Wiki-Watch (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Wiki-Watch" in English language version.

Last modified: 11:21:50, 12 August 2026 (UTC)

Ref.Un. Ref.Website

Global rank English rank

1410web.archive.org

1^st place

74spiegel.de

87^th place

363^rd place

44wiki-watch.de

low place

33faz.net

282^nd place

1,243^rd place

31newswire.ca

3,066^th place

1,749^th place

22monstersandcritics.com

3,780^th place

2,667^th place

21heute.de

low place

21europa-uni.de

low place

11theinformationsociety.org

low place

11haz.de

4,802^nd place

low place

11heise.de

905^th place

3,454^th place

11welt.de

255^th place

947^th place

11cedailynews.com

low place

11nytimes.com

7^th place

11theguardian.com

16^th place

11^th place

11informationweek.com

6,678^th place

4,598^th place

11cbc.ca

110^th place

65^th place

11taz.de

603^rd place

2,727^th place

cbc.ca (Global: 110^th place; English: 65^th place)

Tech: wiki software, Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, 6 September 2007

cedailynews.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

Wiki-Watch: new tool checking Wikipedia reliability, CE Daily News, 14 January 2011, archived from the original on 24 November 2021, retrieved 2 May 2011

europa-uni.de (Global: low place; English: low place)

European University Viadrina (7 September 2011). "Medieninformation Nr. 129-2011 vom 7. 20 September: Wiki-Watch organisiert sich neu". Archived from the original on 16 June 2013. Retrieved 12 October 2012.

faz.net (Global: 282^nd place; English: 1,243^rd place)

faz.net

Jörg Wittkewitz (11 July 2011). "Kritik an Wiki-Watch: Schon Großmutter war zuckerkrank". FAZ online. Retrieved 11 July 2011. – article was taken offline after Weberling and Stock announced legal action. The FAZ had to print a formal reply: Gegendarstellung zum Beitrag "Schon Großmutter war zuckerkrank" vom 11.7.2011. Archived 18 November 2014 at the Wayback Machine by Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Stock, written on 1 August 2011.
Jörg Wittkewitz (8 July 2011). ""Der Rest war Handarbeit" : Interview mit einem Wikipedia-Administrator". Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. Retrieved 9 July 2011. – article was taken offline after Weberling and Stock announced legal action

fazarchiv.faz.net

Jörg Wittkewitz (11 July 2011). "Kritik an Wiki-Watch: Schon Großmutter war zuckerkrank". FAZ online. Retrieved 11 July 2011. – article was taken offline after Weberling and Stock announced legal action. The FAZ had to print a formal reply: Gegendarstellung zum Beitrag "Schon Großmutter war zuckerkrank" vom 11.7.2011. Archived 18 November 2014 at the Wayback Machine by Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Stock, written on 1 August 2011.

haz.de (Global: 4,802^nd place; English: low place)

Corinth, Ernst (4 November 2010). "Netzgeflüster: Einblicke ins Wiki". Hannoversche Allgemeine. Archived from the original on 8 May 2016. Retrieved 20 June 2015.

heise.de (Global: 905^th place; English: 3,454^th place)

Torsten Kleinz; Jo Bager. "Wikipedia-Admins: männlich, gebildet und genervt". heise.de. Archived from the original on 26 October 2010. Retrieved 25 October 2010.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

heute.de (Global: low place; English: low place)

Alfred Krüger (3 November 2010). "Aufpasser für Wikipedianer: Portal 'Wiki-Watch' will Online-Lexikon durchsichtiger machen". heute online, ZDF. Retrieved 4 November 2010.^{[permanent dead link]}

informationweek.com (Global: 6,678^th place; English: 4,598^th place)

Wikipedia Considers Coloring Untested Text, Information Week, 31 August 2009

monstersandcritics.com (Global: 3,780^th place; English: 2,667^th place)

Deutsche Presse Agentur (13 January 2011). "German watchdog monitoring English Wikipedia". Monsters and Critics. Archived from the original on 16 January 2011. Retrieved 2 May 2011.
German watchdog monitoring English Wikipedia, Monsters and Critics, 13 January 2011, archived from the original on 16 January 2011, retrieved 2 May 2011

newswire.ca (Global: 3,066^th place; English: 1,749^th place)

News, CA: CNW, 14 January 2011, archived from the original on 18 January 2011, retrieved 2 May 2011

nytimes.com (Global: 7^th place; English: 7^th place)

Seelye, Katharine Q (4 December 2005), "Snared in the Web of a Wikipedia Liar", The New York Times

spiegel.de (Global: 87^th place; English: 363^rd place)

Stock, Prof. Dr. Wolfgang (15 September 2011). "Gegendarstellung". Der Spiegel.
Grill, Markus (2011). "Wir bleiben im Hintergrund". Der Spiegel. No. 28. pp. 74–76.
"Zielkonflikt: Wikipedia-Autor arbeitet für Sanofi-Aventis". Spiegel Online. 10 July 2011. Retrieved 11 July 2011.
Markus Grill (15 July 2011). "Wiki-Watch-Gründer gerät in Erklärungsnot". Spiegel Online. Retrieved 15 July 2011.

taz.de (Global: 603^rd place; English: 2,727^th place)

Schwan, Ben (27 October 2010). "Wissenschaftliches Projekt Wiki-Watch: Wikipedia von innen". Die Tageszeitung.

