Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Holodomor" in English language version.
See also full book
See also full book
Similarly, the overwhelming weight of opinion among scholars working in the new archives (including Courtois's co-editor Werth) is that the terrible famine of the 1930s was the result of Stalinist bungling and rigidity rather than some genocidal plan.Suny, Ronald Grigor (2017). Red Flag Unfurled: History, Historians, and the Russian Revolution. Verso Books. pp. 94–95. ISBN 978-1-78478-564-2.
Most scholars rejected this claim, seeing the famine as following from a badly conceived and miscalculated policy of excessive requisitioning of grain, but not as directed specifically against ethnic Ukrainians.
Part 2, Part 3, Part 4.
Similar to famines in Ireland in 1846–1851 (Ó Gráda 2007) and China in 1959–1961 (Meng, Qian and Yared 2015), the politics behind Holodomor have been a focus of historiographic debate. The most common interpretation is that Holodomor was 'terror by hunger' (Conquest 1987, 224), 'state aggression' (Applebaum 2017) and 'clearly premeditated mass murder' (Snyder 2010, 42). Others view it as an unintended by-product of Stalin's economic policies (Kotkin 2017; Naumenko 2017), precipitated by natural factors like adverse weather and crop infestation (Davies and Wheatcroft 1996; Tauger 2001).
Similarly, the overwhelming weight of opinion among scholars working in the new archives (including Courtois's co-editor Werth) is that the terrible famine of the 1930s was the result of Stalinist bungling and rigidity rather than some genocidal plan.Suny, Ronald Grigor (2017). Red Flag Unfurled: History, Historians, and the Russian Revolution. Verso Books. pp. 94–95. ISBN 978-1-78478-564-2.
Most scholars rejected this claim, seeing the famine as following from a badly conceived and miscalculated policy of excessive requisitioning of grain, but not as directed specifically against ethnic Ukrainians.
During the hearings, the Ukrainian politician Stefan Khmara said, 'I would like to address the scientists, particularly, Stanislav Kulchytsky, who attempts to mark down the number of victims and counts them as 3–3.5 million. I studied these questions analysing the demographic statistics as early as in 1970s and concluded that the number of victims was no less than 7 million'.[permanent dead link]
The author suggests that never in the history of mankind was cannibalism so widespread as during the Holodomor.
Shtuchnyy holod, orhanizovanyy u velycheznykh masshtabakh zlochynnoyu vladoyu proty naselennya vlasnoyi krayiny.Штучний голод, організований у величезних масштабах злочинною владою проти населення власної країни. [An artificial famine organized on a huge scale by a criminal government against the population of its own country.]
На Кубани только за период с ноября 1932 г. по весну 1933 г. число задокументированных жертв голода составило 62 тысячи человек. По мнению большинства историков, реальная цифра погибших в разы больше.[In the Kuban, only for the period from November 1932 to the spring of 1933, the number of documented victims of famine amounted to 62 thousand people. According to most historians, the real death toll is many times higher.]
Similar to famines in Ireland in 1846–1851 (Ó Gráda 2007) and China in 1959–1961 (Meng, Qian and Yared 2015), the politics behind Holodomor have been a focus of historiographic debate. The most common interpretation is that Holodomor was 'terror by hunger' (Conquest 1987, 224), 'state aggression' (Applebaum 2017) and 'clearly premeditated mass murder' (Snyder 2010, 42). Others view it as an unintended by-product of Stalin's economic policies (Kotkin 2017; Naumenko 2017), precipitated by natural factors like adverse weather and crop infestation (Davies and Wheatcroft 1996; Tauger 2001).
Similarly, the overwhelming weight of opinion among scholars working in the new archives (including Courtois's co-editor Werth) is that the terrible famine of the 1930s was the result of Stalinist bungling and rigidity rather than some genocidal plan.Suny, Ronald Grigor (2017). Red Flag Unfurled: History, Historians, and the Russian Revolution. Verso Books. pp. 94–95. ISBN 978-1-78478-564-2.
Most scholars rejected this claim, seeing the famine as following from a badly conceived and miscalculated policy of excessive requisitioning of grain, but not as directed specifically against ethnic Ukrainians.
Similarly, the overwhelming weight of opinion among scholars working in the new archives (including Courtois's co-editor Werth) is that the terrible famine of the 1930s was the result of Stalinist bungling and rigidity rather than some genocidal plan.
Documentary on Youtube
First appeared in Toronto Sun, 16Nov2003
На Кубани только за период с ноября 1932 г. по весну 1933 г. число задокументированных жертв голода составило 62 тысячи человек. По мнению большинства историков, реальная цифра погибших в разы больше.[In the Kuban, only for the period from November 1932 to the spring of 1933, the number of documented victims of famine amounted to 62 thousand people. According to most historians, the real death toll is many times higher.]
Shtuchnyy holod, orhanizovanyy u velycheznykh masshtabakh zlochynnoyu vladoyu proty naselennya vlasnoyi krayiny.Штучний голод, організований у величезних масштабах злочинною владою проти населення власної країни. [An artificial famine organized on a huge scale by a criminal government against the population of its own country.]
See also full book
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link){{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)See also full book
Part 2, Part 3, Part 4.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)First appeared in Toronto Sun, 16Nov2003
The author suggests that never in the history of mankind was cannibalism so widespread as during the Holodomor.
Similarly, the overwhelming weight of opinion among scholars working in the new archives (including Courtois's co-editor Werth) is that the terrible famine of the 1930s was the result of Stalinist bungling and rigidity rather than some genocidal plan.Suny, Ronald Grigor (2017). Red Flag Unfurled: History, Historians, and the Russian Revolution. Verso Books. pp. 94–95. ISBN 978-1-78478-564-2.
Most scholars rejected this claim, seeing the famine as following from a badly conceived and miscalculated policy of excessive requisitioning of grain, but not as directed specifically against ethnic Ukrainians.
Similarly, the overwhelming weight of opinion among scholars working in the new archives (including Courtois's co-editor Werth) is that the terrible famine of the 1930s was the result of Stalinist bungling and rigidity rather than some genocidal plan.
Documentary on Youtube
Part 2, Part 3, Part 4.
На Кубани только за период с ноября 1932 г. по весну 1933 г. число задокументированных жертв голода составило 62 тысячи человек. По мнению большинства историков, реальная цифра погибших в разы больше.[In the Kuban, only for the period from November 1932 to the spring of 1933, the number of documented victims of famine amounted to 62 thousand people. According to most historians, the real death toll is many times higher.]
Similarly, the overwhelming weight of opinion among scholars working in the new archives (including Courtois's co-editor Werth) is that the terrible famine of the 1930s was the result of Stalinist bungling and rigidity rather than some genocidal plan.Suny, Ronald Grigor (2017). Red Flag Unfurled: History, Historians, and the Russian Revolution. Verso Books. pp. 94–95. ISBN 978-1-78478-564-2.
Most scholars rejected this claim, seeing the famine as following from a badly conceived and miscalculated policy of excessive requisitioning of grain, but not as directed specifically against ethnic Ukrainians.
Similarly, the overwhelming weight of opinion among scholars working in the new archives (including Courtois's co-editor Werth) is that the terrible famine of the 1930s was the result of Stalinist bungling and rigidity rather than some genocidal plan.Suny, Ronald Grigor (2017). Red Flag Unfurled: History, Historians, and the Russian Revolution. Verso Books. pp. 94–95. ISBN 978-1-78478-564-2.
Most scholars rejected this claim, seeing the famine as following from a badly conceived and miscalculated policy of excessive requisitioning of grain, but not as directed specifically against ethnic Ukrainians.