Wikipedia (Norwegian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Wikipedia" in Norwegian language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Norwegian rank
1st place
1st place
low place
low place
2nd place
9th place
low place
low place
7th place
33rd place
12th place
35th place
6th place
42nd place
254th place
309th place
1,216th place
3,831st place
34th place
136th place
228th place
520th place
8th place
21st place
30th place
94th place
1,103rd place
2,849th place
low place
low place
259th place
718th place
18th place
86th place
69th place
407th place
1,943rd place
5,879th place
140th place
469th place
5th place
13th place
4th place
23rd place
234th place
369th place
193rd place
699th place
49th place
132nd place
5,485th place
low place
low place
low place
1,475th place
2,440th place
5,701st place
7,418th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,317th place
4,587th place
17th place
801st place
low place
low place
1,266th place
1,666th place
712th place
1,434th place
6,373rd place
low place
1,131st place
1,802nd place
28th place
77th place
774th place
298th place
24th place
46th place
61st place
150th place
132nd place
522nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
179th place
212th place
272nd place
1,058th place
415th place
793rd place
41st place
205th place
137th place
629th place
1,185th place
1,389th place
79th place
345th place
low place
low place
7,969th place
2,540th place
low place
low place
2,298th place
1,545th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
36th place
119th place
22nd place
169th place
484th place
923rd place
4,313th place
low place
20th place
44th place
low place
low place
702nd place
1,066th place
low place
low place
14th place
37th place
2,754th place
low place
low place
low place
2,548th place
5,696th place
low place
low place
6,119th place
3,764th place
1,544th place
2,882nd place
115th place
541st place
low place
low place
low place
low place
3,169th place
5,405th place
1,067th place
1,809th place
low place
low place
241st place
440th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
40th place
17th place
4,730th place
1,729th place
8,331st place
low place
1,060th place
4,692nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
92nd place
365th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
4,161st place
low place
1,674th place
1,463rd place
5,003rd place
1,571st place
low place
low place
207th place
1,302nd place
3,837th place
3,405th place
26th place
107th place
993rd place
1,003rd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
7,958th place
2,463rd place
low place
6,995th place
961st place
low place
766th place
8,743rd place
low place
low place
791st place
1,674th place
685th place
4,210th place
274th place
698th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,356th place
low place
3,250th place
6,581st place
268th place
431st place
9,052nd place
57th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,768th place
6,331st place
low place
low place
388th place
1,208th place
4,506th place
7,930th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
240th place
476th place
low place
256th place
2,113th place
2,024th place
99th place
311th place
1,228th place
1,952nd place
67th place
207th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,746th place
1,973rd place
54th place
189th place
low place
low place
187th place
851st place
1,110th place
3,269th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
354th place
2,655th place
2,275th place
low place
4,212th place
7,978th place
low place
low place
505th place
1,084th place
9,135th place
45th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
2,802nd place
low place
3,085th place
8,579th place
low place
low place
5,206th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
8,139th place
1,658th place
4,463rd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
210th place
491st place
low place
low place
1,336th place
4,017th place
low place
9,808th place
3,518th place
5,048th place
1,303rd place
3,150th place
1,554th place
3,876th place
3,410th place
3,416th place
low place
low place
low place
low place

aaronsw.com

acm.org

portal.acm.org

dl.acm.org

ajc.com

ajr.org

alexa.com

aljazeera.com

stream.aljazeera.com

androgeoid.com

apple.com

itunes.apple.com

archive.org

archive.today

arstechnica.com

arxiv.org

bbc.co.uk

bbc.co.uk

news.bbc.co.uk

bbc.com

bepress.com

works.bepress.com

bgsu.edu

bing.com

bloomberg.com

brandchannel.com

britannica.com

corporate.britannica.com

britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk

blog.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk

businessinsider.com

businessweek.com

cbc.ca

chinadigitaltimes.net

chronicle.com

citizendium.org

cjr.org

cnet.com

cnet.com

news.cnet.com

cnn.com

comedycentral.com

tosh.comedycentral.com

comscore.com

corante.com

many.corante.com

  • Boyd, Danah (4. januar 2005). «Academia and Wikipedia». Many 2 Many: A Group Weblog on Social Software. Corante. Arkivert fra originalen 16. mars 2006. Besøkt 18. desember 2008. «[The author, Danah Boyd, describes herself as] an expert on social media[,] [...] a doctoral student in the School of Information at the University of California, Berkeley [,] and a fellow at the Harvard University Berkman Center for Internet & Society [at Harvard Law School.]» 

