Shaw, Donna (februar–mars 2008). «Wikipedia in the Newsroom». American Journalism Review. Arkivert fra originalen 5. august 2012. Besøkt 29. oktober 2021.
Yasseri, Taha; Spoerri, Anselm; Graham, Mark; Kertész, János (2014). The Most Controversial Topics in Wikipedia: A Multilingual and Geographical Analysis. Scarecrow Press. arXiv:1305.5566. doi:10.2139/SSRN.2269392.
Boyd, Danah (4. januar 2005). «Academia and Wikipedia». Many 2 Many: A Group Weblog on Social Software. Corante. Arkivert fra originalen 16. mars 2006. Besøkt 18. desember 2008. «[The author, Danah Boyd, describes herself as] an expert on social media[,] [...] a doctoral student in the School of Information at the University of California, Berkeley [,] and a fellow at the Harvard University Berkman Center for Internet & Society [at Harvard Law School.]»
Harald Brombach (18. mars 2021). «Vil at storbrukerne skal betale for Wikipedia-innholdet». digi.no. Besøkt 29. oktober 2021. «Nå planlegger WMF å kreve betaling fra noen, nemlig de store kommersielle selskapene, som gjenbruker blant annet Wikipedia-innholdet i sine egne tjenester. Facebook, Google, Apple og Amazon er blant disse. I løpet av året skal WMF lansere Wikimedia Enterprise, som mot betaling skal tilby utviklerverktøy og tjenester som skal gjøre det enklere for virksomheter å bruke eller gjenbruke stiftelsens data. Dette vil være et supplement til det Wikimedia tilbyr av dataeksporttjenester i dag.»
Hugo Lauritz Jenssen (11. februar 2022). «Gudmund Hernes: – Er jeg en angrende synder? Nei, det er jeg ikke». Dagens Næringsliv, Magasinet. Besøkt 14. februar 2022. «Wikipedia er bedre enn sitt rykte. Det skal man egentlig ikke si hvis man er akademiker. Men jeg bruker Wikipedia uhemmet.»
Loveland, Jeff; Reagle, Joseph (15. januar 2013). «Wikipedia and encyclopedic production». New Media & Society. 15 (8): 1294. doi:10.1177/1461444812470428.
Kalyanasundaram, Arun; Wei, Wei; Carley, Kathleen M.; Herbsleb, James D. (desember 2015). «An agent-based model of edit wars in Wikipedia: How and when is consensus reached». 2015 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC). Huntington Beach, CA, USA: IEEE: 276–287. doi:10.1109/WSC.2015.7408171.
Bear, Julia B.; Collier, Benjamin (mars 2016). «Where are the Women in Wikipedia? Understanding the Different Psychological Experiences of Men and Women in Wikipedia». Sex Roles. 74 (5–6): 254–265. doi:10.1007/s11199-015-0573-y.
Kriplean, Travis Kriplean; Beschastnikh, Ivan; McDonald, David W. (2008). «Articulations of wikiwork». Articulations of wikiwork: uncovering valued work in Wikipedia through barnstars. Proceedings of the ACM. s. 47. ISBN978-1-60558-007-4. doi:10.1145/1460563.1460573.
Strohmaier, Markus (6. mars 2017). «KAT50 Society, Culture». Multilingual historical narratives on Wikipedia. GESIS Data Archive. doi:10.7802/1411. «Wikipedia narratives about national histories (i) are skewed towards more recent events (recency bias) and (ii) are distributed unevenly across the continents with significant focus on the history of European countries (Eurocentric bias).»
Yasseri, Taha; Spoerri, Anselm; Graham, Mark; Kertész, János (2014). The Most Controversial Topics in Wikipedia: A Multilingual and Geographical Analysis. Scarecrow Press. arXiv:1305.5566. doi:10.2139/SSRN.2269392.
Das, Sanmay; Allen, Lavoie; Malik, Magdon-Ismail (24. desember 2016). «Manipulation among the arbiters of collective intelligence: How Wikipedia administrators mold public opinion». ACM Transactions on the Web. 10 (4): 24. doi:10.1145/3001937.
Orlowitz, Jake (2018). «The Wikipedia Library : the biggest encyclopedia needs a digital library and we are building it». JLIS.IT. 9 (3). doi:10.4403/jlis.it-12505.
