Kyllo v. United States (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Kyllo v. United States" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

3heinonline.org

3,322^nd place

1,897^th place

3nytimes.com

7^th place

3justia.com

696^th place

428^th place

2cornell.edu

332^nd place

246^th place

2oyez.org

8,598^th place

4,874^th place

2pacificlegal.org

low place

2cato.org

4,789^th place

3,253^rd place

2uic.edu

5,752^nd place

3,776^th place

1scholar.google.com

1,697^th place

1,040^th place

1web.archive.org

1^st place

1congress.gov

730^th place

468^th place

1harvardlawreview.org

low place

6,995^th place

1washingtonpost.com

34^th place

27^th place

1justice.gov

918^th place

556^th place

1campbell.edu

low place

1ccgnlud.org

low place

1unc.edu

1,538^th place

1,042^nd place

1jstor.org

26^th place

20^th place

1doi.org

2^nd place

1eff.org

3,285^th place

2,156^th place

1crimlawpractitioner.org

low place

1cwsl.edu

low place

1nccu.edu

low place

campbell.edu

scholarship.law.campbell.edu

Hardee, Sarilyn E. (Fall 2001). "Why the United States Supreme Court's Rule in Kyllo v. United States Is Not the Final Word on the Constitutionality of Thermal Imaging". Campbell Law Review. 24 (1): 53–70 – via Campbell University.

cato.org

Anthony, Nicholas (October 28, 2021). "Why Don't Americans Have Stronger Financial Privacy Rights?". Cato Institute. Retrieved June 13, 2022. The Fourth Amendment applies to much more than just 'physical' searches.
Feeney, Matthew (March 24, 2021). "Does the 4th Amendment Prohibit Warrantless Drone Surveillance?". Cato Institute. Retrieved June 18, 2022.

ccgnlud.org

privacylibrary.ccgnlud.org

"Kyllo vs. United States". Privacy Law Library. Centre for Communication Governance at National Law University Delhi. Retrieved July 11, 2022.

congress.gov

constitution.congress.gov

"Katz and the Adoption of the Reasonable Expectation of Privacy Test". Constitution Annotated. Library of Congress. Archived from the original on June 4, 2022. Retrieved June 4, 2022.

cornell.edu

law.cornell.edu

"KYLLO V. UNITED STATES (99-8508) 533 U.S. 27 (2001)". Legal Information Institute. Cornell Law School. Retrieved June 4, 2022.
"FLORIDA v. JARDINES". Legal Information Institute. Cornell Law School. Retrieved June 4, 2022.

crimlawpractitioner.org

LeFrere, J.D. (February 1, 2021). "Revisiting Kyllo v. United States' Publicly Available Technology Test and it's [sic] Implication on Drone". The Criminal Law Practitioner. Washington College of Law, American University. Retrieved June 20, 2022.

cwsl.edu

scholarlycommons.law.cwsl.edu

McKnight, Veronica E. (2015). "Drone Technology and the Fourth Amendment: Aerial Surveillance Precedent and Kyllo Do Not Account for Current Technology". California Western Law Review. 51 (2): 282–291.

doi.org

Kerr, Orin S. (2004). "The Fourth Amendment and New Technologies: Constitutional Myths and the Case for Caution". Michigan Law Review. 102 (5): 831–838. doi:10.2307/4141982. JSTOR 4141982 – via JSTOR.

eff.org

Opsahl, Kurt (October 5, 2020). "Come Back with a Warrant for my Virtual House". Electronic Frontier Foundation. Retrieved June 18, 2022.

harvardlawreview.org

"Addressing the Harm of Total Surveillance: A Reply to Professor Neil Richards". Harvard Law Review. Retrieved February 22, 2024.