crmbuyer.com

csmonitor.com

datacenterknowledge.com

dawn.com

digi.no

  • Harald Brombach (18. mars 2021). «Vil at storbrukerne skal betale for Wikipedia-innholdet». digi.no. Besøkt 29. oktober 2021. «Nå planlegger WMF å kreve betaling fra noen, nemlig de store kommersielle selskapene, som gjenbruker blant annet Wikipedia-innholdet i sine egne tjenester. Facebook, Google, Apple og Amazon er blant disse. I løpet av året skal WMF lansere Wikimedia Enterprise, som mot betaling skal tilby utviklerverktøy og tjenester som skal gjøre det enklere for virksomheter å bruke eller gjenbruke stiftelsens data. Dette vil være et supplement til det Wikimedia tilbyr av dataeksporttjenester i dag.» 

dilbert.com

dmagazine.com

dn.no

doi.org

doi.org

domaintools.com

whois.domaintools.com

domesday1986.com

economist.com

educationnext.org

emorywheel.com

erasmusprijs.org

fas.org

faz.net

firstamendmentcenter.org

archive.firstamendmentcenter.org

firstmonday.org

forbes.com

fpa.es

ft.com

  • Christopher Caldwell (journalist) (14. juni 2013). «A chapter in the Enlightenment closes». ft.com. «Bertelsmann did not resort to euphemism this week when it announced the end of the Brockhaus encyclopedia brand. Brockhaus had been publishing reference books for two centuries when the media group bought it in 2008. [...] The internet has finished off Brockhaus altogether. [...] What Germans like is Wikipedia.» 

gizmocrazed.com

globule.org

gmu.edu

chnm.gmu.edu

gnu.org

google.no

books.google.no

  • «Varnish at Wikipedia», «Basically, Wikipedia has a multitiered Varnish stack to handle on average 100,000 incoming requests per second.»

grillini.it

grouplens.org

files.grouplens.org

harvard.edu

adsabs.harvard.edu

hbr.org

heise.de

historynewsnetwork.org

hitwise.com

weblogs.hitwise.com

iastate.edu

public.iastate.edu

  • Goodwin, Jean (2009). «The Authority of Wikipedia» (PDF). Arkivert fra originalen (PDF) 22. november 2009. Besøkt 31. januar 2011. «Wikipedia's commitment to anonymity/pseudonymity thus imposes a sort of epistemic agnosticism on its readers»  «Arkivert kopi» (PDF). Archived from the original on 30. april 2011. Besøkt 30. oktober 2021. 

ibls.com

ibm.com

research.ibm.com

ibtimes.co.uk

icevirtuallibrary.com

idg.com.au

pcworld.idg.com.au

ilounge.com

independent.co.uk

indiana.edu

slis.indiana.edu

indiatimes.com

economictimes.indiatimes.com

insidehighered.com

japannewsreview.com

jstor.org

kuro5hin.org

  • Sanger, Larry (31. desember 2004). «Why Wikipedia Must Jettison Its Anti-Elitism». Kuro5hin, Op–Ed. Arkivert fra originalen 1. november 2021. Besøkt 24. oktober 2021. «There is a certain mindset associated with unmoderated Usenet groups [...] that infects the collectively-managed Wikipedia project: if you react strongly to trolling, that reflects poorly on you, not (necessarily) on the troll. If you [...] demand that something be done about constant disruption by trollish behavior, the other listmembers will cry "censorship", attack you, and even come to the defense of the troll. [...] The root problem: anti-elitism, or lack of respect for expertise. There is a deeper problem [...] which explains both of the above-elaborated problems. Namely, as a community, Wikipedia lacks the habit or tradition of respect for expertise. As a community, far from being elitist, it is anti-elitist (which, in this context, means that expertise is not accorded any special respect, and snubs and disrespect of expertise are tolerated). This is one of my failures: a policy that I attempted to institute in Wikipedia's first year, but for which I did not muster adequate support, was the policy of respecting and deferring politely to experts. (Those who were there will, I hope, remember that I tried very hard.)» 

