Порицање климатских промена (Serbian Wikipedia)
Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Порицање климатских промена" in Serbian language version.
refsWebsite
Global rank
Serbian rank
1st place
1st place
11th place
23rd place
12th place
43rd place
3rd place
2nd place
18th place
28th place
7th place
25th place
928th place
2,549th place
low place
9,328th place
low place
low place
269th place
695th place
2,088th place
3,544th place
120th place
187th place
low place
low place
102nd place
266th place
low place
low place
234th place
287th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
2,516th place
low place
34th place
144th place
low place
low place
818th place
2,738th place
5th place
12th place
993rd place
613th place
bbc.com (Global: 20th place; Serbian: 51st place)
- Climate change: How did a hacking scandal impact climate science? BBC, приступљено 15. новембар 2019.
books.google.com (Global: 3rd place; Serbian: 2nd place)
- Hoggan, James; Littlemore, Richard (децембар 2009). Climate Cover-Up: The Crusade to Deny Global Warming. Greystone Books. ISBN 9781926706771.
- Lever-Tracy 2010, стр. 255: In sum, we see that manufacturing uncertainty over climate change is the fundamental strategy of the denial machine […] As we reflect on the evolution of climate science and policy-making over the past few decades, we believe the denial machine has achieved considerable success – especially in the US but internationally as well. Public concern over global warming and support for climate policy-making in the US is low relative to other nations (see Chapter 10, this volume), contributing to inaction by the US government." Lever-Tracy, Констанца (2010). Routledge Handbook of Climate Change and Society. Тејлор & Франсис. ISBN 978-0-203-87621-3.
- White, Rob (12. 6. 2012). Climate Change from a Criminological Perspective. Springer. стр. 48. ISBN 9781461436409.
carbonbrief.org (Global: low place; Serbian: 9,328th place)
climatecentral.org (Global: low place; Serbian: low place)
- 110 Years on, Climate Economists Reflect on Stern Review, Climate Central
cnn.com (Global: 28th place; Serbian: 89th place)
edition.cnn.com
desmogblog.com (Global: low place; Serbian: low place)
doi.org (Global: 2nd place; Serbian: 4th place)
- Matthews, Paul (2015). „Why Are People Skeptical about Climate Change? Some Insights from Blog Comments”. Environmental Communication. 9 (2): 153—168. S2CID 143727181. doi:10.1080/17524032.2014.999694.
- Hansson, Sven Ove (2017). „Science denial as a form of pseudoscience”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 63: 39—47. Bibcode:2017SHPSA..63...39H. PMID 28629651. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.05.002.]
- Dunlap 2013, стр. 691–698: "There is debate over which term is most appropriate… Those involved in challenging climate science label themselves "skeptics"… Yet skepticism is…a common characteristic of scientists, making it inappropriate to allow those who deny AGW to don the mantle of skeptics…It seems best to think of skepticism-denial as a continuum, with some individuals (and interest groups) holding a skeptical view of AGW…and others in complete denial" Dunlap, Riley E. (2013). „Climate Change Skepticism and Denial: An Introduction”. American Behavioral Scientist. 57 (6): 691—698. S2CID 147126996. doi:10.1177/0002764213477097. Приступљено 27. 5. 2015.
- Xifra, Jordi (2016). „Climate Change Deniers and Advocacy”. American Behavioral Scientist. 60 (3): 276—287. S2CID 58914584. doi:10.1177/0002764215613403. hdl:10230/32970.
- Lahsen, Myanna (зима 2005). „Technocracy, Democracy, and the U.S. Climate Politics: The Need for Demarcations”. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 30: 137—169. S2CID 145482135. doi:10.1177/0162243904270710. „Numerous high-ranked officers in the Clinton-Gore administration sought to dismiss all critics of the climate paradigm as "pseudoscientists"”
- Bohr, Jeremiah (2017). „Is it hot in here or is it just me? Temperature anomalies and political polarization over global warming in the American public”. Climatic Change. 142 (1–2): 271—285. S2CID 158001461. doi:10.1007/s10584-017-1934-z.
- Jacques, Peter J.; Dunlap, Riley E.; Freeman, Mark (2008). „The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism”. Environmental Politics. 17 (3): 349—385. S2CID 144975102. doi:10.1080/09644010802055576.
