Pangan rekayasa genetika (Indonesian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Pangan rekayasa genetika" in Indonesian language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Indonesian rank
1st place
1st place
2nd place
4th place
4th place
13th place
low place
7,359th place
7th place
35th place
447th place
792nd place
438th place
284th place
low place
low place
18th place
44th place
low place
low place
6th place
2nd place
195th place
203rd place
3rd place
6th place
5th place
7th place
234th place
238th place
low place
low place
79th place
211th place
68th place
182nd place
3,257th place
8,233rd place
70th place
87th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
9,624th place
5,057th place
22nd place
131st place
8,258th place
low place
low place
low place
59th place
475th place
857th place
574th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
49th place
96th place
2,020th place
1,166th place
2,474th place
low place
low place
low place
332nd place
218th place
1,266th place
1,369th place
low place
low place
1,943rd place
2,656th place
228th place
678th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
4,372nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
40th place
36th place
222nd place
280th place
264th place
197th place
low place
low place
115th place
448th place
1,360th place
821st place
low place
low place
318th place
200th place
low place
low place
9,065th place
7,193rd place
2,128th place
2,612th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
7,096th place
low place
61st place
113th place
2,812th place
3,377th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
2,747th place
2,094th place
4,784th place
7,643rd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
3,322nd place
low place
low place
low place

aaas.org

  • "Statement by the AAAS Board of Directors On Labeling of Genetically Modified Foods" (PDF). American Association for the Advancement of Science. October 20, 2012. Diakses tanggal February 8, 2016. The EU, for example, has invested more than €300 million in research on the biosafety of GMOs. Its recent report states: "The main conclusion to be drawn from the efforts of more than 130 research projects, covering a period of more than 25 years of research and involving more than 500 independent research groups, is that biotechnology, and in particular GMOs, are not per se more risky than e.g. conventional plant breeding technologies." The World Health Organization, the American Medical Association, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, the British Royal Society, and every other respected organization that has examined the evidence has come to the same conclusion: consuming foods containing ingredients derived from GM crops is no riskier than consuming the same foods containing ingredients from crop plants modified by conventional plant improvement techniques. 

aaemonline.org

afcd.gov.hk

agbioforum.org

agrobio.org

  • Nicolia, Alessandro; Manzo, Alberto; Veronesi, Fabio; Rosellini, Daniele (2013). "An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research" (PDF). Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. 34 (1): 1–12. doi:10.3109/07388551.2013.823595. PMID 24041244. Diarsipkan dari versi asli (PDF) tanggal 2016-09-17. Diakses tanggal 2019-07-17. We have reviewed the scientific literature on GE crop safety for the last 10 years that catches the scientific consensus matured since GE plants became widely cultivated worldwide, and we can conclude that the scientific research conducted so far has not detected any significant hazard directly connected with the use of GM crops.

    The literature about Biodiversity and the GE food/feed consumption has sometimes resulted in animated debate regarding the suitability of the experimental designs, the choice of the statistical methods or the public accessibility of data. Such debate, even if positive and part of the natural process of review by the scientific community, has frequently been distorted by the media and often used politically and inappropriately in anti-GE crops campaigns. 

ama-assn.org

  • "AMA Report on Genetically Modified Crops and Foods (online summary)". American Medical Association. January 2001. Diakses tanggal March 19, 2016. A report issued by the scientific council of the American Medical Association (AMA) says that no long-term health effects have been detected from the use of transgenic crops and genetically modified foods, and that these foods are substantially equivalent to their conventional counterparts. (from online summary prepared by ISAAA)" "Crops and foods produced using recombinant DNA techniques have been available for fewer than 10 years and no long-term effects have been detected to date. These foods are substantially equivalent to their conventional counterparts. (from original report by AMA: [1]) 
  • American Medical Association (2012). Report 2 of the Council on Science and Public Health: Labeling of Bioengineered Foods. Diarsipkan 2012-09-07 di Wayback Machine. "To better detect potential harms of bioengineered foods, the Council believes that pre-market safety assessment should shift from a voluntary notification process to a mandatory requirement." p. 7

americanbar.org

aquabounty.com

archive.org

arcticapples.com

bc.edu

lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu

biomedcentral.com

bis.gov.uk

books.google.com

britannica.com

  • "Soybean". Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Diakses tanggal February 18, 2012. 

canolainfo.org

cape.ca

cbc.ca

centerforfoodsafety.org

cfr.org

cieh.org

cornell.edu

usda.mannlib.cornell.edu

  • "Acreage NASS" (PDF). National Agricultural Statistics Board annual report. June 2010. Diakses tanggal July 23, 2010. 

cottonseed.com

crops.org

doi.org

eastagri.org

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2009). Sugar Beet: White Sugar (PDF). hlm. 9. Diarsipkan dari versi asli (PDF) tanggal 2015-09-05. Diakses tanggal 2019-07-26. 

embopress.org

embor.embopress.org

europa.eu

ec.europa.eu

fao.org

  • "State of Food and Agriculture 2003–2004. Agricultural Biotechnology: Meeting the Needs of the Poor. Health and environmental impacts of transgenic crops". Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Diakses tanggal February 8, 2016. Currently available transgenic crops and foods derived from them have been judged safe to eat and the methods used to test their safety have been deemed appropriate. These conclusions represent the consensus of the scientific evidence surveyed by the ICSU (2003) and they are consistent with the views of the World Health Organization (WHO, 2002). These foods have been assessed for increased risks to human health by several national regulatory authorities (inter alia, Argentina, Brazil, Canada, China, the United Kingdom and the United States) using their national food safety procedures (ICSU). To date no verifiable untoward toxic or nutritionally deleterious effects resulting from the consumption of foods derived from genetically modified crops have been discovered anywhere in the world (GM Science Review Panel). Many millions of people have consumed foods derived from GM plants - mainly maize, soybean and oilseed rape - without any observed adverse effects (ICSU). 

