Laogai (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Laogai" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
low place
low place
7th place
7th place
268th place
215th place
5th place
5th place
729th place
650th place
low place
low place
1,360th place
845th place
8th place
10th place
488th place
374th place
low place
low place
1,029th place
657th place
low place
low place
low place
9,471st place
4,483rd place
7,249th place
581st place
738th place
20th place
30th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,398th place
881st place
1,308th place
924th place
3rd place
3rd place
2,932nd place
1,911th place
803rd place
826th place

academia.org

aljazeera.com

bbc.co.uk

news.bbc.co.uk

bbc.com

books.google.com

  • Werth, Nicolas; Panné, Jean-Louis; Paczkowski, Andrzej; Bartosek, Karel; Margolin, Jean-Louis (October 1999). Courtois, Stéphane (ed.). The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression. Harvard University Press. p. 498. ISBN 978-0-674-07608-2. The laogai was a sort of nonplace, a black hole where the light of Maoism blinded tens of millions of people. As a rough indication, Harry Wu calculates that up to the mid-1980s some 50 million people passed through the system.115 Many died there. According to estimates by Jean-Luc Domenach, there were roughly 10 million detainees each year, which equals 1—2 percent of the overall population. Given that the mortality rate was around 5 percent, some 20 million Chinese must have died during imprisonment, including approximately 4 million in 1959-1962 during the famine caused by the Great Leap Forward (although a return to normal rations took place only in 1964).116 Along with Jean Pasqualini's extraordinary revelations, two recent studies (those of Wu and Domenach) now yield a better general picture of the least-known of the century's three great concentration-camp systems. [....] 115. Wu, Laogai, p. 38. 116. Domenach, Chine, p. 242; Pasqualini, Prisoner of Mao, p. 318.

cecc.gov

cicus.org

columbia.edu

fabbs.org

gpo.gov

frwebgate.access.gpo.gov

hartford-hwp.com

hawaii.edu

hrw.org

laogai.org

marxists.org

npc.gov.cn

nytimes.com

routledge.com

  • Benton, Gregor; Chun, Lin, eds. (2010). Was Mao Really a Monster?: The Academic Response to Chang and Halliday's "Mao: The Unknown Story" (1st ed.). Routledge. p. 149. ISBN 9780415493307. Twenty-seven million deaths in prisons and labour camps Jung Chang's second large group of Mao's peacetime victims is those who died in Chinese government custody. The number is actually produced by magic formula. Mao's responsibility is not discussed, merely assumed. During Mao's 27 years of rule, 'the number who died in prisons and labour camps could well amount to 27 million' (p. 338). The proof: 'China's prison and labour camp population was roughly 10 million in any one year under Mao. Descriptions of camp life by inmates, which point to high mortality rates, indicate a probable annual death rate of at least 10 per cent' (p. 338 fn.). So 10m × 10% × 27 = 27 million. Jung Chang accuses Mao of killing x = a × b × c number of people, where a = 'China's prison and labour camp population', b = 'annual death rate', and c = the years of his rule. She does not explain why a = 10 million. Her justification of b = 10 per cent is based on 'descriptions of camp life by inmates'. If we applied this magic formula to Deng Xiao-ping's reign from 1978 to 1989, we get the figure of 12 million deaths, and 14 million for his successor Jiang Ze-min (1990–2003). Jung Chang does not show why Mao was responsible. Apparently she simply blames Mao for every Chinese death of whatever kind.

taipeitimes.com

thegreatseparation.com

voanews.com

washingtontimes.com

web.archive.org

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org