United States v. Microsoft Corp. (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "United States v. Microsoft Corp." in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

18web.archive.org

1^st place

5justice.gov

918^th place

556^th place

4wired.com

193^rd place

152^nd place

3justia.com

696^th place

428^th place

2wsj.com

79^th place

65^th place

2businessweek.com

712^th place

526^th place

2washingtonpost.com

34^th place

27^th place

2scholar.google.com

1,697^th place

1,040^th place

2cornell.edu

332^nd place

246^th place

2unclaw.com

low place

2cnn.com

28^th place

26^th place

1books.google.com

3^rd place

1leconcurrentialiste.com

low place

1archive.today

14^th place

1cnet.com

272^nd place

225^th place

1richardnoble.com

low place

1worldcat.org

5^th place

1independent.org

low place

1wsws.org

4,672^nd place

3,645^th place

1scotusblog.com

7,147^th place

3,830^th place

1uscourts.gov

2,275^th place

1,288^th place

1itprotoday.com

low place

1criterioneconomics.com

low place

1leagle.com

4,919^th place

2,808^th place

1sec.gov

572^nd place

436^th place

1seattlepi.com

1,215^th place

726^th place

1pbs.org

198^th place

154^th place

1columbia.edu

488^th place

374^th place

1cato.org

4,789^th place

3,253^rd place

1researchgate.net

120^th place

125^th place

1archive.is

87^th place

low place

1northwestern.edu

2,302^nd place

1,389^th place

archive.is

Jo Foley, Mary (March 10, 1999). "Free-Software Advocate Offers Remedies for Microsoft Case". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on October 26, 2018. Retrieved June 1, 2024.

archive.today

Kawamoto, Dawn (August 28, 1998). "Gates deposition called evasive". CNET News. Archived from the original on May 24, 2012.

books.google.com

Caruso, Denise (April 2, 1984). "Company Strategies Boomerang". InfoWorld. pp. 80–83. Retrieved February 10, 2015.

businessweek.com

Neuborne, Ellen (November 30, 1998). "Microsoft's Teflon Bill". Businessweek. Archived from the original on December 2, 1999. Retrieved March 19, 2013.
"Buggy Video and More, Microsoft Is Going Backward". Business Week. February 3, 1999. Archived from the original on November 3, 1999. Retrieved December 12, 2014.

cato.org

Friedman, Milton (March–April 1999). "The Business Community's Suicidal Impulse". Policy Forum. Cato Institute. Retrieved February 23, 2013.

cnet.com

news.cnet.com

Kawamoto, Dawn (August 28, 1998). "Gates deposition called evasive". CNET News. Archived from the original on May 24, 2012.

cnn.com

money.cnn.com

"Gates stands tough - Mar. 3, 1998". money.cnn.com. Retrieved October 26, 2023.

cnn.com

"Gates deposition makes judge laugh in court". CNN. November 16, 1998. Archived from the original on September 2, 1999. Retrieved May 27, 2010.

columbia.edu

moglen.law.columbia.edu

Eben Moglen (January 28, 2002). "Free Software Matters: Shaking Up The Microsoft Settlement" (PDF). Retrieved February 7, 2013.

cornell.edu

law.cornell.edu

criterioneconomics.com

J. Gregory Sidak & David J. Teece, Dynamic Competition in Antitrust Law, 5 J. Competition L. & Econ. 581, 621–22 (2009).

independent.org

Theroux, David (June 2, 1999). "Open Letter on Antitrust Protectionism". The Independent Institute. Archived from the original on February 17, 2022. Retrieved March 25, 2022.

itprotoday.com

Thurrott, Paul (March 14, 2001). "Judge Jackson Exits Microsoft Discrimination Case". Windows IT Pro. Archived from the original on December 21, 2020. Retrieved March 25, 2022.

