Line of Actual Control (English Wikipedia)

Fisher, Rose & Huttenback, Himalayan Battleground (1963), 137. Fisher, Margaret W.; Rose, Leo E.; Huttenback, Robert A. (1963), Himalayan Battleground: Sino-Indian Rivalry in Ladakh, Praeger – via archive.org.
Report of the Officials (2016), p. 103. Palat, Madhavan K., ed. (2016) [1962], "Report of the Officials of the Governments of India and the People's Republic of China on the Boundary Question", Selected Works of Jawaharlal Nehru, Second Series, Volume 66, Jawaharlal Nehru Memorial Fund/Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-01-994670-1-3 – via archive.org
Fisher, Rose & Huttenback, Himalayan Battleground (1963), p. 137-138: "In fact, the Chinese claim that their 1956 and 1960 maps were 'equally valid' was soon used to define the 1959 'line of actual control' as essentially the border shown on the 1960 map—thus incorporating several thousand additional square miles, some of which had not been seized until after the hostilities had broken out in October, 1962." Fisher, Margaret W.; Rose, Leo E.; Huttenback, Robert A. (1963), Himalayan Battleground: Sino-Indian Rivalry in Ladakh, Praeger – via archive.org.

asiamaior.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

Torri, India 2020 (2020), p. 384: "An unending source of friction and tension between China and India has been the undefined nature of the LAC... Connecting the points effectively held by either China or India, the two governments have notionally drawn the segments making up the LAC. I write "notionally" because the resulting line has not been mutually demarcated on the ground; on the contrary, in some sectors the militaries of the nation notionally claiming that area as part of the territory under their actual control have never set foot on it, or have done so only temporarily, or only recently". Torri, Michelguglielmo (2020), "India 2020: Confronting China, Aligning with the US", Asia Major, XXXI, ProQuest 2562568306.

bbc.co.uk (Global: 11^th place; English: 10^th place)

"India: Army "mistook planets for spy drones"". BBC. 25 July 2013..

books.google.com (Global: 3^rd place; English: 3^rd place)

Joshi, Manoj (2015), "The Media in the Making of Indian Foreign Policy", in David Malone; C. Raja Mohan; Srinath Raghavan (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Indian Foreign Policy, Oxford University Press, p. 274, ISBN 978-0-19-874353-8: "The entire length of the 4,056 km Sino-Indian border is disputed by China and exists today as a notional Line of Actual Control. This line is not marked on the ground, and the two countries do not share a common perception of where the line runs".
Hoffmann, India and the China Crisis (1990), 80. Hoffmann, Steven A. (1990), India and the China Crisis, University of California Press, ISBN 978-0-520-06537-6.
Hoffmann, India and the China Crisis (1990), p. 80. Hoffmann, Steven A. (1990), India and the China Crisis, University of California Press, ISBN 978-0-520-06537-6.
Menon, Choices (2016), p. Chapter 1 (section: The India-China Border). Menon, Shivshankar (2016), Choices: Inside the Making of India's Foreign Policy, Brookings Institution Press, ISBN 978-0-8157-2911-2.
Sali, M.L., (2008) India-China border dispute Archived 28 October 2022 at the Wayback Machine, p. 185, ISBN 1-4343-6971-4.
Rose, Leo E. (1963). "Conflict in the Himalayas". Military Review. Command and General Staff School. p. 7. In September 1959 Chou En-lai wrote Nehru that the 1956 map correctly showed the boundary alignment as conceived by China.
Rose, Leo E. (1963). "Conflict in the Himalayas". Military Review. Command and General Staff School. p. 7. In 1956, when Peking decided to push a road through Aksai Chin, a new map had been issued depicting this area as part of China.
Hoffmann, India and the China Crisis (1990), p. 225: "Furthermore, the Chinese claim line differed greatly from any line held by them on 7 November 1959 and reflected their efforts to establish claims to Indian territory by force, both before and after their massive attack on Indian outposts and forces on 20 October 1962. In some places, the line still went beyond the territory that the invading Chinese army had reached". Hoffmann, Steven A. (1990), India and the China Crisis, University of California Press, ISBN 978-0-520-06537-6.
Whiting, Chinese calculus of deterrence (1975), pp. 123–124. Whiting, Allen Suess (1975), The Chinese Calculus of Deterrence: India and Indochina, University of Michigan Press, ISBN 978-0-472-96900-5.
Hoffmann, India and the China Crisis (1990), p. 225. Hoffmann, Steven A. (1990), India and the China Crisis, University of California Press, ISBN 978-0-520-06537-6.
Hoffmann, India and the China Crisis (1990), p. 226. Hoffmann, Steven A. (1990), India and the China Crisis, University of California Press, ISBN 978-0-520-06537-6.
Gupta, The Himalayan Face-off (2014), Introduction: "While the Indian Army asked the PLA to withdraw to its original positions as per the 1976 border patrolling agreement, the PLA produced a map, which was part of the annexure to a letter written by Zhou to Nehru and the Conference of African-Asian leaders in November 1959 [sic; the correct date is November 1962], to buttress its case that the new position was well within the Chinese side of the LAC". Gupta, Shishir (2014), The Himalayan Face-Off: Chinese Assertion and the Indian Riposte, Hachette India, ISBN 978-93-5009-606-2.
Menon, Choices (2016), p. 21 (ebook). Menon, Shivshankar (2016), Choices: Inside the Making of India's Foreign Policy, Brookings Institution Press, ISBN 978-0-8157-2911-2.
Menon, Choices (2016), p. 32-34. Menon, Shivshankar (2016), Choices: Inside the Making of India's Foreign Policy, Brookings Institution Press, ISBN 978-0-8157-2911-2.
Menon, Choices (2016), p. Chapter 1: Pacifying the Border. The 1993 Border Peace and Tranquility Agreement with China. Menon, Shivshankar (2016), Choices: Inside the Making of India's Foreign Policy, Brookings Institution Press, ISBN 978-0-8157-2911-2.
Menon, Choices (2016), p. 3-4 (ebook), Chapter 1: Pacifying the Border. The 1993 Border Peace and Tranquillity Agreement with China. Menon, Shivshankar (2016), Choices: Inside the Making of India's Foreign Policy, Brookings Institution Press, ISBN 978-0-8157-2911-2.

