Sign In

Login

Password

Forgot Password ? Sign Up

Non-Fungible Token (German Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Non-Fungible Token" in German language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank German rank
53doi.org
2nd place
3rd place
8forbes.com
54th place
107th place
8nytimes.com
7th place
19th place
8google.de
2,106th place
139th place
5web.archive.org
1st place
1st place
5theverge.com
114th place
489th place
4bloomberg.com
99th place
323rd place
4bbc.com
20th place
57th place
4derstandard.at
743rd place
45th place
4treasury.gov
1,996th place
2,969th place
3ethereum.org
low place
low place
3cointelegraph.com
low place
9,167th place
3coindesk.com
low place
9,310th place
3redirecter.toolforge.org
33rd place
2nd place
3IABotmemento.invalid
low place
low place
3theguardian.com
12th place
25th place
3variety.com
13th place
34th place
3rollingstone.com
47th place
110th place
3wsj.com
79th place
283rd place
3wiwo.de
3,921st place
273rd place
3medium.com
551st place
812th place
2vice.com
175th place
256th place
2cnbc.com
220th place
747th place
2spiegel.de
66th place
4th place
2zdb-katalog.de
123rd place
6th place
2ft.com
210th place
569th place
2independent.co.uk
36th place
102nd place
2techcrunch.com
187th place
662nd place
2ssrn.com
703rd place
1,638th place
2kotaku.com
401st place
1,322nd place
2reuters.com
49th place
151st place
2npr.org
92nd place
415th place
2rusi.org
6,095th place
8,591st place
1tante.cc
low place
low place
1pymnts.com
low place
low place
1dappgambl.com
low place
low place
1moxie.org
low place
low place
1cre.fm
low place
low place
1gameswirtschaft.de
low place
2,261st place
1youtube.com
9th place
9th place
1cryptoticker.io
low place
low place
1christies.com
2,978th place
1,934th place
1venturebeat.com
616th place
1,875th place
1hackernoon.com
low place
low place
1sludgefeed.com
low place
low place
1cryptonews.com
low place
low place
1nba.com
64th place
259th place
1jpost.com
544th place
977th place
1worldarchitecture.org
low place
low place
1heise.de
766th place
46th place
1monopol-magazin.de
low place
1,746th place
1amycastor.com
low place
low place
1newyorker.com
146th place
379th place
1mondaq.com
low place
low place
1wlu.edu
low place
low place
1sciencedirect.com
149th place
298th place
1cbsnews.com
108th place
361st place
1derstandard.de
4,051st place
264th place
1theatlantic.com
228th place
655th place
1hypebeast.com
1,891st place
4,740th place
1giga.de
9,376th place
625th place
1decrypt.co
low place
low place
1jingculturecommerce.com
low place
low place
1theartnewspaper.com
3,687th place
5,509th place
1etoro.art
low place
low place
1sothebys.com
4,497th place
4,021st place
1nbcnews.com
137th place
472nd place
1musictech.com
low place
low place
1yahoo.com
38th place
194th place
1deadline.com
10th place
24th place
1screenrant.com
98th place
311th place
1musicbusinessworldwide.com
3,879th place
7,967th place
1reviewjournal.com
1,030th place
2,542nd place
1cheddar.com
low place
low place
1vulture.com
126th place
530th place
1xxlmag.com
625th place
2,096th place
1billboard.com
19th place
21st place
1researchgate.net
120th place
143rd place
1miami.edu
4,511th place
9,982nd place
1iq-mag.net
low place
low place
1bbc.co.uk
8th place
37th place
1github.com
383rd place
343rd place
1coinmarketcap.com
low place
6,404th place
1metro.co.uk
296th place
624th place
1gamerant.com
1,655th place
5,980th place
1pledgetimes.com
low place
low place
1eurogamer.net
288th place
1,003rd place
1techspot.com
7,139th place
low place
1forbesindia.com
1,886th place
low place
1insidehighered.com
4,161st place
low place
1nebula.org
low place
low place
1futurism.com
low place
low place
1businessinsider.com
140th place
541st place
1molecule.to
low place
low place
1rmdslab.com
low place
low place
1bcm.edu
low place
low place
1vechain.org
low place
low place
1mdpi.com
2,912th place
1,242nd place
1chainalysis.com
low place
low place
1handelsblatt.com
1,065th place
65th place
1justice.gov
918th place
2,263rd place
1scmp.com
362nd place
1,394th place
1tagesschau.de
884th place
51st place
1rarible.com
low place
low place
1statista.com
776th place
182nd place
1coinquora.com
low place
low place
1hslu.ch
low place
low place
1espacenet.com
800th place
160th place
1thenextweb.com
1,356th place
2,667th place
1cryptoninjas.net
low place
low place
1icoexaminer.com
low place
low place
1orf.at
418th place
22nd place
1consensys.net
low place
low place
1t3n.de
low place
970th place
1theblockcrypto.com
low place
low place
1raretoshi.com
low place
low place
1news-krypto.de
low place
low place

IABotmemento.invalid

amycastor.com

bbc.co.uk

bbc.com

bcm.edu

  • Siehe die Angaben des Baylor College of Medicine unter: Kristin Kostick, Ph.D. Abgerufen am 3. Januar 2023.