- Painter & Ashe 2012: "Despite a high degree of consensus amongst publishing climate researchers that global warming is occurring and that it is anthropogenic, this discourse, promoted largely by non-scientists, has had a significant impact on public perceptions of the issue, fostering the impression that elite opinion is divided as to the nature and extent of the threat." Painter, James; Ashe, Teresa (2012). „Међудржавно поређење присуства климатског скептицизма у штампаним медијима у шест земаља, 2007”. Environ. Res. Lett. 7 (4): 044005. Bibcode:2012ERL.....7d4005P. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044005
.
grist.org (Global: low place; Serbian: low place)
- Zimmerman, Jess (7. 11. 2011). „Handy image shows how climate deniers manipulate data”. Grist. Архивирано из оригинала 1. 10. 2019. г.
handle.net (Global: 102nd place; Serbian: 266th place)
hdl.handle.net
- Xifra, Jordi (2016). „Climate Change Deniers and Advocacy”. American Behavioral Scientist. 60 (3): 276—287. S2CID 58914584. doi:10.1177/0002764215613403. hdl:10230/32970.
harvard.edu (Global: 18th place; Serbian: 28th place)
adsabs.harvard.edu
- Hansson, Sven Ove (2017). „Science denial as a form of pseudoscience”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 63: 39—47. Bibcode:2017SHPSA..63...39H. PMID 28629651. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.05.002.]
- Painter & Ashe 2012: "Despite a high degree of consensus amongst publishing climate researchers that global warming is occurring and that it is anthropogenic, this discourse, promoted largely by non-scientists, has had a significant impact on public perceptions of the issue, fostering the impression that elite opinion is divided as to the nature and extent of the threat." Painter, James; Ashe, Teresa (2012). „Међудржавно поређење присуства климатског скептицизма у штампаним медијима у шест земаља, 2007”. Environ. Res. Lett. 7 (4): 044005. Bibcode:2012ERL.....7d4005P. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044005 .
house.gov (Global: 529th place; Serbian: 3,801st place)
democrats.science.house.gov
- Brown 1996, стр. 28: "As the scientific fringe has become institutionalized, professionalized, and lionized… One finds that a fundamental difference between the traditional scientific establishment and the emerging "skeptic" establishment relates to their ultimate scientific goals. The former has traditionally emphasized the generation of new knowledge as a measure of productivity. That is, the collection of original data, construction of new mathematical techniques, and generation and validation of testable hypotheses have been the hallmarks of the traditional scientific community… On the other hand, the emerging culture profiled in these hearings emphasizes the generation of new perspectives. Productivity is measured on the ability to alter public opinion – through opinion pieces aimed not at their fellow scientists but at policymakers, the media, and the general public – and funding flows accordingly." Brown, R. G. E., Jr. (23. 10. 1996). „Environmental science under siege: Fringe science and the 104th Congress, U. S. House of Representatives.” (PDF). Report, Democratic Caucus of the Committee on Science. Washington, D. C.: U. S. House of Representatives. Архивирано из оригинала (PDF) 26. 9. 2007. г.
ipcc.ch (Global: 1,778th place; Serbian: 2,961st place)
archive.ipcc.ch
- IPCC AR4 SYR 2007 harvnb грешка: више циљева (2×): CITEREFIPCC_AR4_SYR2007 (help), Section 1: Observed changes in climate and their effects Архивирано 23 децембар 2018 на сајту Wayback Machine. IPCC (2007). Core Writing Team; Pachuri, R.K.; Reisinger, A., ур. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC. ISBN 978-92-9169-122-7.
- IPCC AR4 WG2 Ch4 2007, Executive Summary Архивирано 27 јун 2019 на сајту Wayback Machine, p. 213. Fischlin, A.; Midgley, G.F.; Price, J.T.; Leemans, R.; et al. (2007). „Chapter 4: Ecosystems, their properties, goods and services” (PDF). IPCC AR4 WG2 2007. стр. 211—272.
ipcc.ch
- IPCC AR4 SYR 2007 harvnb грешка: више циљева (2×): CITEREFIPCC_AR4_SYR2007 (help), Section 1: Observed changes in climate and their effects Архивирано 23 децембар 2018 на сајту Wayback Machine. IPCC (2007). Core Writing Team; Pachuri, R.K.; Reisinger, A., ур. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC. ISBN 978-92-9169-122-7.