Building automated vandalism detection tools for Wikidata. International Conference on World Wide Web Companion. Perth, Australia; New York City, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. april 2017. ISBN978-1-4503-4914-7. doi:10.1145/3041021.3053366.
Asthana, Sumit; Halfaker, Aaron (november 2018). Lampe, Cliff, red. «With Few Eyes, All Hoaxes are Deep». Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. New York City, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. 2 (CSCW). 21. doi:10.1145/3274290.
dx.doi.org
See author acknowledged comments in response to the citation of the Nature study, at PLoS ONE, 2014, "Citation of fundamentally flawed Nature quality 'study' ", In response to T. Yasseri et al. (2012) Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia, publisert 20. juni 2012, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038869, see «Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia». Arkivert fra originalen 16. januar 2016. Besøkt 22. juli 2014.«Arkivert kopi». Archived from the original on 16. januar 2016. Besøkt 24. oktober 2021.CS1-vedlikehold: Uheldig URL (link), accessed 21. juli 2014.
Lexington (24. september 2011). «Classlessness in America: The uses and abuses of an enduring myth». The Economist. «Socialist Labour Party of America [...] though it can trace its history as far back as 1876, when it was known as the Workingmen's Party, no less an authority than Wikipedia pronounces it "moribund".»
Aftergood, Steven (21. mars 2007). «The Wikipedia Factor in US Intelligence». Federation of American Scientists Project on Government Secrecy. Arkivert fra originalen 18. januar 2013. Besøkt 14. april 2007.
Christopher Caldwell (journalist) (14. juni 2013). «A chapter in the Enlightenment closes». ft.com. «Bertelsmann did not resort to euphemism this week when it announced the end of the Brockhaus encyclopedia brand. Brockhaus had been publishing reference books for two centuries when the media group bought it in 2008. [...] The internet has finished off Brockhaus altogether. [...] What Germans like is Wikipedia.»
Goodwin, Jean (2009). «The Authority of Wikipedia»(PDF). Arkivert fra originalen(PDF) 22. november 2009. Besøkt 31. januar 2011. «Wikipedia's commitment to anonymity/pseudonymity thus imposes a sort of epistemic agnosticism on its readers»«Arkivert kopi»(PDF). Archived from the original on 30. april 2011. Besøkt 30. oktober 2021.CS1-vedlikehold: Uheldig URL (link)
ibls.com
Arias, Martha L. (29. januar 2007). «Wikipedia: The Free Online Encyclopedia and its Use as Court Source». Internet Business Law Services. Arkivert fra originalen 20. mai 2012. Besøkt 31. oktober 2021. (The name "World Intellectual Property Office" should however read "World Intellectual Property Organization" in this source.)
ibm.com
research.ibm.com
Viégas, Fernanda B.; Wattenberg, Martin M.; Kriss, Jesse; van Ham, Frank (3. januar 2007). «Talk Before You Type: Coordination in Wikipedia»(PDF). Visual Communication Lab, IBM Research. Besøkt 27. juni 2008.
Sanger, Larry (31. desember 2004). «Why Wikipedia Must Jettison Its Anti-Elitism». Kuro5hin, Op–Ed. Arkivert fra originalen 1. november 2021. Besøkt 24. oktober 2021. «There is a certain mindset associated with unmoderated Usenet groups [...] that infects the collectively-managed Wikipedia project: if you react strongly to trolling, that reflects poorly on you, not (necessarily) on the troll. If you [...] demand that something be done about constant disruption by trollish behavior, the other listmembers will cry "censorship", attack you, and even come to the defense of the troll. [...] The root problem: anti-elitism, or lack of respect for expertise. There is a deeper problem [...] which explains both of the above-elaborated problems. Namely, as a community, Wikipedia lacks the habit or tradition of respect for expertise. As a community, far from being elitist, it is anti-elitist (which, in this context, means that expertise is not accorded any special respect, and snubs and disrespect of expertise are tolerated). This is one of my failures: a policy that I attempted to institute in Wikipedia's first year, but for which I did not muster adequate support, was the policy of respecting and deferring politely to experts. (Those who were there will, I hope, remember that I tried very hard.)»
Kleinz, Torsten (februar 2005). «World of Knowledge»(PDF). Linux Magazine. Arkivert fra originalen(PDF) 25. september 2007. Besøkt 30. oktober 2021. «The Wikipedia's open structure makes it a target for trolls and vandals who malevolently add incorrect information to articles, get other people tied up in endless discussions, and generally do everything to draw attention to themselves.»