billboard.com

bloomberg.com

businessinsider.com

cbsnews.com

  • Andrea Sestino, Gianluigi Guido, Alessandro M. Peluso: Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs). Examining the Impact on Consumers and Marketing Strategies. 1. Auflage. Palgrave, 2022, S. 26 f., doi:10.1007/978-3-031-07203-1 (eingeschränkte Vorschau in der Google-Buchsuche): „One of the most widely known uses of NFTs, in the context of cultural heritage, is the protection and guarantee of artworks, which may encourage the dematerialization and transformation of art itself (...) NFTs assign artworks a digital identity and authenticate their genuine content (...) The owner of each specific right would be immutably recorded in the blocks on the chain.“ Vgl. Dan Patterson: Blockchain company buys and burns Banksy artwork to turn it into a digital original. In: CBS News. 4. März 2021, abgerufen am 3. Januar 2023 (englisch).

chainalysis.com

cheddar.com

christies.com

cnbc.com

coindesk.com

coinmarketcap.com

  • Siehe Allan Fowler und Johanna Pirker: Tokenfication - The potential of non-fungible tokens (NFT) for game development. In: CHI PLAY '21: Extended Abstracts of the 2021 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. 15. Oktober 2021, S. 154 f., doi:10.1145/3450337.3483501. Eine Auflistung aller bisher handelbaren Titel findet sich auf Top Play To Earn Tokens by Market Capitalization. Abgerufen am 2. Januar 2023.