business-standard.com (Global: 589^th place; English: 300^th place)

Shukla, Ajai (7 January 2025). "ITBP brings forward 33 posts along China LAC, deploys 6 fresh battalions". Business Standard. Retrieved 2 August 2025..

centurychina.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

Maxwell, Neville (1999). "India's China War". Archived from the original on 22 August 2008..

china-embassy.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

in.china-embassy.org

"The Relations between China and India". Embassy of the People's Republic of China in India. 2 February 2002. Retrieved 16 February 2021..

claudearpi.net (Global: low place; English: low place)

Chinese Aggression in Maps: Ten maps, with an introduction and explanatory notes Archived 27 September 2020 at the Wayback Machine, Publications Division, Government of India, 1963. Map 2.
ILLUSTRATION DES PROPOSITIONS DE LA CONFERENCE DE COLOMBO - SECTEUR OCCIDENTAL Archived 12 October 2020 at the Wayback Machine, claudearpi.net, retrieved 1 October 2020, "Ligne au-delà de laquelle les forces chinoises se retirent de 20 km. Selon les propositions de la Conférence de Colombo (Line beyond which the Chinese forces will withdraw 20 km. According to the proposals of the Colombo Conference)."

deccanchronicle.com (Global: 645^th place; English: 306^th place)

"India deploys troops and tanks in Ladakh to counter Chinese deployment". Deccan Chronicle. ANI. 4 August 2020..

deccanherald.com (Global: 719^th place; English: 359^th place)

PTI (21 September 2009). "Smuggling rampant along LAC in Ladakh". Deccan Herald..

defencenews.in (Global: low place; English: low place)

"India Destroyed Bunkers in Chumar to Resolve Ladakh Row" Archived 24 July 2013 at the Wayback Machine, Defence News, 8 May 2013, retrieved 11 May 2013.

doi.org (Global: 2^nd place; English: 2^nd place)

