Right of revolution (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Right of revolution" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
3rd place
3rd place
1st place
1st place
488th place
374th place
2nd place
2nd place
low place
low place
703rd place
501st place
low place
low place
7,982nd place
4,574th place
4,208th place
2,295th place
2,762nd place
1,498th place
low place
9,731st place
low place
low place
1,858th place
1,014th place
low place
low place
5,770th place
low place
low place
low place
97th place
164th place

books.google.com

  • Danvila y Collado, Manuel (1881). Las libertades de Aragón: ensayo histórico, jurídico y político. Imprenta de Fortanet.
  • Rives, John C. (1861). "The Congressional Globe: containing The Debates and Proceedings of the Second Session of the Thirty-Sixth Congress: also, of the Special Session of the Senate". The Congressional Globe. Washington: Congressional Globe Office. p. 11. But, sir, while a State has no power under the Constitution conferred upon it, to secede from the Federal Government or from the Union, each State has the right of revolution, which all admit. Whenever the burdens of the Government under which it acts become so onerous that it cannot bear them, or if anticipated evil shall be so great that the State believes it would be better off – even risking the perils of secession – out of the Union than in it, then that State, in my opinion, like all people upon earth, has the right to exercise the great fundamental principle of self-preservation, and go out of the Union – though, of course, at its own peril – and bear the risk of the consequences. And while no State may have the constitutional right to secede from the Union, the President may not be wrong when he says the Federal Government has no power under the Constitution to compel the State to come back into the Union. It may be a casus omissus in the constitution; but I should like to know where the power exists in the Constitution of the United States to authorize the Federal Government to coerce a sovereign State. It does not exist in any terms, at any rate, in the Constitution. (Iverson said this in 1860; 1861 is when Globe published it.)
  • Kiefer, Howard Evans; Munitz, Milton Karl. Ethics and Social Justice. ISBN 9780873950541. Retrieved 30 June 2015.
  • Darsey, James (September 1999). Prophetic Tradition and Radical Rhetoric in America. ISBN 9780814719244. Retrieved 30 June 2015.
  • See Christian G. Fritz, American Sovereigns: The People and America's Constitutional Tradition Before the Civil War. (Cambridge University Press, 2008) at p. 25 ISBN 978-0-521-88188-3. In Chapter 2, "Revolutionary Constitutionalism", Professor Fritz notes that after the Revolution, "[i]ncreasingly, as Americans included it in their constitutions, the right of revolution came to be seen as a constitutional principle permitting the people as the sovereign to control government and revise their constitutions without limit."

btg-bestellservice.de

columbia.edu

columbia.edu

college.columbia.edu

davekopel.com

doi.org

dx.doi.org

friesian.com

hellenicparliament.gr

jurisprudencia.gob.sv

ky.gov

courts.ky.gov

nh.gov

ssrn.com

state.pa.us

sites.state.pa.us

state.tn.us

state.tx.us

tlc.state.tx.us

un.org

usoud.cz

web.archive.org