ロシアのウクライナ侵攻における偽情報 (Japanese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "ロシアのウクライナ侵攻における偽情報" in Japanese language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Japanese rank
1st place
1st place
49th place
67th place
12th place
120th place
7th place
63rd place
5th place
19th place
1,388th place
2,960th place
20th place
100th place
129th place
896th place
34th place
255th place
32nd place
1,753rd place
612th place
4,309th place
481st place
2,184th place
8th place
73rd place
28th place
188th place
928th place
2,294th place
1,116th place
2,723rd place
low place
low place
1,347th place
4,946th place
444th place
3,936th place
97th place
272nd place
268th place
1,290th place
2nd place
6th place
269th place
994th place
1,763rd place
2,883rd place
204th place
1,485th place
61st place
289th place
1,210th place
4,007th place
9th place
8th place
115th place
741st place
170th place
1,712th place
146th place
933rd place
140th place
599th place
137th place
1,092nd place
737th place
1,763rd place
99th place
542nd place
36th place
268th place
3,833rd place
low place
940th place
2,910th place
4,574th place
296th place
low place
low place
92nd place
562nd place
187th place
440th place
1,737th place
low place
497th place
2,728th place
low place
low place
6,589th place
low place
985th place
6,135th place
965th place
3,889th place
1,020th place
2,936th place
1,534th place
7,069th place
1,898th place
8,156th place
low place
low place
3,951st place
4,098th place
low place
low place
571st place
3,710th place
5,865th place
low place
low place
low place
139th place
1,039th place
7,075th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
3,287th place
6,047th place
68th place
425th place
1,108th place
8,726th place
1,811th place
low place
30th place
177th place
544th place
2,030th place
476th place
4,439th place
83rd place
1,407th place
2,523rd place
7,804th place
330th place
1,479th place
323rd place
15th place
1,367th place
5,614th place
1,952nd place
119th place
3,281st place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
636th place
2,528th place
79th place
235th place
559th place
3,119th place
low place
low place
5,480th place
low place
low place
low place
2,130th place
1,614th place
5,333rd place
low place
306th place
3,945th place
388th place
1,331st place
581st place
3,488th place
874th place
6,762nd place
3,208th place
low place
3,368th place
low place
8,796th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
964th place
9,886th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
3,474th place
248th place
193rd place
739th place
433rd place
1,942nd place
60th place
2,503rd place
791st place
2,162nd place
729th place
2,298th place
1,716th place
6,596th place
6,620th place
low place
2,596th place
low place
low place
7,106th place
228th place
1,361st place
2,968th place
low place
1,110th place
4,470th place
1,382nd place
3,406th place
362nd place
814th place
14th place
320th place
543rd place
3,059th place
450th place
9,002nd place
2,433rd place
low place
1,084th place
5,045th place
638th place
37th place
561st place
2,216th place
low place
897th place

abc.net.au (Global: 139th place; Japanese: 1,039th place)

afpbb.com (Global: 638th place; Japanese: 37th place)

aljazeera.com (Global: 268th place; Japanese: 1,290th place)

amnesty.org (Global: 1,367th place; Japanese: 5,614th place)

apnews.com (Global: 129th place; Japanese: 896th place)

archive.today (Global: 14th place; Japanese: 320th place)

arstechnica.com (Global: 388th place; Japanese: 1,331st place)

atalayar.com (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

atlanticcouncil.org (Global: 5,865th place; Japanese: low place)

axios.com (Global: 1,716th place; Japanese: 6,596th place)

bbc.co.uk (Global: 8th place; Japanese: 73rd place)

bbc.com (Global: 20th place; Japanese: 100th place)

bivings.com (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

dev-isw.bivings.com

bloomberg.com (Global: 99th place; Japanese: 542nd place)

bnr.bg (Global: 5,480th place; Japanese: low place)

brusselstimes.com (Global: 8,796th place; Japanese: low place)

businessinsider.com (Global: 140th place; Japanese: 599th place)

cbc.ca (Global: 115th place; Japanese: 741st place)

cnn.co.jp (Global: 1,952nd place; Japanese: 119th place)

cnn.com (Global: 28th place; Japanese: 188th place)

cnn.com

edition.cnn.com

cnnindonesia.com (Global: 1,737th place; Japanese: low place)

counterextremism.com (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

csmonitor.com (Global: 791st place; Japanese: 2,162nd place)

detector.media (Global: 3,368th place; Japanese: low place)