latimes.com

latimesblogs.latimes.com

libresoft.es

linux-magazine.com

w3.linux-magazine.com

  • Kleinz, Torsten (februar 2005). «World of Knowledge» (PDF). Linux Magazine. Arkivert fra originalen (PDF) 25. september 2007. Besøkt 30. oktober 2021. «The Wikipedia's open structure makes it a target for trolls and vandals who malevolently add incorrect information to articles, get other people tied up in endless discussions, and generally do everything to draw attention to themselves.» 

lne.es

loomarea.com

marketwatch.com

mediawiki.org

memeburn.com

mit.edu

alumni.media.mit.edu

direct.mit.edu

mysanantonio.com

nature.com

nbcnews.com

sys03-public.nbcnews.com

nbcnews.com

nedworks.org

networksolutions.com

newscientist.com

niemanlab.org

nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

npr.org

nupedia.com

nytimes.com

nytimes.com

mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com

officetally.com

osdir.com

otrs.com

parl.gc.ca

pcmag.com

pcworld.com

pewinternet.org

  • Rainie, Lee; Tancer, Bill (15. desember 2007). «Wikipedia users» (PDF). Pew Internet & American Life Project. Pew Research Center. Arkivert fra originalen (PDF) 6. mars 2008. Besøkt 15. desember 2007. «36% of online American adults consult Wikipedia. It is particularly popular with the well-educated and current college-age students.»  «Arkivert kopi» (PDF). Arkivert fra originalen (PDF) 6. mars 2008. Besøkt 31. oktober 2021. 

play.google.com

plosone.org

  • See author acknowledged comments in response to the citation of the Nature study, at PLoS ONE, 2014, "Citation of fundamentally flawed Nature quality 'study' ", In response to T. Yasseri et al. (2012) Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia, publisert 20. juni 2012, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038869, see «Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia». Arkivert fra originalen 16. januar 2016. Besøkt 22. juli 2014.  «Arkivert kopi». Archived from the original on 16. januar 2016. Besøkt 24. oktober 2021. , accessed 21. juli 2014.

psu.edu

citeseerx.ist.psu.edu

psychologytoday.com

python.org.ar

quest-cdecjournal.it

qz.com

reuters.com

reuters.com

in.reuters.com

roughtype.com

schools-wikipedia.org

sciam.com

sciencedaily.com

sciencenews.org

signonsandiego.com

slashdot.org

features.slashdot.org

slate.com

smh.com.au

softpedia.com

news.softpedia.com

springer.com

link.springer.com

stanford.edu

snap.stanford.edu

ai100.stanford.edu

  • «AI Research Trends». One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence (AI100). Stanford University. Besøkt 3. september 2016. 

starbulletin.com

archives.starbulletin.com

tamiu.edu

cits.tamiu.edu

techcentralstation.com

techcrunch.com

social.techcrunch.com

technologyreview.com

telegraph.co.uk

theatlantic.com

thecrimson.com

theguardian.com

theinquirer.net

thenextweb.com

theonion.com

theregister.co.uk

time.com

content.time.com

timeshighereducation.co.uk

timeshighereducation.com

timesonline.co.uk

tnr.com

  • Cowen, Tyler (14. mars 2008). «Cooked Books». The New Republic. Arkivert fra originalen 18. mars 2008. Besøkt 24. oktober 2021. 

