Secure Hash Algorithm (Spanish Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Secure Hash Algorithm" in Spanish language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Spanish rank
1st place
1st place
355th place
83rd place
8,888th place
low place
5,032nd place
7,832nd place
low place
low place
388th place
684th place

arstechnica.com

iacr.org

eprint.iacr.org

nist.gov

csrc.nist.gov

schneier.com

  • Schneier, Bruce (18 de febrero de 2005). «SHA-1 Broken» (html). Bruce Schneier's Blog (en inglés). Archivado desde el original el 17 de diciembre de 2018. Consultado el 17 de diciembre de 2018. «The research team of Xiaoyun Wang, Yiqun Lisa Yin, and Hongbo Yu (mostly from Shandong University in China) have been quietly circulating a paper announcing their results: collisions in the the full SHA-1 in 2**69 hash operations, much less than the brute-force attack of 2**80 operations based on the hash length. collisions in SHA-0 in 2**39 operations. collisions in 58-round SHA-1 in 2**33 operations.» 
  • Schneier, Bruce (18 de febrero de 2005). «Cryptanalysis of SHA-1» (html). Bruce Schneier's Blog (en inglés). Archivado desde el original el 21 de febrero de 2005. Consultado el 17 de diciembre de 2018. «SHA-1 produces a 160-bit hash. That is, every message hashes down to a 160-bit number. Given that there are an infinite number of messages that hash to each possible value, there are an infinite number of possible collisions. But because the number of possible hashes is so large, the odds of finding one by chance is negligibly small (one in 280, to be exact). If you hashed 280 random messages, you'd find one pair that hashed to the same value. (...) They can find collisions in SHA-1 in 269 calculations, about 2,000 times faster than brute force. Right now, that is just on the far edge of feasibility with current technology. Two comparable massive computations illustrate that point.» 

web.archive.org

  • Schneier, Bruce (18 de febrero de 2005). «SHA-1 Broken» (html). Bruce Schneier's Blog (en inglés). Archivado desde el original el 17 de diciembre de 2018. Consultado el 17 de diciembre de 2018. «The research team of Xiaoyun Wang, Yiqun Lisa Yin, and Hongbo Yu (mostly from Shandong University in China) have been quietly circulating a paper announcing their results: collisions in the the full SHA-1 in 2**69 hash operations, much less than the brute-force attack of 2**80 operations based on the hash length. collisions in SHA-0 in 2**39 operations. collisions in 58-round SHA-1 in 2**33 operations.» 
  • Xiaoyun Wang, Dengguo Feng, Xuejia Lai, Hongbo Yu (17 de agosto de 2004). «Collisions for Hash Functions MD4, MD5, HAVAL-128 and RIPEMD» (pdf). International Association for Cryptologic Research (en inglés). Archivado desde el original el 20 de diciembre de 2004. Consultado el 17 de diciembre de 2018. 
  • Schneier, Bruce (18 de febrero de 2005). «Cryptanalysis of SHA-1» (html). Bruce Schneier's Blog (en inglés). Archivado desde el original el 21 de febrero de 2005. Consultado el 17 de diciembre de 2018. «SHA-1 produces a 160-bit hash. That is, every message hashes down to a 160-bit number. Given that there are an infinite number of messages that hash to each possible value, there are an infinite number of possible collisions. But because the number of possible hashes is so large, the odds of finding one by chance is negligibly small (one in 280, to be exact). If you hashed 280 random messages, you'd find one pair that hashed to the same value. (...) They can find collisions in SHA-1 in 269 calculations, about 2,000 times faster than brute force. Right now, that is just on the far edge of feasibility with current technology. Two comparable massive computations illustrate that point.» 

yp.to

bench.cr.yp.to