coinquora.com

cointelegraph.com

de.cointelegraph.com

consensys.net

cre.fm

cryptonews.com

cryptoninjas.net

cryptoticker.io

dappgambl.com

deadline.com

decrypt.co

derstandard.at

derstandard.de

doi.org

  • Valeonti Foteini u. a.: Crypto Collectibles, Museum Funding and OpenGLAM: Challenges, Opportunities and the Potential of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs). In: Applied Sciences. Band 11, 2021, S. 9931, doi:10.3390/app11219931 (englisch).
  • Anatoli Colicev: How can non-fungible tokens bring value to brands. In: International Journal of Research in Marketing. 2022, S. 4, doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2022.07.003. Vgl. Daniel Daniele: NFTs' Nifty Copyright Issues - Intellectual Property - Canada. In: mondaq. 17. Mai 2021, abgerufen am 3. Januar 2023 (englisch).
  • Edward Lee: NFTs as Decentralized Intellectual Property. In: University of Illinois Law Review. 2022, S. 20, doi:10.2139/ssrn.4023736 (2023 im University of Illinois Law Review zu veröffentlichendes Preprint).
  • Joshua A.T. Fairfield: Tokenized: The Law of Non-Fungible Tokens and Unique Digital Property. In: Indiana Law Journal. Band 97, Nr. 4, 2022, S. 1290. Entsprechende Angaben finden sich auch in Charlotte Ducuing: How to Make Sure My Cryptokitties Are Here Forever? The Complementary Roles of Blockchain and the Law to Bring Trust. In: European Journal of Risk Regulation. Band 10, Nr. 2, 1. Juni 2019, S. 329 und passim, doi:10.1017/err.2019.39: „The need for trust does not disappear with the arrival of blockchain. Users also need to authenticate (trust) that an alleged Dapp genuinely is one. (...) blockchain needs the complementary role of the law in order to deliver its promises (...) Failing to find an appropriate mix between the respective operations of blockchain and the law, the article contends that the beneficial innovations expected from public blockchains will not materialise for the general public or may shortly fade away.“ Siehe auch Alesja Serada, Tanja Sihvonen und J. Tuomas Harviainen: CryptoKitties and the New Ludic Economy. How Blockchain Introduces Value, Ownership, and Scarcity in Digital Gaming. In: Games and Culture. Band 16, Nr. 4, 2020, S. 472 und 475, doi:10.1177/1555412019898305: „Even if blockchain minimizes “exploitation” from the side of game publishers, it does the bare minimum to protect ownership rights from perpetrators, hackers, and cheaters. (...) Even though a crypto wallet cannot be physically destroyed, “true ownership” is always endangered by its permanent loss (and eventually set back to centralized institutional support). (...) pseudo true ownership as a by-product of the organization of the blockchain system makes it possible for players to enjoy the idea of anonymous ownership of game tokens even if their ownership is not legally validated outside of the game. The principle of anonymity and delegation of trust to algorithms and open data undermine any possibility of legal protection of full ownership. Therefore, account recovery on a blockchain only becomes possible at the price of deanonymization.“ Vgl. aber Omar Ali u. a.: A review of the key challenges of non-fungible tokens. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Band 187, 2023, ISSN 0040-1625, S. 9, doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122248 (sciencedirect.com): „(...) NFTs present a platform for consumers to showcase digital artefacts with the record of sale and ownership. This is the primary driver for the exponential growth of NFTs. Since NFTs provide a certification of authenticity for digital objects, consumers are attracted to NFTs due to the token it provides to assure customers of the uniqueness of their possession in addition to the sense of ownership and value generated from obtaining something perceived to be very rare.“
  • Andrea Sestino, Gianluigi Guido, Alessandro M. Peluso: Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs). Examining the Impact on Consumers and Marketing Strategies. 1. Auflage. Palgrave, 2022, S. 26 f., doi:10.1007/978-3-031-07203-1 (eingeschränkte Vorschau in der Google-Buchsuche): „One of the most widely known uses of NFTs, in the context of cultural heritage, is the protection and guarantee of artworks, which may encourage the dematerialization and transformation of art itself (...) NFTs assign artworks a digital identity and authenticate their genuine content (...) The owner of each specific right would be immutably recorded in the blocks on the chain.“ Vgl. Dan Patterson: Blockchain company buys and burns Banksy artwork to turn it into a digital original. In: CBS News. 4. März 2021, abgerufen am 3. Januar 2023 (englisch).
  • Logan Kugler: Non-Fungible Tokens and the Future of Art. In: Communications of the ACM (Association for Computing Machinery). Band 64, Nr. 9, 24. August 2021, S. 19 f., doi:10.1145/3474355. Vgl. aber Lawrence J. Trautman: Virtual Art and Non-Fungible Tokens. In: Hofstra Law Review. Band 50, Nr. 361, 2022, S. 372 f., doi:10.2139/ssrn.3814087. Dort mit Verweis auf Jonathan Zittrain und Will Marks: What Critics Don’t Understand About NFTs. The complexity and arbitrariness of non-fungible tokens are a big part of their appeal. 7. April 2021, abgerufen am 3. Januar 2023 (englisch).
  • Zachary Small: Why many art collectors are staying away from the NFT gold rush. In: The Independent. 30. April 2021, abgerufen am 3. Januar 2023 (englisch). Vgl. Foteini Valeonti u. a.: Crypto Collectibles, Museum Funding and OpenGLAM: Challenges, Opportunities and the Potential of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs). In: Applied Sciences. Band 11, Nr. 21, 2021, doi:10.3390/app11219931.
  • Lawrence J. Trautman: Virtual Art and Non-Fungible Tokens. In: Hofstra Law Review. Band 50, Nr. 361, 2022, S. 371, doi:10.2139/ssrn.3814087.
  • Phil Gonserkewitz, Erik Karger und Marvin Jagals: Non-Fungible Tokens: Use Cases of NFTs and Future Research Agenda. In: Risk Governance & Control: Financial Markets & Institutions. Band 12, Nr. 3, 2022, S. 12 f., doi:10.22495/rgcv12i3p1. Siehe auch Tommy Beer: NBA Top Shot Collectibles Continues Meteoric Rise With Over $50 Million In Sales In A Week. In: Forbes. 20. Februar 2021, abgerufen am 3. Januar 2023.
  • Andrea Sestino, Gianluigi Guido, Alessandro M. Peluso: Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs). Examining the Impact on Consumers and Marketing Strategies. 1. Auflage. Palgrave, 2022, S. 28 f., doi:10.1007/978-3-031-07203-1 (eingeschränkte Vorschau in der Google-Buchsuche).
  • Andrea Sestino, Gianluigi Guido, Alessandro M. Peluso: Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs). Examining the Impact on Consumers and Marketing Strategies. 1. Auflage. Palgrave, 2022, S. 32 f., doi:10.1007/978-3-031-07203-1 (eingeschränkte Vorschau in der Google-Buchsuche).