heinonline.org

Froh, Amanda S. (Fall 2002). "Rethinking Canine Sniffs: The Impact of Kyllo v. United States". Seattle University Law Review. 26 (2): 337–364 – via HeinOnline.
"Fourth Amendment Search - Fuzz Shades of Gray: The New Bright-Line Rule in Determining When the Use of Technology Constitutes a Search". Wyoming Law Review. 2 (1): 169–202. 2002 – via HeinOnline.
Maclin, Tracey (Fall 2002). "Katz, Kyllo, and Technology: Virtual Fourth Amendment Protection in the Twenty-First Century". Mississippi Law Journal. 72 (1): 101–106 – via HeinOnline.

jstor.org

Kerr, Orin S. (2004). "The Fourth Amendment and New Technologies: Constitutional Myths and the Case for Caution". Michigan Law Review. 102 (5): 831–838. doi:10.2307/4141982. JSTOR 4141982 – via JSTOR.

justia.com

law.justia.com

United States v. Kyllo, 190 F.3d 1041 (9th Cir. 1999)

verdict.justia.com

Colb, Sherry F. (November 7, 2012). "The U.S. Supreme Court Considers Dog Sniffs and the Fourth Amendment". Justia. Retrieved June 21, 2022.

supreme.justia.com

Florida v. Jardines, 569 U.S. 1, 9 (2013).

justice.gov

"Kyllo v. United States – Merits". United States Department of Justice. October 21, 2014. Retrieved June 13, 2022.

nccu.edu

archives.law.nccu.edu

Hurley-Deal, Shannon R. (2003). "State v. Fisher: Canine Sniffs - Who Let the Dogs Out". North Carolina Central Law Journal. 26 (1): 47–58.

nytimes.com

Greenhouse, Linda (September 27, 2000). "Supreme Court Adds to Its Calendar". The New York Times. p. 14. Retrieved June 13, 2022.
Greenhouse, Linda (July 2, 2001). "In Year of Florida Vote, Supreme Court Also Did Much Other Work". The New York Times. Retrieved June 13, 2022.
Friedman, Barry (January 28, 2012). "Opinion | Privacy, Technology and Law". The New York Times. Retrieved June 13, 2022.

oyez.org

Kyllo v. United States - Oral Argument (Oral argument). February 20, 2001. Retrieved July 5, 2022 – via Oyez Project.
Kyllo v. United States - Oral Argument (Oral argument). February 20, 2001. Event occurs at 16:50. Retrieved July 5, 2022 – via Oyez Project.

pacificlegal.org

Burling, James (February 23, 2021). "The 4th Amendment to the Constitution: A Primer". Pacific Legal Foundation. Retrieved June 13, 2022.
Nhan, Raymond (April 29, 2016). "Drones and property rights". Pacific Legal Foundation. Retrieved June 21, 2022.

scholar.google.com

Kyllo v. United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001).

uic.edu

repository.law.uic.edu

Kleppetsch, Paul (Winter 2003). "In the Wake of Kyllo v. United States: The Future of Thermal Imaging Cameras". UIC Law Review. 36 (2): 517 – via University of Illinois Chicago School of Law. Justice Stevens argued that surveillance with the device failed to constitute a protected search because similar results could occur by mere use of the human senses.
O'Brien, Jennifer (Summer 2013). "Warrantless Government Drone Surveillance: A Challenge to the Fourth Amendment". John Marshall Journal of Information Technology and Privacy Law. 30 (1): 203–204 – via University of Illinois Chicago.

unc.edu

scholarship.law.unc.edu

Childers, Jeffrey W. (2003). "Kyllo v. United States: A Temporary Reprieve from Technology-Enhanced Surveillance of the Home". North Carolina Law Review. 81 (2): 728–768 – via UNC School of Law.

washingtonpost.com

Lane, Charles (February 21, 2001). "Justices Hear Oregon Case On High-Tech Surveillance". The Washington Post. Retrieved June 11, 2022.

web.archive.org

"Katz and the Adoption of the Reasonable Expectation of Privacy Test". Constitution Annotated. Library of Congress. Archived from the original on June 4, 2022. Retrieved June 4, 2022.