Level of support for evolution (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Level of support for evolution" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
low place
9,698th place
2nd place
2nd place
4th place
4th place
926th place
945th place
low place
low place
1,418th place
966th place
low place
low place
3rd place
3rd place
7th place
7th place
2,128th place
1,553rd place
8th place
10th place
11th place
8th place
774th place
716th place
9,502nd place
low place
5th place
5th place
3,828th place
2,823rd place
2,558th place
1,868th place
27th place
51st place
4,584th place
3,029th place
18th place
17th place
5,220th place
4,234th place
14th place
14th place
low place
low place
9,065th place
7,557th place
259th place
188th place
low place
low place
1,069th place
6,414th place
low place
low place
857th place
3,832nd place
low place
low place
8,518th place
7,193rd place
low place
low place
26th place
20th place
7,357th place
8,049th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
146th place
110th place
7,814th place
4,478th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
7,189th place
6,078th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
3,744th place
2,124th place
1,216th place
797th place
low place
9,380th place
low place
low place
281st place
448th place
5,009th place
3,478th place
4,371st place
3,452nd place
1,430th place
1,166th place
low place
low place
1,844th place
1,231st place
low place
low place
low place
9,417th place
9,837th place
7,335th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,766th place
3,484th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
6th place
6th place
7,503rd place
4,969th place
34th place
27th place
low place
low place
132nd place
96th place
412th place
266th place
low place
low place
74th place
444th place
low place
low place
22nd place
19th place
60th place
43rd place
low place
8,984th place
951st place
533rd place
139th place
108th place
571st place
403rd place
849th place
1,207th place
1,347th place
909th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
459th place
360th place
1,029th place
657th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
332nd place
246th place
1,940th place
low place
910th place
593rd place
197th place
356th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,299th place
903rd place

aaas.org

aaas.org

archives.aaas.org

abc.net.au

adventist.org

ag.org

angusreidglobal.com

answersingenesis.org

apologeticspress.org

archive-it.org

wayback.archive-it.org

archive.org

archive.today

bahai.org

reference.bahai.org

bbc.co.uk

news.bbc.co.uk

beliefnet.com

  • Tom Heneghan. "Catholics and Evolution: Interview with Cardinal Christoph Schönborn", BeliefNet, Jan. 5, 2006 [1]

books.google.com

catholic.org

cesame-nm.org

cornell.edu

supct.law.cornell.edu

culturalcognition.net

cvaas.org

  • "Science and the Genesis account". Was Life Created? (PDF). Watch Tower Society. pp. 24–27.

discovery.com

news.discovery.com

discovery.org

doi.org

don-lindsay-archive.org

elibrary.ru

els.org

emporia.edu

encyclopediaofarkansas.net

entouch.net

home.entouch.net

errantskeptics.org

  • Princeton theologian Charles Hodge, in his book Systematic Theology Archived 2007-02-24 at the Wayback Machine, Charles Hodge, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co, 1975, vol. 2, p. 15, argues that "First, it shocks the common sense of unsophisticated men to be told that the whale and the humming-bird, man and the mosquito, are derived from the same source... the system is thoroughly atheistic, and therefore cannot possibly stand."

evolutionnews.org

gallup.com

gallup.com

news.gallup.com

guardian.co.uk

education.guardian.co.uk

harrisinteractive.com

harvard.edu

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

icr.org

icsu.org

indianexpress.com

indiatvnews.com

interacademies.net

ipsos-mori.com

jci.org

jstor.org

jw.org

wol.jw.org

latimes.com

opinion.latimes.com

lcms.org

ljworld.com

media.ljworld.com

  • The Elie Wiesel Foundation for Humanity Nobel Laureates Initiative. Intelligent design cannot be tested as a scientific theory "because its central conclusion is based on belief in the intervention of a supernatural agent." Nobel Laureates Initiative Archived December 9, 2006, at the Wayback Machine (PDF file)

msu.edu

  • [3] Dave Hernandez - Michigan State University

nap.edu

nap.edu

books.nap.edu

orsted.nap.edu

nationalacademies.org

nap.nationalacademies.org

ncse.com

ncse.ngo

newscientist.com

newyorker.com

  • Orr, H. Allen (2005-05-23). "Devolution". The New Yorker. Retrieved 2023-03-01. Biologists aren't alarmed by intelligent design's arrival in Dover and elsewhere because they have all sworn allegiance to atheistic materialism; they're alarmed because intelligent design is junk science.

nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

nihrecord.od.nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

niscair.res.in

op.niscair.res.in

nrk.no

nsf.gov

nsf.gov

srsstats.sbe.nsf.gov

nsta.org

www3.nsta.org

ntskeptics.org

nytimes.com

pandasthumb.org

pathlights.com

  • Evolution and Christianity are opposites Archived 2006-10-21 at the Wayback Machine, p. 36 of Evolution and Society, Volume 2 of Scientific Facts Against Evolution-Origin of the Universe: 3 Volume Encyclopedia states, of evolution and Christianity, "there can be no reconciliation between the two. One view stands for fighting, warfare against the supposed weaker ones, and atheism; the other is for peace, self-sacrifice for the good of others, and belief and trust in the Creator God...Even evolutionists and atheists have declared that their creeds are totally different than those of Christianity." Also in the article Evolution and the churches on pages 39-41 of the same volume, "In spite of clear-cut statements by evolutionists that "evolution IS atheism," many denominations today accept one form or another of evolutionary theory."

people-press.org

pewforum.org

pewresearch.org

  • "For Darwin Day, 6 facts about the evolution debate". 11 February 2019.
  • Rosenberg, Stacy (2009-07-09). "Section 5: Evolution, Climate Change and Other Issues". Pew Research Center. Retrieved 2024-05-11.
  • "Chapter 4: Evolution and Perceptions of Scientific Consensus". July 2015.
  • Funk, Cary (6 February 2019). "How highly religious Americans view evolution depends on how they're asked about it". Pew Research Center. Retrieved 2022-02-18.

pfaw.org

politico.eu

redorbit.com

religioustolerance.org

researchco.ca

royalsoc.ac.uk

sbc.net

science.org.au

scienceblogs.com

sciencemag.org

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

slate.com

smh.com.au

srigranth.org

susanohanian.org

t-online.de

www2.onnachrichten.t-online.de

talkorigins.org

theage.com.au

theregister.co.uk

thoughtco.com

timesofisrael.com

umich.edu

news.umich.edu

unsw.edu.au

science.unsw.edu.au

uol.com.br

www1.folha.uol.com.br

vatican.va

washingtonpost.com

washingtontimes.com

wbj.pl

  • "And finally." Warsaw Business Journal. 2006-12-18. Retrieved 2007-10-23.

web.archive.org

wikisource.org

en.wikisource.org

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

worldcat.org