  • Andrea Sestino, Gianluigi Guido, Alessandro M. Peluso: Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs). Examining the Impact on Consumers and Marketing Strategies. 1. Auflage. Palgrave, 2022, S. 32, doi:10.1007/978-3-031-07203-1 (eingeschränkte Vorschau in der Google-Buchsuche). Dort mit Verweis auf Sam Willings: Artists are selling their music as NFTs – and they’re making millions. In: Musictech. 4. März 2021, abgerufen am 1. Januar 2023 (englisch).
  • Andrea Sestino, Gianluigi Guido, Alessandro M. Peluso: Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs). Examining the Impact on Consumers and Marketing Strategies. 1. Auflage. Palgrave, 2022, S. 33, doi:10.1007/978-3-031-07203-1 (eingeschränkte Vorschau in der Google-Buchsuche).
  • Johnny Diaz: Miramax Sues Quentin Tarantino Over Planned 'Pulp Fiction' NFTs. In: The New York Times. 17. November 2021, abgerufen am 3. Januar 2023 (englisch). Vgl. Andrea Sestino, Gianluigi Guido, Alessandro M. Peluso: Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs). Examining the Impact on Consumers and Marketing Strategies. 1. Auflage. Palgrave, 2022, S. 33, doi:10.1007/978-3-031-07203-1 (eingeschränkte Vorschau in der Google-Buchsuche). mit dortigem Verweis auf Edward Lee: NFTs as Decentralized Intellectual Property. 2022, S. 41 f. (ssrn.com – Preprint für das University of Illinois Law Review).
  • Phil Gonserkewitz, Erik Karger und Marvin Jagals: Non-Fungible Tokens: Use Cases of NFTs and Future Research Agenda. In: Risk Governance & Control: Financial Markets & Institutions. Band 12, Nr. 3, 2022, S. 13, doi:10.22495/rgcv12i3p1: „For tickets to events, there is a secondary market where the seller can call an arbitrary price. There is a risk of purchasing invalid tickets. Regular tickets can also be copied and thus sold multiple times, although only one of them is valid. NFTs can guarantee the uniqueness and authenticity of the tickets“
  • Andrea Sestino, Gianluigi Guido, Alessandro M. Peluso: Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs). Examining the Impact on Consumers and Marketing Strategies. 1. Auflage. Palgrave, 2022, S. 34, doi:10.1007/978-3-031-07203-1 (eingeschränkte Vorschau in der Google-Buchsuche).
  • Phil Gonserkewitz, Erik Karger und Marvin Jagals: Non-Fungible Tokens: Use Cases of NFTs and Future Research Agenda. In: Risk Governance & Control: Financial Markets & Institutions. Band 12, Nr. 3, 2022, S. 13, doi:10.22495/rgcv12i3p1: „NFT video games can be divided into classic video games that make use of NFTs and blockchain-based video games. Blockchain-based video games have NFT usage at their core, and an economy is emerging around the game. (...) In classic video games, NFTs serve as add-ons, such as in Ubisoft‘s Ghost Recon Breakpoint, where NFTs enable cosmetic changes in the game.“
  • CryptoKitties craze slows down transactions on Ethereum. In: BBC News. 5. Dezember 2017, abgerufen am 3. Januar 2023 (englisch). Vgl. Fitz Tepper: CryptoKitties raises $12M from Andreessen Horowitz and Union Square Ventures. 21. März 2018, archiviert vom Original (nicht mehr online verfügbar) am 13. August 2021; abgerufen am 3. Januar 2023 (englisch).  Info: Der Archivlink wurde automatisch eingesetzt und noch nicht geprüft. Bitte prüfe Original- und Archivlink gemäß Anleitung und entferne dann diesen Hinweis.@1@2Vorlage:Webachiv/IABot/social.techcrunch.com Siehe auch Evelyn Cheng: Meet CryptoKitties, the $100,000 digital beanie babies epitomizing the cryptocurrency mania. In: CNBC. 6. Dezember 2017, abgerufen am 3. Januar 2023 (englisch). Mit dem Potenzial blockchainbasierter Videospiele am Beispiel CryptoKitties befasst sich Seyed Mojtaba Hosseini Bamakan u. a.: Patents and intellectual property assets as non-fungible tokens; key technologies and challenges. In: Scientific Reports. Band 12, 9. Februar 2022, doi:10.1038/s41598-022-05920-6. Vgl. Alesja Serada, Tanja Sihvonen und J. Tuomas Harviainen: CryptoKitties and the New Ludic Economy: How Blockchain Introduces Value, Ownership, and Scarcity in Digital Gaming. In: Games and Culture. Band 16, Nr. 4, 20. Februar 2020, doi:10.1177/1555412019898305.
  • Siehe Allan Fowler und Johanna Pirker: Tokenfication - The potential of non-fungible tokens (NFT) for game development. In: CHI PLAY '21: Extended Abstracts of the 2021 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. 15. Oktober 2021, S. 154 f., doi:10.1145/3450337.3483501. Eine Auflistung aller bisher handelbaren Titel findet sich auf Top Play To Earn Tokens by Market Capitalization. Abgerufen am 2. Januar 2023.
  • Nicola Jones: How scientists are embracing NFTs. In: Nature. Band 594, 18. Juni 2021, S. 481―482, doi:10.1038/d41586-021-01642-3.
  • Emma Whitford: UC Berkeley Will Auction NFTs for 2 Nobel Prize Patents. In: Inside Higher Ed. 28. Mai 2021, abgerufen am 3. Januar 2023 (englisch). Siehe auch Andrea Sestino, Gianluigi Guido, Alessandro M. Peluso: Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs). Examining the Impact on Consumers and Marketing Strategies. 1. Auflage. Palgrave, 2022, S. 28, doi:10.1007/978-3-031-07203-1 (eingeschränkte Vorschau in der Google-Buchsuche).
  • Kenneth Chang: You Can Buy a Piece of a Nobel Prize-Winning Discovery. In: New York Times. 27. Mai 2021, abgerufen am 3. Januar 2023 (englisch). Vgl. Lawrence J. Trautman: Virtual Art and Non-Fungible Tokens. In: Hofstra Law Review. Band 50, Nr. 361, 2022, S. 369 f., doi:10.2139/ssrn.3814087.
  • Nicola Jones: How scientists are embracing NFTs. In: Nature. Band 594, 18. Juni 2021, S. 482, doi:10.1038/d41586-021-01642-3.
  • Nicola Jones: How scientists are embracing NFTs. In: Nature. Band 594, 18. Juni 2021, S. 481 f., doi:10.1038/d41586-021-01642-3.
  • Nicola Jones: How scientists are embracing NFTs. In: Nature. Band 594, 18. Juni 2021, S. 481 f., doi:10.1038/d41586-021-01642-3. Zum Vorhaben Churchs siehe auch Victor Tangermann: A Harvard Scientist is Selling his Genetic Code as an NFT. In: Neoscope ― Futurism. 21. April 2022, abgerufen am 3. Januar 2023 (englisch).
  • Siehe dazu die Angaben in Nicola Jones: How scientists are embracing NFTs. In: Nature. Band 594, 18. Juni 2021, S. 482, doi:10.1038/d41586-021-01642-3.
  • Kristin Kostick-Quenet u. a.: How NFTs could transform health information exchange. In: Science. Band 375, Nr. 6580, 3. Februar 2022, S. 500―502, doi:10.1126/science.abm2004.
  • Kristin Kostick-Quenet u. a.: How NFTs could transform health information exchange. In: Science. Band 375, Nr. 6580, 3. Februar 2022, S. 500, doi:10.1126/science.abm2004.
  • Sebastian Porsdam Mann u. a.: Blockchain, consent and prosent for medical research. In: Journal of Medical Ethics. Band 47, Nr. 4, 2021, S. 251―252, doi:10.1136/medethics-2019-105963.