Sanger, Larry (17. januar 2001). «Wikipedia Is Up!». Arkivert fra originalen 11. juli 2003. Besøkt 30. oktober 2021.
Sanger, Larry (10. januar 2001). «Let's Make a Wiki». Internet Archive. Arkivert fra originalen 14. april 2003. Besøkt 22. oktober 2021.
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
Meyers, Peter (20. september 2001). «Fact-Driven? Collegial? This Site Wants You». The New York Times. «'I can start an article that will consist of one paragraph, and then a real expert will come along and add three paragraphs and clean up my one paragraph,' said Larry Sanger of Las Vegas, who founded Wikipedia with Mr. Wales.»
Rainie, Lee; Tancer, Bill (15. desember 2007). «Wikipedia users»(PDF). Pew Internet & American Life Project. Pew Research Center. Arkivert fra originalen(PDF) 6. mars 2008. Besøkt 15. desember 2007. «36% of online American adults consult Wikipedia. It is particularly popular with the well-educated and current college-age students.»«Arkivert kopi»(PDF). Arkivert fra originalen(PDF) 6. mars 2008. Besøkt 31. oktober 2021.
See author acknowledged comments in response to the citation of the Nature study, at PLoS ONE, 2014, "Citation of fundamentally flawed Nature quality 'study' ", In response to T. Yasseri et al. (2012) Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia, publisert 20. juni 2012, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038869, see «Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia». Arkivert fra originalen 16. januar 2016. Besøkt 22. juli 2014.«Arkivert kopi». Archived from the original on 16. januar 2016. Besøkt 24. oktober 2021.CS1-vedlikehold: Uheldig URL (link), accessed 21. juli 2014.
«Why China Blocked Wikipedia in All Languages». Slate. 21. mai 2019. Besøkt 30. oktober 2021. «The Chinese government has long been suspicious of Wikipedia. It’s been blocked in China intermittently since 2004, and the Chinese-language version has been blocked since June 2015. Now the government has gone even further. The Wikimedia Foundation released a statement on Friday announcing that it had determined that China blocked all versions of Wikipedia.»
Orlowski, Andrew (18. september 2006). «Wikipedia founder forks Wikipedia, More experts, less fiddling?». The Register. «Larry Sanger describes the Citizendium project as a "progressive or gradual fork", with the major difference that experts have the final say over edits.»
Cowen, Tyler (14. mars 2008). «Cooked Books». The New Republic. Arkivert fra originalen 18. mars 2008. Besøkt 24. oktober 2021.
umn.edu
www-users.cs.umn.edu
Priedhorsky, Reid; Chen, Jilin; Shyong (Tony) K. Lam; Panciera, Katherine; Terveen, Loren; Riedl, John (4. november 2007). «Creating, Destroying, and Restoring Value in Wikipedia»(PDF). Association for Computing Machinery GROUP '07 Conference Proceedings; GroupLens Research, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota.
Sanger, Larry (31. desember 2004). «Why Wikipedia Must Jettison Its Anti-Elitism». Kuro5hin, Op–Ed. Arkivert fra originalen 1. november 2021. Besøkt 24. oktober 2021. «There is a certain mindset associated with unmoderated Usenet groups [...] that infects the collectively-managed Wikipedia project: if you react strongly to trolling, that reflects poorly on you, not (necessarily) on the troll. If you [...] demand that something be done about constant disruption by trollish behavior, the other listmembers will cry "censorship", attack you, and even come to the defense of the troll. [...] The root problem: anti-elitism, or lack of respect for expertise. There is a deeper problem [...] which explains both of the above-elaborated problems. Namely, as a community, Wikipedia lacks the habit or tradition of respect for expertise. As a community, far from being elitist, it is anti-elitist (which, in this context, means that expertise is not accorded any special respect, and snubs and disrespect of expertise are tolerated). This is one of my failures: a policy that I attempted to institute in Wikipedia's first year, but for which I did not muster adequate support, was the policy of respecting and deferring politely to experts. (Those who were there will, I hope, remember that I tried very hard.)»
See "Libel" by David McHam for the legal distinction.