Mehra, Parshotam (October 1970). "India's China War". India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs. 26 (4): 415–416. doi:10.1177/097492847002600406. ISSN 0974-9284. Maintaining that the contrary was true, [Neville] Maxwell quotes that the 1960 map was 'a mere elaboration' of the 1956 version which, Chou solemnly pledged, 'correctly depicted' the traditional boundary in the western sector.
Fisher, India in 1963 (1964), p. 738: "For India, the determination of the line from which the Chinese were to withdraw was of crucial importance since in this sector Chinese maps over the years had shown steadily advancing claims, with quite different lines each identified as 'the line of actual control as of 7 November 1959'." Fisher, Margaret W. (March 1964), "India in 1963: A Year of Travail", Asian Survey, 4 (3): 737–745, doi:10.2307/3023561, JSTOR 3023561.
Fisher, India in 1963 (1964), pp. 738–739 Fisher, Margaret W. (March 1964), "India in 1963: A Year of Travail", Asian Survey, 4 (3): 737–745, doi:10.2307/3023561, JSTOR 3023561.
Karackattu, Joe Thomas (2020). "The Corrosive Compromise of the Sino-Indian Border Management Framework: From Doklam to Galwan". Asian Affairs. 51 (3): 590–604. doi:10.1080/03068374.2020.1804726. ISSN 0306-8374. S2CID 222093756. See Fig. 1, p. 592

financialexpress.com (Global: 1,342^nd place; English: 667^th place)

"India-China LAC Standoff: Know what patrolling points are and what do they signify?". The Financial Express. 9 July 2020..

fmprc.gov.cn (Global: 3,630^th place; English: 5,377^th place)

"Sino-Indian Joint Press Communique". Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the People's Republic of China. 23 December 1988..

hindustantimes.com (Global: 128^th place; English: 76^th place)

"33 outposts moved closer to LAC as part of forwardisation: ITBP". Hindustan Times. 7 January 2025. Retrieved 2 August 2025..
Patrolling points do not define the Indian claim in East Ladakh LAC, Hindustan Times, 26 September 2022.
Chinese troops make 2 incursion attempts in Ladakh, Hindustan Times, 26 July 2014.

ibtimes.com (Global: 1,495^th place; English: 1,080^th place)

"Line Of Actual Control: China And India Again Squabbling Over Disputed Himalayan Border". International Business Times. 3 May 2013..

ifri.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

Li, Zhang (September 2010). China-India Relations: Strategic Engagement and Challenges (PDF). Institut français des relations internationales: Center for Asian Studies. ISBN 9782865927746 – via ifri.org.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: publisher location (link).

indiandefencereview.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

Arpi, Claude (23 August 2019). "Is there a way forward for India-China in Ladakh?". Indian Defence Review..

indianexpress.com (Global: 108^th place; English: 58^th place)

indianexpress.com

Singh, Sushant (1 June 2020). "Line of Actual Control (LAC): Where it is located, and where India and China differ". The Indian Express..
"Why Chinese PLA troops target Yangtse, one of 25 contested areas". 14 December 2022..
Singh, Sushant (4 June 2020). "De-escalation process underway: 2 LAC flashpoints are not in list of identified areas still contested". The Indian Express..
Subramanian, Nirupama; Kaushik, Krishn (20 September 2020). "Month before standoff, China blocked 5 patrol points in Depsang". The Indian Express..
Singh, Sushant (13 July 2020). "Patrolling Points: What do these markers on the LAC signify?". The Indian Express..

archive.indianexpress.com

Inder Malhotra, The Colombo "compromise", The Indian Express, 17 October 2011. "Nehru also rejected emphatically China's definition of the LAC as it existed on November 7, 1959."
Stobdan, P. (26 April 2013). "The Ladakh drift". archive.indianexpress.com. Retrieved 30 October 2020..

indiatimes.com (Global: 31^st place; English: 19^th place)

timesofindia.indiatimes.com

Kalita, Prabin (19 September 2020). "Defence forces on toes in six areas along LAC in Arunachal Pradesh". The Times of India..
"India, China exchange maps to resolve border dispute". The Times of India. PTI. 29 November 2002..

economictimes.indiatimes.com

Gurung, Shaurya Karanbir (21 January 2018). "Indian Army focussing on locations along LAC where Doklam-like flashpoints could happen". Economic Times..

indiatoday.in (Global: 167^th place; English: 82^nd place)

"Chinese Troops Had Dismantled Bunkers on Indian Side of LoAC in August 2011", India Today, 25 April 2013, retrieved 11 May 2013.

jstor.org (Global: 23^rd place; English: 15^th place)

