Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
3rd place
3rd place
2nd place
2nd place
163rd place
185th place
6,203rd place
5,278th place
5th place
5th place
low place
low place
6th place
6th place
low place
low place
120th place
125th place
1,418th place
966th place
70th place
63rd place
264th place
249th place
666th place
1,300th place
low place
low place
216th place
186th place
108th place
80th place
109th place
87th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
3,803rd place
3,266th place
1,360th place
845th place
low place
low place
low place
7,610th place
471st place
409th place
26th place
20th place
3,322nd place
1,897th place
34th place
27th place
2,230th place
low place
8,719th place
6,566th place
14th place
14th place
2,858th place
2,017th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
2,612th place
1,418th place
low place
7,577th place

about.com

christianity.about.com

apostolicpilgrimage.org

archive.org

archive.today

armenianweekly.com

books.google.com

cbsnews.com

cnewa.org

delegumtextibus.va

doi.org

ec-patr.org

ecumenicalnews.com

euromaidanpress.com

  • Tomos ante portas: a short guide to Ukrainian church independence. Euromaidan Press. 14 October 2018. Retrieved 16 October 2018. the Synod ... of the Ecumenical Patriarchate ... gave further confirmation that Ukraine is on the path to receiving church independence from Moscow. ... Although President Poroshenko triumphantly announced that in result of the meeting Ukraine had received the long-awaited Tomos, or decree of Church independence – a claim circulated in Ukraine with great enthusiasm, this is not true. ... Constantinople's decision will benefit other jurisdictions in Ukraine – the UOC KP and UAOC, which will have to effectively dismantle their own administrative structures and set up a new Church, which will receive the Tomos of autocephaly. ... Right now it's unclear which part of the UOC MP will join the new Church. 10 out of 90 UOC MP bishops signed the appeal for autocephaly to the Ecumenical Patriarch – only 11%. But separate priests could join even if their bishops don't, says Zuiev.

fanarion.blogspot.com

google.com

gpo.gov

guardian.ng

heinonline.org

huffingtonpost.com

jstor.org

konradsblatt-online.de

loc.gov

lccn.loc.gov

middleeasteye.net

minorityrights.org

newadvent.org

  • New Catholic Encyclopedia. ...in 1053 he [Michael Caerularius] sends off a declaration of war, then shuts up the Latin churches at Constantinople, hurls a string of wild accusations, and shows in every possible way that he wants a schism, apparently for the mere pleasure of not being in communion with the West. He got his wish. After a series of wanton aggressions, unparalleled in church history, after he had begun by striking the pope's name from his diptychs, the Roman legates excommunicated him (16 July 1054). But still there was no idea of a general excommunication of the Byzantine Church, still less of all the East. The legates carefully provided against that in their Bull. They acknowledged that the emperor (Constantine IX, who was excessively annoyed at the whole quarrel), the Senate, and the majority of the inhabitants of the city were "most pious and orthodox". They excommunicated Caerularius, Leo of Achrida, and their adherents. This quarrel, too, need no more have produced a permanent state of schism than the excommunication of any other contumacious bishop. The real tragedy is that gradually all the other Eastern patriarchs took sides with Caerularius, obeyed him by striking the pope's name from their diptychs, and chose of their own accord to share his schism. At first they do not seem to have wanted to do so. John III of Antioch certainly refused to go into schism at Caerularius's bidding. But, eventually, the habit they had acquired of looking to Constantinople for orders proved too strong. The emperor (not Constantine IX, but his successor) was on the side of his patriarch and they had learned too well to consider the emperor as their over-lord in spiritual matters too. Again, it was the usurped authority of Constantinople, the Erastianism of the East that turned a personal quarrel into a great schism.

oikoumene.org

openedition.org

journals.openedition.org

orthodoxie.com

patriarchate.org

patriarchia.ru

pewresearch.org

researchgate.net

romfea.gr

state.gov

todayszaman.com

washingtonpost.com

web.archive.org

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org