인도-파키스탄 관계 (Korean Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "인도-파키스탄 관계" in Korean language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Korean rank
1st place
1st place
3rd place
9th place
2nd place
3rd place
2,812th place
3,902nd place
low place
low place
1,382nd place
1,818th place
52nd place
1,770th place
3,524th place
3,977th place
121st place
423rd place
231st place
207th place
low place
4,582nd place
low place
low place
354th place
3,811th place
1,067th place
1,209th place
34th place
124th place
208th place
940th place
188th place
5,016th place
5th place
11th place
26th place
70th place
11th place
310th place
1,811th place
8,332nd place

academia.edu

nub.academia.edu

archive.af

books.google.com

  • Marshall Cavendish (September 2006). 《World and Its Peoples》. Marshall Cavendish. 396쪽. ISBN 978-0-7614-7571-2. 
  • Vazira Fazila-Yacoobali Zamindar (2010). 《The Long Partition and the Making of Modern South Asia: Refugees, Boundaries, Histories》. Columbia University Press. 40–쪽. ISBN 978-0-231-13847-5. Second, it was feared that if an exchange of populations was agreed to in principle in Punjab, ' there was the likelihood of trouble breaking out in other parts of the subcontinent to force Muslims in the Indian Dominion to move to Pakistan. If that happened, we would find ourselves with inadequate land and other resources to support the influx.' Punjab could set a very dangerous precedent for the rest of the subcontinent. Given that Muslims in the rest of India, some 42 million, formed a population larger than the entire population of West Pakistan at the time, economic rationality eschewed such a forced migration. However, in divided Punjab, millions of people were already on the move, and the two governments had to respond to this mass movement. Thus, despite these important reservations, the establishment of the MEO led to an acceptance of a 'transfer of populations' in divided Punjab, too, 'to give a sense of security' to ravaged communities on both sides. A statement of the Indian government's position of such a transfer across divided Punjab was made in the legislature by Neogy on November 18, 1947. He stated that although the Indian government's policy was 'to discourage mass migration from one province to another.' Punjab was to be an exception. In the rest of the subcontinent migrations were not to be on a planned basis, but a matter of individual choice. This exceptional character of movements across divided Punjab needs to be emphasized, for the agreed and 'planned evacuations' by the two governments formed the context of those displacements. 
  • Peter Gatrell (2013). 《The Making of the Modern Refugee》. OUP Oxford. 149–쪽. ISBN 978-0-19-967416-9. Notwithstanding the accumulated evidence of inter-communal tension, the signatories to the agreement that divided the Raj did not expect the transfer of power and the partition of India to be accompanied by a mass movement of population. Partition was conceived as a means of preventing migration on a large scale because the borders would be adjusted instead. Minorities need not be troubled by the new configuration. As Pakistan's first Prime Minister, Liaquat Ali Khan, affirmed, 'the division of India into Pakistan and India Dominions was based on the principle that minorities will stay where they were and that the two states will afford all protection to them as citizens of the respective states'. 
  • Haroon, Sana (2007년 12월 1일). 《Frontier of faith: Islam in the Indo-Afghan borderland》. Columbia University Press. 179–180쪽. ISBN 978-0-231-70013-9. 2012년 2월 26일에 확인함. 

cfr.org

dawn.com

doi.org

dx.doi.org

globescan.com

jstor.org

newindianexpress.com

nypost.com

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

spectator.co.uk

statpak.gov.pk

thediplomat.com

thehindu.com

washington.edu

faculty.washington.edu

washingtonpost.com

web.archive.org

wilsoncenter.org

worldbank.org

siteresources.worldbank.org

worldcat.org