Sistemas de defesa antimísseis por países (Portuguese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Sistemas de defesa antimísseis por países" in Portuguese language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Portuguese rank
1st place
1st place
49th place
88th place
5,975th place
low place
14th place
110th place
low place
low place
727th place
6,459th place
17th place
499th place
3,631st place
low place
5,865th place
8,082nd place
109th place
181st place
1,663rd place
1,459th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
137th place
406th place
38th place
54th place
9,643rd place
7,652nd place
low place
low place
649th place
627th place
low place
low place
432nd place
967th place
261st place
3,513th place
low place
low place
163rd place
204th place
1,184th place
low place
52nd place
1,273rd place
138th place
2,372nd place
1,259th place
3,985th place
1,332nd place
low place
4,681st place
7,024th place
1,668th place
738th place
low place
low place
3,896th place
7,251st place
4,922nd place
9,009th place
low place
low place
505th place
604th place
1,608th place
5,094th place
low place
low place
54th place
82nd place
412th place
636th place
443rd place
484th place
3rd place
6th place
3,010th place
low place
8th place
13th place
389th place
552nd place
2,497th place
4,205th place
12th place
21st place
342nd place
779th place
low place
low place
34th place
86th place
low place
low place
7,966th place
7,549th place
5,210th place
low place
low place
low place
22nd place
60th place
1,029th place
1,328th place
4,686th place
4,965th place

aipac.org

archive.today

armscontrol.org

armyrecognition.com

arquivo.pt

atlanticcouncil.org

  • "... Missile defense would become a reality and that systems would eventually be deployed. Paris realized that it needed to adjust policy to these realities to avoid risking the credibility of the French nuclear deterrent. " Nonetheless, Gruselle concedes in the same work that "Paris realized that it needed to adjust policy to these realities to avoid risking the credibility of the French nuclear deterrent.", as well as the fact that "France recognized the necessity of missile defense to protect deployed French troops." That is to say, French policy makers realized that the increasing performance and reliability of missile defense systems could reduce its own nuclear deterrence, and was also necessary to maintain its foreign military deployment Bruno Gruselle (Nov 2010) "Missile Defense in NATO: a French Perspective" Lisbon NATO Summit, Nov 2010
  • "... Missile defense would become a reality and that systems would eventually be deployed. Paris realized that it needed to adjust policy to these realities to avoid risking the credibility of the French nuclear deterrent. " Nonetheless, Gruselle concedes in the same work that "Paris realized that it needed to adjust policy to these realities to avoid risking the credibility of the French nuclear deterrent.", as well as the fact that "France recognized the necessity of missile defense to protect deployed French troops." That is to say, French policy makers realized that the increasing performance and reliability of missile defense systems could reduce its own nuclear deterrence, and was also necessary to maintain its foreign military deployment Bruno Gruselle (Nov 2010) "Missile Defense in NATO: a French Perspective" Lisbon NATO Summit, Nov 2010
  • Bruno Gruselle (2010) "Missile Defense in NATO: A French Perspective"

ausairpower.net

bbc.co.uk

news.bbc.co.uk

bharat-rakshak.com

books.google.com

businesstoday.in

chosun.com

english.chosun.com

defense-update.com

defensenews.com

domain-b.com

fas.org

forbes.com

fortblissbugle.com

globalsecurity.org

google.com

gov.uk

hindu.com

huffingtonpost.com

iht.com

iiss.org

in.com

ibnlive.in.com

india-defence.com

indiatimes.com

articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com

timesofindia.indiatimes.com

indiatoday.com

  • The New Guardian Arquivado em 2 fevereiro 2008 no Wayback MachineIndia unveils an all new anti-ballistic missile expected to be the fore-runner of a sophisticated air defence system to thwart, among other threats, a Pakistani nuclear weapons attack

japantimes.co.jp

jcpa.org

  • Dr. Uzi Rubin: "The Arrow program used practically no U.S. technology, just U.S. money. It was almost entirely based on Israeli technology, though we bought some components in the U.S. because they were cheaper." (2003) —source

latimes.com

graphics.latimes.com

missiledefenseadvocacy.org

  • «Tien-Kung (Sky Bow)». missiledefenseadvocacy.org. Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance. Consultado em 19 de abril de 2019 
  • «The Antelope». missiledefenseadvocacy.org. Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance. Consultado em 19 de abril de 2019 

missilethreat.com

nbcnews.com

ndtv.com

nti.org

pib.nic.in

reuters.com

reuters.com

in.reuters.com

theage.com.au

thebulletin.org

theguardian.com

thehindu.com

triblive.com

uscc.gov

usfk.mil

waaytv.com

washingtonpost.com

washingtontimes.com

web.archive.org

wiktionary.org

en.wiktionary.org

  • However, it is kinematically inferior to the imported Russian S-300PMU2 Favorit according to this source

wwwJapan

yahoo.com

in.news.yahoo.com

tw.news.yahoo.com

zmne.hu