Reasonable doubt (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Reasonable doubt" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

4justia.com

696^th place

428^th place

3web.archive.org

1^st place

2doi.org

2^nd place

2bailii.org

3,544^th place

1,912^th place

2canlii.org

6,607^th place

3,855^th place

2canlii.ca

8,552^nd place

low place

1ssrn.com

703^rd place

501^st place

1congress.gov

730^th place

468^th place

1nycourts.gov

low place

1cornell.edu

332^nd place

246^th place

1oup.com

485^th place

440^th place

1heinonline.org

3,322^nd place

1,897^th place

1semanticscholar.org

11^th place

8^th place

1yougov.co.uk

7,016^th place

4,084^th place

1books.google.com

3^rd place

1hnn.us

7,733^rd place

5,564^th place

1cps.gov.uk

8,764^th place

5,075^th place

1lawcom.govt.nz

low place

1canberra.edu.au

low place

1yale.edu

565^th place

460^th place

1jstor.org

26^th place

20^th place

bailii.org

R v Majid [2009] EWCA Crim 2563 (12 October 2009)
Woolmington v DPP [1935] UKHL 1 (23 May 1935)

books.google.com

Franklin, James (2001). The Science of Conjecture: Evidence and Probability Before Pascal. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 28, 42, 61, 63, 67. ISBN 0-8018-6569-7.

canberra.edu.au

Young, William (2003). "Summing-up to juries in criminal cases – what jury research says about current rules and practice" (PDF). Crim LR. 665: 674. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 November 2012. Retrieved 14 April 2012.

canlii.ca

R. v. Starr, [2000 2 SCR 144], 242 (SCC 2000) ("In my view, an effective way to define the reasonable doubt standard for a jury is to explain that it falls much closer to absolute certainty than to proof on a balance of probabilities.").
R. v. Layton, [2009 2 SCR 540] (SCC 2009).

canlii.org

R. v. Brydon, [1995 4 SCR 253] (SCC 1995).
R. v. Lifchus, [1997 3 SCR 320] (SCC 1997).

congress.gov

constitution.congress.gov

"Amdt14.S1.5.5.5 Guilt Beyond a Reasonable Doubt". Constitution Annotated. United States Congress. Retrieved 29 December 2024.

cornell.edu

law.cornell.edu

"beyond a reasonable doubt". LII / Legal Information Institute. Cornell University. Retrieved 29 December 2024.

cps.gov.uk

"The verdict and sentencing - Rape and Serious Sexual Assault". The Crown Prosecution Service. Archived from the original on 30 May 2022.

doi.org

Franklin, James (2006). "Case comment—United States v. Copeland, 369 F. Supp. 2d 275 (E.D.N.Y. 2005): quantification of the 'proof beyond reasonable doubt' standard". Law, Probability and Risk. 5 (2): 159–165. doi:10.1093/lpr/mgl017. Retrieved 30 June 2021.
Diamond, H. A. (1990). "Reasonable doubt: to define, or not to define". Columbia Law Review. 90 (6): 1716–1736. doi:10.2307/1122751. JSTOR 1122751.

heinonline.org

Pi, Daniel, Francesco Parisi, and Barbara Luppi, Quantifying Reasonable Doubt 72 Rutgers U. L. Rev. 455 (2020)

hnn.us

James Q. Whitman What Are the Origins of Reasonable Doubt?, History News Network, George Mason University, February 25, 2008.

jstor.org

Diamond, H. A. (1990). "Reasonable doubt: to define, or not to define". Columbia Law Review. 90 (6): 1716–1736. doi:10.2307/1122751. JSTOR 1122751.

justia.com

supreme.justia.com

Coffin v. United States, 156 U.S. 432 (1895)
In re Winship 397 U.S. 358 (1970)
103 U.S. 304 (1880)
Victor v. Nebraska, 511 U.S. 1 (1994)

lawcom.govt.nz

Young, Warren; Cameron, Neil; Tinsley, Yvette (November 1999). Juries in Criminal Trials: Part Two (PDF). Preliminary Paper 37. Vol. 2. Wellington, New Zealand: Law Commission. p. 54. ISBN 1-877187-42-9. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 February 2013. Retrieved 14 April 2012.

nycourts.gov

"Presumption of Innocence Burden of Proof (in cases with an affirmative defense) Proof Beyond A Reasonable Doubt" (PDF). New York State Unified Court System. Retrieved 29 December 2024.

oup.com

academic.oup.com

Franklin, James (2006). "Case comment—United States v. Copeland, 369 F. Supp. 2d 275 (E.D.N.Y. 2005): quantification of the 'proof beyond reasonable doubt' standard". Law, Probability and Risk. 5 (2): 159–165. doi:10.1093/lpr/mgl017. Retrieved 30 June 2021.

semanticscholar.org

Kagehiro, Dorothy K. and W. Clark Staunton, Legal v. Quantified Definitions of the Standard of Proof 9 L. Hum. Behav. 159 (1985)

ssrn.com

Grechenig, Nicklisch & Thoeni, Punishment Despite Reasonable Doubt - A Public Goods Experiment with Sanctions under Uncertainty, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies (JELS) 2010, vol. 7 (4), p. 847-867 (ssrn).

web.archive.org

"The verdict and sentencing - Rape and Serious Sexual Assault". The Crown Prosecution Service. Archived from the original on 30 May 2022.
Young, Warren; Cameron, Neil; Tinsley, Yvette (November 1999). Juries in Criminal Trials: Part Two (PDF). Preliminary Paper 37. Vol. 2. Wellington, New Zealand: Law Commission. p. 54. ISBN 1-877187-42-9. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 February 2013. Retrieved 14 April 2012.
Young, William (2003). "Summing-up to juries in criminal cases – what jury research says about current rules and practice" (PDF). Crim LR. 665: 674. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 November 2012. Retrieved 14 April 2012.

yale.edu

digitalcommons.law.yale.edu

Whitman, James Q., The Origins of "Reasonable Doubt" (2005), Faculty Scholarship Series. 1.

yougov.co.uk

Smith, Matthew (3 October 2019). "How large can a 'reasonable doubt' be?". YouGov. Retrieved 24 June 2023.