justia.com

law.justia.com

United States v. Microsoft Corp., 253 F.3d 34 (D.C. Cir. 2001).
United States v. Microsoft Corp., 87 F. Supp. 2d 30 (D.D.C. 2000).
United States v. Microsoft Corp., 97 F. Supp. 2d 59 (D.D.C. 2000).

justice.gov

"Memorandum Opinion : U.S. V. Microsoft Corp". United States Department of Justice. August 14, 2015. Retrieved June 1, 2023.
United States v. Microsoft Corp., 98-CV-1232, 98-CV-1233 (D.D.C. Nov. 5, 1999).
"Antitrust Division | U.S. V. Microsoft: Court's Findings Of Fact". www.justice.gov. August 14, 2015. Retrieved April 23, 2024.
United States v. Microsoft Corp., 98-CV-1232 (D.D.C. Nov. 12, 2002).
"Microsoft Consent Decree Compliance Advisory - August 1, 2003 : U.S. V. Microsoft". United States Department of Justice. August 14, 2015. Archived from the original on April 22, 2021. Retrieved March 25, 2022.

leagle.com

United States v. Microsoft Corp., 231 F. Supp. 2d 144 (D.D.C. 2002).

leconcurrentialiste.com

"The Microsoft case by the numbers: comparison between U.S. and E.U." Le Concurrentialiste. February 10, 2014. Retrieved February 6, 2015.

northwestern.edu

scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu

Butts, Chris 2010 https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1105&context=njtip

pbs.org

Cringely, Robert. "The Once and Future King: Now the Only Way Microsoft Can Die is by Suicide". I, Cringely. Archived from the original on November 25, 2015.

researchgate.net

Gregory T. Jenkins & Robert W. Bing, Microsoft’s Monopoly: Anti-Competitive Behavior, Predatory Tactics, And The Failure Of Governmental Will, 5 J. Bus. & Econ. Research 222 (2007).

richardnoble.com

"Retracing the Missteps in Microsoft's Defense at Its Antitrust Trial". Archived from the original on May 3, 2001. Retrieved November 19, 2018.

scholar.google.com

United States v. Microsoft Corp., 253 F.3d 34, 48 (D.C. Cir. 2001)
Massachusetts v. Microsoft Corp., 373 F. 3d 1199 (D.C. Cir., 2004).

scotusblog.com

Russell, Kevin. "Overview of Supreme Court's cert. before judgment practice". SCOTUSblog. Retrieved June 15, 2018.

seattlepi.com

blog.seattlepi.com

ATR-SV-DIV401;MDE;15906;7(Archive at https://web.archive.org/web/20210707231429/https://blog.seattlepi.com/microsoft/files/library/jsr20060512.pdf)

sec.gov

"Microsoft Corporation Form 10-K Annual Report for fiscal year ending June 30, 2008 (pg. 14)". Archived from the original on June 14, 2019. Retrieved June 18, 2010.

unclaw.com

Chin, Andrew (September 30, 2004). "A case of insecure browsing" (PDF). newsobserver.com. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 6, 2021.
Chin, Andrew (March 21, 2005). "DECODING MICROSOFT: A FIRST PRINCIPLES APPROACH" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on November 24, 2021.

uscourts.gov

"Judiciary Policies And Procedures: Codes Of Conduct". Archived from the original on March 13, 2014. Retrieved April 17, 2007.

washingtonpost.com

Chandrasekaran, Rajiv (November 13, 1998). "Microsoft Attacks Credibility of Intel Exec". The Washington Post. p. B1. Archived from the original on February 5, 2012. Retrieved May 27, 2010.
Leibovich, Mark (December 31, 2000). "Alter Egos". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on December 25, 2016. Retrieved June 24, 2019.