fda.gov

federalregister.gov

foodsafetynews.com

foodstandards.gov.au

genetics.org

  • Ronald, Pamela (May 5, 2011). "Plant Genetics, Sustainable Agriculture and Global Food Security". Genetics. 188 (1): 11–20. doi:10.1534/genetics.111.128553. PMC 3120150alt=Dapat diakses gratis. PMID 21546547. There is broad scientific consensus that genetically engineered crops currently on the market are safe to eat. After 14 years of cultivation and a cumulative total of 2 billion acres planted, no adverse health or environmental effects have resulted from commercialization of genetically engineered crops (Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Environmental Impacts Associated with Commercialization of Transgenic Plants, National Research Council and Division on Earth and Life Studies 2002). Both the U.S. National Research Council and the Joint Research Centre (the European Union's scientific and technical research laboratory and an integral part of the European Commission) have concluded that there is a comprehensive body of knowledge that adequately addresses the food safety issue of genetically engineered crops (Committee on Identifying and Assessing Unintended Effects of Genetically Engineered Foods on Human Health and National Research Council 2004; European Commission Joint Research Centre 2008). These and other recent reports conclude that the processes of genetic engineering and conventional breeding are no different in terms of unintended consequences to human health and the environment (European Commission Directorate-General for Research and Innovation 2010). 

gmo-compass.org

gpo.gov

harvard.edu

adsabs.harvard.edu

hawaiipapaya.com

heinonline.org

ideaireland.org

imace.org

isaaa.org

iseo.org

  • "Food Fats and Oils" (PDF). Institute of Shortening and Edible Oils. 2006. Diarsipkan dari versi asli (PDF) tanggal 2007-02-14. Diakses tanggal 2011-11-19. 

justlabelit.org

lancs.ac.uk

csec.lancs.ac.uk

latimes.com

articles.latimes.com

loc.gov

  • "Restrictions on Genetically Modified Organisms: United States. Public and Scholarly Opinion". Library of Congress. June 9, 2015. Diakses tanggal February 8, 2016. Several scientific organizations in the US have issued studies or statements regarding the safety of GMOs indicating that there is no evidence that GMOs present unique safety risks compared to conventionally bred products. These include the National Research Council, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and the American Medical Association. Groups in the US opposed to GMOs include some environmental organizations, organic farming organizations, and consumer organizations. A substantial number of legal academics have criticized the US's approach to regulating GMOs. 
  • "Restrictions on Genetically Modified Organisms". Library of Congress. June 9, 2015. Diakses tanggal February 24, 2016. 

madehow.com

monsanto.com

nap.edu

  • "Genetically Engineered Crops: Experiences and Prospects". The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (US). 2016. hlm. 149. Diakses tanggal May 19, 2016. Overall finding on purported adverse effects on human health of foods derived from GE crops: On the basis of detailed examination of comparisons of currently commercialized GE with non-GE foods in compositional analysis, acute and chronic animal toxicity tests, long-term data on health of livestock fed GE foods, and human epidemiological data, the committee found no differences that implicate a higher risk to human health from GE foods than from their non-GE counterparts. 

nature.com

ncfap.org

ncga.com

news.google.com

nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

nytimes.com

pewinternet.org

  • Funk, Cary; Rainie, Lee (January 29, 2015). "Public and Scientists' Views on Science and Society". Pew Research Center. Diakses tanggal February 24, 2016. The largest differences between the public and the AAAS scientists are found in beliefs about the safety of eating genetically modified (GM) foods. Nearly nine-in-ten (88%) scientists say it is generally safe to eat GM foods compared with 37% of the general public, a difference of 51 percentage points. 

phaa.net.au

potatopro.com

reading.ac.uk

ncbe.reading.ac.uk

  • Staff, National Centre for Biotechnology Education (2006). "Chymosin". Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal May 22, 2016. 

research-in-germany.de

reuters.com

rsc.org

sciencemag.org

science.sciencemag.org

southeastfarmpress.com

soyatech.com

starch.dk

state.gov

fpc.state.gov

technologyreview.com

theatlantic.com

time.com

ucanr.org

umm.edu

umn.edu

agrisk.umn.edu

usda.gov

ers.usda.gov

usda.gov

aphis.usda.gov

ndb.nal.usda.gov

web.archive.org

who.int

  • World Health Organization. "Frequently asked questions on genetically modified foods". Diakses tanggal 29 March 2016. 
  • "Frequently asked questions on genetically modified foods". World Health Organization. Diakses tanggal February 8, 2016. Different GM organisms include different genes inserted in different ways. This means that individual GM foods and their safety should be assessed on a case-by-case basis and that it is not possible to make general statements on the safety of all GM foods.

    GM foods currently available on the international market have passed safety assessments and are not likely to present risks for human health. In addition, no effects on human health have been shown as a result of the consumption of such foods by the general population in the countries where they have been approved. Continuous application of safety assessments based on the Codex Alimentarius principles and, where appropriate, adequate post market monitoring, should form the basis for ensuring the safety of GM foods. 

wiley.com

eu.wiley.com

worldcat.org

wsj.com

yoelinbar.net