John Powers, History As Propaganda: Tibetan Exiles versus the People's Republic of ChinaArchived 2017-10-01 at the Wayback Machine, Oxford University Press, 2004, 224 p., p. 9: "These statements indicate the sort of actions in which Chinese authors believe themselves to be engaged. Their writings are intended to persuade a Western audience that claims of Tibetan independence are false and that an unbiased examination of "historical facts" will reveal that Tibet has been an integral part of China since time immemorial."
José Elías Esteve Moltó, TibetArchived 2015-11-17 at the Wayback Machine, Oxford Bibliographies: "Original work published in Chinese and Tibetan with the title, The Historical Status of China’s Tibet (Beijing: China Intercontinental, 1997)."
revues.org
lerhistoria.revues.org
José Raimundo Noras, « O Tibete entre impérios: formação e sobrevivência de uma identidade cultural. Ensaio bibliográfico »Archived 2017-10-02 at the Wayback Machine, Ler História [Online], 69, 2016, posto online no dia 07 Março 2017: "O ponto de vista chinês no debate sobre a «questão tibetana» também tem sido explorado por alguns autores, quase todos chineses. A doutrina oficial da República Popular da China nasce da argumentação segundo a qual, de uma forma ou de outra, o Tibete sempre foi um domínio chinês, sensivelmente, a partir do século XIII. É esta perspetiva histórica – com algum fundamento, como vimos sobretudo no que respeita ao período posterior ao século XVII – que é defendida por Jiawei Wang e Nyima Gyaincain no livro The Historical Status of China’s Tibet23. Essa obra constitui uma espécie de «história oficial chinesa» do «estatuto político» do Tibete." (The Chinese point of view in the debate on the 'Tibetan issue' has also been explored by some authors, almost all Chinese. The official doctrine of the People's Republic of China arises from the argument that, in one way or another, Tibet has always been a Chinese domain, roughly from the thirteenth century. It is this historical perspective – with some foundation, as we saw above all in regard to the period after the seventeenth century – which is advocated by Jiawei Wang and Nyima Gyaincain in The Historical Status of China's Tibet. This work constitutes a kind of 'official Chinese history' of Tibet's 'political status'.)
scio.gov.cn
"Wǔzhōu chuánbò zhōngxīn (wǔzhōu chūbǎn shè)" 五洲传播中心(五洲出版社) [Intercontinental Communication Center (Intercontinental Publishing House)]. The State Council Information Office of the People's Republic of China (中华人民共和国国务院新闻办公室) (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2018-11-24.
"Wǔzhōu chuánbò zhōngxīn (wǔzhōu chūbǎn shè)" 五洲传播中心(五洲出版社) [Intercontinental Communication Center (Intercontinental Publishing House)]. The State Council Information Office of the People's Republic of China (中华人民共和国国务院新闻办公室) (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2018-11-24.
中国西藏的历史地位 引言 [Introduction to The Historical Status of China's Tibet] (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2004-11-25. Retrieved 2018-06-21.
José Raimundo Noras, « O Tibete entre impérios: formação e sobrevivência de uma identidade cultural. Ensaio bibliográfico »Archived 2017-10-02 at the Wayback Machine, Ler História [Online], 69, 2016, posto online no dia 07 Março 2017: "O ponto de vista chinês no debate sobre a «questão tibetana» também tem sido explorado por alguns autores, quase todos chineses. A doutrina oficial da República Popular da China nasce da argumentação segundo a qual, de uma forma ou de outra, o Tibete sempre foi um domínio chinês, sensivelmente, a partir do século XIII. É esta perspetiva histórica – com algum fundamento, como vimos sobretudo no que respeita ao período posterior ao século XVII – que é defendida por Jiawei Wang e Nyima Gyaincain no livro The Historical Status of China’s Tibet23. Essa obra constitui uma espécie de «história oficial chinesa» do «estatuto político» do Tibete." (The Chinese point of view in the debate on the 'Tibetan issue' has also been explored by some authors, almost all Chinese. The official doctrine of the People's Republic of China arises from the argument that, in one way or another, Tibet has always been a Chinese domain, roughly from the thirteenth century. It is this historical perspective – with some foundation, as we saw above all in regard to the period after the seventeenth century – which is advocated by Jiawei Wang and Nyima Gyaincain in The Historical Status of China's Tibet. This work constitutes a kind of 'official Chinese history' of Tibet's 'political status'.)
José Elías Esteve Moltó, TibetArchived 2015-11-17 at the Wayback Machine, Oxford Bibliographies: "Original work published in Chinese and Tibetan with the title, The Historical Status of China’s Tibet (Beijing: China Intercontinental, 1997)."
John Powers, History As Propaganda: Tibetan Exiles versus the People's Republic of ChinaArchived 2017-10-01 at the Wayback Machine, Oxford University Press, 2004, 224 p., p. 9: "These statements indicate the sort of actions in which Chinese authors believe themselves to be engaged. Their writings are intended to persuade a Western audience that claims of Tibetan independence are false and that an unbiased examination of "historical facts" will reveal that Tibet has been an integral part of China since time immemorial."