Fisher, India in 1963 (1964), p. 738: "For India, the determination of the line from which the Chinese were to withdraw was of crucial importance since in this sector Chinese maps over the years had shown steadily advancing claims, with quite different lines each identified as 'the line of actual control as of 7 November 1959'." Fisher, Margaret W. (March 1964), "India in 1963: A Year of Travail", Asian Survey, 4 (3): 737–745, doi:10.2307/3023561, JSTOR 3023561.
Fisher, India in 1963 (1964), pp. 738–739 Fisher, Margaret W. (March 1964), "India in 1963: A Year of Travail", Asian Survey, 4 (3): 737–745, doi:10.2307/3023561, JSTOR 3023561.

mea.gov.in (Global: 4,900^th place; English: 3,082^nd place)

"Documents signed between India and China during Prime Minister Vajpayee's visit to China (23 June 2003)". mea.gov.in. Retrieved 27 February 2021..

newmediacomm.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

Trade point planned at India-China LAC, newmediacomm.com, 28 October 2024.

oneindia.com (Global: 2,623^rd place; English: 1,598^th place)

"India, China on with Border Personnel Meeting". oneindia. 15 November 2006. Retrieved 19 November 2017..

orfonline.org (Global: low place; English: 8,669^th place)

Pandey, Utkarsh (16 December 2020). "The India-China Border Question: An Analysis of International Law and State Practices". ORF..
Joshi, Manoj (8 June 2020). "Indo-China row signals breakdown of confidence building measures". ORF..
Joshi, Eastern Ladakh (2021), p.11, Fig. 2. Joshi, Manoj (2021), "Eastern Ladakh, the Longer Perspective", Orf, Observer Research Foundation.

osaarchivum.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

J. C. K. (1962). "Chou's Latest Proposals". Archived from the original on 17 July 2011 – via Blinken Open Society Archives..

peaceagreements.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

"PA-X: Agreement on the Maintenance of Peace and Tranquility along the Line of Actual Control in the India-China Border Areas". Peace Agreements Database. 1993 – via The University of Edinburgh..

proquest.com (Global: 121^st place; English: 59^th place)

Torri, India 2020 (2020), p. 384: "An unending source of friction and tension between China and India has been the undefined nature of the LAC... Connecting the points effectively held by either China or India, the two governments have notionally drawn the segments making up the LAC. I write "notionally" because the resulting line has not been mutually demarcated on the ground; on the contrary, in some sectors the militaries of the nation notionally claiming that area as part of the territory under their actual control have never set foot on it, or have done so only temporarily, or only recently". Torri, Michelguglielmo (2020), "India 2020: Confronting China, Aligning with the US", Asia Major, XXXI, ProQuest 2562568306.

rediff.com (Global: 253^rd place; English: 124^th place)

"Govt increases number of ITBP posts along China border". Rediff News. 10 November 2023. Retrieved 2 August 2025..

reuters.com (Global: 38^th place; English: 30^th place)

China, India sign deal aimed at soothing Himalayan tension Archived 24 September 2015 at the Wayback Machine.

ris.org.in (Global: low place; English: low place)

Siddiq Wahid (February 2014) The Changthang Borderlands of Ladakh: A Preliminary Inquiry (Discussion Paper # 187) Archived 1 August 2021 at the Wayback Machine. Research and Information Systems for Developing Countries. Retrieved on 31 October 2020.

scroll.in (Global: 1,216^th place; English: 593^rd place)

Srivastava, Niraj (24 June 2020). "Galwan Valley clash with China shows that India has discarded the "differing perceptions" theory". Scroll.in..

semanticscholar.org (Global: 15^th place; English: 8^th place)

api.semanticscholar.org

Karackattu, Joe Thomas (2020). "The Corrosive Compromise of the Sino-Indian Border Management Framework: From Doklam to Galwan". Asian Affairs. 51 (3): 590–604. doi:10.1080/03068374.2020.1804726. ISSN 0306-8374. S2CID 222093756. See Fig. 1, p. 592

stimson.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

"Agreement On The Maintenance Of Peace Along The Line Of Actual Control In The India-China Border". stimson.org. Stimson Center. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015..
Wheeler, Travis (10 May 2019). "Clarify and Respect the Line of Actual Control". Stimson Center..