klima101.rs (Global: low place; Serbian: low place)
nationalpost.com (Global: 818th place; Serbian: 2,738th place)
- Corcoran, Terence (6 January 2010). "The cool down in climate polls". Financial post. Angus Reid surveyed people…before and after the Copenhagen summit. The drop off in public support for the idea that global warming is a fact mostly caused by human activity looks most pronounced in Canada. In November, 63% of Canadians supported global warming as a man-made phenomenon. By 23 Dec, that support had fallen 52%… A similar trend has been noted in the United States, where confidence in global warming theory has dropped to 46%… down from 51% in July last year. In Britain, only 43% believe man-made global warming is a fact, down from… 55% in July. In all three countries, there are signs of growing skepticism.
nature.com (Global: 234th place; Serbian: 287th place)
ncse.com (Global: low place; Serbian: low place)
- „NCSE Tackles Climate Change Denial”. National Center for Science Education. 13. 1. 2012. Приступљено 5. 7. 2015. „Science education is under attack… by climate change deniers, who ignore a mountain of evidence gathered over the last fifty years that the planet is warming and that humans are largely responsible. These deniers attempt to sabotage science education with fringe ideas, pseudoscience, and outright lies.”
ncse.ngo (Global: low place; Serbian: low place)
- Why Is It Called Denial?".National Center for Science Education 15 January 2016. Приступљено 21. јануара 2016.
newsweek.com (Global: 269th place; Serbian: 695th place)
- Begley 2007: "polls found that 64 percent of Americans thought there was 'a lot' of scientific disagreement on climate change; only one third thought planetary warming was "mainly caused by things people do." In contrast, majorities in Europe and Japan recognize a broad consensus among climate experts" Begley, Sharon (13. 8. 2007). „The Truth About Denial”. Newsweek. Архивирано из оригинала 21. 10. 2007. г.
- Begley 2007: "A new NEWSWEEK Poll finds that the influence of the denial machine remains strong. Although the figure is less than in earlier polls, 39 percent of those asked say there is "a lot of disagreement among climate scientists" on the basic question of whether the planet is warming; 42 percent say there is a lot of disagreement that human activities are a major cause of global warming. Only 46 percent say the greenhouse effect is being felt today.". Begley, Sharon (13. 8. 2007). „The Truth About Denial”. Newsweek. Архивирано из оригинала 21. 10. 2007. г.
nih.gov (Global: 4th place; Serbian: 8th place)
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Hansson, Sven Ove (2017). „Science denial as a form of pseudoscience”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 63: 39—47. Bibcode:2017SHPSA..63...39H. PMID 28629651. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.05.002.]
noaa.gov (Global: 212th place; Serbian: 255th place)
sos.noaa.gov
- Ocean-Atmosphere CO2 Exchange, Science On a Sphere
ncdc.noaa.gov
- NOAA 12 January 2015: National Climate Report - Annual 2014
npr.org (Global: 92nd place; Serbian: 305th place)
nytimes.com (Global: 7th place; Serbian: 25th place)
- Egan, Timothy (5 November 2015). "Exxon Mobil and the G.O.P.: Fossil Fools" The New York Times. Приступљено 9. новембра 2015.
- Њујорк тајмс, 12 December 2015,"Nations Approve Landmark Climate Accord in Paris".
phys.org (Global: 1,283rd place; Serbian: 1,812th place)
- Brown, Michael. Adversaries, zombies and NIPCC climate pseudoscience, Phys.org, 26 September 2013
rasmussenreports.com (Global: low place; Serbian: low place)
- Rasmussen Reports (6 February 2009). 54% Say Media Hype Global Warming Dangers.
