Вільне та відкрите програмне забезпечення (Ukrainian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Вільне та відкрите програмне забезпечення" in Ukrainian language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Ukrainian rank
1st place
1st place
68th place
77th place
1,475th place
1,926th place
3rd place
11th place
2nd place
4th place
1,216th place
1,876th place
786th place
2,146th place
low place
low place
4,423rd place
2,613th place
24th place
3rd place
5th place
9th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
8,472nd place
6,454th place
4,347th place
7,322nd place
4,558th place
7,575th place
low place
low place
8,246th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
2,069th place
9,453rd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
5,701st place
5,409th place
3,857th place
4,345th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
850th place
1,064th place
low place
low place
1,317th place
1,955th place
8,888th place
7,255th place
1,067th place
1,705th place
low place
low place
760th place
2,212th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
2,910th place
5,899th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
5,080th place
2,744th place
97th place
76th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
2,139th place
9,201st place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
84th place
1,285th place
low place
low place
446th place
1,369th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,131st place
939th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
3,975th place
9,807th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
766th place
2,912th place
low place
8,429th place
6,651st place
low place
2,649th place
low place

2020flossroadmap.org

algomau.ca

archives.gov

obamawhitehouse.archives.gov

aristeksystems.com

books.google.com

cio.gov

sourcecode.cio.gov

compgroups.net

debian.org

lists.debian.org

difesa.it

el-stelmilit.difesa.it

doi.org

dvdfllc.co.jp

elpais.com

estebanmendieta.com

europa.eu

joinup.ec.europa.eu

ec.europa.eu

bookshop.europa.eu

eur-lex.europa.eu

interoperable-europe.ec.europa.eu

flossproject.org

flossworld.org

fsf.org

gnu.org

heise.de

hp.com

ibm.com

ictau.ug

internetnews.com

  • Kerner, Sean Michael (8 січня 2008). Torvalds Still Keen On GPLv2. internetnews.com. Архів оригіналу за 12 лютого 2015. Процитовано 12 лютого 2015. "In some ways, Linux was the project that really made the split clear between what the FSF is pushing which is very different from what open source and Linux has always been about, which is more of a technical superiority instead of a -- this religious belief in freedom," Torvalds told Zemlin. "So, the GPL Version 3 reflects the FSF's goals and the GPL Version 2 pretty closely matches what I think a license should do and so right now, Version 2 is where the kernel is."

iosspl.org

ip-watch.org

itp.net

keralait.org

kernel.org

kernel.org

git.kernel.org

  • Torvalds, Linus. COPYING. kernel.org. Архів оригіналу за 17 грудня 2015. Процитовано 13 серпня 2013. Also note that the only valid version of the GPL as far as the kernel is concerned is _this_ particular version of the license (ie v2, not v2.2 or v3.x or whatever), unless explicitly otherwise stated.

librearts.org

  • Prokoudine, Alexandre (26 січня 2012). What's up with DWG adoption in free software?. librearts.org. Процитовано 9 березня 2025. [Blender's Toni Roosendaal:] "Blender is also still 'GPLv2 or later'. For the time being we stick to that, moving to GPL 3 has no evident benefits I know of."

libreitalia.it

licensespring.com

linux.com

linuxjournal.com

  • Архівована копія. Архів оригіналу за 14 травня 2011. Процитовано 25 травня 2010.{{cite web}}: Обслуговування CS1: Сторінки з текстом «archived copy» як значення параметру title (посилання)(англ.)

linuxtoday.com

llvm.org

lwn.net

  • corbet (1 жовтня 2006). Busy busy busybox. lwn.net. Архів оригіналу за 7 січня 2016. Процитовано 21 листопада 2015. Since BusyBox can be found in so many embedded systems, it finds itself at the core of the GPLv3 anti-DRM debate. [...]The real outcomes, however, are this: BusyBox will be GPLv2 only starting with the next release. It is generally accepted that stripping out the "or any later version" is legally defensible, and that the merging of other GPLv2-only code will force that issue in any case
  • Landley, Rob (9 вересня 2006). Re: Move GPLv2 vs v3 fun... lwn.net. Архів оригіналу за 7 січня 2016. Процитовано 21 листопада 2015. Don't invent a straw man argument please. I consider licensing BusyBox under GPLv3 to be useless, unnecessary, overcomplicated, and confusing, and in addition to that it has actual downsides. 1) Useless: We're never dropping GPLv2.
  • Kernel developers' position on GPLv3 [LWN.net]. lwn.net. Процитовано 15 квітня 2025.

meity.gov.in

modernisation.gouv.fr

references.modernisation.gouv.fr

muenchen.de

mysql.com

naci.org.za

observer.com

opensource.org

oreilly.com

oreilly.com

radar.oreilly.com

oscc.org.my

oscc.org.my

  • OSCC.org. Архів оригіналу за 27 жовтня 2011. Процитовано 23 жовтня 2011.

knowledge.oscc.org.my

pcworld.com

perens.com

prodefinity.de

purdue.edu

lib.purdue.edu

redalyc.org

redmonk.com

schneier.com

scmagazine.com

slashdot.org

news.slashdot.org

  • Slashdot.org. News.slashdot.org. 16 лютого 2009. Архів оригіналу за 17 липня 2013. Процитовано 23 жовтня 2011.

socializedsoftware.com

  • Mark (8 травня 2008). The Curse of Open Source License Proliferation. socializedsoftware.com. Архів оригіналу за 8 грудня 2015. Процитовано 30 листопада 2015. Currently the decision to move from GPL v2 to GPL v3 is being hotly debated by many open source projects. According to Palamida, a provider of IP compliance software, there have been roughly 2489 open source projects that have moved from GPL v2 to later versions.

softwarelivre.org

sourcecodecontrol.co

sussex.ac.uk

sro.sussex.ac.uk

theregister.co.uk

tsj.gov.ve

ulitzer.com

akashsingh.ulitzer.com

  • Barr, Joe (13 січня 2003). Meet the Perens. LinuxWorld Magazine. Архів оригіналу за 6 листопада 2013. Процитовано 18 лютого 2017.

un.org

unpan1.un.org

usp.br

ccsl.ime.usp.br

videolan.org

  • Denis-Courmont, Rémi. VLC media player to remain under GNU GPL version 2. videolan.org. Архів оригіналу за 22 листопада 2015. Процитовано 21 листопада 2015. In 2001, VLC was released under the OSI-approved GNU General Public version 2, with the commonly-offered option to use "any later version" thereof (though there was not any such later version at the time). Following the release by the Free Software Foundation (FSF) of the new version 3 of its GNU General Public License (GPL) on the 29th of June 2007, contributors to the VLC media player, and other software projects hosted at videolan.org, debated the possibility of updating the licensing terms for future version of the VLC media player and other hosted projects, to version 3 of the GPL. [...] There is strong concern that these new additional requirements might not match the industrial and economic reality of our time, especially in the market of consumer electronics. It is our belief that changing our licensing terms to GPL version 3 would currently not be in the best interest of our community as a whole. Consequently, we plan to keep distributing future versions of VLC media player under the terms of the GPL version 2.

washington.edu

courses.cs.washington.edu

web.archive.org

webcitation.org

whyfloss.com

wien.gv.at

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

zdnet.co.uk

news.zdnet.co.uk

zdnet.com