Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Judith Butler" in English language version.
Similarly, MacKinnon's appeal to the state to construe pornography as performative speech and, hence, as the injurious conduct of representation, does not settle the theoretical question of the relation between representation and conduct, but collapses the distinction in order to enhance the power of state intervention over graphic sexual representation.
A censorship of sex? There was installed [since the 17th century] rather an apparatus for producing an ever greater quantity of discourse about sex, capable of functioning and taking effect in its very economy.
[In Butler's eyes] we can have whatever type of gender we want […] and that we wear our gender as drag
The So-Called Voluntarist Theory of Gender. I will proceed backwards, from present to past, from critiques and interpretations to Beauvoir's own writing. My starting point is the recent criticism presented by Judith Butler in her Gender Trouble (1990a). In this work, Butler contrasts her own "performative theory of gender" to Beauvoir's[...][[fi:Sara Heinamaa]]
[...]the notion that Butler presented a voluntarist theory of gender. [...] Judith Butler bases her voluntarist reading on Le Doeuff's work.
Butler's theory of performative gender has been criticized for being a voluntarist theory. Elspeth Probyn, for example, takes Butler as saying that gender construction is a totally voluntary act. Hence, Probyn argues that according to Butler's theory of gender performativity "we can have whatever type of gender we want [...] " [...] Butler herself does not criticize Beauvoir for [...] a voluntaristic framework [...] [Butler] mentions Michele Le Doeuff and other feminists who accuse of Beauvoir for resurrecting "a classical form of voluntarism which insidiously blames the victims of oppression for 'choosing' their situation"
The So-Called Voluntarist Theory of Gender. I will proceed backwards, from present to past, from critiques and interpretations to Beauvoir's own writing. My starting point is the recent criticism presented by Judith Butler in her Gender Trouble (1990a). In this work, Butler contrasts her own "performative theory of gender" to Beauvoir's[...][[fi:Sara Heinamaa]]
[...]the notion that Butler presented a voluntarist theory of gender. [...] Judith Butler bases her voluntarist reading on Le Doeuff's work.
Many people who were assigned "female" at birth never felt at home with that assignment, and those people (including me) tell all of us something important about the constraints of traditional gender norms for many who fall outside its terms. ... *Judith Butler goes by she or they
In the revised introduction to Gender Trouble (1999), however, Butler [...] repudiate[s] voluntarist interpretations of her work. [...] Butler says the agency in question is not that of the subject (as in individualist-voluntarist accounts), but of language itself, whereby we can locate "agency within the possibility of a variation on … [linguistic] repetition" {Butler, 1999 #6@145}.
The So-Called Voluntarist Theory of Gender. I will proceed backwards, from present to past, from critiques and interpretations to Beauvoir's own writing. My starting point is the recent criticism presented by Judith Butler in her Gender Trouble (1990a). In this work, Butler contrasts her own "performative theory of gender" to Beauvoir's[...][[fi:Sara Heinamaa]]
[...]the notion that Butler presented a voluntarist theory of gender. [...] Judith Butler bases her voluntarist reading on Le Doeuff's work.
While Butler's theory was initially viewed by some as a kind of gender voluntarism, it is clear that this is very far from her actual view, further refined in Bodies that Matter (1993). Butler clarifies that instead of a kind of voluntary theatricality donned and doffed by a pre-existing agent, gender performance is constitutive of the agent itself.
Which pronoun do I prefer? Butler laughs ... . 'It is they', Butler says ... . It is the year 2020, and Butler outs themselves as "they" - a truly historic moment. (Welches Pronomen bevorzuge ich? Butler lacht .. . 'Es ist they', sagt Butler ... . Wir haben das Jahr 2020 und Butler outet sich als "they" - ein wahrhaft historischer Moment.)
Anti-gender movements[sic] [...]insist that "gender" is an imperialist construct, that it is an "ideology" now being imposed on local cultures of the global south, spuriously drawing on the language of liberation theology and decolonial rhetoric. Or, as the rightwing Italian group Pro Vita maintains, "gender" intensifies the social effects of capitalism [...] The anti-gender movement[sic] is not a conservative position with [...] clear [...] principles. No, as a fascist trend, it mobilizes a range of rhetorical strategies from across the political spectrum [...] its incoherence is part of its power. [...] [The anti-gender movement] mixes right[-wing] and left[-wing] discourses at will.
The So-Called Voluntarist Theory of Gender. I will proceed backwards, from present to past, from critiques and interpretations to Beauvoir's own writing. My starting point is the recent criticism presented by Judith Butler in her Gender Trouble (1990a). In this work, Butler contrasts her own "performative theory of gender" to Beauvoir's[...][[fi:Sara Heinamaa]]
[...]the notion that Butler presented a voluntarist theory of gender. [...] Judith Butler bases her voluntarist reading on Le Doeuff's work.