Evgeny Morozov (5. november 2009). «Edit This Page». Boston Review. Archived from the original on 11. desember 2019. Besøkt 23. oktober 2021.CS1-vedlikehold: Uheldig URL (link)
Kleinz, Torsten (februar 2005). «World of Knowledge»(PDF). Linux Magazine. Arkivert fra originalen(PDF) 25. september 2007. Besøkt 30. oktober 2021. «The Wikipedia's open structure makes it a target for trolls and vandals who malevolently add incorrect information to articles, get other people tied up in endless discussions, and generally do everything to draw attention to themselves.»
Goodwin, Jean (2009). «The Authority of Wikipedia»(PDF). Arkivert fra originalen(PDF) 22. november 2009. Besøkt 31. januar 2011. «Wikipedia's commitment to anonymity/pseudonymity thus imposes a sort of epistemic agnosticism on its readers»«Arkivert kopi»(PDF). Archived from the original on 30. april 2011. Besøkt 30. oktober 2021.CS1-vedlikehold: Uheldig URL (link)
See author acknowledged comments in response to the citation of the Nature study, at PLoS ONE, 2014, "Citation of fundamentally flawed Nature quality 'study' ", In response to T. Yasseri et al. (2012) Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia, publisert 20. juni 2012, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038869, see «Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia». Arkivert fra originalen 16. januar 2016. Besøkt 22. juli 2014.«Arkivert kopi». Archived from the original on 16. januar 2016. Besøkt 24. oktober 2021.CS1-vedlikehold: Uheldig URL (link), accessed 21. juli 2014.
Cowen, Tyler (14. mars 2008). «Cooked Books». The New Republic. Arkivert fra originalen 18. mars 2008. Besøkt 24. oktober 2021.
Boyd, Danah (4. januar 2005). «Academia and Wikipedia». Many 2 Many: A Group Weblog on Social Software. Corante. Arkivert fra originalen 16. mars 2006. Besøkt 18. desember 2008. «[The author, Danah Boyd, describes herself as] an expert on social media[,] [...] a doctoral student in the School of Information at the University of California, Berkeley [,] and a fellow at the Harvard University Berkman Center for Internet & Society [at Harvard Law School.]»
"Wikipedia on DVD"Arkivert 3. juni 2013 hos Wayback Machine. Arkivert 2013-06-03 hos Wayback Machine Linterweb. hentet 1. juni 2007. "Linterweb is authorized to make a commercial use of the Wikipedia trademark restricted to the selling of the Encyclopedia CDs and DVDs".
Rainie, Lee; Tancer, Bill (15. desember 2007). «Wikipedia users»(PDF). Pew Internet & American Life Project. Pew Research Center. Arkivert fra originalen(PDF) 6. mars 2008. Besøkt 15. desember 2007. «36% of online American adults consult Wikipedia. It is particularly popular with the well-educated and current college-age students.»«Arkivert kopi»(PDF). Arkivert fra originalen(PDF) 6. mars 2008. Besøkt 31. oktober 2021.
Arias, Martha L. (29. januar 2007). «Wikipedia: The Free Online Encyclopedia and its Use as Court Source». Internet Business Law Services. Arkivert fra originalen 20. mai 2012. Besøkt 31. oktober 2021. (The name "World Intellectual Property Office" should however read "World Intellectual Property Organization" in this source.)
Aftergood, Steven (21. mars 2007). «The Wikipedia Factor in US Intelligence». Federation of American Scientists Project on Government Secrecy. Arkivert fra originalen 18. januar 2013. Besøkt 14. april 2007.
Shaw, Donna (februar–mars 2008). «Wikipedia in the Newsroom». American Journalism Review. Arkivert fra originalen 5. august 2012. Besøkt 29. oktober 2021.
«Wikipedia:Why create an account?». Wikipedia. Besøkt 23. oktober 2021. «Once you have had an account for about 4 days and have made at least 10 edits, you will be allowed to: [...] Start new articles, rename pages, or upload images.»
«Wikipedia:Protection policy». Wikipedia. Besøkt 23. oktober 2021. «In some circumstances, pages may need to be protected from modification by certain groups of editors. Pages are protected when a specific damaging event has been identified that can not be prevented through other means such as a block. Otherwise, Wikipedia is built on the principle that anyone can edit it, and it therefore aims to have as many of its pages as possible open for public editing so that anyone can add material and correct errors. [...] Protection is a technical restriction applied only by administrators, although any user may request protection. Protection can be indefinite or expire after a specified time. The various levels of protection are detailed below, and they can be applied to the page edit, page move, page create, and file upload actions. Even when a page is protected from editing, the source code (wikitext) of the page can still be viewed and copied by anyone. A protected page is marked at its top right by a padlock icon, usually added by the pp-protected template.»
