“Defense proposal to authorize the introduction of “Honest John” and the 280 millimeter gun in Korea”, Memorandum of a Conversation (United States Department of State – Office of the Historian), (28 November 1956), http://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1955-57v23p2/d18721 March 2013閲覧, "Summing up, Mr. Phleger stated our view as lawyers that introduction of the two weapons could not be successfully supported as a matter of liberal interpretation, would upset the balance established under the agreement, and would generally be regarded as a violation of the agreement under existing circumstances. He reaffirmed that the agreement should not, however, stand in the way of any action which it might be considered necessary and wise to take, now or in the future, in view of the military and political situation, and with full awareness of all the consequences."
Statement of U.S. Policy toward Korea. National Security Council (Report). United States Department of State – Office of the Historian. 9 August 1957. NSC 5702/2. 2012年4月17日閲覧。
“Modernization of United States Forces in Korea”, Record of a Meeting (United States Department of State – Office of the Historian), (17 June 1957), http://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1955-57v23p2/d22221 March 2013閲覧, "Sir Harold then asked what plans were being made to inform not just the United Nations but the press and the world at large of the Communist violations of the Armistice. Mr. Robertson said considerable thought had been given to this point but that the Defense Department felt and the Secretary of State concurred that at the MAC meeting it would be inadvisable to submit any supplementary data on violations. A good deal of the information now at hand is classified and would have to be declassified before public use. Furthermore, the Secretary felt very strongly that the release of such information would give the Communists ammunition for their propaganda. We would not, therefore, submit any evidence to accompany the statement."
