중성자 (Korean Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "중성자" in Korean language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Korean rank
2nd place
3rd place
18th place
27th place
1st place
1st place
355th place
172nd place
low place
low place
2,509th place
673rd place
5,926th place
3,191st place
850th place
1,033rd place
26th place
70th place
2,569th place
628th place
low place
low place
124th place
427th place
6,156th place
4,638th place
75th place
67th place

ambartsumian.ru

  • Ambartsumian and Ivanenko (1930) "Об одном следствии теории дирака протонов и электронов" (On a Consequence of the Dirac Theory of Protons and Electrons), Доклады Академии Наук СССР (Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR / Proceedings of the USSR Academy of Sciences) Ser. A, no. 6, pages 153-155. Available in Russian on-line.

ansnuclearcafe.org

bnf.fr

visualiseur.bnf.fr

bnl.gov

nndc.bnl.gov

  • Nudat 2. Nndc.bnl.gov. Retrieved on 2010-12-04.

doi.org

dx.doi.org

  • Nakamura, K (2010). “Review of Particle Physics”. 《Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics》 37 (7A): 075021. Bibcode:2010JPhG...37g5021N. doi:10.1088/0954-3899/37/7A/075021.  PDF with 2011 partial update for the 2012 editionThe exact value of the mean lifetime is still uncertain, due to conflicting results from experiments.The Particle Data Group reports values up to six seconds apart (more than four standard deviations), commenting that "our 2006, 2008, and 2010 Reviews stayed with 885.7±0.8 s; but we noted that in light of SEREBROV 05 our value should be regarded as suspect until further experiments clarified matters. Since our 2010 Review, PICHLMAIER 10 has obtained a mean life of 880.7±1.8 s, closer to the value of SEREBROV 05 than to our average. And SEREBROV 10B[...] claims their values should be lowered by about 6 s, which would bring them into line with the two lower values. However, those reevaluations have not received an enthusiastic response from the experimenters in question; and in any case the Particle Data Group would have to await published changes (by those experimenters) of published values.At this point, we can think of nothing better to do than to average the seven best but discordant measurements, getting 881.5±1.5s. Note that the error includes a scale factor of 2.7. This is a jump of 4.2 old (and 2.8 new) standard deviations. This state of affairs is a particularly unhappy one, because the value is so important. We again call upon the experimenters to clear this up."
  • E. Rutherford (1920). “Nuclear Constitution of Atoms”. 《Proceedings of the Royal Society A97: 374. Bibcode:1920RSPSA..97..374R. doi:10.1098/rspa.1920.0040. 
  • Rutherford, E. (1920). “Bakerian Lecture. Nuclear Constitution of Atoms”. 《Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences》 97 (686): 374. Bibcode:1920RSPSA..97..374R. doi:10.1098/rspa.1920.0040. JSTOR 93888. 
  • Brown, Laurie M. (1978). “The idea of the neutrino”. 《Physics Today》 31 (9): 23. doi:10.1063/1.2995181. 
  • “V. A. Ambartsumian— a life in science” (PDF). 《Astrophysics》 51 (3): 280. 2008. Bibcode:2008Ap.....51..280T. doi:10.1007/s10511-008-9016-6. [깨진 링크(과거 내용 찾기)]
  • Bothe, W.; Becker, H. (1930). “Künstliche Erregung von Kern-γ-Strahlen” [Artificial excitation of nuclear γ-radiation]. 《Zeitschrift für Physik》 66 (5–6): 289. Bibcode:1930ZPhy...66..289B. doi:10.1007/BF01390908. 
  • Becker, H.; Bothe, W. (1932). “Die in Bor und Beryllium erregten γ-Strahlen” [Γ-rays excited in boron and beryllium]. 《Zeitschrift für Physik》 76 (7–8): 421. Bibcode:1932ZPhy...76..421B. doi:10.1007/BF01336726. 
  • Chadwick, J. (1933). “Bakerian Lecture. The Neutron”. 《Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences》 142 (846): 1. Bibcode:1933RSPSA.142....1C. doi:10.1098/rspa.1933.0152. 
  • Chadwick, James (1932). “Possible Existence of a Neutron”. 《Nature129 (3252): 312. Bibcode:1932Natur.129Q.312C. doi:10.1038/129312a0. 
  • Kumakhov, M. A.; Sharov, V. A. (1992). “A neutron lens”. 《Nature357 (6377): 390–391. Bibcode:1992Natur.357..390K. doi:10.1038/357390a0. 