  • Siehe Vasiliki Nataly Rahimzadeh: Pros and cons of prosent as an alternative to traditional consent in medical research. In: Journal of Medical Ethics. Band 47, Nr. 4, 2021, S. 244―250, doi:10.1136/medethics-2020-106443.
  • Kristin Kostick-Quenet u. a.: How NFTs could transform health information exchange. In: Science. Band 375, Nr. 6580, 3. Februar 2022, S. 501, doi:10.1126/science.abm2004.
  • Kristin Kostick-Quenet u. a.: How NFTs could transform health information exchange. In: Science. Band 375, Nr. 6580, 3. Februar 2022, S. 501 f., doi:10.1126/science.abm2004.
  • Luca Petrigna und Giuseppe Musumeci: The Metaverse: A New Challenge for the Healthcare System: A Scoping Review. In: Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology (JFMK ). Band 7, Nr. 3, 30. August 2022, S. 8 f., doi:10.3390/jfmk7030063.
  • Stephane Doyen und Nicholas B. Dadario: 12 Plagues of AI in Healthcare: A Practical Guide to Current Issues With Using Machine Learning in a Medical Context. In: Frontiers in Digital Health. Band 4, 3. Mai 2022, S. 5, doi:10.3389/fdgth.2022.76540.
  • Ioannis Skalidis u. a.: CardioVerse: The cardiovascular medicine in the era of Metaverse. In: Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine. 11. Mai 2022, doi:10.1016/j.tcm.2022.05.004.
  • Ioannis Skalidis u. a.: CardioVerse: The cardiovascular medicine in the era of Metaverse. In: Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine. 11. Mai 2022, doi:10.1016/j.tcm.2022.05.004. Dort mit Verweis auf Hemang Subramanian, Susmitha Subramanian: Improving Diagnosis Through Digital Pathology: Proof-of-Concept Implementation Using Smart Contracts and Decentralized File Storage. In: Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR). Band 24, Nr. 3, 28. März 2022, doi:10.2196/34207.
  • Siehe F. Chiacchio u. a.: Non-Fungible Token Solution for the Track and Trace of Pharmaceutical Supply Chain. In: Applied Sciences. Band 12, Nr. 8, 15. April 2022, doi:10.3390/app12084019.
  • F. Chiacchio u. a.: Non-Fungible Token Solution for the Track and Trace of Pharmaceutical Supply Chain. In: Applied Sciences. Band 12, Nr. 8, 15. April 2022, S. 6―20, doi:10.3390/app12084019.
  • F. Chiacchio u. a.: Non-Fungible Token Solution for the Track and Trace of Pharmaceutical Supply Chain. In: Applied Sciences. Band 12, Nr. 8, 15. April 2022, S. 11 f., doi:10.3390/app12084019.
  • F. Chiacchio u. a.: Non-Fungible Token Solution for the Track and Trace of Pharmaceutical Supply Chain. In: Applied Sciences. Band 12, Nr. 8, 15. April 2022, S. 20, doi:10.3390/app12084019.
  • Siehe dazu:
    • Sotiris P. Gayialis u. a.: A Business Process Reference Model for the Development of a Wine Traceability System. In: Sustainability. Band 14, Nr. 18, 17. September 2022, S. 3, doi:10.3390/su141811687.
    • Senay A. Gebreab u. a.: NFT-Based Traceability and Ownership Management of Medical Devices. In: Sustainability. Band 14, Nr. 18, 17. September 2022, doi:10.3390/su141811687.
    • Senay A. Gebreab u. a.: NFT-Based Traceability and Ownership Management of Medical Devices. In: Sustainability. Band 14, Nr. 18, 17. September 2022, S. 126398 sowie 126409, doi:10.3390/su141811687.
    • Siehe unter Angabe weiterführender Sekundärliteratur Sotiris P. Gayialis u. a.: A Business Process Reference Model for the Development of a Wine Traceability System. In: Sustainability. Band 14, Nr. 18, 17. September 2022, S. 3, doi:10.3390/su141811687. Vgl. Wenlong Guo u. a.: Reputation-Based Blockchain for Spatial Crowdsourcing in Vehicular Networks. In: Applied Sciences. Band 12, Nr. 21, 31. Oktober 2022, S. 3, doi:10.3390/app122111049. Siehe auch Michał Bajor, Marcin Niemiec: An Asynchronous AAA Blockchain-Based Protocol for Configuring Information Systems. In: Energies. Band 15, Nr. 18, 6. September 2022, S. 3, doi:10.3390/en15186516.
    • Seyed Mojtaba Hosseini Bamakan u. a.: Patents and intellectual property assets as non-fungible tokens; key technologies and challenges. In: Scientific Reports. Band 12, 9. Februar 2022, doi:10.1038/s41598-022-05920-6. Vgl. Haya R. Hasan u. a.: Incorporating Registration, Reputation, and Incentivization Into the NFT Ecosystem. In: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Access. Band 10, 19. Juli 2022, S. 76417, doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3192388: „The paper describes the solution’s various layers, which include storage, authentication, verification, blockchain, and the application layer. The authors focused on utilizing NFTs to protect intellectual properties. Their framework is theoretical and can be improved upon by adding a programmable logic implementation using smart contracts.“
    • Seyed Mojtaba Hosseini Bamakan u. a.: Patents and intellectual property assets as non-fungible tokens; key technologies and challenges. In: Scientific Reports. Band 12, 9. Februar 2022, S. 4–6, doi:10.1038/s41598-022-05920-6.
    • Seyed Mojtaba Hosseini Bamakan u. a.: Patents and intellectual property assets as non-fungible tokens; key technologies and challenges. In: Scientific Reports. Band 12, 9. Februar 2022, S. 6 f., doi:10.1038/s41598-022-05920-6.
    • Seyed Mojtaba Hosseini Bamakan u. a.: Patents and intellectual property assets as non-fungible tokens; key technologies and challenges. In: Scientific Reports. Band 12, 9. Februar 2022, S. 7–9, doi:10.1038/s41598-022-05920-6.
    • Seyed Mojtaba Hosseini Bamakan u. a.: Patents and intellectual property assets as non-fungible tokens; key technologies and challenges. In: Scientific Reports. Band 12, 9. Februar 2022, S. 9 f., doi:10.1038/s41598-022-05920-6.
    • Seyed Mojtaba Hosseini Bamakan u. a.: Patents and intellectual property assets as non-fungible tokens; key technologies and challenges. In: Scientific Reports. Band 12, 9. Februar 2022, S. 10, doi:10.1038/s41598-022-05920-6.
    • Seyed Mojtaba Hosseini Bamakan u. a.: Patents and intellectual property assets as non-fungible tokens; key technologies and challenges. In: Scientific Reports. Band 12, 9. Februar 2022, S. 10 f., doi:10.1038/s41598-022-05920-6.
    • Siehe dazu Hong Bao, David Roubaud: Non-Fungible Token: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda. In: Journal of Risk and Financial Management. Band 15, Nr. 5, 2022, ISSN 1911-8074, doi:10.3390/jrfm15050215 (mdpi.com).
    • Zur dahingehenden Rolle von NFTs siehe Phil Gonserkewitz, Erik Karger und Marvin Jagals: Non-Fungible Tokens: Use Cases of NFTs and Future Research Agenda. In: Risk Governance & Control: Financial Markets & Institutions. Band 12, Nr. 3, 2022, S. 13, doi:10.22495/rgcv12i3p1. Vgl. Saeed Banaeian Far u. a.: A Review of Non-fungible Tokens Applications in the Real-world and Metaverse. In: Procedia Computer Science. Band 214, 2022, S. 759―761, doi:10.1016/j.procs.2022.11.238.