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; Japanese: 6th place)

dtnext.in (Global: 2,968th place; Japanese: low place)

dw.com (Global: 204th place; Japanese: 1,485th place)

eurointegration.com.ua (Global: 6,589th place; Japanese: low place)

euronews.com (Global: 612th place; Japanese: 4,309th place)

europa.eu (Global: 68th place; Japanese: 425th place)

ec.europa.eu

euvsdisinfo.eu (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

factcheck.kg (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

factcheck.org (Global: 7,075th place; Japanese: low place)

foreignpolicy.com (Global: 1,116th place; Japanese: 2,723rd place)

fortune.com (Global: 433rd place; Japanese: 1,942nd place)

france24.com (Global: 481st place; Japanese: 2,184th place)

geopolitika.ru (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

ghostarchive.org (Global: 32nd place; Japanese: 1,753rd place)

gigazine.net (Global: 3,474th place; Japanese: 248th place)

globalnews.ca (Global: 985th place; Japanese: 6,135th place)

haaretz.com (Global: 497th place; Japanese: 2,728th place)

hrw.org (Global: 729th place; Japanese: 2,298th place)

icij.org (Global: 6,620th place; Japanese: low place)

ifri.org (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

independent.co.uk (Global: 36th place; Japanese: 268th place)

indianexpress.com (Global: 60th place; Japanese: 2,503rd place)

inews.co.uk (Global: 1,084th place; Japanese: 5,045th place)

interfax.com (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

international.gc.ca (Global: 5,333rd place; Japanese: low place)

jewishjournal.com (Global: 1,020th place; Japanese: 2,936th place)

jpost.com (Global: 544th place; Japanese: 2,030th place)

kcl.ac.uk (Global: 3,833rd place; Japanese: low place)

kompas.com (Global: 450th place; Japanese: 9,002nd place)

kremlin.ru (Global: 306th place; Japanese: 3,945th place)

en.kremlin.ru

leadstories.com (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

lemonde.fr (Global: 83rd place; Japanese: 1,407th place)

logically.ai (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

logicallyfacts.com (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

mashable.com (Global: 561st place; Japanese: 2,216th place)

meduza.io (Global: 444th place; Japanese: 3,936th place)

monash.edu (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

lens.monash.edu

nato.int (Global: 940th place; Japanese: 2,910th place)

nbcnews.com (Global: 137th place; Japanese: 1,092nd place)

newlinesinstitute.org (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

newstatesman.com (Global: 1,108th place; Japanese: 8,726th place)

newsweek.com (Global: 269th place; Japanese: 994th place)

newsweekjapan.jp (Global: 4,574th place; Japanese: 296th place)

newyorker.com (Global: 146th place; Japanese: 933rd place)

npr.org (Global: 92nd place; Japanese: 562nd place)

nytimes.com (Global: 7th place; Japanese: 63rd place)

  • Stuart A. Thompson, Davey Alba (2022年3月3日). “Fact and Mythmaking Blend in Ukraine's Information War”. The New York Times (英語). 0362-4331. 2022年3月14日時点のオリジナルよりアーカイブ. 2022年5月2日閲覧. In the information war over the invasion of Ukraine, some of the country’s official accounts have pushed stories with questionable veracity, spreading anecdotes, gripping on-the-ground accounts and even some unverified information that was later proved false, in a rapid jumble of fact and myth. The claims by Ukraine do not compare to the falsehoods being spread by Russia, which laid the groundwork for a “false flag” operation in the lead-up to the invasion, which the Biden administration sought to derail.
  • Mozur, Paul; Satariano, Adam; Krolik, Aaron (2022年12月15日). “An Alternate Reality: How Russia's State TV Spins the Ukraine War”. The New York Times (アメリカ英語). ISSN 0362-4331. 2023年6月19日閲覧.
  • Smart, Charlie (2022年7月2日). “How the Russian Media Spread False Claims About Ukrainian Nazis”. The New York Times. 2022年7月3日時点のオリジナルよりアーカイブ. 2022年10月11日閲覧.
  • Wong, Edward (2022年3月11日). “U.S. Fights Bioweapons Disinformation Pushed by Russia and China”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. 2022年3月14日時点のオリジナルよりアーカイブ. 2022年3月13日閲覧.
  • Myers, Steven Lee; Thompson, Stuart A. (2022年3月20日). “Truth Is Another Front in Putin's War”. The New York Times. 2022年3月31日時点のオリジナルよりアーカイブ. 2022年3月27日閲覧.
  • Stuart A. Thompson, Davey Alba (2022年3月3日). “Fact and Mythmaking Blend in Ukraine's Information War”. The New York Times (英語). 0362-4331. 2022年3月14日時点のオリジナルよりアーカイブ. 2022年5月2日閲覧. In the information war over the invasion of Ukraine, some of the country’s official accounts have pushed stories with questionable veracity, spreading anecdotes, gripping on-the-ground accounts and even some unverified information that was later proved false, in a rapid jumble of fact and myth. The claims by Ukraine do not compare to the falsehoods being spread by Russia, which laid the groundwork for a “false flag” operation in the lead-up to the invasion, which the Biden administration sought to derail.
  • Thompson, Stuart; Alba, Davey (2022年3月3日). “Fact and Mythmaking Blend in Ukraine's Information War”. The New York Times. 2022年3月3日時点のオリジナルよりアーカイブ. 2022年3月10日閲覧.
  • Méheut, Constant; Mitiuk, Daria (2024年1月3日). ‘It’s State Propaganda’: Ukrainians Shun TV News as War Drags on”. The New York Times (アメリカ英語). ISSN 0362-4331. 2024年1月4日閲覧.
  • Kramer, Andrew E. (2023年9月26日). “Disinformation is a weapon regularly deployed in Russia’s war in Ukraine”. The New York Times (アメリカ英語). ISSN 0362-4331. 2024年1月9日閲覧.
  • Hopkins, Valerie (2022年3月6日). “Ukrainians Find That Relatives in Russia Don't Believe It's a War”. The New York Times. 2022年3月10日時点のオリジナルよりアーカイブ. 2022年3月13日閲覧.

