ケムトレイル (Japanese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "ケムトレイル" in Japanese language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Japanese rank
1st place
1st place
2nd place
6th place
18th place
107th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
3rd place
61st place
low place
low place
439th place
710th place
5,915th place
low place
476th place
4,439th place
1,009th place
1,963rd place
911th place
1,845th place
175th place
751st place
41st place
199th place
5th place
19th place
882nd place
3,524th place
low place
low place
206th place
3,819th place
7th place
63rd place
360th place
1,515th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
3,411th place
low place
30th place
177th place
170th place
1,712th place
5,567th place
low place
791st place
2,162nd place
505th place
1,024th place
20th place
100th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
28th place
188th place
9th place
8th place
1,299th place
3,374th place
77th place
86th place
6,651st place
9,986th place
low place
low place
934th place
57th place
2,229th place
low place
546th place
2,512th place
low place
low place
4,212th place
low place
7,223rd place
low place
367th place
1,431st place
low place
low place
228th place
1,361st place
330th place
1,479th place
12th place
120th place
2,526th place
6,861st place
405th place
1,442nd place
34th place
255th place
2,492nd place
low place
low place
4,120th place
955th place
5,854th place

af.mil

bbc.com

books.google.com

cleveland.com

cnn.com

edition.cnn.com

colorado.edu

cires.colorado.edu

csicop.org

csmonitor.com

discovery.com

news.discovery.com

distractify.com

doi.org

earthisland.org

ele-king.net

epa.gov

nepis.epa.gov

faa.gov

facebook.com

factcheckcenter.jp

fas.org

fortunecity.com

fox12news.com

genius.com

geoengineering-governance-research.org

google.co.jp

books.google.co.jp

govtrack.us

harvard.edu

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

keith.seas.harvard.edu

cces.gov.harvard.edu

highbeam.com

business.highbeam.com

holmestead.ca

ibtimes.com

isbnspy.com

isdglobal.org

ksla.com

nytimes.com

oed.com

  • "chemtrail". Oxford English Dictionary (Third ed.). Oxford University Press. December 2011.(Paid subscription required要購読契約)

parl.gc.ca

www2.parl.gc.ca

  • 37th Parliament, 2nd Sessions Edited Hansard; Number 110 Contents”. Publications: Debates: Committees of the House: Petitions: The Environment 1030. Parliament of Canada (3 June 2003). 13 April 2009閲覧。 “Mr. John Herron (Fundy–Royal, PC): Mr. Speaker, I am presenting a petition on behalf of Mr. Brian Holmes of Ontario regarding aerial spraying. Mr. Holmes has collected signatures from across the country from concerned Canadians who believe that chemicals used in aerial sprayings are adversely affecting the health of Canadians. The petitioners call upon Parliament to stop this type of high altitude spraying. The petition has been duly certified by the clerk and I present it at this time.”

parliament.uk

publications.parliament.uk

proquest.com

search.proquest.com

  • Fraser, Stephen (2009). “Phantom menace? Are conspirators using aircraft to pollute the sky?”. Current Science 94 (14): 8–9. ProQuest 195877531. "Some theorists speculate that the goal is population control; some say it's climate modification; others say it's military weapons testing."  (Paid subscription required要購読契約)

reporternews.com

skepticalinquirer.org

sussex.ac.uk

sro.sussex.ac.uk

telegraph.co.uk

  • Smith, Oliver (24 September 2013). “'Chemtrails' and other aviation conspiracy theories”. The Telegraph. 11 December 2016閲覧。 “So persistent is the chemtrail theory that US government agencies regularly receive calls from irate citizens demanding an explanation...The conspiracy theory took root in the Nineties, with the publication of a US Air Force research paper about weather modification...Governments and scientific institutions have of course dismissed the theories, and claim those vapour trails which persist for longer than usual, or disperse to cover a wide area, are just normal contrails.”

theatlantic.com

thedailybeast.com

theguardian.com

thehill.com

  • Cama, Timothy (13 March 2015). “EPA confronts 'chemtrails' conspiracy talk”. the Hill. 10 December 2016閲覧。 “Conspiracy theorists say that government officials or others are using jets to spray harmful chemicals into the atmosphere. They cite the contrails left by jets as evidence of the chemicals. The EPA has added a new notice to its website, which links to a fact sheet explaining that the trails left by jets in the atmosphere are only ice particles and contain no harmful chemicals. "Contrails are line-shaped clouds or 'Condensation trails' composed of ice particles that are visible behind jet aircraft engines under certain atmospheric conditions and at times can persist", says the notice, posted to the EPA’s website Friday. "EPA is not aware of any deliberate actions to release chemical or biological agents into the atmosphere". Theorists have posited that the chemicals are meant to control the climate, to harm humans or to kill them. The fact sheet from the EPA and other federal agencies like the Federal Aviation Administration and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration was first published in 2000, when the chemtrails conspiracy became popular on the Web. An EPA spokeswoman said the agency frequently receives questions about chemtrails.”
  • Cama, Timothy (13 March 2015). “EPA confronts 'chemtrails' conspiracy talk”. TheHill. http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/235632-epa-confronts-chemtrails-conspiracy-theory 

thetimes.co.uk

theweathernetwork.com

theyworkforyou.com

toolbox.google.com

  • Chemtrail”. Google Fact Check Explorer. 2023年5月18日閲覧。

usatoday.com

usatoday30.usatoday.com

  • Watson, Traci (7 March 2001). “Conspiracy theorists read between lines in the sky”. USA Today: p. A.04. http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/weather/science/2001-03-07-contrails.htm. "Exasperated by persistent questions, the Environmental Protection Agency, NASA, the Federal Aviation Administration and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration joined forces last fall to publish a fact sheet explaining the science of contrail formation. A few months earlier, the Air Force had put out its own fact sheet, which tries to refute its opponents' arguments point by point. "If you try to pin these people down and refute things, it's, 'Well, you're just part of the conspiracy,' " says atmospheric scientist Patrick Minnis of NASA's Langley Research Center in Hampton, Va. "Logic is not exactly a real selling point for most of them."" 

usatoday.com

vice.com

washingtonpost.com

weatherwise.org

web.archive.org

wikipedia.org

en.wikipedia.org

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

worldcat.org

youtube.com