theguardian.com (Global: 16^th place; English: 11^th place)

"Can you trust Wikipedia?", The Guardian, 24 October 2005

theinformationsociety.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

Möller, Christian (10 January 2011). "Wikipedia: On Watch". The Information Society Blog. Archived from the original on 27 December 2019. Retrieved 12 October 2012. Wol[f]gang Stock is confident: 'With Wiki Watch and WikiTrust in place no one will be able to smuggle in an additional name or other false information unnoticed in the future.'

web.archive.org (Global: 1^st place; English: 1^st place)

Deutsche Presse Agentur (13 January 2011). "German watchdog monitoring English Wikipedia". Monsters and Critics. Archived from the original on 16 January 2011. Retrieved 2 May 2011.
Möller, Christian (10 January 2011). "Wikipedia: On Watch". The Information Society Blog. Archived from the original on 27 December 2019. Retrieved 12 October 2012. Wol[f]gang Stock is confident: 'With Wiki Watch and WikiTrust in place no one will be able to smuggle in an additional name or other false information unnoticed in the future.'
Corinth, Ernst (4 November 2010). "Netzgeflüster: Einblicke ins Wiki". Hannoversche Allgemeine. Archived from the original on 8 May 2016. Retrieved 20 June 2015.
Torsten Kleinz; Jo Bager. "Wikipedia-Admins: männlich, gebildet und genervt". heise.de. Archived from the original on 26 October 2010. Retrieved 25 October 2010.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
Mann, Selena (14 January 2011), New tool used to evaluate Wikipedia, Canada: IT World, archived from the original on 11 June 2011, retrieved 1 May 2011
News, CA: CNW, 14 January 2011, archived from the original on 18 January 2011, retrieved 2 May 2011
Wiki-Watch: new tool checking Wikipedia reliability, CE Daily News, 14 January 2011, archived from the original on 24 November 2021, retrieved 2 May 2011
German watchdog monitoring English Wikipedia, Monsters and Critics, 13 January 2011, archived from the original on 16 January 2011, retrieved 2 May 2011
Jörg Wittkewitz (11 July 2011). "Kritik an Wiki-Watch: Schon Großmutter war zuckerkrank". FAZ online. Retrieved 11 July 2011. – article was taken offline after Weberling and Stock announced legal action. The FAZ had to print a formal reply: Gegendarstellung zum Beitrag "Schon Großmutter war zuckerkrank" vom 11.7.2011. Archived 18 November 2014 at the Wayback Machine by Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Stock, written on 1 August 2011.
European University Viadrina (7 September 2011). "Medieninformation Nr. 129-2011 vom 7. 20 September: Wiki-Watch organisiert sich neu". Archived from the original on 16 June 2013. Retrieved 12 October 2012.

welt.de (Global: 255^th place; English: 947^th place)

Hollstein, Miriam (31 October 2010). "Undurchschaubare Wissensmacht". Welt am Sonntag: 4.

wiki-watch.de (Global: low place; English: low place)

en.wiki-watch.de

Wiki-Watch. "Exklusive Insight". Retrieved 12 October 2012.
Wiki-Watch. "International Press Review by languages". Retrieved 12 October 2012.

de.wiki-watch.de

"Wiki-Watch - Impressum". De.wiki-watch.de. Retrieved 22 March 2012.

wiki-watch.de

Wiki-Watch. "German Press Review". Retrieved 12 October 2012.

Wiki-Watch (English Wikipedia)

cbc.ca (Global: 110th place; English: 65th place)

cedailynews.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

europa-uni.de (Global: low place; English: low place)

faz.net (Global: 282nd place; English: 1,243rd place)

faz.net

fazarchiv.faz.net

haz.de (Global: 4,802nd place; English: low place)

heise.de (Global: 905th place; English: 3,454th place)

heute.de (Global: low place; English: low place)

informationweek.com (Global: 6,678th place; English: 4,598th place)

monstersandcritics.com (Global: 3,780th place; English: 2,667th place)

newswire.ca (Global: 3,066th place; English: 1,749th place)

nytimes.com (Global: 7th place; English: 7th place)

spiegel.de (Global: 87th place; English: 363rd place)

taz.de (Global: 603rd place; English: 2,727th place)

theguardian.com (Global: 16th place; English: 11th place)

theinformationsociety.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; English: 1st place)

welt.de (Global: 255th place; English: 947th place)

wiki-watch.de (Global: low place; English: low place)

en.wiki-watch.de

de.wiki-watch.de

wiki-watch.de

cbc.ca (Global: 110^th place; English: 65^th place)

faz.net (Global: 282^nd place; English: 1,243^rd place)

haz.de (Global: 4,802^nd place; English: low place)

heise.de (Global: 905^th place; English: 3,454^th place)

informationweek.com (Global: 6,678^th place; English: 4,598^th place)

monstersandcritics.com (Global: 3,780^th place; English: 2,667^th place)

newswire.ca (Global: 3,066^th place; English: 1,749^th place)

nytimes.com (Global: 7^th place; English: 7^th place)

spiegel.de (Global: 87^th place; English: 363^rd place)

taz.de (Global: 603^rd place; English: 2,727^th place)

theguardian.com (Global: 16^th place; English: 11^th place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1^st place; English: 1^st place)

welt.de (Global: 255^th place; English: 947^th place)