espacenet.com

worldwide.espacenet.com

  • Patent US10505726B1: System and method for providing cryptographically secured digital assets. Angemeldet am 28. Mai 2019, veröffentlicht am 10. Dezember 2019, Anmelder: Nike Inc, Erfinder: Christopher Andon et Al.‌

ethereum.org

eips.ethereum.org

etoro.art

  • Siehe dazu deren Webpräsenz: eToro ART. Abgerufen am 3. Januar 2023 (englisch).

eurogamer.net

forbes.com

forbesindia.com

ft.com

futurism.com

gamerant.com

gameswirtschaft.de

giga.de

github.com

google.de

books.google.de

hackernoon.com

handelsblatt.com

heise.de

hslu.ch

news.hslu.ch

hypebeast.com

icoexaminer.com

independent.co.uk

insidehighered.com

iq-mag.net

jingculturecommerce.com

jpost.com

justice.gov

kotaku.com

mdpi.com

  • Siehe dazu Hong Bao, David Roubaud: Non-Fungible Token: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda. In: Journal of Risk and Financial Management. Band 15, Nr. 5, 2022, ISSN 1911-8074, doi:10.3390/jrfm15050215 (mdpi.com).

medium.com

medium.com

memoakten.medium.com

metro.co.uk

miami.edu

business-law-review.law.miami.edu

molecule.to

docs.molecule.to

mondaq.com

monopol-magazin.de

moxie.org

musicbusinessworldwide.com

musictech.com

nba.com

nbcnews.com

nebula.org

  • Siehe dazu deren Webpräsenz unter nebula.org. Abgerufen am 3. Januar 2023.

news-krypto.de

newyorker.com

npr.org

nytimes.com

orf.at

steiermark.orf.at

pledgetimes.com

pymnts.com

raretoshi.com

  • Ray Rizzling: Actually nothing. In: raretoshi.com. 10. November 2021, abgerufen am 25. Dezember 2021 (englisch).

rarible.com

static.rarible.com

redirecter.toolforge.org

researchgate.net

reuters.com

reviewjournal.com

rmdslab.com

  • Siehe deren Webpräsenz mitsamt dort verlinkten journalistischen Artikeln unter: rmdslab.com. Abgerufen am 3. Januar 2023.