telegraphindia.com (Global: 640^th place; English: 331^st place)

Dixit, J. N. (17 July 2001). "Talks Know No Boundaries". telegraphindia.com.
"ITBP strengthens vigil along China border with 40 new outposts". The Telegraph. 10 November 2023. Retrieved 2 August 2025..

thehindu.com (Global: 72^nd place; English: 37^th place)

Ananth Krishnan, Line of Actual Control |India-China: the line of actual contest Archived 9 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine, 13 June 2020: "In contrast, the alignment of the LAC has never been agreed upon, and it has neither been delineated nor demarcated. There is no official map in the public domain that depicts the LAC. It can best be thought of as an idea, reflecting the territories that are, at present, under the control of each side, pending a resolution of the boundary dispute".
Krishnan, Ananth (30 July 2020). "Clarifying LAC could create new disputes: Chinese envoy". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X..
"Keeping strict vigil, ITBP conducted 2,899 patrols along China border". The Hindu. 17 October 2023. Retrieved 2 August 2025..
Singh, Vijaita (18 September 2020). "LAC standoff | 10 patrolling points in eastern Ladakh blocked by Chinese People's Liberation Army, says senior official". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X..
Krishnan, Ananth (24 May 2020). "What explains the India-China border flare-up?". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X..

thehindubusinessline.com (Global: 1,392^nd place; English: 691^st place)

Sen, Amiti (21 October 2024). "LAC breakthrough: India, China agree on patrolling arrangements in border area". thehindubusinessline.com. Retrieved 22 October 2024..

theprint.in (Global: 1,350^th place; English: 644^th place)

If India loses grip on Kailash Range, PLA will make sure we never get it back, The Print, 12 November 2020.
5 maps that tell you all you want to know about India vs China in Ladakh, The Print, 23 September 2020.
Lt. Gen. H. S. Panag, India, China's stand on Hot Springs has 2 sticking points — Chang Chenmo, 1959 Claim Line Archived 2 July 2022 at the Wayback Machine, The Print, 14 April 2022.
India in talks with China for resumption of trade via 3 border passes ahead of Modi's SCO visit, ThePrint, 8 August 2025.

theweek.in (Global: 2,613^th place; English: 1,279^th place)

Has India lost 26 of 65 patrolling points to China in Ladakh?, The Week, 25 January 2023.

thewire.in (Global: 2,145^th place; English: 1,089^th place)

Ladakh: Local Herders Clash With Chinese Soldiers Over Access to Grazing Land, The Wire, 30 January 2024.

un.org (Global: 117^th place; English: 160^th place)

peacemaker.un.org

"Agreement on the Maintenance of Peace and Tranquility along the Line of Actual Control in the India-China Border Areas". United Nations. 7 September 1993. Archived from the original on 10 June 2017..
"Agreement between India and China on Confidence-Building Measures in the Military Field along the Line of Actual Control in the India-China Border Areas". peacemaker.un.org. 1996. Retrieved 27 February 2021..

vedantu.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

"Which Indian States Share Boundaries with China?". Vedantu. Retrieved 2 August 2025..

vifindia.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

Bedi, Lt Gen (Retd.) AS (4 June 2020). "India-China Standoff: Contracting Options in Ladakh". vifindia.org..

warontherocks.com (Global: low place; English: 8,468^th place)

Clary, Christopher; Narang, Vipin (2 July 2020), "India'S Pangong Pickle: New Delhi's options after it clashes with China", War on the Rocks: "By the end of the month, Indian and Chinese media had focused attention on several points along the Indian territory of Ladakh in the western sector of the disputed border, known as the Line of Actual Control. In this sector, the official name for the boundary is a misnomer: There is no agreement on where any "line" is, nor is there a clear mutual delineation of the territory under "actual control" of either party".

web.archive.org (Global: 1^st place; English: 1^st place)