ohchr.org (Global: 1,210th place; Japanese: 4,007th place)

oko.press (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

paperpaper.ru (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

pikiran-rakyat.com (Global: 2,433rd place; Japanese: low place)

cimahi.pikiran-rakyat.com

politico.eu (Global: 1,347th place; Japanese: 4,946th place)

politifact.com (Global: 3,208th place; Japanese: low place)

pravda.com.ua (Global: 636th place; Japanese: 2,528th place)

propublica.org (Global: 3,281st place; Japanese: low place)

qz.com (Global: 1,110th place; Japanese: 4,470th place)

rappler.com (Global: 874th place; Japanese: 6,762nd place)

reuters.com (Global: 49th place; Japanese: 67th place)

reuters.com

jp.reuters.com

rferl.org (Global: 737th place; Japanese: 1,763rd place)

rfi.fr (Global: 559th place; Japanese: 3,119th place)

sankei.com (Global: 323rd place; Japanese: 15th place)

scmp.com (Global: 362nd place; Japanese: 814th place)

spectator.co.uk (Global: 1,811th place; Japanese: low place)

stopfake.org (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

straitstimes.com (Global: 543rd place; Japanese: 3,059th place)

substack.com (Global: 3,951st place; Japanese: 4,098th place)

snyder.substack.com

svoboda.org (Global: 964th place; Japanese: 9,886th place)

tass.com (Global: 1,763rd place; Japanese: 2,883rd place)

techcrunch.com (Global: 187th place; Japanese: 440th place)

telegraph.co.uk (Global: 30th place; Japanese: 177th place)

theatlantic.com (Global: 228th place; Japanese: 1,361st place)

theaustralian.com.au (Global: 965th place; Japanese: 3,889th place)

thebulwark.com (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

thechicagocouncil.org (Global: low place; Japanese: 7,106th place)

theconversation.com (Global: 928th place; Japanese: 2,294th place)

thedailybeast.com (Global: 330th place; Japanese: 1,479th place)

thediplomat.com (Global: 1,382nd place; Japanese: 3,406th place)

theguardian.com (Global: 12th place; Japanese: 120th place)

thehill.com (Global: 476th place; Japanese: 4,439th place)

theintercept.com (Global: 2,523rd place; Japanese: 7,804th place)

themoscowtimes.com (Global: 1,388th place; Japanese: 2,960th place)

thetimes.co.uk (Global: 170th place; Japanese: 1,712th place)

time.com (Global: 61st place; Japanese: 289th place)

time.com

content.time.com

timesofisrael.com (Global: 571st place; Japanese: 3,710th place)

ukraineworld.org (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

ukrinform.net (Global: 3,287th place; Japanese: 6,047th place)

un.org (Global: 97th place; Japanese: 272nd place)

news.un.org

ukraine.un.org

un.org

usembassy.gov (Global: 2,130th place; Japanese: 1,614th place)

ge.usembassy.gov

ushmm.org (Global: 1,534th place; Japanese: 7,069th place)

valigiablu.it (Global: low place; Japanese: low place)

voanews.com (Global: 581st place; Japanese: 3,488th place)

washingtonpost.com (Global: 34th place; Japanese: 255th place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; Japanese: 1st place)

wionews.com (Global: 2,596th place; Japanese: low place)

wired.com (Global: 193rd place; Japanese: 739th place)

worldcat.org (Global: 5th place; Japanese: 19th place)

search.worldcat.org

wsj.com (Global: 79th place; Japanese: 235th place)

x.com (Global: low place; Japanese: 897th place)

yadvashem.org (Global: 1,898th place; Japanese: 8,156th place)

  • “Yad Vashem Statement Regarding the Russian Invasion of Ukraine”. Jerusalem, Israel: Yad Vashem. 2022年2月27日. 2022年3月9日時点のオリジナル (Press Release)よりアーカイブ. 2022年3月4日閲覧. ... the propagandist discourse accompanying the current hostilities is saturated with irresponsible statements and completely inaccurate comparisons with Nazi ideology and actions before and during the Holocaust. Yad Vashem condemns this trivialization and distortion of the historical facts of the Holocaust.

youtube.com (Global: 9th place; Japanese: 8th place)