Det tyske nasjonalbibliotekets katalog, GND-ID 119182297, besøkt 11. juli 2024[Hentet fra Wikidata]
doi.org
MAGUIRE, LINDA; TAYLOR, TELFORD (1994). «AN INTERVIEW WITH TELFORD TAYLOR». The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs. 2. 18: 1–5. ISSN1046-1868. doi:10.2307/45288894. Besøkt 5. mars 2021. «I think the most misunderstood thing was on the part of Germany and its reaction to what we had done at Nuremberg. Very few Germans saw that the purpose of Nuremberg was really for the benefit of Germany. Practically none of them saw that if Nuremberg had not occurred, the results would have been far worse.»
Macchiarola, Frank J. (1971). «Review of Nuremberg and Vietnam: An American Tragedy». Columbia Law Review. 5. 71: 950–960. ISSN0010-1958. doi:10.2307/1121446. Besøkt 5. mars 2021. «And despite this calm and reasoned approach-Professor Falk has labeled it "a minimalist indictment"-he concludes that the war in Vietnam represents "the most costly and tragic national blunder in American history" (p. 207).»
Bishop, Joseph W. (1971). «Review of Nuremberg and Vietnam: An American Tragedy». University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 5. 119: 900–904. ISSN0041-9907. doi:10.2307/3311230. Besøkt 5. mars 2021. «The core of the book is devoted to breaches in Vietnam of the conventional law of war. There can be no doubt that American soldiers have sometimes-far too often-been guilty of violations of those provisions of the Geneva Conventions which are clearly applicable, particularly in the mistreatment and killing of noncombatants and prisoners of war who were not in a position to commit hostile acts.»
MAGUIRE, LINDA; TAYLOR, TELFORD (1994). «AN INTERVIEW WITH TELFORD TAYLOR». The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs. 2. 18: 1–5. ISSN1046-1868. doi:10.2307/45288894. Besøkt 5. mars 2021. «I think the most misunderstood thing was on the part of Germany and its reaction to what we had done at Nuremberg. Very few Germans saw that the purpose of Nuremberg was really for the benefit of Germany. Practically none of them saw that if Nuremberg had not occurred, the results would have been far worse.»
Macchiarola, Frank J. (1971). «Review of Nuremberg and Vietnam: An American Tragedy». Columbia Law Review. 5. 71: 950–960. ISSN0010-1958. doi:10.2307/1121446. Besøkt 5. mars 2021. «And despite this calm and reasoned approach-Professor Falk has labeled it "a minimalist indictment"-he concludes that the war in Vietnam represents "the most costly and tragic national blunder in American history" (p. 207).»
Bishop, Joseph W. (1971). «Review of Nuremberg and Vietnam: An American Tragedy». University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 5. 119: 900–904. ISSN0041-9907. doi:10.2307/3311230. Besøkt 5. mars 2021. «The core of the book is devoted to breaches in Vietnam of the conventional law of war. There can be no doubt that American soldiers have sometimes-far too often-been guilty of violations of those provisions of the Geneva Conventions which are clearly applicable, particularly in the mistreatment and killing of noncombatants and prisoners of war who were not in a position to commit hostile acts.»
MAGUIRE, LINDA; TAYLOR, TELFORD (1994). «AN INTERVIEW WITH TELFORD TAYLOR». The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs. 2. 18: 1–5. ISSN1046-1868. doi:10.2307/45288894. Besøkt 5. mars 2021. «I think the most misunderstood thing was on the part of Germany and its reaction to what we had done at Nuremberg. Very few Germans saw that the purpose of Nuremberg was really for the benefit of Germany. Practically none of them saw that if Nuremberg had not occurred, the results would have been far worse.»
Macchiarola, Frank J. (1971). «Review of Nuremberg and Vietnam: An American Tragedy». Columbia Law Review. 5. 71: 950–960. ISSN0010-1958. doi:10.2307/1121446. Besøkt 5. mars 2021. «And despite this calm and reasoned approach-Professor Falk has labeled it "a minimalist indictment"-he concludes that the war in Vietnam represents "the most costly and tragic national blunder in American history" (p. 207).»
Bishop, Joseph W. (1971). «Review of Nuremberg and Vietnam: An American Tragedy». University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 5. 119: 900–904. ISSN0041-9907. doi:10.2307/3311230. Besøkt 5. mars 2021. «The core of the book is devoted to breaches in Vietnam of the conventional law of war. There can be no doubt that American soldiers have sometimes-far too often-been guilty of violations of those provisions of the Geneva Conventions which are clearly applicable, particularly in the mistreatment and killing of noncombatants and prisoners of war who were not in a position to commit hostile acts.»