harvard.edu

adsabs.harvard.edu

  • Nakamura, K (2010). “Review of Particle Physics”. 《Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics》 37 (7A): 075021. Bibcode:2010JPhG...37g5021N. doi:10.1088/0954-3899/37/7A/075021.  PDF with 2011 partial update for the 2012 editionThe exact value of the mean lifetime is still uncertain, due to conflicting results from experiments.The Particle Data Group reports values up to six seconds apart (more than four standard deviations), commenting that "our 2006, 2008, and 2010 Reviews stayed with 885.7±0.8 s; but we noted that in light of SEREBROV 05 our value should be regarded as suspect until further experiments clarified matters. Since our 2010 Review, PICHLMAIER 10 has obtained a mean life of 880.7±1.8 s, closer to the value of SEREBROV 05 than to our average. And SEREBROV 10B[...] claims their values should be lowered by about 6 s, which would bring them into line with the two lower values. However, those reevaluations have not received an enthusiastic response from the experimenters in question; and in any case the Particle Data Group would have to await published changes (by those experimenters) of published values.At this point, we can think of nothing better to do than to average the seven best but discordant measurements, getting 881.5±1.5s. Note that the error includes a scale factor of 2.7. This is a jump of 4.2 old (and 2.8 new) standard deviations. This state of affairs is a particularly unhappy one, because the value is so important. We again call upon the experimenters to clear this up."
  • E. Rutherford (1920). “Nuclear Constitution of Atoms”. 《Proceedings of the Royal Society A97: 374. Bibcode:1920RSPSA..97..374R. doi:10.1098/rspa.1920.0040. 
  • Rutherford, E. (1920). “Bakerian Lecture. Nuclear Constitution of Atoms”. 《Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences》 97 (686): 374. Bibcode:1920RSPSA..97..374R. doi:10.1098/rspa.1920.0040. JSTOR 93888. 
  • “V. A. Ambartsumian— a life in science” (PDF). 《Astrophysics》 51 (3): 280. 2008. Bibcode:2008Ap.....51..280T. doi:10.1007/s10511-008-9016-6. [깨진 링크(과거 내용 찾기)]
  • Bothe, W.; Becker, H. (1930). “Künstliche Erregung von Kern-γ-Strahlen” [Artificial excitation of nuclear γ-radiation]. 《Zeitschrift für Physik》 66 (5–6): 289. Bibcode:1930ZPhy...66..289B. doi:10.1007/BF01390908. 
  • Becker, H.; Bothe, W. (1932). “Die in Bor und Beryllium erregten γ-Strahlen” [Γ-rays excited in boron and beryllium]. 《Zeitschrift für Physik》 76 (7–8): 421. Bibcode:1932ZPhy...76..421B. doi:10.1007/BF01336726. 
  • Chadwick, J. (1933). “Bakerian Lecture. The Neutron”. 《Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences》 142 (846): 1. Bibcode:1933RSPSA.142....1C. doi:10.1098/rspa.1933.0152. 
  • Chadwick, James (1932). “Possible Existence of a Neutron”. 《Nature129 (3252): 312. Bibcode:1932Natur.129Q.312C. doi:10.1038/129312a0. 
  • Kumakhov, M. A.; Sharov, V. A. (1992). “A neutron lens”. 《Nature357 (6377): 390–391. Bibcode:1992Natur.357..390K. doi:10.1038/357390a0. 

jstor.org

lbl.gov

pdg.lbl.gov

  • Nakamura, K (2010). “Review of Particle Physics”. 《Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics》 37 (7A): 075021. Bibcode:2010JPhG...37g5021N. doi:10.1088/0954-3899/37/7A/075021.  PDF with 2011 partial update for the 2012 editionThe exact value of the mean lifetime is still uncertain, due to conflicting results from experiments.The Particle Data Group reports values up to six seconds apart (more than four standard deviations), commenting that "our 2006, 2008, and 2010 Reviews stayed with 885.7±0.8 s; but we noted that in light of SEREBROV 05 our value should be regarded as suspect until further experiments clarified matters. Since our 2010 Review, PICHLMAIER 10 has obtained a mean life of 880.7±1.8 s, closer to the value of SEREBROV 05 than to our average. And SEREBROV 10B[...] claims their values should be lowered by about 6 s, which would bring them into line with the two lower values. However, those reevaluations have not received an enthusiastic response from the experimenters in question; and in any case the Particle Data Group would have to await published changes (by those experimenters) of published values.At this point, we can think of nothing better to do than to average the seven best but discordant measurements, getting 881.5±1.5s. Note that the error includes a scale factor of 2.7. This is a jump of 4.2 old (and 2.8 new) standard deviations. This state of affairs is a particularly unhappy one, because the value is so important. We again call upon the experimenters to clear this up."

nasa.gov

nist.gov

physics.nist.gov

physorg.com

purdue.edu

chemed.chem.purdue.edu

springerlink.com

web.archive.org