Parliamentary sovereignty (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Parliamentary sovereignty" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
121st place
142nd place
1st place
1st place
367th place
243rd place
2nd place
2nd place
1,812th place
995th place
3rd place
3rd place
11th place
8th place
703rd place
501st place
6th place
6th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
5,159th place
9,005th place
9,755th place
8,874th place
low place
low place
low place
7,123rd place
1,234th place
779th place
low place
low place
744th place
547th place
5,447th place
3,767th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
432nd place
278th place
68th place
117th place

academia.edu

ait.org.tw

  • "Constitutionalism: America & Beyond". Bureau of International Information Programs (IIP), U.S. Department of State. Archived from the original on 24 October 2014. Retrieved 30 October 2014. The earliest, and perhaps greatest, victory for liberalism was achieved in England. The rising commercial class that had supported the Tudor monarchy in the 16th century led the revolutionary battle in the 17th, and succeeded in establishing the supremacy of Parliament and, eventually, of the House of Commons. What emerged as the distinctive feature of modern constitutionalism was not the insistence on the idea that the king is subject to law but the establishment of effective means of political control whereby the rule of law might be enforced. Modern constitutionalism was born with the political requirement that representative government depended upon the consent of citizen-subjects... However, as can be seen through provisions in the 1689 Bill of Rights, the English Revolution was fought not just to protect the rights of property (in the narrow sense) but to establish those liberties which liberals believed essential to human dignity and moral worth. The "rights of man" enumerated in the English Bill of Rights gradually were proclaimed beyond the boundaries of England, notably in the American Declaration of Independence of 1776 and in the French Declaration of the Rights of Man in 1789.

archive.org

austlii.edu.au

bl.uk

  • "Britain's unwritten constitution". British Library. Retrieved 27 November 2015. The key landmark is the Bill of Rights (1689), which established the supremacy of Parliament over the Crown following the forcible replacement of King James II (r.1685–88) by William III (r.1689–1702) and Mary (r.1689–94) in the Glorious Revolution (1688).

books.google.com

  • Jowell, Jeffrey; Oliver, Dawn, eds. (2007). The Changing Constitution (6th ed.). Oxford University Press. pp. 60–1. ISBN 9780199205110.
  • Carroll, Alex (2003). "The legislative sovereignty of the Westminster Parliament". Constitutional and Administrative Law (3rd ed.). Pearson/Longman. pp. 90–92. ISBN 978-0-582-47343-0.
  • Fordham, Michael (July 2012). "<P7>". Judicial Review Handbook (Sixth ed.). Oxford: Hart Publishing Ltd. p. 2009. ISBN 9781849461597. R (Misick) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2009] EWCA Civ 1549 at [12] (Laws LJ): "It remains a first principle of our constitutional law that Parliament in enacting primary legislation is sovereign. Parliamentary sovereignty has been qualified though not departed from in different ways by the adoption of the law of the European Union through the European Communities Act 1972 and by the Human Rights Act 1998 ... Where neither the EU nor the Human Rights Act touches the case in hand ... Parliament's power to make any law of its choosing is unconfined..."

dekamer.be

doi.org

eduskunta.fi

web.eduskunta.fi

europa.eu

finland.fi

gov.jm

japarliament.gov.jm

gov.uk

h-net.org

networks.h-net.org

idi.org.il

en.idi.org.il

nationalarchives.gov.uk

parliament.uk

  • "Parliament's authority". UK Parliament. n.d. Retrieved 24 September 2021.
  • "The Convention and Bill of Rights". UK Parliament. Retrieved 2 November 2014.
  • "The Financial Revolution". Parliament of the United Kingdom. Retrieved 14 March 2015.

pearsoned.co.uk

catalogue.pearsoned.co.uk

  • "I prefer to preserve my opinion on what the position would be if the United Kingdom Parliament passed an Act purporting to abolish the Court of Session or the Church of Scotland or to substitute English Law for the whole body of Scots Law." It is self evidently logical that, given the Acts of Union of 1706/7 implemented an international treaty, which via those Acts, abolished the Parliaments of the constituent states of England and Scotland the new, Union, Parliament does not necessarily draw its fundamental rules from only one of the constituent states rather than the other. Equally, at least on a formal legal basis it is bound to abide by the rules under which it was created. That is not to say that it has always obeyed that rule.[1].

politics.co.uk

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

ssrn.com

papers.ssrn.com

swarb.co.uk

  • Salomon v Commissioners of Customs and Excise, 2 QB 116, 143–144 (1967) ("Diplock LJ: If the terms of the legislation are clear and unambiguous, they must be given effect to, whether or not they carry out Her Majesty′s treaty obligations, for the sovereign power of the Queen in Parliament extends to breaking treaties (see Ellerman Lines v. Murray; White Star Line and U.S. Mail Steamers Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. Ltd. v. Comerford [1931] A.C. 126; sub nom. The Croxteth Hall; The Celtic, 47 T.L.R. 147, H.L.(E.), and any remedy for such a breach of an international obligation lies in a forum other than Her Majesty′s own courts...").

ukconstitutionallaw.org

web.archive.org