Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
23rd place
32nd place
7th place
7th place
34th place
27th place
1,651st place
900th place
low place
low place
28th place
26th place
476th place
282nd place
634th place
432nd place
446th place
308th place
2,031st place
1,171st place
5th place
5th place
12th place
11th place
49th place
47th place
129th place
89th place
259th place
188th place
553rd place
334th place
3,566th place
1,985th place
7,944th place
4,127th place
77th place
111th place
low place
7,351st place
low place
7,803rd place
92nd place
72nd place
low place
5,675th place
5,025th place
2,711th place
312th place
197th place
7,460th place
4,676th place
1,241st place
1,069th place
198th place
154th place
18th place
17th place
330th place
222nd place
2,643rd place
1,539th place
20th place
30th place
7,814th place
4,478th place
599th place
369th place
7,309th place
5,071st place
3,208th place
1,803rd place
48th place
39th place
low place
low place
7,075th place
4,103rd place
4,892nd place
2,749th place
3,074th place
1,678th place
453rd place
267th place
519th place
316th place
low place
low place
146th place
110th place
5,802nd place
3,163rd place
9,378th place
5,089th place
1,969th place
1,098th place
22nd place
19th place
474th place
329th place
2,516th place
1,393rd place
2,088th place
1,251st place
low place
6,750th place
3,815th place
2,247th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
421st place
263rd place
7,916th place
4,315th place
6,775th place
3,885th place
685th place
404th place
6,964th place
3,916th place
low place
low place
9,018th place
4,931st place
low place
low place
9,444th place
5,396th place
low place
low place
3,210th place
1,795th place
low place
7,575th place
low place
low place
low place
8,292nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
2,906th place
1,720th place
low place
6,564th place
5,859th place
3,179th place
2,254th place
1,243rd place
7,635th place
4,307th place
8,054th place
4,306th place
2,326th place
1,246th place
3,556th place
2,043rd place
2,272nd place
1,222nd place
low place
6,816th place
6,853rd place
3,712th place
low place
5,732nd place
770th place
472nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,266th place
860th place
9,902nd place
5,558th place
1,029th place
657th place
low place
7,532nd place
4,633rd place
2,753rd place
3,163rd place
1,731st place
109th place
87th place
730th place
468th place
61st place
54th place
137th place
101st place

4029tv.com

abqjournal.com

ajc.com

alabama.gov

sos.alabama.gov

alaska.gov

ltgov.alaska.gov

apnews.com

archives.gov

trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov

baltimoresun.com

bbc.com

bna.com

bostonglobe.com

brennancenter.org

  • Michael Waldman, Donald Trump Tells His Voter Fraud Panel: Find Me 'Something', Brennan Center for Justice, New York University School of Law (July 20, 2017) (also republished at The Daily Beast): "The panel was created to justify one of the more outlandish presidential fibs ... After Trump was roundly mocked for his claim of 3 to 5 million illegal voters, the panel was launched in an effort to try to rustle up some evidence—any evidence—for the charge.... The purpose of the panel is not just to try to justify his laughable claims of millions of invisible illegal voters. It aims to stir fears, to lay the ground for new efforts to restrict voting. Trump's claims, after all, are just a cartoon version of the groundless arguments already used to justify restrictive voting laws."
  • "New Survey of Local Election Officials Debunks Trump's Claims that Millions Improperly Voted in 2016". Brennan Center for Justice. Retrieved July 4, 2017.
  • Pérez, Myrna (October 28, 2004). "Voter Purges" (PDF). Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law. Retrieved August 7, 2017. Some commentators argue that voter purges are simply a variation of older, more overt methods of disenfranchisement intended to reduce minority participation. Courts have agreed: one court overturned the aforementioned Louisiana purge, finding it "massively discriminatory in purpose and effect," and another referred to a Texas statute requiring yearly re-registration as a "direct descendant of the poll tax" that unconstitutionally disenfranchised voters. Although other courts differ on the motivations of purges, they do not deny that their effect can be discriminatory {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  • "State Responses to Commission Requests". Brennan Center for Justice. Retrieved July 6, 2017.
  • Detzner, Ken (July 6, 2017). "Florida DOS Letter to Presidential Advisory Commission" (PDF). Retrieved July 8, 2017 – via Brennan Center for Justice.

