One China (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "One China" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
low place
low place
2nd place
2nd place
5th place
5th place
1,398th place
881st place
11th place
8th place
264th place
249th place
26th place
20th place
49th place
47th place
3,524th place
2,337th place
20th place
30th place
505th place
410th place
1,653rd place
1,397th place
1,116th place
790th place
low place
low place
6th place
6th place
3rd place
3rd place
1,634th place
1,093rd place
7th place
7th place
254th place
236th place
730th place
468th place
2,367th place
1,825th place
581st place
738th place
6,193rd place
5,086th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
507th place
429th place
371st place
4,709th place
1,067th place
749th place
6,931st place
4,746th place
1,382nd place
876th place
low place
low place
325th place
255th place
2,100th place
4,490th place
179th place
183rd place
2,046th place
1,783rd place
low place
low place
4,456th place
low place
1,029th place
657th place
139th place
108th place
3,164th place
2,032nd place
low place
low place
1,840th place
1,115th place
2,619th place
2,163rd place
low place
low place
6,444th place
4,011th place
268th place
215th place
152nd place
120th place
446th place
308th place
129th place
89th place
99th place
77th place
389th place
273rd place
146th place
110th place
818th place
524th place
437th place
260th place
543rd place
346th place
low place
low place
362nd place
245th place
7,056th place
low place
8th place
10th place
6,266th place
4,133rd place
low place
low place

abc.net.au

aljazeera.com

apnews.com

archive.org

archives.gov

trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov

asiatimes.com

bbc.co.uk

news.bbc.co.uk

bbc.com

bcnq.com

en.bcnq.com

bigthink.com

bloomberg.com

books.google.com

brill.com

brookings.edu

ccpwatch.org

china-embassy.org

china.org.cn

chinamatters.org.au

chinapost.com.tw

congress.gov

csis.org

dfat.gov.au

doi.org

doi.org

dx.doi.org

economist.com

  • "What is America's policy of "strategic ambiguity" over Taiwan?". The Economist. ISSN 0013-0613. Archived from the original on 12 March 2023. Retrieved 23 July 2022.

ettoday.net

  • 蔡, 儀潔 (27 July 2022). "陸委會指沒有九二共識 陸學者:民進黨將對抗責任「甩鍋大陸」". ETtoday (in Chinese (Taiwan)). Archived from the original on 27 July 2022. Retrieved 27 July 2022. 唐永紅(廈門大學台研院副主任)進一步闡述道,在「九二共識」指的是雙方同意「兩岸同屬一個中國、共同努力謀求國家統一」,並非所謂的「一中各表」,「各表」實乃兩岸之分歧而非共識,而當年國民黨及其當局故意在台灣把「九二共識」說成「一中各表」,意圖將「各表」也當成兩岸「共識」,大陸從未認可;事實上,依據兩岸各自有關法規,兩岸不能相互承認,也就是不能把「各表」作為兩岸共識 。

fas.org

  • Kan, Shirley A. (10 October 2014). "China/Taiwan: Evolution of the "One China" Policy—Key Statements from Washington, Beijing, and Taipei" (PDF). Congressional Research Service. p. 39. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 April 2017. Retrieved 7 March 2017 – via FAS Project on Government Secrecy. In the Chinese text, the word for "acknowledge" is "cheng ren" (recognize), a change from "ren shi" (acknowledge),used in the 1972 Shanghai Communique. During debate on the TRA in February 1979, Senator Jacob Javits noted the difference and said that "it is very important that we not subscribe to [the Chinese position on one China] either way." Deputy Secretary of State Warren Christopher responded that "we regard the English text as being the binding text. We regard the word 'acknowledge' as being the word that is determinative for the U.S." (Wolff and Simon, pp. 310-311).
  • Lee Teng-hui 1999 interview with Deutsche Welle: https://fas.org/news/taiwan/1999/0709.htm Archived 9 April 2015 at the Wayback Machine

focustaiwan.tw

foreignpolicy.com

foxnews.com

freedomhouse.org

  • "Taiwan". 30 January 2019. Archived from the original on 23 January 2020. Retrieved 18 June 2019.