Ananth Krishnan, Line of Actual Control |India-China: the line of actual contest Archived 9 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine, 13 June 2020: "In contrast, the alignment of the LAC has never been agreed upon, and it has neither been delineated nor demarcated. There is no official map in the public domain that depicts the LAC. It can best be thought of as an idea, reflecting the territories that are, at present, under the control of each side, pending a resolution of the boundary dispute".
"Agreement On The Maintenance Of Peace Along The Line Of Actual Control In The India-China Border". stimson.org. Stimson Center. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015..
Maxwell, Neville (1999). "India's China War". Archived from the original on 22 August 2008..
J. C. K. (1962). "Chou's Latest Proposals". Archived from the original on 17 July 2011 – via Blinken Open Society Archives..
Sali, M.L., (2008) India-China border dispute Archived 28 October 2022 at the Wayback Machine, p. 185, ISBN 1-4343-6971-4.
"Agreement on the Maintenance of Peace and Tranquility along the Line of Actual Control in the India-China Border Areas". United Nations. 7 September 1993. Archived from the original on 10 June 2017..
"India Destroyed Bunkers in Chumar to Resolve Ladakh Row" Archived 24 July 2013 at the Wayback Machine, Defence News, 8 May 2013, retrieved 11 May 2013.
China, India sign deal aimed at soothing Himalayan tension Archived 24 September 2015 at the Wayback Machine.
Chinese Aggression in Maps: Ten maps, with an introduction and explanatory notes Archived 27 September 2020 at the Wayback Machine, Publications Division, Government of India, 1963. Map 2.
"Premier Zhou Letter to Prime Minister Nehru dated 7 November 1959" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 September 2022. Retrieved 9 September 2022..
ILLUSTRATION DES PROPOSITIONS DE LA CONFERENCE DE COLOMBO - SECTEUR OCCIDENTAL Archived 12 October 2020 at the Wayback Machine, claudearpi.net, retrieved 1 October 2020, "Ligne au-delà de laquelle les forces chinoises se retirent de 20 km. Selon les propositions de la Conférence de Colombo (Line beyond which the Chinese forces will withdraw 20 km. According to the proposals of the Colombo Conference)."
Lt. Gen. H. S. Panag, India, China's stand on Hot Springs has 2 sticking points — Chang Chenmo, 1959 Claim Line Archived 2 July 2022 at the Wayback Machine, The Print, 14 April 2022.
Siddiq Wahid (February 2014) The Changthang Borderlands of Ladakh: A Preliminary Inquiry (Discussion Paper # 187) Archived 1 August 2021 at the Wayback Machine. Research and Information Systems for Developing Countries. Retrieved on 31 October 2020.

wilsoncenter.org (Global: 3,534^th place; English: 2,393^rd place)

digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org

"Premier Zhou Letter to Prime Minister Nehru dated 7 November 1959" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 September 2022. Retrieved 9 September 2022..

worldcat.org (Global: 4^th place; English: 4^th place)

search.worldcat.org

Mehra, Parshotam (October 1970). "India's China War". India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs. 26 (4): 415–416. doi:10.1177/097492847002600406. ISSN 0974-9284. Maintaining that the contrary was true, [Neville] Maxwell quotes that the 1960 map was 'a mere elaboration' of the 1956 version which, Chou solemnly pledged, 'correctly depicted' the traditional boundary in the western sector.
Karackattu, Joe Thomas (2020). "The Corrosive Compromise of the Sino-Indian Border Management Framework: From Doklam to Galwan". Asian Affairs. 51 (3): 590–604. doi:10.1080/03068374.2020.1804726. ISSN 0306-8374. S2CID 222093756. See Fig. 1, p. 592
Krishnan, Ananth (30 July 2020). "Clarifying LAC could create new disputes: Chinese envoy". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X..
Singh, Vijaita (18 September 2020). "LAC standoff | 10 patrolling points in eastern Ladakh blocked by Chinese People's Liberation Army, says senior official". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X..
Krishnan, Ananth (24 May 2020). "What explains the India-China border flare-up?". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X..

Line of Actual Control (English Wikipedia)

archive.org (Global: 6th place; English: 6th place)

asiamaior.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

bbc.co.uk (Global: 11th place; English: 10th place)

books.google.com (Global: 3rd place; English: 3rd place)

business-standard.com (Global: 589th place; English: 300th place)

centurychina.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

china-embassy.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

in.china-embassy.org

claudearpi.net (Global: low place; English: low place)

deccanchronicle.com (Global: 645th place; English: 306th place)

deccanherald.com (Global: 719th place; English: 359th place)

defencenews.in (Global: low place; English: low place)