ca.gov

sos.ca.gov

chron.com

cnn.com

commonwealthmagazine.org

concordmonitor.com

congress.gov

ct.gov

delaware.gov

news.delaware.gov

denverpost.com

dispatch.com

documentcloud.org

assets.documentcloud.org

facebook.com

factcheck.org

fec.gov

fivethirtyeight.com

gizmodo.com

go.com

abcnews.go.com

harvard.edu

ash.harvard.edu

helenair.com

huffingtonpost.com

idaho.gov

sos.idaho.gov

il.gov

elections.il.gov

inforum.com

kansascity.com

kansaspublicradio.org

kentucky.gov

la.gov

sos.la.gov

latimes.com

law.com

ljworld.com

www2.ljworld.com

lovelycitizen.com

mediamatters.org

ms.gov

sos.ms.gov

nbcnews.com

newsok.com

newyorker.com

nhpr.org

npr.org

nvsos.gov

nytimes.com

pa.gov

governor.pa.gov

palmbeachpost.com

palmcoastobserver.com

pbs.org

pima.gov

recorder.pima.gov

politico.com

politifact.com

  • Booker, Cory (August 18, 2015). "Lightning strikes more common in Texas than in-person voter fraud, says Cory Booker". Politifact. Retrieved March 2, 2016. Voter fraud is 'the intentional corruption of the electoral process by voters. This covers knowingly and willingly giving false information to establish voter eligibility, and knowingly and willingly voting illegally or participating in a conspiracy to encourage illegal voting by others,' according to Lorraine Minnite, a professor at Rutgers and author of the book The Myth of Voter Fraud.

postandcourier.com

pressherald.com

psmag.com

  • Erroneously voting using the superfluous entry instead of one's true registration entry does not impact the outcome of an election. Example 1: A person uses the mail in ballot of his deceased wife rather than his own to cast a vote. Example 2: A person owns two homes, is registered to vote in both homes, but only votes once. This is not uncommon. (For reference, see "Why Are So Many People Registered to Vote in Multiple States?". Pacific Standard. January 27, 2017.)

rapidcityjournal.com

reuters.com

sacbee.com

seacoastonline.com

seattletimes.com

slate.com

  • Gifford, Bill (October 28, 2004). "People Who Vote Twice". Slate. Retrieved August 7, 2017. Intentionally voting more than once in a federal election is a third-degree felony in most states and probably also violates federal election-fraud laws. The punishment varies from state to state but is usually up to five or 10 years in jail and fine of up to $5,000 or $10,000.
  • Hasen, Rick (June 30, 2017). "Trump's Voter Fraud Endgame". Slate.

state.co.us

sos.state.co.us

state.md.us

elections.state.md.us

state.me.us

state.mn.us

sos.state.mn.us

state.oh.us

sos.state.oh.us

state.or.us

records.sos.state.or.us

state.vt.us

sec.state.vt.us

stlpublicradio.org

news.stlpublicradio.org

thedailybeast.com

  • Michael Waldman, Donald Trump Tells His Voter Fraud Panel: Find Me 'Something', Brennan Center for Justice, New York University School of Law (July 20, 2017) (also republished at The Daily Beast): "The panel was created to justify one of the more outlandish presidential fibs ... After Trump was roundly mocked for his claim of 3 to 5 million illegal voters, the panel was launched in an effort to try to rustle up some evidence—any evidence—for the charge.... The purpose of the panel is not just to try to justify his laughable claims of millions of invisible illegal voters. It aims to stir fears, to lay the ground for new efforts to restrict voting. Trump's claims, after all, are just a cartoon version of the groundless arguments already used to justify restrictive voting laws."

theguardian.com

thehill.com

thenation.com

time.com

trib.com

twitter.com

umn.edu

editions.lib.umn.edu

uscis.gov

usnews.com

utah.gov

elections.utah.gov

virginia.gov

governor.virginia.gov

washingtonpost.com

washingtontimes.com

web.archive.org

whitehouse.gov

wi.gov

elections.wi.gov

wmur.com

wnyc.org

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

wowt.com

wvgazettemail.com