globaltaiwan.org

gutenberg-e.org

heritage.org

hiidunia.com

inquirer.net

globalnation.inquirer.net

japantimes.co.jp

jstor.org

mac.gov.tw

nat.gov.tw

taiwanjournal.nat.gov.tw

nationalpost.com

ndhu.edu.tw

faculty.ndhu.edu.tw

newyorker.com

nytimes.com

openlibrary.org

president.gov.tw

english.president.gov.tw

reuters.com

scmp.com

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

sinica.edu.tw

aao.sinica.edu.tw

stanford.edu

spice.fsi.stanford.edu

  • "Introduction to Sovereignty: A Case Study of Taiwan". Stanford University. 2004. Archived from the original on 7 November 2014. Retrieved 23 August 2011. Enmeshed in a civil war between the Nationalists and the Communists for control of China, Chiang's government mostly ignored Taiwan until 1949, when the Communists won control of the mainland. That year, Chiang's Nationalists fled to Taiwan and established a government-in-exile.

state.gov

fpc.state.gov

  • Shirley A. Kan; Wayne M. Morrison (4 January 2013). "U.S.-Taiwan Relationship: Overview of Policy Issues" (PDF). Congressional Research Service. p. 4. Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 December 2016. Retrieved 11 May 2017 – via Foreign Press Centers. The position of the United States, as clarified in the China/Taiwan: Evolution of the "One China" Policy report of the Congressional Research Service (date: July 9, 2007) is summed up in five points:
    1. The United States did not explicitly state the sovereign status of Taiwan in the three US-PRC Joint Communiques of 1972, 1979, and 1982.
    2. The United States "acknowledged" the "One China" position of both sides of the Taiwan Strait.
    3. U.S. policy has not recognized the PRC's sovereignty over Taiwan;
    4. U.S. policy has not recognized Taiwan as a sovereign country; and
    5. U.S. policy has considered Taiwan's status as undetermined. U.S. policy has considered Taiwan's status as unsettled.
    These positions remained unchanged in a 2013 report of the Congressional Research Service.
  • Kerry Dumbaugh (Specialist in Asian Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division) (23 February 2006). "Taiwan's Political Status: Historical Background and Ongoing Implications" (PDF). Congressional Research Service. Archived (PDF) from the original on 7 July 2011. Retrieved 23 August 2011. While on October 1, 1949, in Beijing a victorious Mao proclaimed the creation of the People's Republic of China (PRC), Chiang Kai-shek re-established a temporary capital for his government in Taipei, Taiwan, declaring the ROC still to be the legitimate Chinese government-in-exile and vowing that he would "retake the mainland" and drive out communist forces.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • Shirley A. Kan; Wayne M. Morrison (4 January 2013). "U.S.-Taiwan Relationship: Overview of Policy Issues" (PDF). Congressional Research Service. p. 4. Archived (PDF) from the original on 31 December 2017. Retrieved 25 June 2017.

state.gov

straitstimes.com

taipeitimes.com

taiwanbasic.com

taiwandc.org

tandfonline.com

thediplomat.com

us-taiwan.org

voanews.com

washington.edu

faculty.washington.edu

washingtontimes.com

web.archive.org

wilsoncenter.org

digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org

worldcat.org

  • "What is America's policy of "strategic ambiguity" over Taiwan?". The Economist. ISSN 0013-0613. Archived from the original on 12 March 2023. Retrieved 23 July 2022.
  • "'Taiwan Independence' Doesn't Mean What You Think". Foreign Policy. ISSN 1945-2276. Archived from the original on 12 April 2016. Retrieved 30 May 2024.
  • Marquis, Christopher; Qiao, Kunyuan (2022). Mao and Markets: The Communist Roots of Chinese Enterprise. New Haven: Yale University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctv3006z6k. ISBN 978-0-300-26883-6. JSTOR j.ctv3006z6k. OCLC 1348572572. S2CID 253067190.
  • Zhao, Suisheng (2023). The dragon roars back : transformational leaders and dynamics of Chinese foreign policy. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. p. 63. ISBN 978-1-5036-3415-2. OCLC 1332788951.
  • Zhao, Suisheng (2022). The dragon roars back : transformational leaders and dynamics of Chinese foreign policy. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. p. 48. ISBN 978-1-5036-3415-2. OCLC 1332788951.