- Rasmussen Reports. (3 December 2009). Americans Skeptical of Science Behind Global Warming.
researchgate.net (Global: 120th place; Serbian: 187th place)
- Dunlap 2013, стр. 691–698: "There is debate over which term is most appropriate… Those involved in challenging climate science label themselves "skeptics"… Yet skepticism is…a common characteristic of scientists, making it inappropriate to allow those who deny AGW to don the mantle of skeptics…It seems best to think of skepticism-denial as a continuum, with some individuals (and interest groups) holding a skeptical view of AGW…and others in complete denial" Dunlap, Riley E. (2013). „Climate Change Skepticism and Denial: An Introduction”. American Behavioral Scientist. 57 (6): 691—698. S2CID 147126996. doi:10.1177/0002764213477097. Приступљено 27. 5. 2015.
sacbee.com (Global: 2,516th place; Serbian: low place)
sciencedaily.com (Global: 993rd place; Serbian: 613th place)
- ScienceDaily, 28 June 2018. „Climate change linked to potential population decline in bees”. ScienceDaily. 28. 6. 2018. Архивирано из оригинала 30. 7. 2018. г. Приступљено 30. 7. 2018.
semanticscholar.org (Global: 11th place; Serbian: 23rd place)
api.semanticscholar.org
- Matthews, Paul (2015). „Why Are People Skeptical about Climate Change? Some Insights from Blog Comments”. Environmental Communication. 9 (2): 153—168. S2CID 143727181. doi:10.1080/17524032.2014.999694.
- Dunlap 2013, стр. 691–698: "There is debate over which term is most appropriate… Those involved in challenging climate science label themselves "skeptics"… Yet skepticism is…a common characteristic of scientists, making it inappropriate to allow those who deny AGW to don the mantle of skeptics…It seems best to think of skepticism-denial as a continuum, with some individuals (and interest groups) holding a skeptical view of AGW…and others in complete denial" Dunlap, Riley E. (2013). „Climate Change Skepticism and Denial: An Introduction”. American Behavioral Scientist. 57 (6): 691—698. S2CID 147126996. doi:10.1177/0002764213477097. Приступљено 27. 5. 2015.
- Xifra, Jordi (2016). „Climate Change Deniers and Advocacy”. American Behavioral Scientist. 60 (3): 276—287. S2CID 58914584. doi:10.1177/0002764215613403. hdl:10230/32970.
- Lahsen, Myanna (зима 2005). „Technocracy, Democracy, and the U.S. Climate Politics: The Need for Demarcations”. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 30: 137—169. S2CID 145482135. doi:10.1177/0162243904270710. „Numerous high-ranked officers in the Clinton-Gore administration sought to dismiss all critics of the climate paradigm as "pseudoscientists"”
- Bohr, Jeremiah (2017). „Is it hot in here or is it just me? Temperature anomalies and political polarization over global warming in the American public”. Climatic Change. 142 (1–2): 271—285. S2CID 158001461. doi:10.1007/s10584-017-1934-z.
- Jacques, Peter J.; Dunlap, Riley E.; Freeman, Mark (2008). „The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism”. Environmental Politics. 17 (3): 349—385. S2CID 144975102. doi:10.1080/09644010802055576.
semanticscholar.org
- Lahsen, Myanna (зима 2005). „Technocracy, Democracy, and the U.S. Climate Politics: The Need for Demarcations”. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 30: 137—169. S2CID 145482135. doi:10.1177/0162243904270710. „Numerous high-ranked officers in the Clinton-Gore administration sought to dismiss all critics of the climate paradigm as "pseudoscientists"”
skepticalscience.com (Global: low place; Serbian: low place)
- The five corrupt pillars of climate change denial, Skeptical Science
theconversation.com (Global: 928th place; Serbian: 2,549th place)
- "US firms knew about global warming in 1968 – what about Australia?", The Conversation
- Five climate change science misconceptions – debunked, The Conversation
theguardian.com (Global: 12th place; Serbian: 43rd place)
- Goldenberg, Suzanne (8 July 2015). "Exxon knew of climate change in 1981, email says – but it funded deniers for 27 more years". Гардијан, Приступљено 9. новембра 2015.
