傳輸層安全性協定 (Chinese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "傳輸層安全性協定" in Chinese language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Chinese rank

30web.archive.org

1^st place

24ietf.org

214^th place

406^th place

3wolfssl.com

low place

3mozilla.org

1,686^th place

1,446^th place

2networkworld.com

4,121^st place

5,833^rd place

2nist.gov

355^th place

411^th place

1microsoft.com

153^rd place

238^th place

1utexas.edu

916^th place

1,065^th place

1netscape.com

low place

1redhat.com

5,386^th place

4,369^th place

1ithome.com.tw

low place

675^th place

1solidot.org

low place

754^th place

1force.com

low place

1doi.org

2^nd place

23^rd place

1computing.co.uk

low place

1sweet32.info

low place

1ssllabs.com

low place

computing.co.uk (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

Gothard, Peter. Google updates SSL certificates to 2048-bit encryption. Computing. Incisive Media. [9 September 2013]. （原始内容存档于2013-09-22）.

doi.org (Global: 2^nd place; Chinese: 23^rd place)

D. Taylor, Ed. Using the Secure Remote Password (SRP) Protocol for TLS Authentication. Internet Engineering Task Force. November 2007 [December 21, 2014]. RFC 5054 . doi:10.17487/RFC5054 . （原始内容存档于December 7, 2014）.

force.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

bluecoat.force.com

ProxySG, ASG and WSS will interrupt SSL connections when clients using TLS 1.3 access sites also using TLS 1.3. BlueTouch Online. 16 May 2017 [11 September 2017]. （原始内容存档于2017-09-12）.

ietf.org (Global: 214^th place; Chinese: 406^th place)

datatracker.ietf.org

RFC 5746 must be implemented to fix a renegotiation flaw that would otherwise break this protocol.
If libraries implement fixes listed in RFC 5746, this violates the SSL 3.0 specification, which the IETF cannot change unlike TLS. Fortunately, most current libraries implement the fix and disregard the violation that this causes.
Use of RC4 in all versions of TLS is prohibited by RFC 7465 (because RC4 attacks weaken or break RC4 used in SSL/TLS).
RFC 8422
RFC 5830 6986 7091 7801 8891
RFC 5288 5289
RFC 6655 7251
RFC 6367
RFC 5932 6367
RFC 6209
RFC 4162
RFC 5469
RFC 7905

tools.ietf.org

RFC 6176. [2020-05-22]. （原始内容存档于2016-12-06）.
RFC 7568. [2020-05-22]. （原始内容存档于2018-03-28）.
RFC 8996. [2021-03-25]. （原始内容存档于2021-03-24）.
Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla. The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.1, RFC 4346. April 2006 [2014-12-02]. （原始内容存档于2017-12-24）.
RFC 5246: The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2. Internet Engineering Task Force. [9 September 2013]. （原始内容存档于2017-12-24）.
P. Eronen, Ed. RFC 4279: Pre-Shared Key Ciphersuites for Transport Layer Security (TLS). Internet Engineering Task Force. [9 September 2013]. （原始内容存档于2013-09-05）.
D. Taylor, Ed. Using the Secure Remote Password (SRP) Protocol for TLS Authentication. Internet Engineering Task Force. November 2007 [December 21, 2014]. RFC 5054 . doi:10.17487/RFC5054 . （原始内容存档于December 7, 2014）.
draft-chudov-cryptopro-cptls-04 – GOST 28147-89 Cipher Suites for Transport Layer Security (TLS)
AEAD Ciphers. [2014-12-02]. （原始内容存档于2017-12-24）.

ietf.org

Joseph A. Salowey; Sean Turner; Christopher A. Wood. TLS 1.3. IETF. 2018-08-10 [2018-08-11]. （原始内容存档于2018-08-11）（英语）.
Sean Turner. Consensus: remove DSA from TLS 1.3. September 17, 2015 [2018-01-28]. （原始内容存档于2015-10-03）.

ithome.com.tw (Global: low place; Chinese: 675^th place)

林妍溱. 微軟、蘋果、Google及Mozilla四大瀏覽器業者在2020年終止支援TLS 1.0、1.1. iThome. 2018-10-16 [2020-01-12]. （原始内容存档于2020-01-12）.

microsoft.com (Global: 153^rd place; Chinese: 238^th place)

technet.microsoft.com

"SSL/TLS in Detail （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）". Microsoft TechNet. Updated July 31, 2003.

mozilla.org (Global: 1,686^th place; Chinese: 1,446^th place)

developer.mozilla.org

NSS 3.29 release notes. Mozilla Developer Network. February 2017 [2018-08-11]. （原始内容存档于2017-02-22）.

bugzilla.mozilla.org

Enable TLS 1.3 by default. Bugzilla@Mozilla. 16 October 2016 [10 October 2017]. （原始内容存档于2018-08-12）.

