410th place
40th place
58th place
34th place
27th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
5th place
5th place
low place
low place
194th place
643rd place
26th place
20th place
4th place
4th place
low place
low place
low place
low place

aavso.org

alduhaa.com

archive.org

archive.today

astronomerstelegram.org

astronomy.ca

bibalex.org

books.google.com

britannica.com

dioi.org

  • See DIO 16 Archived 2011-07-26 at the Wayback Machine p.2 (2009). Though those Greek and perhaps Babylonian astronomers who determined the three previously unsolved lunar motions were spread over more than four centuries (263 BC to 160 AD), the math-indicated early eclipse records are all from a much smaller span Archived 2015-04-02 at the Wayback Machine: the 13th century BC. The anciently attested Greek technique: use of eclipse cycles, automatically providing integral ratios, which is how all ancient astronomers' lunar motions were expressed. Long-eclipse-cycle-based reconstructions precisely produce all of the 24 digits appearing in the three attested ancient motions just cited: 6247 synod = 6695 anom (System A), 5458 synod = 5923 drac (Hipparchos), 3277 synod = 3512 anom (Planetary Hypotheses). By contrast, the System B motion, 251 synod = 269 anom (Aristarchos?), could have been determined without recourse to remote eclipse data, simply by using a few eclipse-pairs 4267 months apart.

doi.org

exploratorium.edu

harvard.edu

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

in.gr

jstor.org

lexundria.com

lingvozone.com

mathpages.com

moonblink.info

nasa.gov

sunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov

science.nasa.gov

eclipse2017.nasa.gov

nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

noaa.gov

crh.noaa.gov

nytimes.com

query.nytimes.com

  • Staff (March 31, 1981). "Science Watch: A Really Big Syzygy". The New York Times (Press release). Archived from the original on December 10, 2008. Retrieved 2008-02-29.

quizlet.com

sciforums.com

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

  • de Jong, T.; van Soldt, W. H. (1989). "The earliest known solar eclipse record redated". Nature. 338 (6212): 238–240. Bibcode:1989Natur.338..238D. doi:10.1038/338238a0. S2CID 186243477. The new translation runs as follows: (Obverse) "On the ... day of the new moon in [the month] ḫiyaru the Sun went down, its gate-keeper was Ršp". (Reverse) "Two livers were examined: danger". [...] As pointed out by Sawyer and Stephenson, Ršp is probably to be identified with the planet Mars. [...] Of the candidate eclipses [...], the one occurring on 5 March 1223 BC is the only one during which the plant Mars was above the horizon.
  • Tholen, D. J.; Buie, M. W.; Binzel, R. P.; Frueh, M. L. (1987). "Improved Orbital and Physical Parameters for the Pluto-Charon System". Science. 237 (4814): 512–514. Bibcode:1987Sci...237..512T. doi:10.1126/science.237.4814.512. PMID 17730324. S2CID 33536340.
  • Goodricke, John; Englefield, H. C. (1785). "Observations of a New Variable Star". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. 75: 153–164. Bibcode:1785RSPT...75..153G. doi:10.1098/rstl.1785.0009. S2CID 186208561.

sfasu.edu

physics.sfasu.edu

st-andrews.ac.uk

mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk

stanford.edu

plato.stanford.edu

  • Curd, Patricia (2019), "Anaxagoras", in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2019 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, retrieved 2023-08-18

translate.google.com

uu.nl

webspace.science.uu.nl

washingtonpost.com

  • Gene Weingarten, 'Me, in a Nutshell', Washington Post (USA), 8 March 2009, Page W32 (accessed 9 March 2009).

web.archive.org

  • Staff (March 31, 1981). "Science Watch: A Really Big Syzygy". The New York Times (Press release). Archived from the original on December 10, 2008. Retrieved 2008-02-29.
  • "in.gr". Archived from the original on 2018-05-11. Retrieved 2009-09-24.
  • Espenak, Fred (September 21, 2007). "Glossary of Solar Eclipse Terms". NASA. Archived from the original on February 24, 2008. Retrieved 2008-02-28.
  • "Speed of eclipse shadow? - Sciforums". sciforums.com. Archived from the original on 2015-04-02.
  • Espenak, Fred (July 12, 2007). "Eclipses and the Saros". NASA. Archived from the original on 2007-10-30. Retrieved 2007-12-13.
  • Smith, Ian Cameron. "Eclipse Statistics". moonblink.info. Archived from the original on 2014-05-27.
  • Gent, R.H. van. "A Catalogue of Eclipse Cycles". webspace.science.uu.nl. Archived from the original on 2011-09-05.
  • Hipschman, R. (2015-10-29). "Solar Eclipse: Why Eclipses Happen". Archived from the original on 2008-12-05. Retrieved 2008-12-01.
  • Staff (January 6, 2006). "Solar and Lunar Eclipses". NOAA. Archived from the original on May 12, 2007. Retrieved 2007-05-02.
  • Phillips, Tony (February 13, 2008). "Total Lunar Eclipse". NASA. Archived from the original on March 1, 2008. Retrieved 2008-03-03.
  • Ancient Timekeepers, "Ancient Timekeepers, Part 1: Movements of the Earth". 2011-09-16. Archived from the original on 2011-10-26. Retrieved 2011-10-25.
  • Griffin, Paul (2002). "Confirmation of World's Oldest Solar Eclipse Recorded in Stone". The Digital Universe. Archived from the original on 2007-04-09. Retrieved 2007-05-02.
  • See DIO 16 Archived 2011-07-26 at the Wayback Machine p.2 (2009). Though those Greek and perhaps Babylonian astronomers who determined the three previously unsolved lunar motions were spread over more than four centuries (263 BC to 160 AD), the math-indicated early eclipse records are all from a much smaller span Archived 2015-04-02 at the Wayback Machine: the 13th century BC. The anciently attested Greek technique: use of eclipse cycles, automatically providing integral ratios, which is how all ancient astronomers' lunar motions were expressed. Long-eclipse-cycle-based reconstructions precisely produce all of the 24 digits appearing in the three attested ancient motions just cited: 6247 synod = 6695 anom (System A), 5458 synod = 5923 drac (Hipparchos), 3277 synod = 3512 anom (Planetary Hypotheses). By contrast, the System B motion, 251 synod = 269 anom (Aristarchos?), could have been determined without recourse to remote eclipse data, simply by using a few eclipse-pairs 4267 months apart.
  • Espenak, Fred (May 29, 2007). "Planetary Transits Across the Sun". NASA. Archived from the original on March 11, 2008. Retrieved 2008-03-11.
  • "When will the next transits of Mercury and Venus occur during a total solar eclipse? | Total Solar Eclipse 2017". eclipse2017.nasa.gov. Archived from the original on 2017-09-18. Retrieved 2017-09-25.
  • Bruton, Dan. "Eclipsing binary stars". Midnightkite Solutions. Archived from the original on 2007-04-14. Retrieved 2007-05-01.
  • Price, Aaron (January 1999). "Variable Star Of The Month: Beta Persei (Algol)". AAVSO. Archived from the original on 2007-04-05. Retrieved 2007-05-01.

wikiwix.com

archive.wikiwix.com

world-mysteries.com

blog.world-mysteries.com

worldcat.org