Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Telif hakkı eleştirisi" in Turkish language version.
|ad1= eksik |soyadı1= (yardım)“We conclude that the snippet function does not give searchers access to effectively competing substitutes. Snippet view, at best and after a large commitment of manpower, produces discontinuous, tiny fragments, amounting in the aggregate to no more than 16% of a book. This does not threaten the rights holders with any significant harm to the value of their copyrights or diminish their harvest of copyright revenue,” wrote the court.Yazar
|ad1= eksik |soyadı1= (yardım)|ad1= eksik |soyadı1= (yardım)|ad1= eksik |soyadı1= (yardım)|ad1= eksik |soyadı1= (yardım)|ad1= eksik |soyadı1= (yardım)|ad1= eksik |soyadı1= (yardım)|ad1= eksik |soyadı1= (yardım)|ad1= eksik |soyadı1= (yardım)|ad1= eksik |soyadı1= (yardım)|ad1= eksik |soyadı1= (yardım)|ad1= eksik |soyadı1= (yardım)“We conclude that the snippet function does not give searchers access to effectively competing substitutes. Snippet view, at best and after a large commitment of manpower, produces discontinuous, tiny fragments, amounting in the aggregate to no more than 16% of a book. This does not threaten the rights holders with any significant harm to the value of their copyrights or diminish their harvest of copyright revenue,” wrote the court.Yazar
|ad1= eksik |soyadı1= (yardım)|ad1= eksik |soyadı1= (yardım)|ad1= eksik |soyadı1= (yardım)|ad1= eksik |soyadı1= (yardım)|ad1= eksik |soyadı1= (yardım)|ad1= eksik |soyadı1= (yardım)|ad1= eksik |soyadı1= (yardım)|ad1= eksik |soyadı1= (yardım)in 2013 a district court ruled that copyright owners do not have the right to simply take down content before undertaking a legal analysis to determine whether the remixed work could fall under fair use, a concept in US copyright law which permits limited use of copyrighted material without the need to obtain the right holder's permission (US District Court, Stephanie Lenz v. Universal Music Corp., Universal Music Publishing Inc., and Universal Music Publishing Group, Case No. 5:07-cv-03783-JF, January 24, 2013).[...] Given the emergence of today's "remix" culture, and the legal uncertainty surrounding remixes and mash-ups, the time would appear to be ripe for policy makers to take a new look at copyright law.Yazar
|ad1= eksik |soyadı1= (yardım)|ad1= eksik |soyadı1= (yardım)|ad1= eksik |soyadı1= (yardım)in 2013 a district court ruled that copyright owners do not have the right to simply take down content before undertaking a legal analysis to determine whether the remixed work could fall under fair use, a concept in US copyright law which permits limited use of copyrighted material without the need to obtain the right holder's permission (US District Court, Stephanie Lenz v. Universal Music Corp., Universal Music Publishing Inc., and Universal Music Publishing Group, Case No. 5:07-cv-03783-JF, January 24, 2013).[...] Given the emergence of today's "remix" culture, and the legal uncertainty surrounding remixes and mash-ups, the time would appear to be ripe for policy makers to take a new look at copyright law.Yazar
|ad1= eksik |soyadı1= (yardım)|ad1= eksik |soyadı1= (yardım)