弦理論 (Chinese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "弦理論" in Chinese language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Chinese rank

7web.archive.org

1^st place

3arxiv.org

69^th place

254^th place

3columbia.edu

488^th place

823^rd place

1thetroublewithphysics.com

low place

1pbs.org

198^th place

378^th place

1americanscientist.org

7,231^st place

4,958^th place

1tau.ac.il

4,464^th place

5,257^th place

americanscientist.org

Prominent critics include Philip Anderson ("string theory is the first science in hundreds of years to be pursued in pre-Baconian fashion, without any adequate experimental guidance", New York Times, 4 January 2005), Sheldon Glashow ("there ain't no experiment that could be done nor is there any observation that could be made that would say, `You guys are wrong.' The theory is safe, permanently safe", NOVA interview （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）), Lawrence Krauss ("String theory [is] yet to have any real successes in explaining or predicting anything measurable", New York Times, 8 November 2005), Peter Woit (see his blog （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, article （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆） and book "Not Even Wrong", ISBN 978-0-224-07605-0) and Carlo Rovelli (see his Dialog on Quantum Gravity （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）)

arxiv.org

S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A. Linde and S. P. Trivedi, de Sitter Vacua in String Theory （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, Phys.Rev.D68:046005,2003
P. Woit (Columbia University) String theory: An Evaluation （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）,February 2001, e-Print: physics/0102051
Prominent critics include Philip Anderson ("string theory is the first science in hundreds of years to be pursued in pre-Baconian fashion, without any adequate experimental guidance", New York Times, 4 January 2005), Sheldon Glashow ("there ain't no experiment that could be done nor is there any observation that could be made that would say, `You guys are wrong.' The theory is safe, permanently safe", NOVA interview （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）), Lawrence Krauss ("String theory [is] yet to have any real successes in explaining or predicting anything measurable", New York Times, 8 November 2005), Peter Woit (see his blog （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, article （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆） and book "Not Even Wrong", ISBN 978-0-224-07605-0) and Carlo Rovelli (see his Dialog on Quantum Gravity （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）)

columbia.edu

math.columbia.edu

Peter Woit's Not Even Wrong weblog. [2008-08-06]. （原始内容存档于2012-11-05）.
P. Woit, Is String Theory Testable? （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆） INFN Rome March 2007
Prominent critics include Philip Anderson ("string theory is the first science in hundreds of years to be pursued in pre-Baconian fashion, without any adequate experimental guidance", New York Times, 4 January 2005), Sheldon Glashow ("there ain't no experiment that could be done nor is there any observation that could be made that would say, `You guys are wrong.' The theory is safe, permanently safe", NOVA interview （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）), Lawrence Krauss ("String theory [is] yet to have any real successes in explaining or predicting anything measurable", New York Times, 8 November 2005), Peter Woit (see his blog （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, article （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆） and book "Not Even Wrong", ISBN 978-0-224-07605-0) and Carlo Rovelli (see his Dialog on Quantum Gravity （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）)

pbs.org

Prominent critics include Philip Anderson ("string theory is the first science in hundreds of years to be pursued in pre-Baconian fashion, without any adequate experimental guidance", New York Times, 4 January 2005), Sheldon Glashow ("there ain't no experiment that could be done nor is there any observation that could be made that would say, `You guys are wrong.' The theory is safe, permanently safe", NOVA interview （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）), Lawrence Krauss ("String theory [is] yet to have any real successes in explaining or predicting anything measurable", New York Times, 8 November 2005), Peter Woit (see his blog （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, article （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆） and book "Not Even Wrong", ISBN 978-0-224-07605-0) and Carlo Rovelli (see his Dialog on Quantum Gravity （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）)

tau.ac.il

video.tau.ac.il

David Gross, Perspectives （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, String Theory: Achievements and Perspectives - A conference

thetroublewithphysics.com

Lee Smolin's The Trouble With Physics webpage. [2021-09-30]. （原始内容存档于2019-09-18）.

web.archive.org

S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A. Linde and S. P. Trivedi, de Sitter Vacua in String Theory （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, Phys.Rev.D68:046005,2003
Peter Woit's Not Even Wrong weblog. [2008-08-06]. （原始内容存档于2012-11-05）.
P. Woit (Columbia University) String theory: An Evaluation （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）,February 2001, e-Print: physics/0102051
P. Woit, Is String Theory Testable? （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆） INFN Rome March 2007
Lee Smolin's The Trouble With Physics webpage. [2021-09-30]. （原始内容存档于2019-09-18）.
Prominent critics include Philip Anderson ("string theory is the first science in hundreds of years to be pursued in pre-Baconian fashion, without any adequate experimental guidance", New York Times, 4 January 2005), Sheldon Glashow ("there ain't no experiment that could be done nor is there any observation that could be made that would say, `You guys are wrong.' The theory is safe, permanently safe", NOVA interview （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）), Lawrence Krauss ("String theory [is] yet to have any real successes in explaining or predicting anything measurable", New York Times, 8 November 2005), Peter Woit (see his blog （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, article （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆） and book "Not Even Wrong", ISBN 978-0-224-07605-0) and Carlo Rovelli (see his Dialog on Quantum Gravity （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）)
David Gross, Perspectives （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, String Theory: Achievements and Perspectives - A conference