rollingstone.com

rusi.org

  • Allison Owen, Isabella Chase: NFTs: A New Frontier for Money Laundering? In: Royal United Services Institute. 2. Dezember 2021, abgerufen am 3. Januar 2023 (englisch): „Along with the risks stemming from cryptocurrency usage, money launderers can exploit the trade and sale of NFTs in a similar way to which they exploit physical art.“
  • Allison Owen, Isabella Chase: NFTs: A New Frontier for Money Laundering? In: Royal United Services Institute. 2. Dezember 2021, abgerufen am 3. Januar 2023 (englisch): „With the development of guidance for KYC best practices, strong cyber security measures and a stolen art registry, many of the money-laundering risks of NFTs can be mitigated without restricting the growth of this new market. Implementation of these techniques will ensure that consumers can trade freely within the market without the fear of purchasing a forged NFT or having a token stolen.“

sciencedirect.com

  • Joshua A.T. Fairfield: Tokenized: The Law of Non-Fungible Tokens and Unique Digital Property. In: Indiana Law Journal. Band 97, Nr. 4, 2022, S. 1290. Entsprechende Angaben finden sich auch in Charlotte Ducuing: How to Make Sure My Cryptokitties Are Here Forever? The Complementary Roles of Blockchain and the Law to Bring Trust. In: European Journal of Risk Regulation. Band 10, Nr. 2, 1. Juni 2019, S. 329 und passim, doi:10.1017/err.2019.39: „The need for trust does not disappear with the arrival of blockchain. Users also need to authenticate (trust) that an alleged Dapp genuinely is one. (...) blockchain needs the complementary role of the law in order to deliver its promises (...) Failing to find an appropriate mix between the respective operations of blockchain and the law, the article contends that the beneficial innovations expected from public blockchains will not materialise for the general public or may shortly fade away.“ Siehe auch Alesja Serada, Tanja Sihvonen und J. Tuomas Harviainen: CryptoKitties and the New Ludic Economy. How Blockchain Introduces Value, Ownership, and Scarcity in Digital Gaming. In: Games and Culture. Band 16, Nr. 4, 2020, S. 472 und 475, doi:10.1177/1555412019898305: „Even if blockchain minimizes “exploitation” from the side of game publishers, it does the bare minimum to protect ownership rights from perpetrators, hackers, and cheaters. (...) Even though a crypto wallet cannot be physically destroyed, “true ownership” is always endangered by its permanent loss (and eventually set back to centralized institutional support). (...) pseudo true ownership as a by-product of the organization of the blockchain system makes it possible for players to enjoy the idea of anonymous ownership of game tokens even if their ownership is not legally validated outside of the game. The principle of anonymity and delegation of trust to algorithms and open data undermine any possibility of legal protection of full ownership. Therefore, account recovery on a blockchain only becomes possible at the price of deanonymization.“ Vgl. aber Omar Ali u. a.: A review of the key challenges of non-fungible tokens. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Band 187, 2023, ISSN 0040-1625, S. 9, doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122248 (sciencedirect.com): „(...) NFTs present a platform for consumers to showcase digital artefacts with the record of sale and ownership. This is the primary driver for the exponential growth of NFTs. Since NFTs provide a certification of authenticity for digital objects, consumers are attracted to NFTs due to the token it provides to assure customers of the uniqueness of their possession in addition to the sense of ownership and value generated from obtaining something perceived to be very rare.“

scmp.com

screenrant.com

sludgefeed.com

  • Non-Fungible Token (NFT) Market Projected to Reach $315 Million in 2020. In: DeFi Republic. 5. März 2020, archiviert vom Original (nicht mehr online verfügbar) am 22. Mai 2020; abgerufen am 1. Mai 2021 (amerikanisches Englisch).  Info: Der Archivlink wurde automatisch eingesetzt und noch nicht geprüft. Bitte prüfe Original- und Archivlink gemäß Anleitung und entferne dann diesen Hinweis.@1@2Vorlage:Webachiv/IABot/sludgefeed.com

sothebys.com

spiegel.de

ssrn.com

papers.ssrn.com

  • Edward Lee: NFTs as Decentralized Intellectual Property. 2022, S. 36, 39 f. und 43 (ssrn.com – Preprint für das University of Illinois Law Review): „Using NFTs, artists now have the option of choosing to require a resale royalty for every resale of their NFTs. (...) Another way in which NFTs have changed the traditional contours of copyright is to diminish the significance of unauthorized copies and unauthorized derivative works. (...) By creating a new IP in the form of an NFT, authenticated on blockchain and whose value derives in its uniqueness, NFTs have made unauthorized copies and unauthorized derivative work less significant. In short, the unauthorized copies do not substitute for the authentic NFT. (...) NFTs have the potential to disrupt the market dominance of industry gatekeepers and intermediaries—in effect, to open the gates to commercialization. NFTs can be used sources of funding or patronage—bypassing the need for a gatekeeper.“
  • Johnny Diaz: Miramax Sues Quentin Tarantino Over Planned 'Pulp Fiction' NFTs. In: The New York Times. 17. November 2021, abgerufen am 3. Januar 2023 (englisch). Vgl. Andrea Sestino, Gianluigi Guido, Alessandro M. Peluso: Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs). Examining the Impact on Consumers and Marketing Strategies. 1. Auflage. Palgrave, 2022, S. 33, doi:10.1007/978-3-031-07203-1 (eingeschränkte Vorschau in der Google-Buchsuche). mit dortigem Verweis auf Edward Lee: NFTs as Decentralized Intellectual Property. 2022, S. 41 f. (ssrn.com – Preprint für das University of Illinois Law Review).