web.archive.org

Wilke, John R. (September 10, 2001). "Microsoft Drafts Settlement Proposal, Hoping to Resolve Antitrust Lawsuit". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on September 19, 2001.
"Gates deposition makes judge laugh in court". CNN. November 16, 1998. Archived from the original on September 2, 1999. Retrieved May 27, 2010.
Neuborne, Ellen (November 30, 1998). "Microsoft's Teflon Bill". Businessweek. Archived from the original on December 2, 1999. Retrieved March 19, 2013.
Chandrasekaran, Rajiv (November 13, 1998). "Microsoft Attacks Credibility of Intel Exec". The Washington Post. p. B1. Archived from the original on February 5, 2012. Retrieved May 27, 2010.
"Buggy Video and More, Microsoft Is Going Backward". Business Week. February 3, 1999. Archived from the original on November 3, 1999. Retrieved December 12, 2014.
McCullagh, Declan (February 2, 1999), "Feds Accuse MS of Falsification", Wired, archived from the original on January 15, 2011, retrieved November 14, 2009
McCullagh, Declan (February 16, 1999). "Compaq: It Was All a Big Mix-Up". Wired. Archived from the original on October 31, 2020.
"Retracing the Missteps in Microsoft's Defense at Its Antitrust Trial". Archived from the original on May 3, 2001. Retrieved November 19, 2018.
Leibovich, Mark (December 31, 2000). "Alter Egos". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on December 25, 2016. Retrieved June 24, 2019.
Theroux, David (June 2, 1999). "Open Letter on Antitrust Protectionism". The Independent Institute. Archived from the original on February 17, 2022. Retrieved March 25, 2022.
"Judiciary Policies And Procedures: Codes Of Conduct". Archived from the original on March 13, 2014. Retrieved April 17, 2007.
Thurrott, Paul (March 14, 2001). "Judge Jackson Exits Microsoft Discrimination Case". Windows IT Pro. Archived from the original on December 21, 2020. Retrieved March 25, 2022.
"Microsoft Corporation Form 10-K Annual Report for fiscal year ending June 30, 2008 (pg. 14)". Archived from the original on June 14, 2019. Retrieved June 18, 2010.
"Microsoft Consent Decree Compliance Advisory - August 1, 2003 : U.S. V. Microsoft". United States Department of Justice. August 14, 2015. Archived from the original on April 22, 2021. Retrieved March 25, 2022.
ATR-SV-DIV401;MDE;15906;7(Archive at https://web.archive.org/web/20210707231429/https://blog.seattlepi.com/microsoft/files/library/jsr20060512.pdf)
Cringely, Robert. "The Once and Future King: Now the Only Way Microsoft Can Die is by Suicide". I, Cringely. Archived from the original on November 25, 2015.
Chin, Andrew (September 30, 2004). "A case of insecure browsing" (PDF). newsobserver.com. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 6, 2021.
Chin, Andrew (March 21, 2005). "DECODING MICROSOFT: A FIRST PRINCIPLES APPROACH" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on November 24, 2021.

wired.com

McCullagh, Declan (February 2, 1999), "Feds Accuse MS of Falsification", Wired, archived from the original on January 15, 2011, retrieved November 14, 2009
McCullagh, Declan (February 16, 1999). "Compaq: It Was All a Big Mix-Up". Wired. Archived from the original on October 31, 2020.
"U.S. v. Microsoft: Timeline". Wired. November 4, 2002.
"Microsoft Judge Ripped in Court". Wired. February 28, 2001.

worldcat.org

Leibovich, Mark (December 31, 2000). "Alter Egos". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on December 25, 2016. Retrieved June 24, 2019.

wsj.com

Wilke, John R. (September 10, 2001). "Microsoft Drafts Settlement Proposal, Hoping to Resolve Antitrust Lawsuit". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on September 19, 2001.
Jo Foley, Mary (March 10, 1999). "Free-Software Advocate Offers Remedies for Microsoft Case". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on October 26, 2018. Retrieved June 1, 2024.

wsws.org

Ingram, Mike (June 9, 2000). "U.S. Judge Orders Break-up of Microsoft". World Socialist Web Site. International Committee of the Fourth International.