mozilla.org

Firefox — Notes (60.0). Mozilla. [2018-05-10]. （原始内容存档于2018-05-09）（美国英语）.

netscape.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

home.netscape.com

THE SSL PROTOCOL. Netscape Corporation. 2007 [2014-12-02]. （原始内容存档于1997-06-14）.

networkworld.com (Global: 4,121^st place; Chinese: 5,833^rd place)

Messmer, Ellen. Father of SSL, Dr. Taher Elgamal, Finds Fast-Moving IT Projects in the Middle East. Network World. [30 May 2014]. （原始内容存档于2014年5月31日）.
Greene, Tim. Father of SSL says despite attacks, the security linchpin has lots of life left. Network World. [30 May 2014]. （原始内容存档于2014年5月31日）.

nist.gov (Global: 355^th place; Chinese: 411^th place)

nvlpubs.nist.gov

Polk, Tim; McKay, Terry; Chokhani, Santosh. Guidelines for the Selection, Configuration, and Use of Transport Layer Security (TLS) Implementations (PDF). National Institute of Standards and Technology: 67. April 2014 [2014-05-07]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2014-05-08）.

csrc.nist.gov

NIST Special Publication 800-57 Recommendation for Key Management — Part 1: General (Revised) (PDF). 2007-03-08 [2014-07-03]. （原始内容 (PDF)存档于2014-06-06）.

redhat.com (Global: 5,386^th place; Chinese: 4,369^th place)

access.redhat.com

POODLE: SSLv3 vulnerability (CVE-2014-3566). [21 October 2014]. （原始内容存档于2016-03-17）.

solidot.org (Global: low place; Chinese: 754^th place)

pigsrollaroundinthem. TLS 1.3 下的 SNI 将让审查变得更困难. Solidot. 2018-08-16 [2018-08-27]. （原始内容存档于2018-08-27）.

ssllabs.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

Qualys SSL Labs. SSL/TLS Deployment Best Practices. [2 June 2015]. （原始内容存档于2015-07-04）.

sweet32.info (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

On the Practical (In-)Security of 64-bit Block Ciphers — Collision Attacks on HTTP over TLS and OpenVPN (PDF). 2016-10-28 [2017-06-08]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2017-04-24）.

utexas.edu (Global: 916^th place; Chinese: 1,065^th place)

cs.utexas.edu

Thomas Y. C. Woo, Raghuram Bindignavle, Shaowen Su and Simon S. Lam, SNP: An interface for secure network programming （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆） Proceedings USENIX Summer Technical Conference, June 1994

web.archive.org (Global: 1^st place; Chinese: 1^st place)