statista.com

t3n.de

tagesschau.de

tante.cc

  • Das Dritte Web. In: tante.cc. 4. Februar 2022, abgerufen am 6. Februar 2022.

techcrunch.com

social.techcrunch.com

techspot.com

theartnewspaper.com

theatlantic.com

theblockcrypto.com

theguardian.com

thenextweb.com

theverge.com

treasury.gov

home.treasury.gov

variety.com

vechain.org

  • Siehe dazu deren Webpräsenz unter vechain.org. Abgerufen am 3. Januar 2023.

venturebeat.com

vice.com

vulture.com

web.archive.org

wiwo.de

  • Saskia Littmann: Geldwäscher entdecken den NFT-Markt. In: Wirtschaftswoche. 5. Februar 2022, abgerufen am 3. Januar 2023.
  • Entsprechend: Saskia Littmann: Geldwäscher entdecken den NFT-Markt. In: Wirtschaftswoche. 5. Februar 2022, abgerufen am 3. Januar 2023: „Generell spielt Geldwäsche auch bei NFTs eine immer größere Rolle. Das liegt auch daran, dass die Finanzaufsicht diese Märkte noch nicht so stark kontrolliert wie andere Teile des Finanzmarkts. Aber allein im vierten Quartal des vergangenen Jahres flossen laut Chainalysis mehr als 1,3 Millionen gewaschene Dollar in den NFT-Markt. Es dürfte also nur eine Frage der Zeit sein, bis Regulierer auch für den Handel mit den virtuellen Gütern strengere Regeln in Betracht ziehen.“
  • Matthias Reiche: Umgang mit Bitcoin & Co. Wie die EU den Kryptomarkt reguliert. In: Tagesschau. 12. Juli 2022, abgerufen am 3. Januar 2023. Vgl. Philipp Frohn: Kein Bitcoin-Verbot: So reguliert die EU künftig Kryptowährungen. In: Wirtschaftswoche. 1. Juli 2022, abgerufen am 3. Januar 2023.

wlu.edu

law.wlu.edu

  • Siehe die Angaben der entsprechenden Fakultät der Washington & Lee School of Law unter: Joshua A.T. Fairfield. Abgerufen am 3. Januar 2023.

worldarchitecture.org

wsj.com

xxlmag.com

yahoo.com

youtube.com

zdb-katalog.de

  • Joshua A.T. Fairfield: Tokenized: The Law of Non-Fungible Tokens and Unique Digital Property. In: Indiana Law Journal. Band 97, Nr. 4, 2022, S. 1290. Entsprechende Angaben finden sich auch in Charlotte Ducuing: How to Make Sure My Cryptokitties Are Here Forever? The Complementary Roles of Blockchain and the Law to Bring Trust. In: European Journal of Risk Regulation. Band 10, Nr. 2, 1. Juni 2019, S. 329 und passim, doi:10.1017/err.2019.39: „The need for trust does not disappear with the arrival of blockchain. Users also need to authenticate (trust) that an alleged Dapp genuinely is one. (...) blockchain needs the complementary role of the law in order to deliver its promises (...) Failing to find an appropriate mix between the respective operations of blockchain and the law, the article contends that the beneficial innovations expected from public blockchains will not materialise for the general public or may shortly fade away.“ Siehe auch Alesja Serada, Tanja Sihvonen und J. Tuomas Harviainen: CryptoKitties and the New Ludic Economy. How Blockchain Introduces Value, Ownership, and Scarcity in Digital Gaming. In: Games and Culture. Band 16, Nr. 4, 2020, S. 472 und 475, doi:10.1177/1555412019898305: „Even if blockchain minimizes “exploitation” from the side of game publishers, it does the bare minimum to protect ownership rights from perpetrators, hackers, and cheaters. (...) Even though a crypto wallet cannot be physically destroyed, “true ownership” is always endangered by its permanent loss (and eventually set back to centralized institutional support). (...) pseudo true ownership as a by-product of the organization of the blockchain system makes it possible for players to enjoy the idea of anonymous ownership of game tokens even if their ownership is not legally validated outside of the game. The principle of anonymity and delegation of trust to algorithms and open data undermine any possibility of legal protection of full ownership. Therefore, account recovery on a blockchain only becomes possible at the price of deanonymization.“ Vgl. aber Omar Ali u. a.: A review of the key challenges of non-fungible tokens. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Band 187, 2023, ISSN 0040-1625, S. 9, doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122248 (sciencedirect.com): „(...) NFTs present a platform for consumers to showcase digital artefacts with the record of sale and ownership. This is the primary driver for the exponential growth of NFTs. Since NFTs provide a certification of authenticity for digital objects, consumers are attracted to NFTs due to the token it provides to assure customers of the uniqueness of their possession in addition to the sense of ownership and value generated from obtaining something perceived to be very rare.“
  • Siehe dazu Hong Bao, David Roubaud: Non-Fungible Token: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda. In: Journal of Risk and Financial Management. Band 15, Nr. 5, 2022, ISSN 1911-8074, doi:10.3390/jrfm15050215 (mdpi.com).