«Wikipedia:Protection policy». Wikipedia. Besøkt 23. oktober 2021. «Semi-protection prevents the action by unregistered editors and editors with accounts that are not confirmed.»
«Wikipedia:Protection policy». Wikipedia. Besøkt 23. oktober 2021. «A fully protected page cannot be edited or moved by anyone except administrators. The protection may be for a specified time or may be indefinite.»
«Wikipedia:Dispute resolution». Wikipedia. Besøkt 23. oktober 2021. «If discussion stalemates, editors may seek outside input to help resolve the dispute. Discussions can be advertised to noticeboards and WikiProjects to receive participation from interested uninvolved editors. Mediation can also help in finding a compromise solution. As content decisions on Wikipedia are made through consensus, the final stage in content dispute resolution is a request for comments, where a discussion is advertised to uninvolved editors to receive broad input on the issue.»
«Wikipedia:Notability», hentet 24. oktober 202|. «A topic is presumed to merit an article if: It meets either the general notability guideline (GNG) below, or the criteria outlined in a subject-specific notability guideline (SNG) listed in the box on the right; and It is not excluded under the What Wikipedia is not policy.»
«Wikipedia:Verifiability», 24. oktober 2021. «All material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists and captions, must be verifiable. All quotations, and any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the material. Any material that needs a source but does not have one may be removed.»
«Wikipedia:Ownership of content». Wikipedia. Besøkt 24. oktober 2021. «All Wikipedia pages and articles are edited collaboratively by a community of volunteer contributors. Individual contributors, also called editors, are known as Wikipedians. No one, no matter what, has the right to act as though they are the owner of a particular article (or any part of it). Even a subject of an article, be that a person or organization, does not own the article, nor has any right to dictate what the article may or may not say.»
«Wikipedia:Vandalisme». Wikipedia. Besøkt 23. oktober 2021. «De vi kaller vandaler er personer som ødelegger artikler eller legger inn ødeleggende tøyseartikler. Som regel regnes ikke personer som «eksperimenterer» med redigeringsknappen (f.eks. ved å legger inn «hei» på slutten av en artikkel) som vandaler, selv om eksperimentet bør fjernes og eksperimentering etter at man har fått advarsel om å gjøre slikt i sandkassen kan regnes som vandalisme.»
«Wikipedia:Hva Wikipedia ikke er», hentet 24. oktober 2021. «Wikipedia er ikke en ordbok, eller en språkveileder. Til det har vi søsterprosjektet Wiktionary, som er felles for nynorsk og bokmål.»
«Wikipedia:Nøytralt ståsted». Wikipedia. Besøkt 24. oktober 2021. «En politikk om nøytralt ståsted betyr at alle artikler skal representere alle synspunkt på en rettferdig, proporsjonal og upartisk måte. Nøytralt ståsted blir ofte misforstått. Politikken betyr ikke at man tror det er mulig å skrive en enkel upartisk artikkel, men at man skal følge rettferdig alle partene i en diskusjon, og ikke lage en artikkel som bare taler én sides sak. Rettferdig vil også si at hver side av en sak får omtale som står i sammenheng med utbredelsen av synet. Et syn som kun en liten minoritet hevder, skal ikke ha like stor omtale som majoritetssynet.»
«Wikipedia:Brukertyper». Wikipedia. Besøkt 24. oktober 2021. «En bidragsyters tilgang til å utføre visse oppgaver i Wikipedia er definert ved diverse «flagg» knyttet til brukerkontoen. Noen av disse er automatisk tildelt mens andre må gis manuelt. En bruker med et visst flagg blir beskrevet som å være et medlem av det flaggets «brukergruppe», noe som gir dem visse «rettigheter» og tilgang til bruk av visse egenskaper i MediaWiki programvaren.»
«Wikipedia:Generelle forbehold». Wikipedia. Besøkt 25. oktober 2021. «WIKIPEDIA GIR INGEN GARANTI FOR PÅLITELIGHETEN AV INNHOLDET»
"Wikipedia on DVD"Arkivert 3. juni 2013 hos Wayback Machine. Arkivert 2013-06-03 hos Wayback Machine Linterweb. hentet 1. juni 2007. "Linterweb is authorized to make a commercial use of the Wikipedia trademark restricted to the selling of the Encyclopedia CDs and DVDs".