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; English: 2nd place)

financialexpress.com (Global: 1,342nd place; English: 667th place)

fmprc.gov.cn (Global: 3,630th place; English: 5,377th place)

hindustantimes.com (Global: 128th place; English: 76th place)

ibtimes.com (Global: 1,495th place; English: 1,080th place)

ifri.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

indiandefencereview.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

indianexpress.com (Global: 108th place; English: 58th place)

indianexpress.com

archive.indianexpress.com

indiatimes.com (Global: 31st place; English: 19th place)

timesofindia.indiatimes.com

economictimes.indiatimes.com

indiatoday.in (Global: 167th place; English: 82nd place)

jstor.org (Global: 23rd place; English: 15th place)

mea.gov.in (Global: 4,900th place; English: 3,082nd place)

newmediacomm.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

oneindia.com (Global: 2,623rd place; English: 1,598th place)

orfonline.org (Global: low place; English: 8,669th place)

osaarchivum.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

peaceagreements.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

proquest.com (Global: 121st place; English: 59th place)

rediff.com (Global: 253rd place; English: 124th place)

reuters.com (Global: 38th place; English: 30th place)

ris.org.in (Global: low place; English: low place)

scroll.in (Global: 1,216th place; English: 593rd place)

semanticscholar.org (Global: 15th place; English: 8th place)

api.semanticscholar.org

stimson.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

telegraphindia.com (Global: 640th place; English: 331st place)

thehindu.com (Global: 72nd place; English: 37th place)

thehindubusinessline.com (Global: 1,392nd place; English: 691st place)

theprint.in (Global: 1,350th place; English: 644th place)

theweek.in (Global: 2,613th place; English: 1,279th place)

thewire.in (Global: 2,145th place; English: 1,089th place)

un.org (Global: 117th place; English: 160th place)

peacemaker.un.org

vedantu.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

vifindia.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

warontherocks.com (Global: low place; English: 8,468th place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; English: 1st place)

wilsoncenter.org (Global: 3,534th place; English: 2,393rd place)

digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org

worldcat.org (Global: 4th place; English: 4th place)

search.worldcat.org

archive.org (Global: 6^th place; English: 6^th place)

bbc.co.uk (Global: 11^th place; English: 10^th place)

books.google.com (Global: 3^rd place; English: 3^rd place)

business-standard.com (Global: 589^th place; English: 300^th place)

deccanchronicle.com (Global: 645^th place; English: 306^th place)

deccanherald.com (Global: 719^th place; English: 359^th place)

doi.org (Global: 2^nd place; English: 2^nd place)

financialexpress.com (Global: 1,342^nd place; English: 667^th place)

fmprc.gov.cn (Global: 3,630^th place; English: 5,377^th place)

hindustantimes.com (Global: 128^th place; English: 76^th place)

ibtimes.com (Global: 1,495^th place; English: 1,080^th place)

indianexpress.com (Global: 108^th place; English: 58^th place)

indiatimes.com (Global: 31^st place; English: 19^th place)

indiatoday.in (Global: 167^th place; English: 82^nd place)

jstor.org (Global: 23^rd place; English: 15^th place)

mea.gov.in (Global: 4,900^th place; English: 3,082^nd place)

oneindia.com (Global: 2,623^rd place; English: 1,598^th place)

orfonline.org (Global: low place; English: 8,669^th place)

proquest.com (Global: 121^st place; English: 59^th place)

rediff.com (Global: 253^rd place; English: 124^th place)

reuters.com (Global: 38^th place; English: 30^th place)

scroll.in (Global: 1,216^th place; English: 593^rd place)

semanticscholar.org (Global: 15^th place; English: 8^th place)

telegraphindia.com (Global: 640^th place; English: 331^st place)

thehindu.com (Global: 72^nd place; English: 37^th place)

thehindubusinessline.com (Global: 1,392^nd place; English: 691^st place)

theprint.in (Global: 1,350^th place; English: 644^th place)

theweek.in (Global: 2,613^th place; English: 1,279^th place)

thewire.in (Global: 2,145^th place; English: 1,089^th place)

un.org (Global: 117^th place; English: 160^th place)

warontherocks.com (Global: low place; English: 8,468^th place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1^st place; English: 1^st place)

wilsoncenter.org (Global: 3,534^th place; English: 2,393^rd place)

worldcat.org (Global: 4^th place; English: 4^th place)