umn.edu

www-users.cs.umn.edu

unt.edu

cse.unt.edu

upenn.edu

repository.upenn.edu

usatoday.com

usatoday.com

usatoday30.usatoday.com

uscourts.gov

ca11.uscourts.gov

uva.nl

staff.science.uva.nl

vox.com

waikato.ac.nz

cms.waikato.ac.nz

washington.edu

faculty.washington.edu

washingtonpost.com

web.archive.org

webbyawards.com

webcitation.org

wikimedia.org

meta.wikimedia.org

lists.wikimedia.org

upload.wikimedia.org

wikitech.wikimedia.org

diff.wikimedia.org

stats.wikimedia.org

commons.wikimedia.org

phabricator.wikimedia.org

techblog.wikimedia.org

wikimediafoundation.org

wikipedia-watch.org

wikipedia.com

wikipedia.org

en.wikipedia.org

  • Se for eksempel «Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard» eller «Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard», etablert for å ta hånd om innhold som kommer inn under de respektive områdene.
  • «Multilingual statistics». Wikipedia. 30. mars 2005. Besøkt 26. desember 2008. 
  • «Wikipedia:Why create an account?». Wikipedia. Besøkt 23. oktober 2021. «Once you have had an account for about 4 days and have made at least 10 edits, you will be allowed to: [...] Start new articles, rename pages, or upload images.» 
  • «Wikipedia:Protection policy». Wikipedia. Besøkt 23. oktober 2021. «In some circumstances, pages may need to be protected from modification by certain groups of editors. Pages are protected when a specific damaging event has been identified that can not be prevented through other means such as a block. Otherwise, Wikipedia is built on the principle that anyone can edit it, and it therefore aims to have as many of its pages as possible open for public editing so that anyone can add material and correct errors. [...] Protection is a technical restriction applied only by administrators, although any user may request protection. Protection can be indefinite or expire after a specified time. The various levels of protection are detailed below, and they can be applied to the page edit, page move, page create, and file upload actions. Even when a page is protected from editing, the source code (wikitext) of the page can still be viewed and copied by anyone. A protected page is marked at its top right by a padlock icon, usually added by the pp-protected template.» 
  • «Wikipedia:Protection policy». Wikipedia. Besøkt 23. oktober 2021. «Semi-protection prevents the action by unregistered editors and editors with accounts that are not confirmed.» 
  • «Wikipedia:Protection policy». Wikipedia. Besøkt 23. oktober 2021. «A fully protected page cannot be edited or moved by anyone except administrators. The protection may be for a specified time or may be indefinite.» 
  • «Wikipedia:New pages patrol». Wikipedia. Besøkt 23. oktober 2021. 
  • «Wikipedia:Dispute resolution». Wikipedia. Besøkt 23. oktober 2021. «If discussion stalemates, editors may seek outside input to help resolve the dispute. Discussions can be advertised to noticeboards and WikiProjects to receive participation from interested uninvolved editors. Mediation can also help in finding a compromise solution. As content decisions on Wikipedia are made through consensus, the final stage in content dispute resolution is a request for comments, where a discussion is advertised to uninvolved editors to receive broad input on the issue.» 
  • «Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines». Wikipedia. Besøkt 24. oktober 2021. 
  • «Wikipedia:Notability», hentet 24. oktober 202|. «A topic is presumed to merit an article if: It meets either the general notability guideline (GNG) below, or the criteria outlined in a subject-specific notability guideline (SNG) listed in the box on the right; and It is not excluded under the What Wikipedia is not policy.»
  • «Wikipedia:No original research». 13. februar 2008. "Wikipedia does not publish original thought."
  • «Wikipedia:Verifiability», 24. oktober 2021. «All material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists and captions, must be verifiable. All quotations, and any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the material. Any material that needs a source but does not have one may be removed.»
  • «Wikipedia:Ownership of content». Wikipedia. Besøkt 24. oktober 2021. «All Wikipedia pages and articles are edited collaboratively by a community of volunteer contributors. Individual contributors, also called editors, are known as Wikipedians. No one, no matter what, has the right to act as though they are the owner of a particular article (or any part of it). Even a subject of an article, be that a person or organization, does not own the article, nor has any right to dictate what the article may or may not say.» 
  • «Wikipedia administrators», fra engelskspråklig Wikipedia, lest 24. oktober 2021
  • «Wikipedia:Administrators». 3. oktober 2018. Besøkt 12. juli 2009. 
  • «Wikipedia:RfA_Review/Reflect». 22. januar 2017. Besøkt 24. september 2009. 
  • «Statistics». English Wikipedia. 4. oktober 2018. Besøkt 21. juni 2008. 
  • «Spelling». Manual of Style. Wikipedia. 26. september 2018. Besøkt 19. mai 2007. 
  • «Countering systemic bias». 15. juli 2018. Besøkt 19. mai 2007. 
  • «Wikipedia:General disclaimer». English Wikipedia. 18. september 2018. Besøkt 22. april 2008. 
  • «Version: Installed extensions». 18. september 2018. Besøkt 18. august 2014. 
  • Snow, Michael (29. desember 2016). «Lucene search: Internal search function returns to service». Wikimedia Foundation. Besøkt 26. februar 2009. 
  • «Wikipedia signpost: Abuse Filter is enabled». English Wikipedia. 23. mars 2009. Besøkt 13. juli 2010. 
  • «Wikipedia:Copyrights». Wikipedia. Besøkt 31. oktober 2021. 
  • «Wikipedia:Licensing update». Wikipedia. Besøkt 29. oktober 2021. 
  • «Wikipedia:Wikipedia CD Selection». Wikipedia. Besøkt 31. oktober 2021. 
  • «Wikipedia:Database download». Wikipedia. Besøkt 31. oktober 2021. 
  • «Wikipedia:Modelling Wikipedia's growth». 31. juli 2018. Besøkt 22. desember 2007. 
  • «Wikipedia:Wikipedia in the media». Wikipedia. 4. juli 2018. Besøkt 26. desember 2008. 

