Human shield (law) (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Human shield (law)" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

16heinonline.org

3,322^nd place

1,897^th place

2oxfordhandbooks.com

5,520^th place

3,524^th place

2stratcomcoe.org

low place

2icrc.org

2,421^st place

2,218^th place

1ouplaw.com

low place

1cbc.ca

115^th place

82^nd place

1aljazeera.com

268^th place

215^th place

aljazeera.com

Marsi, Federica (13 November 2023). "What is a 'human shield' and why is Israel using the term in Gaza?". Al Jazeera.

cbc.ca

"In the line of fire: In Gaza, anyone can wind up a 'human shield'". CBC News. 4 February 2024.

heinonline.org

Michael Schmitt, Human Shields in International Humanitarian Law, 47 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 292 (2009).
Jefferson D. Reynolds, Collateral Damage on the 21st Century Battlefield: Enemy Exploitation of the Law of Armed Conflict, and the Struggle for a Moral High Ground, 56 Air Force Law Review 1, 10 (2005). – via HeinOnline (subscription required)
E.g., Margaret Artz, Chink in the Armor: How a Uniform Approach to Proportionality Analysis Can End the Use of Human Shields, 45 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 1447, 1453 (2012).
Jefferson D. Reynolds, Collateral Damage on the 21st Century Battlefield: Enemy Exploitation of the Law of Armed Conflict, and the Struggle for a Moral High Ground, 56 Air Force Law Review 56, 10 (2005).
Jefferson D. Reynolds, Collateral Damage on the 21st Century Battlefield: Enemy Exploitation of the Law of Armed Conflict, and the Struggle for a Moral High Ground, 56 Air Force Law Review 1, 15 (2005).
Rogier Bartels, Dealing with the Principle of Proportionality in Armed Conflict in Retrospect: The Application of the Principle in International Criminal Trials, 46 Israel Law Review 271, 303 ().
Amnon Rubinstein & Yaniv Roznai, Human Shields in Modern Armed Conflicts: The Need for a Proportionate Proportionality, 22 Stanford Law and Policy Review 93 (2011).. See also: Douglas H. Fischer, Human Shields, Homicides, and House Fires: How a Domestic Law Analogy Can Guide International Law Regarding Human Shield Tactics in Armed Conflict, 57 American University Law Review 479, 490 (2007) (arguing that an analysis based on proportionality and distinction that does not discount attackers culpability when human shields are used "unfairly undermines the right to self-defense").
Amnon Rubinstein & Yaniv Roznai, Human Shields in Modern Armed Conflicts: The Need for a Proportionate Proportionality, 22 Stanford Law and Policy Review 93, 95 (2011).
Douglas H. Fischer, Human Shields, Homicides, and House Fires: How a Domestic Law Analogy Can Guide International Law Regarding Human Shield Tactics in Armed Conflict, 57 American University Law Review 479 (2007).
Douglas H. Fischer, Human Shields, Homicides, and House Fires: How a Domestic Law Analogy Can Guide International Law Regarding Human Shield Tactics in Armed Conflict, 57 American University Law Review 479, 488–89 (2007). (arguing that attackers cannot meet Article 57 obligations to take "precationary measures" unless defenders separate civilian and military targets).
Michael Schmitt, Human Shields in International Humanitarian Law, 47 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 292 (2009).
Nada al-Duaij, The Volunteer Human Shields in International Humanitarian Law, 12 Oregon Review of International Law 117, 117–122 (2010).
Nada al-Duaij, The Volunteer Human Shields in International Humanitarian Law, 12 Oregon Review of International Law 117, 117–120 (2010).
Kristina Maalouf, The Political Question Doctrine in the Ninth Circuit and Why it Should not have Barred the Adjudication of Corrie v. Caterpillar, 44 Golden Gate University Law Review 35, 36 (2014).
Margaret Artz, Chink in the Armor: How a Uniform Approach to Proportionality Analysis Can End the Use of Human Shields, 45 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 1447 (2012).
Nada al-Duaij, The Volunteer Human Shields in International Humanitarian Law, 12 Oregon Review of International Law 117, 122 (2010).

icrc.org

Jean-Marie Henckaerts & Louise Doswald-Beck, Customary International Humanitarian Law, International Committee of the Red Cross (2005). [hereinafter CIHL]

ihl-databases.icrc.org

Customary IHL – Practice Relating to Rule 97. Human Shields, International Committee for the Red Cross (12 April 2017).

ouplaw.com

opil.ouplaw.com

Thilo Marauhn, Armed Conflict, Non-International, MPEPIL (2016).

oxfordhandbooks.com

Antonio Cassese, Current Challenges to International Humanitarian Law, Oxford University Press (2014).
Antonio Cassese, Current Challenges to International Humanitarian Law, Oxford University Press (2014).

stratcomcoe.org

"Hamas' use of human shields in Gaza" (PDF). NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence.
James Pamment, Vladimir Sazonov, Francesca Granelli, Sean Aday, Māris Andžāns, Una Bērziņa-Čerenkova, John-Paul Gravelines, Mils Hills, Irene Martinez-Sanchez, Mariita Mattiisen, Holger Molder, Yeganeh Morakabati, Aurel Sari, Gregory Simons, Jonathan Terra, Hybrid Threats: Hamas' use of human shields in Gaza Nato Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence, 5 June 2019 pp.147–169, 152