- 'Shell knew': oil giant's 1991 film warned of climate change danger, Гардијан
- Readfearn, Graham (5 March 2015). "Doubt over climate science is a product with an industry behind it" "Сумња у климатске науке је проиѕвод иза које стоји индустрија" Гардијан
- The Republican Party stands alone in climate denial, The Guardian, 5 October 2015
- Trump to scrap Nasa climate research in crackdown on ‘politicized science’, Oliver Milman, The Guardian, 23 November 2016
thenation.com (Global: 2,088th place; Serbian: 3,544th place)
- Klein, Naomi (9 November 2011). "Capitalism vs. the Climate". The Nation. Приступљено 2. јануара 2012.
undp.org (Global: 369th place; Serbian: 295th place)
rs.undp.org
uwosh.edu (Global: low place; Serbian: low place)
- "Oil Company Positions on the Reality and Risk of Climate Change". Environmental Studies. University of Oshkosh—Wisconsin. Приступљено 27. марта 2016
washingtonpost.com (Global: 34th place; Serbian: 144th place)
web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; Serbian: 1st place)
- Zimmerman, Jess (7. 11. 2011). „Handy image shows how climate deniers manipulate data”. Grist. Архивирано из оригинала 1. 10. 2019. г.
- Brown 1996, стр. 28: "As the scientific fringe has become institutionalized, professionalized, and lionized… One finds that a fundamental difference between the traditional scientific establishment and the emerging "skeptic" establishment relates to their ultimate scientific goals. The former has traditionally emphasized the generation of new knowledge as a measure of productivity. That is, the collection of original data, construction of new mathematical techniques, and generation and validation of testable hypotheses have been the hallmarks of the traditional scientific community… On the other hand, the emerging culture profiled in these hearings emphasizes the generation of new perspectives. Productivity is measured on the ability to alter public opinion – through opinion pieces aimed not at their fellow scientists but at policymakers, the media, and the general public – and funding flows accordingly." Brown, R. G. E., Jr. (23. 10. 1996). „Environmental science under siege: Fringe science and the 104th Congress, U. S. House of Representatives.” (PDF). Report, Democratic Caucus of the Committee on Science. Washington, D. C.: U. S. House of Representatives. Архивирано из оригинала (PDF) 26. 9. 2007. г.
- Begley 2007: "polls found that 64 percent of Americans thought there was 'a lot' of scientific disagreement on climate change; only one third thought planetary warming was "mainly caused by things people do." In contrast, majorities in Europe and Japan recognize a broad consensus among climate experts" Begley, Sharon (13. 8. 2007). „The Truth About Denial”. Newsweek. Архивирано из оригинала 21. 10. 2007. г.
- Begley 2007: "A new NEWSWEEK Poll finds that the influence of the denial machine remains strong. Although the figure is less than in earlier polls, 39 percent of those asked say there is "a lot of disagreement among climate scientists" on the basic question of whether the planet is warming; 42 percent say there is a lot of disagreement that human activities are a major cause of global warming. Only 46 percent say the greenhouse effect is being felt today.". Begley, Sharon (13. 8. 2007). „The Truth About Denial”. Newsweek. Архивирано из оригинала 21. 10. 2007. г.
- IPCC AR4 SYR 2007 harvnb грешка: више циљева (2×): CITEREFIPCC_AR4_SYR2007 (help), Section 1: Observed changes in climate and their effects Архивирано 23 децембар 2018 на сајту Wayback Machine. IPCC (2007). Core Writing Team; Pachuri, R.K.; Reisinger, A., ур. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC. ISBN 978-92-9169-122-7.
- IPCC AR4 WG2 Ch4 2007, Executive Summary Архивирано 27 јун 2019 на сајту Wayback Machine, p. 213. Fischlin, A.; Midgley, G.F.; Price, J.T.; Leemans, R.; et al. (2007). „Chapter 4: Ecosystems, their properties, goods and services” (PDF). IPCC AR4 WG2 2007. стр. 211—272.
- ScienceDaily, 28 June 2018. „Climate change linked to potential population decline in bees”. ScienceDaily. 28. 6. 2018. Архивирано из оригинала 30. 7. 2018. г. Приступљено 30. 7. 2018.
wikipedia.org (Global: low place; Serbian: low place)
en.wikipedia.org
- Xifra, Jordi (2016). „Climate Change Deniers and Advocacy”. American Behavioral Scientist. 60 (3): 276—287. S2CID 58914584. doi:10.1177/0002764215613403. hdl:10230/32970.
worldcat.org (Global: 5th place; Serbian: 12th place)
- Laville, Sandra (22. 3. 2019). Top oil firms spending millions lobbying to block climate change policies, says report. Gardian. OCLC 1056142271. Непознати параметар
|isnn=игнорисан (помоћ). Приступљено 15. октобра 2019.