Kritik terhadap hak cipta (Indonesian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Kritik terhadap hak cipta" in Indonesian language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Indonesian rank
1st place
1st place
7th place
35th place
1,010th place
5,374th place
low place
low place
703rd place
601st place
2,327th place
6,466th place
low place
low place
193rd place
344th place
low place
low place
488th place
568th place
22nd place
131st place
low place
low place
388th place
493rd place
1,462nd place
1,492nd place
1,475th place
2,125th place
low place
low place
6,812th place
5,770th place
low place
low place
27th place
81st place
3,237th place
5,087th place
6,694th place
6,117th place
2nd place
4th place
low place
low place
433rd place
374th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
115th place
448th place
2,149th place
7,435th place
7,240th place
2,605th place
low place
low place
5,138th place
low place
4,784th place
7,643rd place
1,943rd place
2,656th place

afr.com

arstechnica.com

bc.edu

cato-unbound.org

  • Fleischer, Rasmus (June 2008). "The Future of Copyright". CATO Unbound. "We conclude that the snippet function does not give searchers access to effectively competing substitutes. Snippet view, at best and after a large commitment of manpower, produces discontinuous, tiny fragments, amounting in the aggregate to no more than 16% of a book. This does not threaten the rights holders with any significant harm to the value of their copyrights or diminish their harvest of copyright revenue," wrote the court.

cbc.ca

columbia.edu

emoglen.law.columbia.edu

countercurrents.org

creativecommons.org

creativecommons.org.tw

meeting.creativecommons.org.tw

doi.org

  • Heald, Paul J. (2007). "Property Rights and the Efficient Exploitation of Copyrighted Works: An Empirical Analysis of Public Domain and Copyrighted Fiction Best Sellers". 2nd Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies (dalam bahasa Inggris). doi:10.2139/ssrn.955954. SSRN 955954.

fortune.com

gnu.org

gonzaga.edu

guweb2.gonzaga.edu

  • Alfino, Mark, "Intellectual Property and Copyright Ethics", Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 10.2 (1991): 85–109. Reprinted in Robert A. Larmer (Ed.), Ethics in the Workplace, Minneapolis, MN: West Publishing Company, 1996, 278–293.

hipatia.info

ip-watch.org

kopimistsamfundet.co.nz

latimes.com

linux.com

mac.com

homepage.mac.com

mises.org

nccu.edu.tw

www3.nccu.edu.tw

nytimes.com

rockosamhalle.se

rpi.edu

kryten.mm.rpi.edu

ssrn.com

papers.ssrn.com

  • Heald, Paul J. (2007). "Property Rights and the Efficient Exploitation of Copyrighted Works: An Empirical Analysis of Public Domain and Copyrighted Fiction Best Sellers". 2nd Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies (dalam bahasa Inggris). doi:10.2139/ssrn.955954. SSRN 955954.
  • Jessica, Litman (2010-01-14). "Real Copyright Reform". Iowa Law Review (dalam bahasa Inggris). SSRN 1474929.

techdirt.com

techlawadvisor.com

technologyreview.com

  • Mellisa, Heikkila. [1]

ted.com

  • Larry Lessig (2007-03-01). "Larry Lessig says the law is strangling creativity". ted.com. Diakses tanggal 2016-02-26.

thepublicdomain.org

web.archive.org

wikisource.org

en.wikisource.org

wipo.int

  • Rostama, Guilda (June 1, 2015). "Remix Culture and Amateur Creativity: A Copyright Dilemma". WIPO. Diakses tanggal 2016-03-14. in 2013 a district court ruled that copyright owners do not have the right to simply take down content before undertaking a legal analysis to determine whether the remixed work could fall under fair use, a concept in US copyright law which permits limited use of copyrighted material without the need to obtain the right holder's permission (US District Court, Stephanie Lenz v. Universal Music Corp., Universal Music Publishing Inc., and Universal Music Publishing Group, Case No. 5:07-cv-03783-JF, January 24, 2013).[...] Given the emergence of today's "remix" culture, and the legal uncertainty surrounding remixes and mash-ups, the time would appear to be ripe for policy makers to take a new look at copyright law.

wired.com