no.wikipedia.org

  • «Wikipedia:Vandalisme». Wikipedia. Besøkt 23. oktober 2021. «De vi kaller vandaler er personer som ødelegger artikler eller legger inn ødeleggende tøyseartikler. Som regel regnes ikke personer som «eksperimenterer» med redigeringsknappen (f.eks. ved å legger inn «hei» på slutten av en artikkel) som vandaler, selv om eksperimentet bør fjernes og eksperimentering etter at man har fått advarsel om å gjøre slikt i sandkassen kan regnes som vandalisme.» 
  • «Wikipedia:Hva Wikipedia ikke er», hentet 24. oktober 2021. «Wikipedia er ikke en ordbok, eller en språkveileder. Til det har vi søsterprosjektet Wiktionary, som er felles for nynorsk og bokmål.»
  • «Wikipedia:Nøytralt ståsted». Wikipedia. Besøkt 24. oktober 2021. «En politikk om nøytralt ståsted betyr at alle artikler skal representere alle synspunkt på en rettferdig, proporsjonal og upartisk måte. Nøytralt ståsted blir ofte misforstått. Politikken betyr ikke at man tror det er mulig å skrive en enkel upartisk artikkel, men at man skal følge rettferdig alle partene i en diskusjon, og ikke lage en artikkel som bare taler én sides sak. Rettferdig vil også si at hver side av en sak får omtale som står i sammenheng med utbredelsen av synet. Et syn som kun en liten minoritet hevder, skal ikke ha like stor omtale som majoritetssynet.» 
  • «Wikipedia:Brukertyper». Wikipedia. Besøkt 24. oktober 2021. «En bidragsyters tilgang til å utføre visse oppgaver i Wikipedia er definert ved diverse «flagg» knyttet til brukerkontoen. Noen av disse er automatisk tildelt mens andre må gis manuelt. En bruker med et visst flagg blir beskrevet som å være et medlem av det flaggets «brukergruppe», noe som gir dem visse «rettigheter» og tilgang til bruk av visse egenskaper i MediaWiki programvaren.» 
  • «Wikipedia:Generelle forbehold». Wikipedia. Besøkt 25. oktober 2021. «WIKIPEDIA GIR INGEN GARANTI FOR PÅLITELIGHETEN AV INNHOLDET» 
  • «Wikipedia:Hva Wikipedia ikke er». Wikipedia. Besøkt 25. oktober 2021. 
  • «Wikipedia:Roboter». Wikipedia. Besøkt 28. oktober 2021. 
  • «Wikipedia:Roboter», fra Wikipedia, offisiell retningslinje

de.wikipedia.org

wikipediaondvd.com

wikisym.org

wired.com

wired.com

archive.wired.com

worldcat.org

wsj.com

blogs.wsj.com

online.wsj.com

xbiz.com

newswire.xbiz.com

zerogeography.net