Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Đường giới hạn phía Bắc" in Vietnamese language version.
We are aware of no evidence that NLL has ever been officially presented to North Korea. We would be in an extremely vulnerable position of charging them with penetrations beyond a line they have never accepted or acknowledged. ROKG is wrong in assuming we will join in attempts to impose NLL on NK.
We have protested, as armistice agreement violations, intrusions within three mile contous waters of UNC controlled islands. However UNC has not protested NLL intrusions since line is not specifically mentioned in armistice agreement.
UNC Rules of Engagement has been that territorial sea rights will be enforced within three miles of ROK land areas.
We are concerned that ROK may tend to define very broadly what is an NK hostile act or threat to security, and hence may wish to take counter-actions which would be difficult for us to justify.... Mere NK fishing or patrolling in high seas south of NLL, even if near ROK fishing boats, cannot be used as justification for coercive actions by UNC.... ROKG should clearly understand that we will not participate in any action to establish area as exclusive ROK fishing zone.
there is an area between the two island groups off the Ongjin Peninsula where a 12-mile North Korean territorial sea claim and the Northern Limit Line create a zone of uncertain status.
|archiveurl= và |archive-url= (trợ giúp); Đã định rõ hơn một tham số trong |archivedate= và |archive-date= (trợ giúp)|archiveurl= và |archive-url= (trợ giúp); Đã định rõ hơn một tham số trong |archivedate= và |archive-date= (trợ giúp)