"SSL/TLS in Detail （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）". Microsoft TechNet. Updated July 31, 2003.
RFC 6176. [2020-05-22]. （原始内容存档于2016-12-06）.
RFC 7568. [2020-05-22]. （原始内容存档于2018-03-28）.
RFC 8996. [2021-03-25]. （原始内容存档于2021-03-24）.
Thomas Y. C. Woo, Raghuram Bindignavle, Shaowen Su and Simon S. Lam, SNP: An interface for secure network programming （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆） Proceedings USENIX Summer Technical Conference, June 1994
THE SSL PROTOCOL. Netscape Corporation. 2007 [2014-12-02]. （原始内容存档于1997-06-14）.
Messmer, Ellen. Father of SSL, Dr. Taher Elgamal, Finds Fast-Moving IT Projects in the Middle East. Network World. [30 May 2014]. （原始内容存档于2014年5月31日）.
Greene, Tim. Father of SSL says despite attacks, the security linchpin has lots of life left. Network World. [30 May 2014]. （原始内容存档于2014年5月31日）.
POODLE: SSLv3 vulnerability (CVE-2014-3566). [21 October 2014]. （原始内容存档于2016-03-17）.
Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla. The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.1, RFC 4346. April 2006 [2014-12-02]. （原始内容存档于2017-12-24）.
Polk, Tim; McKay, Terry; Chokhani, Santosh. Guidelines for the Selection, Configuration, and Use of Transport Layer Security (TLS) Implementations (PDF). National Institute of Standards and Technology: 67. April 2014 [2014-05-07]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2014-05-08）.
林妍溱. 微軟、蘋果、Google及Mozilla四大瀏覽器業者在2020年終止支援TLS 1.0、1.1. iThome. 2018-10-16 [2020-01-12]. （原始内容存档于2020-01-12）.
Joseph A. Salowey; Sean Turner; Christopher A. Wood. TLS 1.3. IETF. 2018-08-10 [2018-08-11]. （原始内容存档于2018-08-11）（英语）.
pigsrollaroundinthem. TLS 1.3 下的 SNI 将让审查变得更困难. Solidot. 2018-08-16 [2018-08-27]. （原始内容存档于2018-08-27）.
NSS 3.29 release notes. Mozilla Developer Network. February 2017 [2018-08-11]. （原始内容存档于2017-02-22）.
Enable TLS 1.3 by default. Bugzilla@Mozilla. 16 October 2016 [10 October 2017]. （原始内容存档于2018-08-12）.
Firefox — Notes (60.0). Mozilla. [2018-05-10]. （原始内容存档于2018-05-09）（美国英语）.
ProxySG, ASG and WSS will interrupt SSL connections when clients using TLS 1.3 access sites also using TLS 1.3. BlueTouch Online. 16 May 2017 [11 September 2017]. （原始内容存档于2017-09-12）.
wolfSSL TLS 1.3 BETA Release Now Available. info@wolfssl.com. 11 May 2017 [11 May 2017]. （原始内容存档于2018-07-25）.
TLS 1.3 PROTOCOL SUPPORT. info@wolfssl.com. （原始内容存档于2018-07-26）.
TLS 1.3 Draft 28 Support in wolfSSL. info@wolfssl.com. 14 June 2018 [14 June 2018]. （原始内容存档于2018-07-25）.
RFC 5246: The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2. Internet Engineering Task Force. [9 September 2013]. （原始内容存档于2017-12-24）.
P. Eronen, Ed. RFC 4279: Pre-Shared Key Ciphersuites for Transport Layer Security (TLS). Internet Engineering Task Force. [9 September 2013]. （原始内容存档于2013-09-05）.
D. Taylor, Ed. Using the Secure Remote Password (SRP) Protocol for TLS Authentication. Internet Engineering Task Force. November 2007 [December 21, 2014]. RFC 5054 . doi:10.17487/RFC5054 . （原始内容存档于December 7, 2014）.
Gothard, Peter. Google updates SSL certificates to 2048-bit encryption. Computing. Incisive Media. [9 September 2013]. （原始内容存档于2013-09-22）.
Sean Turner. Consensus: remove DSA from TLS 1.3. September 17, 2015 [2018-01-28]. （原始内容存档于2015-10-03）.
On the Practical (In-)Security of 64-bit Block Ciphers — Collision Attacks on HTTP over TLS and OpenVPN (PDF). 2016-10-28 [2017-06-08]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2017-04-24）.
NIST Special Publication 800-57 Recommendation for Key Management — Part 1: General (Revised) (PDF). 2007-03-08 [2014-07-03]. （原始内容 (PDF)存档于2014-06-06）.
Qualys SSL Labs. SSL/TLS Deployment Best Practices. [2 June 2015]. （原始内容存档于2015-07-04）.
AEAD Ciphers. [2014-12-02]. （原始内容存档于2017-12-24）.

wolfssl.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

wolfSSL TLS 1.3 BETA Release Now Available. info@wolfssl.com. 11 May 2017 [11 May 2017]. （原始内容存档于2018-07-25）.
TLS 1.3 PROTOCOL SUPPORT. info@wolfssl.com. （原始内容存档于2018-07-26）.
TLS 1.3 Draft 28 Support in wolfSSL. info@wolfssl.com. 14 June 2018 [14 June 2018]. （原始内容存档于2018-07-25）.

傳輸層安全性協定 (Chinese Wikipedia)

computing.co.uk (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; Chinese: 23rd place)

force.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

bluecoat.force.com

ietf.org (Global: 214th place; Chinese: 406th place)

datatracker.ietf.org

tools.ietf.org

ietf.org

ithome.com.tw (Global: low place; Chinese: 675th place)

microsoft.com (Global: 153rd place; Chinese: 238th place)

technet.microsoft.com

mozilla.org (Global: 1,686th place; Chinese: 1,446th place)

developer.mozilla.org

bugzilla.mozilla.org

mozilla.org

netscape.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

home.netscape.com

networkworld.com (Global: 4,121st place; Chinese: 5,833rd place)

nist.gov (Global: 355th place; Chinese: 411th place)

nvlpubs.nist.gov

csrc.nist.gov

redhat.com (Global: 5,386th place; Chinese: 4,369th place)

access.redhat.com

solidot.org (Global: low place; Chinese: 754th place)

ssllabs.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

sweet32.info (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

utexas.edu (Global: 916th place; Chinese: 1,065th place)

cs.utexas.edu

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; Chinese: 1st place)

wolfssl.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

doi.org (Global: 2^nd place; Chinese: 23^rd place)

ietf.org (Global: 214^th place; Chinese: 406^th place)

ithome.com.tw (Global: low place; Chinese: 675^th place)

microsoft.com (Global: 153^rd place; Chinese: 238^th place)

mozilla.org (Global: 1,686^th place; Chinese: 1,446^th place)

networkworld.com (Global: 4,121^st place; Chinese: 5,833^rd place)

nist.gov (Global: 355^th place; Chinese: 411^th place)

redhat.com (Global: 5,386^th place; Chinese: 4,369^th place)

solidot.org (Global: low place; Chinese: 754^th place)

utexas.edu (Global: 916^th place; Chinese: 1,065^th place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1^st place; Chinese: 1^st place)